• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.133-158
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze one of CIETEC(China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission) Award on the dispute arising from Cotton Sale Contact which deals with damages and reduction of the price. Especially this case focused on the effect of reduction of the price to damages. The purpose of damages is to place the aggrieved party in as good a position as if the other party had properly performed the contract. So court costs and attorney's fee should be regarded as the loss, because these are caused by consequence of the breach which is recoverable. With the same reason, overpaid taxes should also regard as the loss. It is not impossible, however, to claim both damages and reduction of the price for same loss at the same time. It means buyer could not claim damages for the same loss, once he already claimed reduction of the price. So Korean companies should consider which remedy is proper to himself under the circumstances. He should choose reduction of the price when market price is down. In case of rising market price, he should consider follows: first, it is better to choose damages based on current price(Art.76), if upswing of non-conformity price is higher then upswing of market price. Second, it is better to choose general rule for measuring damages(Art.74), if upswing of market price is higher then upswing of non-conformity price.

• 경영정보학연구
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.275-295
• /
• 2005

경제의 세계화와 지식정보화 사회로의 진입과 함께 초래된 경영환경의 급속한 변화는 의료기관들에게도 경쟁력강화를 위한 변신을 강요하게 되었다. 다시 말하면, 의료기관들은 선진 의료기술의 확보, 환자들에 대한 서비스제고와 함께 경영의 효율성 증대라는 세가지 목표를 동시에 달성해야만 하는 상황에 놓이게 된 것이다. 본 연구는 의료기관들이 당면하고 있는 이러한 세가지 과제 중 병원의 경영효율성 증대를 위한 한가지 대안으로 진료비 청구삭감의 빈도 및 발생 가능성을 낮추기 위한 해법의 마련이 시도되었다. 진료비청구삭감이란 의료기관들이 환자들에 대한 의료서비스에 대한 진료비 중 의료보험으로 인해 환자들이 감면 받은 진료비를 건강보험심사원에 청구하면, 심사원이 의료기관의 청구내역의 적정여부를 심사하여 적정하지 않은 내용에 대한 청구금액을 삭감하는 제도를 이른다. 청구금액에 삭감이 발생하면 해당 의료기관의 수입이 감소하는 것은 물론 원인분석이나 재청구 작업등에 비용과 인력이 이중으로 투입되게 되어 의료기관의 경영에 부담을 주게 되고, 이러한 상황이 빈발하게 되면 해당 의료기관에 대한 환자와 건강보험심사평가원의 신뢰에 문제가 발생하게 된다. 그러므로, 효과적인 진료비 청구삭감분석시스템에 의한 사전대비의 필요성이 높아지게 되는 것이다. 이를 위하여 본 연구에서는 진료비 청구삭감분석을 위한 프로토타입의 개발이 시도되었다. 프로토타입은 데이터마이닝 기법 중 연관분석 알고리즘을 적용하여 개발되었으며, 이렇게 개발된 프로토타입을 D의료원에서 10개월간 발생한 실제 진료데이타를 사용하여 성능을 시험하였다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제34권3호
• /
• pp.97-105
• /
• 2011

Previous researches have focused on the efficiency of project execution and the satisfaction of internal customers In view of the fact that a project is successful if any defects are not found in the short-term performance test of the project final outcome. To execute a project that both internal customer and external customer are satisfied in terms of longer-term benefit perspective, the project claim costs (PCC) which may occur for the warranty period of the project final outcome should be considered. We propose a model included PCC to the linear programming between time and cost to expedite a project and perform the validity test by applying the model to an example project. This model and related procedure will contribute to overall project activities' cost reduction by taking preventive actions for PCC.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제12권
• /
• pp.201-225
• /
• 1999

This article is focused on the review of price reduction and measuring damages under the CISG together with the law relating to sale of goods in main countries when the goods delivered did not conform with the contract. And also reviewed on the election of remedies for the aggrieved party, that is, which one between the two remedies would provide more compensation for the non-conformity. This article can be summarized as below. 1. Price reduction has its principal significance when the buyer accepts non-conforming goods and plays important role only when the seller is not liable for the non-conformity because the same price reduction formula applies for all circumstances. Of course, the buyer must bear any further damages, such as shutdown expenses and other consequential damages. 2. If the seller is liable for the damages and the price level rises, the buyer normally will claim damages since this approach is much more favorable result than price reduction. 3. In case the seller is liable for the damages and the buyer suffers no consequential damages, if the price level falls, price reduction would provide more compensation for the non-conformity than would damages and if there is no change in the market level, the allowance for defects in the goods will be normally the same under the price reduction and damages. By the way, In case the seller is liable for the damages and the buyer suffers consequential damages, it is desired that the buyer firstly elect the price reduction and later seeks to claim for consequential losses when the price level falls and unchanged.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제69권
• /
• pp.63-84
• /
• 2016

