• 한국자원식물학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.169-180
• /
• 2003

생물다양성은 유전적, 종적, 생태적 다양성의 총체이며, 작물 품종 개량, 전통의약 및 생명공학의 원재료가 된다. 생물 다양성 협약은 생물 다양성의 감소에 대처하기 위한 국제적 노력의 결실로서, 생물 다양성의 보전, 지속 가능한 이용, 그리고 유전자원의 이용으로 발생하는 이익의 공평한 공유를 목적으로 한다. 생물 다양성 협약은 이런 목적을 이루기 위해서 원산국은 유전자원에 대한 접근을 위한 조건을 조성해야 하며, 이용국은 유전자원으로부터 얻어진 이익을 상호 합의 조건과 사전 통보 승인 제도에 의해 공정하고 공평한 분배를 해야 하는 의무를 부여하고 있다. 이에 따라 각 국은 유전자원 접근 및 이익공유에 관한 법률을 제정하여 국가적으로 규제하려고 노력하고 있다. 우리나라의 경우 개발도상국의 유전자원에 대한 접근 규제뿐만 아니라 선진국의 생물 공학 기술에 대한 접근 규제로 인하여 유전자원 및 생물 다양성 연구에 있어서 어려움이 증가하고 있으며, 국내의 생물 다양성 연구를 발전시키기 위해서는 생물 다양성 보전과 유전자원 이용에 관한 국제동향을 파악하여 능동적으로 대처하는 것이 필요하다.

• Journal of Plant Biotechnology
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.394-399
• /
• 2010

국내의 GM식물개발과 관련된 R&D사업 중 대표적이라고 할 수 있는 "바이오그린21사업"과 작물유전체기능연구사업단에서 지난 2007년부터 2009년 말 현재까지의 사업성과 중 논문과 동록 된 특허를 분석하여 본 결과 두개의 사업단을 통하여 총 1,212건의 SCI논문과 451건의 비 SCI논문, 그리고 348건의 특허를 등록한 것으로 조사되었다. 이중에서 바이오그린21사업단에서는 6.0%의 SCI 논문, 10.2%의 비SCI논문, 12.6%의 등록된 특허가 그리고 작물유전체기능연사업단의 경우에는 15.7%의 SCI논문, 21.1%의 비SCI 논문, 81.6%의 등록된 특허가 GM식물의 개발과 직접적으로 관련된 것으로 조사되었다. 개발하고자 하는 GM식물의 농업적 특성은 생물학적 스트레스 또는 무생물적 스트레스에 저항성을 갖는 작물 특히 벼와 고추가 가장 많았으나 포장시험까지 진행된 연구 성과는 아직 극히 저조한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 이러한 조사 결과는 국내에서 현재 실험실 또는 온실 단계에서 검정된 초기 단계의 GM식물의 조기상용화를 위하여 보다 많은 연구비가 투자되어야 할 것을 시사하였다.

• 대한영상의학회지
• /
• 제83권4호
• /
• pp.752-758
• /
• 2022

저자됨은 연구 진실성과 출판 윤리적 측면에서 중요하다. 저자됨은 학문적 성취를 증명하는 신용(credit)의 주된 수단으로 저자의 출판 업적은 연구비 수혜와 학술 경력에 중요한 영향을 미친다. 복잡한 이해관계와 경쟁적인 환경 등 다양한 이유에 의해 부적절한 저자됨이 보고되었다. 대표적인 저자됨 오남용에는 명예저자됨과 유령저자됨이 있다. 친족 공저자 또한 부적절한 저자됨이며, 최근 사회적 문제로 대두된 부모 자녀간 부적절한 저자됨이 이에 포함된다. 의학잡지편집인 국제위원회(International Committee of Medical Journal Editors; ICMJE)는 저자됨의 기준을 제시했다. 저자됨의 오남용을 막고 저자의 신용과 책임 평가를 체계적으로 하기 위해 많은 저널들이 기여자 역할 분류(Contributor Roles Taxonomy; CRediT)와 Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) 체계를 사용하고 있다. 이 종설에서는 올바른 저자됨과 부적절한 저자됨에 대해 알아보고 저자됨 오남용을 피하기 위한 방법을 소개하고자 한다.

