• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2011.05b
• /
• pp.667-670
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 일부지역 방사선(학)과 학생들을 대상으로 학과만족도 및 진로인식을 성별, 연령, 학년, 출신고교, 병역관계, 교육과정에 따른 차이를 분석하고자, 3년제 대학 방사선과 4곳과 4년제 대학교 방사선학과 3곳의 학생424명을 대상으로 하였으며, 결과는 다음과 같다. 방사선(학)과 학생들의 학년별 학과만족도는 1, 4학년이 다소 높았고 입학동기에 따른 학과 만족도는 본인의 관심, 적성으로 입학했을 시 만족도가 가장 높았다. 교과 만족도는 남자가 여자보다 높았으며 병역 미필이 군필보다 높은 것으로 나타났다. 진로선택 및 취업준비과정에 필요한 정보획득 경로로는 교수를 통해서가 가장 많았으며 선배, 친구가 그 뒤를 이었고, 취업을 위해 가장 중요하다고 생각하는 것으로서 외국어가 1순위였고 학점, 국가고시 성적이 그 뒤를 이었다. 교육과정에 따라 취업을 위해 가장 중요하다고 생각하는 사항에 대한 결과로는 외국어는 3년제, 4년제 순으로 인간관계는 4년제, 3년제 순 이었으며, 취업을 위해 가장 많은 시간을 할애하고 있는 것은 성적관리가 가장 많았고 어학, 자격증이 그 뒤를 이었다. 방사선(학)과 학생들의 희망 진로(취업)방향에 대한 결과로는 의료기관이 가장 많았으며 보건직 공무원이 그뒤를 이었다. 취업 시 고려사항으로는 적성이 가장 높았으며 급여, 안정성이 그 뒤를 이었다. 결론적으로 방사선(학)과 학생들의 학과만족도 및 진로인식은 성별, 연령, 학년, 출신고교, 병역관계, 교육과정에 따라 다소 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.293-300
• /
• 2024

On October 31, 2023, the revision of the Medical Technologist Act made it mandatory to complete field training courses in order to obtain a license as a radiologic technologist. Therefore, we would like to survey the actual situation of field training in medical institutions to inform the revised Medical Technologist Act and propose improvement measures to increase the effectiveness of field training. A survey was conducted from March to April, 2023, among radiologic technologists working in medical institutions. The questionnaire was sent through a form on a domestic portal site, Company N, and 120 respondents completed it. Eighty-two respondents, or 68.3 percent, had experience in educating on-the-job training students. 58% of the respondents were aware of the fact that the amendment to the Act on Medical Technologist etc. made field training mandatory to obtain a radiologic technologist license. In accordance with Article 9 of the Medical Technologist Act, which prohibits unlicensed persons from practicing, 50% of the respondents were aware that those who are in training to complete an education course equivalent to the license they are seeking to obtain at a university or other institution are allowed to practice as medical Technologists. When asked what is currently taught during fieldwork, 6% of respondents said that they are required to perform radiation-generating activities in addition to observing, guiding patients, and positioning and moving patients. When asked about the future direction of education as fieldwork becomes mandatory for licensure, 77% of respondents said that they will teach more than they currently do. When asked about the appropriate total length of fieldwork, 35% said 12 weeks and 480 hours, 33% said 8 weeks and 320 hours, and 27% said 16 weeks and 640 hours. It can be seen that the current on-the-job training is inadequate according to various regulations, and students' satisfaction is low. However, with the revision of the Act on Medical Technologists, field training has become mandatory to obtain a license as a radiologist, and it is necessary to improve the educational conditions of field training. Therefore, it is necessary to comply with the Nuclear Safety Act and the Rules on the Safety Management of Diagnostic Radiation Generating Devices, introduce standardized training objectives and evaluation systems, designate training hospitals and radiologists in charge of training, and introduce extended training periods and simulation exercises to internalize field training.

• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.205-211
• /
• 2022

Various radioactive materials exist around us. In recent years, as interest in health has increased along with the improvement of the quality of life, examinations using radiation are also increasing. This research defined aforementioned radiation as a living radiation and developed a measurement to measure general knowledge people have on it. Eighteen reliable items were developed; current status on general knowledge regarding the safety of living radiation was analyzed using the items. As a result, a group with radiation-related education got statistically higher score than a group without such education. Correlation analysis and regression analysis showed that higher attention on usual safety leads into the greater knowledge on safety of living radiation. Therefore, this research shed lights on the necessity of radiation safety-related education in current educational course in schools.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.327-334
• /
• 2022

In this study, the purpose of this study was to conduct a basic study on the effectiveness and feasibility of the regulation of the Nuclear Safety Act for the department of radiology by examining the questionnaire on the satisfaction of on-campus practice while attending the department of radiology and the current status of radiation workers and radiation related workers. As for the satisfaction of the workers who were designated as frequent visitors while attending the department of radiology and did not handle and operate the radiation generator during on-campus training, 34.62% of the workers answered 'not satisfied'. On the other hand, 50% of workers who were designated as radiation workers while attending school or who were enrolled in school before the regulation of the nuclear safety act and handled and operated radiation generators were 'satisfied' at 50%. In addition, the annual exposure dose of radiation workers in educational institutions was found to be less than 0.05 mSv. If you look at the trends of radiation workers and radiation workers, it can be seen that students who graduate from the Department of Radiology find the most employment in the field dealing with diagnostic radiation generators registered as radiation workers among medical institutions. Therefore, by easing the regulations of the current Nuclear Safety Act or by amending the medical act and the rules on the safety management of diagnostic radiation generating devices, etc. It is presumed that something is necessary.

• Journal of the Korea Convergence Society
• /
• v.9 no.10
• /
• pp.121-129
• /
• 2018

This study is to analyze and evaluate the factors affecting the selection satisfaction of major of radiology students. After conducting a questionnaire survey on radiology students, we conducted t-test and multiple regression analysis. There was a significant difference between the preference and current factor among the selection of department. There were significant differences in clinical practice between practice environment, practice guidance, practice time and evaluation, satisfaction after practice, and employment. There were significant differences in curriculum framing, professor teaching and evaluation, support facilities, education system satisfaction, and curriculum satisfaction. As a result, it is necessary to develop system for increasing satisfaction with student's major selection and to improve the quality of education.

• Journal of dental hygiene science
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.230-239
• /
• 2014

This study is to promote awareness to be exposed to radiation with identifying knowledge, attitudes and behavior for radiation safety management of the operating room nurse and dental hygienist. And the following results were obtained through questionnaire survey to deduct the education to prevent potential risks in advance and implication to be useful on education program. First, based on the level of knowledge for radiation safety management, 10.57 for dental hygienists, 9.55 for the nurse out of 15 points (p<0.001); based on the level of attitudes for radiation safety management, 4.64 for dental hygienists, 4.67 for the nurse out of 5 points (p<0.001); and based on the level of behavior for radiation safety management, 3.27 for dental hygienists, 2.93 for the nurse out of 5 points (p<0.001). Second, the result for checking the relation with knowledge, attitudes and behavior for radiation safety management, the knowledge of radiation safety management has correlation with attitudes and behavior for radiation safety management statistically (p<0.001).

• Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
• /
• v.56 no.3
• /
• pp.265-272
• /
• 2024

This study aimed to investigate the knowledge and awareness of medical radiation and irradiated foods among nursing college students and those pursuing health-related and health-unrelated majors and to provide basic data for developing and promoting appropriate educational programs on the use of radiation. The knowledge of medical radiation was the highest among those over 30 years of age (3.0 points), and members of the Department of Clinical Laboratory Science (3.0 points). The awareness of the risk of medical radiation was the highest among female (3.34 points), among members of the Department of Nursing and Health Science (3.40 points), and among third-year students (3.41 points). The awareness of the benefits of medical radiation was the highest in male (3.90 points). The awareness of irradiated foods and its safety was low in all departments. The need for education regarding irradiated foods and the willingness to provide information on such foods were high. In conclusion, it is thought that specific promotional activities and educational programs are needed to improve the accuracy of knowledge regarding medical radiation among college students and increase their awareness on the safety of irradiated foods.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.2 no.4
• /
• pp.27-32
• /
• 2008

The role of radiation application technologies and nuclear power is priceless for the recent life of human beings without regardless of nation and race. Nevertheless the advantages, there are lots of difficulties in planning and investigating in the nationwide nuclear related business or the research in Korea. Since the major obstacle is the misderstanding radiation itself by misleading knowleges on it, it is important to make public understand radiation correctly. The result of this research shows that the public recognition could be guided to be friendly and cooperative to the radiation technology by providing educations and experimental experience.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.230-236
• /
• 2011

As a way of improving social receptivity of using radiation, this study looked into the difference of understanding the need of using radiation in various fields between students majoring in radiation and non-radiation related studies, who will influence public opinion in the long term. This study also provides data needed for developing efficient strategies for projects promoting the public's awareness of using radiation. Of the students in the 79 schools sampled, 24%(177) were in 4 year colleges and 146 were junior colleges in educational statistics service (http://cesi.kedi.re.kr) In November 2010 1,945 students were selected as a sample, and they were given surveys on the need of using radiation in different fields. As a result, both between students majoring in radiation and non-radiation related studies showed a high level of understanding the need for radiation in the medical field and showed a low level of understanding of the need for radiation in the agricultural field. In all 6 fields of radiation use, students majoring in radiation related studies showed higher levels of understanding for the need to use radiation than students majoring in radiation and non-radiation related studies. In each field, male students and those who have experience medical radiation and relevant education had higher level of understanding. This shows we need to improve the understanding of the cases of female students and those who have not had experiences with medical radiation and to provide relevant education through various kinds of information. The characteristics of the groups that are shown in the results of this study are considered to be helpful for efficiently for project promoting the public's awareness of using radiation.

• Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.106-118
• /
• 2013

In this paper, we analyzed the Cognition of irradiated food and its relation with self-efficacy. The most important variables described behaviors based on health choices compared with the choice to choose irradiated food items. According to the survey, 33.1% of respondents said that the reason why irradiated food is considered to be a health risk is because "radiation is dangerous". 27.9% of respondents answered that "eating irradiated food is like eating a radioactive substance", 21.1% said radiated food is comparable to a "genetic variation in food" while 10.1% said "food goes bad during the irradiation process". On this basis, it is reasonable to conclude that respondents have a misunderstanding of irradiated food without reference to the general theory of irradiated knowledge. In this respect, it would be helpful to provide education showing that irradiated food is not related to eating harmful or genetically modified food to help high school students create informed opinions of irradiated food. In terms of relevance with health-specific self-efficacy, experience of acquiring information about irradiated food was marked at r=0.148 (p<0.01), experience of purchasing irradiated food was marked at r=0.077 (p<0.05), experience of eating irradiated food was marked at r=0.113 (p<0.01) while knowledge of irradiated food, attitude towards irradiated food and behavior was marked at r=0.103 (p<0.01), r=0.076 (p<0.05) and r=0.105 (p<0.01) respectively. This shows that self-efficacy is high when one has experience of acquiring information about irradiated food, purchasing or eating irradiated food resulting in a high level of knowledge, attitude and behavior. Education which serves to improve the level of self-efficacy needs to be provided along with an educational program which will increase the public's understanding of irradiated food. It is expected that if this education which increases the level of self-efficacy is provided together with correct information of irradiated food, behavior to choose and eat irradiated food will also improve.