Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of IUCN Category Regarding the Designation of Overlapping Protected Areas

중복지정된 보호지역을 고려하기 위한 IUCN 카테고리 적용

  • Kil, Sung Ho (Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Kun (Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sung, Hyun Chan (Department of Green and Landscape Architecture, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Gwan-Gyu (Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Forest and Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Ho Gul (Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Koo, Meehyun (Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Mo, Yong Won (Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2014.01.13
  • Accepted : 2014.04.03
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to seek the application of IUCN categories of overlapping protected areas which is legally designated in South Korea. Different government departments in South Korea have managed and designated as protected areas. However, the protected areas due to different management agencies can be confused with restricting behaviors and supporting residents. The IUCN presents the reasonal standardization classifying the protected areas which could be applied all over the world. Six categories issued by the IUCN could be applied to deal with the problems of the overlapping protected areas. We suggested the application of the IUCN categories compared with legal frame in South Korea. Most areas are overlapped in designation, but the areas are important for ecology and landscape. Moreover, each protected areas in South Korea have zone districts. Comprehensively considered all these things, we made rationale matrix correlated with the IUCN categories and the zone districts of the protected areas in South Korea. For the result of this study, this matrix could be helped to the application of the IUCN categories in domestic protected areas. Although the protected areas has been recognized as regulatory regions, it is expected to expand and sustain the areas based on the matrix.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명수, 최영국, 전대윤, 박정은, 서연미, 2007, 국토자원의 효율적 관리를 위한 보호지역의 위계정립 및 관리방안, 국토연구원.
  2. 김민정, 최종관, 이상돈, 2011, 한국 자연보호구역 현황 및 향후 개선방안, 한국환경영향평가학회지 20(6), 779-786.
  3. 김성일, 강미희, 2011, 백두대간보호지역의 IUCN 관리 카테고리 적용 연구, 한국임학회지100(3), 494-503.
  4. 김보현, 한국 보호지역 관리시스템 개선방안 연구. 서울시립대학교 대학원 박사논문.
  5. 김현, 2008, 우리나라 국립공원에 세계자연보전연맹(IUCN) 보호지역 관리 범주 적용에 관한 연구, 서울대학교 대학원 석사논문.
  6. 이민주, 이관규, 성현찬, 이동근, 이현우, 김준순, 2013, 한.일.중 3국의 보호지역 관리 비교연구, 한국환경복원기술학회지 16(1): 71-82. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.1.071
  7. 조용현, 이용광, 2010, 우리나라 보호지역 관리 실태와 개선방안, 한국조경학회지 38(1), 64-73.
  8. 허학영, 김현, 이영주, 김성일, 2007, 우리나라 보호지역에 IUCN 카테고리 적용 방안에 관한 연구. 환경정책연구. 6(2), 71-96.
  9. 환경부, 2006, 선진외국의 보호지역 관리기법 연구.
  10. 환경부, 2011a, 자연환경보전 업무계획 및 주요 현안사항.
  11. 환경부, 2011b, 보호지역의 재분류 및 협력적 관리를 위한 연구.
  12. Arcese, P. and Sinclair, A.R.E., 1997. The role of protected areas as ecological baselines. Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 587-602. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802167
  13. Bishop, K., Dudley, N., Philips, A. and Stolton, S., 2004. Speaking a Common Language:the Uses and Performance of the IUCN System of Management Categories for Protected Areas. Cardiff University, Cambridge.
  14. Chape, S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M., Lysenko, I., 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 360, 443-455. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1592
  15. Daily, G.C. (Ed.), 1997, Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  16. Dudley, N. (Ed.), 2008, Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
  17. IUCN, 1994, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. CNPPA with the assistance of WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
  18. Leroux, S. J., Krawchuk, M. A., Schmiegelow, F., Cumming, S. G., Lisgo, K., Anderson, L. G., and Petkova, M., 2010, Global protected areas and IUCN designations: Do the categories match the conditions?. Biological conservation, 143(3), 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.11.018
  19. Lindenmayer, D.B. and Franklin, J.F., 2002. Conserving Forest Biodiversity: a Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  20. http://protectedplanet.net.

Cited by

  1. 아이치 생물다양성 목표 11의 이론적 고찰 - 보호지역의 양적 확대 목표와 질적 향상 목표를 중심으로 - vol.20, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2017.20.5.43