• Journal of Animal Science and Technology
• /
• 제47권1호
• /
• pp.115-132
• /
• 2005

This research was conducted to make suggestions for the promotion of research activities in the field of animal resources sciences, and we evaluated the research funding trend and the present status of research funding offered by KOSEF in this field. Comparative portion of the number of research projects and grants in this field to other fields has a tendency to be decreased year by year except recent few years. Researchers in this field have received more research funding from the group-based program than from the individual-based program. Also, they have received less money(per project) than did researchers in the fields of general agricultural sciences and other science and technology. Researchers in this field ranges from 43 to 51 years of age and showed 48 years of average age. It was found that researchers who has been funded in the field of animal resources sciences have showed tendency of publication of more articles to SCI journals in recent 5 years. The strong points of the animal resources of agricultural sciences field in South Korea include: lots of researchers, the establishment of research infra-structure, the excellence in research competitiveness and technology level. However, its weaknesses are: a lack of leadership in relevant societies and institutes, a predicted shortfall of researchers in the next generation and insufficient research productivity. The opportunities include: increasing the importance of the biotechnology industry, activating international cooperation researches and exploring the multitude of possible research areas to be studied. However, some concerns still exist, such as threats from developed countries for the government to open the agricultural market, the reduction of the number of full-time farms and intensification of needs for economic and social effects. The diverse actions and systems based upon the strongpoint, weakness, opportunity and threats above-mentioned are required to encourage research activities in the field of animal resources of agricultural sciences in Korea In addition, researchers in this fields would make an effort to keep pace with international society as well as domestic demands.

• 생명과학회지
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.152-159
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 생명과학분야의 연구활동 활성화에 기여코자 생명과학 분야의 연구비 지원 추이와 현황을 파악하여 생명과학분야 연구활동 활성화를 위한 방향을 제시하고자 과학재단 연구비 수혜자를 중심으로 자료를 분석하였다. 생명과학 분야에서는 개인단위보다는 집단 및 그룹단위 형태의 연구에 더 많은 연구비가 투자되고 있는 것으로 조사되었으며, 생명과학 분야의 단위과제당 연구비 수준은 전체 이공계의 연구비 수준에 비교해서 상대적으로 약간 낮은 수준$(2003년,\;88.0\%)$이었다. 각 세부분야별로 연구비지원액 및 지원과 제수를 기준으로 살펴볼 때, 기초의약학 분야의 약진이 두드러진 반면에 농수산 및 생물분야는 감소추세인 것으로 나타났다. 생명과학 분야의 연구활동 활성화를 위해서는 중 $\cdot$장기 연구전략계획 수립, 생명과학전문인력 DB구축과 타 분야 연구진 또는 생명과학 세부분야간의 연계 활용, 전략적 연구지원 분야의 도출 및 절정 연구지원단가 산출, 생명과학 기초연구 특별프로그램 개발, 학회 내 정책기획 분과 신설, 평가문화의 개선 및 생명과학 연구활동의 계량적 성과 지표 개발 등에 따르는 본 분야의 연구지원을 위한 시스템의 구축과 활용이 필요하다.

• 한국보건간호학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.153-173
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study was conducted to analyze trends in research papers published in the Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing, and to compare and contrast similarities and differences of papers before and after listing in the Korea Citation Index (KCI) in 2007. Methods: A descriptive study was conducted with 266 published studies during the 10-year period. The criteria for analysis included types of research, characteristics of researchers and participants, designs, data collection methods and study instruments, ethical considerations, data analysis, and keywords. Results: Studies conducted with grants constituted 23.7%, and students (32.3%) and general populations (25.2%) comprised the largest proportion of the study participants. The majority of the papers were quantitative research (93.2%), and self-reported methods (63.1%) were most frequently utilized. Seventy percent of the studies obtained verbal consent from the participants. Among the study instruments, psychosocial indicators (41.1%) were most frequently employed. The trends indicated that grant studies, students and general populations as study participants, and experimental studies increased, and use of written consent increased after KCI registration. Conclusions: The results could be used to understand the context of scientific research and to improve the quality of the research papers published in the Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제68권
• /
• pp.89-121
• /
• 2015

