• 산업융합연구
• /
• 제21권4호
• /
• pp.81-89
• /
• 2023

본 연구는 간호대학생의 임상추론역량, 비판적 사고 성향과 핵심기본간호술 수행자신감의 관계를 확인하고자 수행하였다. 연구 대상은 대전광역시 D 대학교 간호대학생 3, 4학년 157명으로 2022년 11월 2일부터 11월 15일까지 자가설문지를 통해 조사하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS/WIN26.0 Program을 이용하였다. 연구결과 간호대학생의 임상추론역량과 비판적 사고 성향(r=.417, p<.001), 임상추론역량과 핵심기본간호술 수행자신감(r=.659, p<.001), 비판적 사고 성향과 핵심기본간호술 수행자신감(r=.303, p<.001)이 유의한 양의 상관관계를 보였다. 따라서 본 연구결과는 간호대학생의 핵심기본간호술 수행자신감을 높이기 위한 다양한 교육과정 개발의 근거로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 보인다.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.655-676
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 대수적 사고 중 하나인 함수적 사고에 기반 한 수학 수업이 6학년 학생들의 대수적 추론 능력 및 함수적 사고 수준에 미치는 영향을 알아보는데 목적이 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 교육과정 및 선행연구 분석을 통한 12차시의 함수적 사고 기반 수업을 개발하여 실시하였다. 그 결과, 함수적 사고 기반 수업은 전통적인 교과서 중심의 수업에 비해 대수적 추론 능력에 있어 통계적으로 유의미한 차이를 보여주었으며, 대수적 추론 능력의 하위요소인 일반화된 산술로서의 대수적 추론 및 함수적 사고로서의 대수적 추론 능력 향상에도 도움이 되었다. 또한, 함수적 사고 기반 수업은 5가지 유형별 학생들의 함수적 사고 수준 변화에도 긍정적인 영향을 주었다.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.91-107
• /
• 1992

The Purpose of this study was to present the procedures and methods of ordering theory,and to search for a learning hierarchy among science process skills in each Piagetian cognitive reasoning level. One of the purpose of this is not to determine the clear and exact hierarchy but rather to demonstrate how ordering theoretic methods and procedures can be used to determine the hierarchy of logical relationships among a set of test items or the testing of a hypothesized hierarchy. Ordering theory was used to analyze five science process skills collected from 509 high school students. Ordering Theory has as its primary intent either the testing of hypothesized hierarchies among items at the determination of hierchies among items. Hierarchical relationships were identified within five science process skills. The results will be helpful in giving useful inform at ions to classroom teachers and science curriculum developer.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.186-194
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is developing a Science Drawing Program to improve Science Process Skills and examining the effect of it. For this study two classes (missed classes with boys and girls) of 3th grade students participated and the subject of the instruction was domain of Air and Weather. The result of this study were as follows: First, the Science Drawing Program was effective in improving the science process skills. Development and Application of the Science Drawing Program brought positive effects especially on the observation, measurement, reasoning power. Second, student showed positive recognition on the Science Drawing Program. Many students showed interests and want to use it in class. And they thought Drawing Program helpful in their learning. Therefore the Science Drawing Program is very effective method in science education.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.43-56
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of small group inquiry skills on improving science process skills and attitudes toward science in elementary school science. The research questions of this study were as follows. First, effects of small group inquiry skills on improving science process skills in elementary school science. Second, effects of small group inquiry skills on improving attitudes toward science in elementary school science. The subjects of this study is two classes from 6th grade elementary classes in Busan. The experiment class practiced small group inquiry skills, while the control class practiced self inquiry. To verify the effect of the experiment, ANOVA was conducted. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, the small group inquiry skills gave a significant influence on increasing the science process skills, including the basic science process skills and the integrated science process skills, of students. Especially, among subordinate factors of science process skills between groups, it was effective to increase abilities of observing, reasoning, interpreting data, formulating hypothesis. It is necessary for teachers to make an effort to teach according to steps of the small group inquiry skills and to support inquiry activities, in order to increasing the science process skills. However, frequency of additional lessons have a little influence on increasing the science process skills. Second, there is meaningful change in the attitudes toward science for those who studied the small group inquiry skills. Also, they affected subordinate factors of the attitudes toward science, like the attitudes toward science inquiry, the happiness about science class. This study shows that the small group inquiry skills give a positive influence on the science process skills and attitudes toward science in elementary school science.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제60권2호
• /
• pp.133-157
• /
• 2021