Article 77 of CISG requires an aggrieved party, the promisee, claiming damages to take reasonable measures to mitigate losses. The reasonable measures required hereunder are limited to those that can be expected under the circumstances having regard to the principle of good faith. When taking such measures, the aggrieved party must do so within a reasonable time under the circumstances. The expenses incurred in taking such measures are recoverable from the promisor. If the aggrieved party fails to do so, the damages recoverable from the promisor are reduced in the amount the loss that should have been mitigated. The aggrieved party's duty to mitigate damages applies to claim for damages only. That is, the violation of this duty should not be invoked against other remedies available under CISG, such as the right to claim specific performance, the right to claim for the price or the right of reduction of price. In practice, under the provision of article 77, the aggrieved party, the seller or the buyer, is often required to enter into a substitute transaction as a measure to mitigate losses and many cases involving a substitute transaction are internationally reported. Therefore this paper intends to provide a certain understanding of the aggrieved party's duty to take measures to mitigate losses based on such cases reported.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제9권9호
• /
• pp.195-200
• /
• 2019

국민건강보험 청구자료는 급여 지급을 위한 자료로 질환에 대한 유병 및 발생자료는 아니므로 보건학적 연구 자료로 활용하기 위해서는 진료에피소드개념을 적용하여 재가공이 필요하다. 따라서 건강보험 청구자료의 보건학적 연구 자료로 활용하기 위한 시범적 진료에피소드 자료를 구축하는 것이 목적이다. 본 연구에서는 무진료기간을 퇴원한 당일 입원한 경우 월 단위 분리청구를 보정하기 위해 0으로 정의하였다. 서울지역에 한하여 호흡기계 질환(ICD10: J00-J99)및 심혈관계 질환(ICD10: I00-I99) 발생의 진료개시일부터 입원 이후 재입원까지 경향을 확인하였다. 무진료기간이 0일 일 때 자료 감소율은 건강보험청구자료의 월 단위 분리청구건으로 인한 것으로 판단된다. 또한 의료기간 종별에 따라 월 단위 분리청구 경향 차이가 있는 것으로 확인 하였다. 본 연구를 통해 구축된 시범적 진료에피소드자료는 기초적 역학정보를 산출하는 자료처리 기법으로 이용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제55권
• /
• pp.3-32
• /
• 2012

CISG article 74 establishes the general formula applicable in all cases where an aggrieved party is entitled to recover damages. It provides that damages for breach of contract comprise all losses, including loss of profits, caused by the breach, to the extent that these losses were foreseeable by the breaching party at the time the contract was concluded. An aggrieved party may claim under article 74 even if entitled to claim under article 75 or 76. The latter articles explicitly provide that an aggrieved party may recover additional damages under article 74. Articles 75 and 76 apply only in cases where the contract has been avoided. Article 75 measures damages concretely by reference to the price in a substitute transactions, while article 76 measures damages abstractly by reference to the current market price. Article 76 (1) provides that an aggrieved party may not calculate damages under article 76 if it has concluded a substitute transaction under article 75. If however, an aggrieved party concludes a substitute transaction for less than the contract quantity, both articles 75 and 76 may apply. Pursuant to article 77, damages recoverable under articles 74, 75 or 76 are reduced if it is established that the aggrieved party failed to mitigate losses. The reduction is the amount by which the loss should have been mitigated. Article 78 entitles a party to interest on the price and any other sum that is in arrears.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제61권
• /
• pp.3-28
• /
• 2014

This study describes the buyer's remedies regarding defects in title under CISG. Although CISG stipulates the seller's liability for the delivery of conforming goods physically at Art. 35 and legally at Art. 41 and Art. 42 respectively, the buyer's remedies are not distinguished between non-conformity governed by Art. 35 and defects in title governed by Art. 41 and Art. 42. If the seller does not fulfill his obligation under Art. 41 and Art. 42 to deliver goods which are free from third party claims, the buyer should pay attention to which remedies are available under CISG. Under CISG, for defects in title in the delivered goods, the buyer is entitled to require performance in Art. 46 (1) unless he has resorted to a remedy which is inconsistent with this requirement, to declare the contract avoided by strictly limiting the situation in which the failure by the seller to perform his obligation amounts to a fundamental breach of contract in Art. 49, to claim damages in Art. 74, and to suspend the performance of his obligation where it becomes apparent that the seller will not perform a substantial part of his obligation in Art. 71 (1). Unlike Art. 35 non-conformity, the buyer may not require delivery of substitute goods under Art. 46 (2), claim repair under Art. 46 (3), and declare price reduction for title defects under Art. 50.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.163-177
• /
• 2024