Investor-State Dispute Settlement(ISDS) grants a foreign investor the right to access an international arbitrator, if he believes actions taken by a host government are in breach of commitments made in an investment agreement or an investment treaty. The arbitration procedure of ICSID is made specifically to resolve investment disputes, so most of investment disputes have been settled in accordance with the procedure. Owing to limitation of dispute settlements through the ICSID arbitration procedure, several investment dispute conciliation schemes have been emerged as alternatives. In the case of a conciliation, the conciliation procedure will be in progress based on arbitrary agreement between parties, and if both parties agree on a conciliation program, then the arbitrary execution rate is relatively higher than that of arbitration procedures. In addition, it is evaluated that the time duration of conducting a conciliation procedure is in general rather short in 8 to 24months, and its incumbent cost is also rather inexpensive. Most of all, through amicable settlement of a dispute between a foreign investor and a host state, the foreign investor may continue his investment activities without a hitch, while the host state may invite more investment without any risk of losing its external credibility. In conclusion, it is desirable to lead any investment dispute between a foreign investor and a host state settle in accordance with the dispute settlement procedure as specified in the relevant investment agreement. In addition, to make the foreign investor continue his investment activities, it will be necessary to provide a separate investment dispute conciliation system aside from such arbitration procedures to cope any unexpected incident flexibly.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제33권
• /
• pp.221-243
• /
• 2007

A party to a contract is bound to perform its contractual duties. But outside events may make performance impossible, physically or legally. In such a situation a party may wish to plead "force majeure" as an excuse for failure to perform. The laws of most countries have provisions which dealt with force majeure. These provisions, however, vary from country to country and may not meet the parties' requirement in international contracts. Therefore, parties to international contracts are frequently in need of contract clauses on force majeure. There are many force majeure clauses in standard forms or individually negotiated. The ICC has drawn up provisions which aim at providing assistance for parties when they are making contracts. The force majeure clause grants relief from contractual sanctions and includes provisions for suspension and termination of contract. The purpose of this study is to examine "ICC Force Majeure Clause 2003" in the international sales contract. For this purpose, firstly this study deals with the major contents of the ICC Force Majeure Clause 1985 and 2003. Secondly this study considers the related provisions under CISG, PICC, PECL and the force majeure clause in Model International Sale Contract. Thirdly this study compares ICC Force Majeure Clause 2003 with the relative provisions under CISG, PICC, PECL and the force majeure clause in Model International Sale Contract. It should be noted that the parties often need to adapt the content of this clause so as to take account of the particular circumstances of the individual contract. This paper contributes to help the parties to a contract to draft the meaningful "Force Majeure Clause" containing more precise and elaborate provisions.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제65권
• /
• pp.51-70
• /
• 2015

The Rotterdam Rules are not phrased in favour of FOB seller's legal status. Whether it will be wise under the Rotterdam Rules to trade on the basis of cash against M/R largely depends on the interpretation of various provisions of the Rotterdam Rules. To protect his interests the M/R holder and his assigns must have a right of delivery of the cargo at the port of destination. The M/R holder and his assigns must be entitled to the bill of lading or at least be able to prevent the carrier from issuing the bill of lading to the shipper. Besides, any additional right of instruction on the part of the shipper must be blocked. Article 35 of the Rules entitles only the shipper to the bill of lading while 47 entitles only the holder of the bill of lading to delivery. When no bill of lading has been issued Article 45 grants to the shipper a right of instruction whereby the shipper is allowed to advise the carrier as to the name and the address of the consignee. I have suggested that by lack of a specific provision to the contrary the Rotterdam Rules have to be considered to be embedded in the system of law as a whole. From the Common Law it follows that a M/R holder, as owner of the cargo, can ask for delivery of the cargo. As owner of the cargo a M/R holder can also claim the bill of lading, if he does so in time, because it must be implied in the contract of carriage that the carrier must deliver the bill of lading to the owner of the goods. It is for the same reason that a M/R holder can prevent the carrier from issuing the bill of lading to any third party but the M/R holder and from taking instructions from the shipper as to name and address of a consignee other than the M/R holder.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제77권
• /
• pp.69-89
• /
• 2018

The United States of America is one of the most favoring countries in which mandatory pre-arbitration clauses in the form of adhesion contract have been widely recognized and supported by courts and the Federal Arbitration Act. However, after the financial crisis in 2008 and the National Arbitration Forum scandal in 2009, in enacting the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ('Dodd-Frank Act'), Section 1028(a) of the Act requires the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to provide Congress with a report on "the use of agreements providing for arbitration of any future dispute between covered persons and consumers". Section 1028(b) also grants the CFPB the authority to "prohibit or impose conditions or limitations on the use of an agreement between a covered person and a consumer for a consumer financial product or service providing for arbitration of any future dispute between the parties, if the Bureau finds that such a prohibition or imposition of conditions or limitations is in the public interest and for the protection of consumers." Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB issued a report entitled "2015 Arbitration Study: Report to Congress 2015 (Report)" in March 2015. This paper examines some major legal issues of the Report and makes a few recommendations for Korean financial institutions which entered into the U.S. financial market or has a plan to do so in the near future.