본 연구에서는 학생들의 생활과 밀접한 공간을 기반으로 한 비구조화된 문제를 개발하고 수업에 적용하였다. 이 과정에서 6학년 학생들의 공간 추론 능력으로는 외적 추론에 비해 내적 추론에서 어려움을 표했으며, 공간 추론이 수와 연산, 측정 등의 영역과 연계되어 활용될 때 그 수준이 더 높게 나타났다. 문제 해결 능력에서는 반성 요소가 미흡하게 나타났으며 초등 현장에서 온라인 환경에서의 협력과 수학적 모델링 학습이 적용 가능하다는 결과를 얻었다. 이를 통해 수학 교육 현장에 공간 학습과 실생활 문제 해결에 관한 의미 있는 시사점을 도출할 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제62권4호
• /
• pp.457-471
• /
• 2023

측정은 초등 수학의 핵심 영역이지만 중요도에 비하여 측정 상황에서 단위에 대한 학생들의 이해는 충분하지 않은 것으로 보고되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 길이 측정 상황에서 초등학교 저학년 학생의 단위 추론에 대한 수준을 분석하여 이를 바탕으로 측정 영역에서 단위 추론을 지도하기 위한 방안을 모색하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 개방형 수직선을 활용하여 길이 측정 과제를 적용한 초등학교 2학년 학생들의 응답을 수집 및 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 초등학교 저학년 학생들의 단위 추론 수준은 단위화, 단위 반복, 단위 분할 정도에 따라 1단위 반복하기, 주어진 단위 반복하기, 단위 사이의 관계 알기, 단위 변환하기의 4개의 수준으로 나타났다. 가장 많은 분포를 보인 수준은 길이 측정을 위해 단위 사이의 관계를 인식하는 수준이었으며 각 수준을 대표하는 단위 추론에 대한 학생들의 수준별 특징과 사례를 제시하였다. 본 연구 결과를 토대로 초등학교 저학년 학생들의 단위 추론 수준에 맞는 지도 방안이 요구되며, 불완전한 단위 추론 능력을 가진 친구들을 위한 추가 지도나 맞춤형 중재물의 활용이 필요함을 논의하였다.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2011

Purpose: To evaluate undergraduate nursing students' ability in clinical competence, critical thinking, and problem solving following enrollment in a clinical reasoning course. Methods: A clinical reasoning course utilizing a human patient simulator and scenarios was offered to 22 senior students at a College of Nursing in Seoul. Students' clinical competence was measured with a checklist of 15 items by analyzing students' performance recorded on video tapes for eight scenarios. Critical thinking disposition and problem solving were measured by a self-administered questionnaire before and after the course. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The high scored items of clinical competence were: 'obtain relevant subjective/objective data', 'interpret vital signs', 'communicate with healthcare providers', and 'utilize standard precautions including handwashing.' Students' critical thinking and problem solving scores following the course were increased with statistical significance. Conclusion: A clinical reasoning course utilizing a human patient simulator creates a realistic clinical environment for nursing students and provides the opportunity to obtain clinical competence, critical thinking, and problem solving skills.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.171-185
• /
• 2014

Mathematically deductive reasoning skill is one of the major learning objectives stated in senior secondary curriculum (CDC & HKEAA, 2007, page 15). Ironically, student performance during routine assessments on geometric reasoning, such as proving geometric propositions and justifying geometric properties, is far below teacher expectations. One might argue that this is caused by teachers' lack of relevant subject content knowledge. However, recent research findings have revealed that teachers' knowledge of teaching (e.g., Ball et al., 2009) and their deductive reasoning skills also play a crucial role in student learning. Prior to a comprehensive investigation on teacher competency, we use a case study to investigate teachers' knowledge competency on how to teach their students to mathematically argue that, for example, two triangles are congruent. Deductive reasoning skill is essential to geometry. The initial findings indicate that both subject and pedagogical content knowledge are essential for effectively teaching this challenging topic. We conclude our study by suggesting a method that teachers can use to further improve their teaching effectiveness.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.620-636
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this study was to analyze one science teacher's understanding of student argumentation and his explicit teaching strategies for implementing it in the classroom. One middle school science teacher, Mr. Field, and his students of 54 participated in this study. Data were collected through three semi-structured interviews, 60 hours of classroom observations, and two times of students' lab reports for eight weeks. Coding categories were developed describing the teacher's understanding of scientific argumentation and a description of the main teaching strategy, the Claim-Evidence Approach, was introduced. Toulmin's approach was employed to analyze student discourse as responses to see how much of this discourse was argumentative. The results indicated that Mr. Field defined scientific inquiry as the abilities of procedural skills through experimentation and of reasoning skills through argumentation. The Claim-Evidence Approach provided students with opportunities to develop their own claims based on their readings, design the investigation for evidence, and differentiate pieces of evidence from data to support their claims and refute others. During this approach, the teacher's role of scaffolding was critical to shift students' less extensive argumentation to more extensive argumentation through his prompts and questions. The different level of teacher's involvement, his explicit teaching strategy, and the students' scientific knowledge influenced the students' ability to develop and improve argumentation.