연구배경: 본 연구는 부당청구 예방형 자율점검제 시범사업의 "개선요청 통보 및 모니터링" 중재활동이 의료기관의 중재 실시 전과 후 청구건수와 청구총진료비 청구행태에 있어서의 변화를 검증하고자 하였다. 방법: 자료는 건강보험심사평가원의 2021년 7월부터 2022년 2월까지 시범사업 항목인 '정맥 내 일시주사(KK020)'를 청구한 기관 중 예방형 자율점검제 대상기관으로 선정된 1,129개 의료기관의 청구자료와 신고 현황자료를 활용하였다. 비교 대상을 선정하기 위해 1:3 비율로 성향점수매칭을 사용하였고, 청구행태 변화를 검증하기 위해 대응표본 t-검정과 t-검정을 실시하였다. 또한 청구행태 변화에 차이가 있는 경우 이에 영향을 미치는 요인분석을 위하여 회귀분석을 시행하였다. 결과: 중재 실시 전과 후의 청구행태는 실험군의 모든 의료기관 종별에서 청구건수와 청구총진료비가 유의하게 감소하였고, 의원의 대조군에서는 유의한 증가를 보였다. 의료기관 및 의사 특성에 따른 중재 실시 전·후 청구행태는 실험군은 의원의 의사 연령 40세 미만을 제외하고 모든 종별에서 유의하게 감소하였다. 대조군은 종합병원과 병원은 개원기간에서, 의원은 표시과목에서 일부 유의한 감소가 있었고, 의사 50세 이상 남성에서 유의하게 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 실험군 대상 의료기관의 청구행태에 변화에 대한 회귀분석 결과, 모든 종별에서 중재 실시 전과 후에 청구건수와 청구총진료비가 유의하게 감소하였다. 또한 의료기관과 의사 특성에서 병원은 개원기간이 길수록 유의한 증가를 나타났고, 의원은 소재지역과 표시과목(기타)에서 유의한 감소를 보였다. 결론: 실험군의 부당청구 예방형 자율점검제의 중재 실시 이후 청구경향의 변화가 연구가설대로 감소하는 경향을 보였다. 이는 제도 시행 직후에 의료기관 스스로 청구행태를 개선하고, 교정하는 사전예방적 활동의 효과가 존재하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대조군에서도 통보 대상기관 위주의 제도운영방식에도 불구하고 일부 유의한 감소가 나타난 것은 예방형 자율점검제의 간접적인 효과로 볼 수 있다. 따라서 비대상기관에도 청구행태 개선활동이 이루어질 수 있도록 적극적인 홍보와 교육, 간담회 등의 추가적인 지원과 지속적인 모니터링이 필요하다. 이를 통해 부당청구가 감소될 수 있도록 예방형 자율점검제를 확대하는 것이 바람직하다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제62권
• /
• pp.3-32
• /
• 2014

Article 77 sets forth the principle of prevention applied in several legal systems. Under this principle the party threatened by ooss as a consequence of a breach of contract by the other party is not permitted to await passively incurrence of the loss and then sue for damages. He is obliged to take adequate preventive measures to mitigate his loss. If the injured party abstains from taking such excessive measures he will not be considered to have failed to mitigate the loss under Article 77. The sanction provided in Article 77 against a party who fails to mitigate his loss only enables the other party to claim reduction in the damages. The reduction in damages under Article 77 is equal to the amount by which the loss should have been mitigated if the injured party had taken reasonable measures to avert or to lessen it. The aim of Article 77 is to encourage mitigation of the loss. The duty to mitigate the loss applies not only to a breach of contract in respect of an obligation whose performance is currently due. but also to an anticipatory breach of contract under Article 71. Article 85 contemplates that the buyer is in delay in fulfilling the latter obligation, or else that he fails to pay the price when payment is to be made concurrently with delivery of the goods by the seller. In both these situations of default, the seller who is either in possession of the goods or otherwise able to control their disposition must take measures, reasonable in the circumstances, to preserve them. The right of retention of the goods y the seller exists until he is reimbursed by the other party for the reasonable expenses incurred. Article 87 and Article 88 of the Convention grant different rights to the party obligated to take steps to preserve the goods; Article 87 allows him to deposit them in the warehouse of a third person, and Article 88 to sell them by whatever means appropriate. A difference exists between paragraph Article 88 (1) which grants the right to sell, and paragraph (2) which imposes the duty to take reasonable measures to sell the goods.