• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제46권2호
• /
• pp.293-304
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This methodological study was conducted to develop and psychometrically test the Transcultural Self-efficacy scale (TCSE-scale) for nurses. Methods: Initial 41 items for the TCSE-scale were generated based on extensive literature reviews and in-depth interviews with 18 nurses who had experience in caring for foreign patients. Cultural Competence and Confidence model was used as a conceptual framework. Content validity was evaluated by an expert panel. Psychometric testing was performed with a convenience sample of 242 nurses recruited from four general hospitals in the Seoul metropolitan area and Gyeonggi-do province of South Korea. To evaluate the reliability of TCSE-scale, a test-retest reliability and an internal consistency reliability were analyzed. Construct validity, concurrent validity, criterion validity, convergent validity and discriminative validity were used to evaluate the validity. Results: The 25-item TCSE-scale was found to have three subscales-Cognitive, Practical, and Affective domain-explaining 91.5% of the total variance. TCSE-scale also demonstrated a concurrent validity with the Cultural Competence Scale. Criterion-related validity was supported by known-group comparison. Reliability analysis showed an acceptable-to-high Cronbach's alpha-.88 in total, and subscales ranged from .76 to .87. The ICC was .90, indicating that the TCSE-scale has internal consistency and stability of reliability. Conclusion: This preliminary evaluation of the psychometric scale properties demonstrated an acceptable validity and reliability. The TCSE-scale is able to contribute to building up empirical and evidence based on data collection regarding the transcultural self-efficacy of clinical nurses. We suggest further testing of the applicability of TCSE-scale in different settings and community contexts.

• 재활간호학회지
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.124-133
• /
• 2002

Purpose: to test of the reliability and validity of the Disabled's Motivation for Rehabilitation Scale, which was developed in 2002. Method: An experimental version of the scale was distributed to a sample of 441 disabled with ages above 18 and below 80 years. The subjects of the test-retest were 60 disabled. Results: revealed a satisfactory level of test-retest and internal consistency. The overall fit of the factor model to the data was good. Correlation among the subscales revealed a simple pattern that, in general, provides support for the self-determination continuum and the construct validity. In testing concurrent, criterion-validity, there was a positive correlation between the motivation scores for rehabilitation and the Health-Related Hardiness scores and a negative correlation between the motivation scores for rehabilitation and the Learned Helplessness scores. Conclusion: The Disabled's Motivation for Rehabilitation Scale revealed a useful instrument with a high degree of reliability and validity. In this sense, this instrument can be effectively utilized in rehabilitative nursing for the disabled.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제54권2호
• /
• pp.279-295
• /
• 2024

Purpose: This study aimed to develop a scale to measure hospital nurses' silence behavior and examine its validity and reliability. Methods: A total of 52 preliminary items on hospital nurses' silence behavior were selected using a content validity test by seven experts on 53 candidate items derived from a literature review and in-depth interviews with 14 nurses. A total of 405 hospital nurses participated in a psychometric testing. Data analysis comprised item analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and convergent and discriminant validity tests. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used for assessing concurrent validity, and Cronbach's alpha was used for the reliability test. Results: The final scale consisted of nine factors with 31 items, exhibiting acceptable model fit indices, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. The score of the entire scale was positively correlated with the 'Organizational Silence Scale (OSS)-the issues on which nurses remain silent' (r = .60, p < .001) and 'OSS-the reasons why nurses remain silent' (r = .68, p < .001). Cronbach's α of the scale was .92, and α of each subscale ranged from .71 to .90. Conclusion: The Hospital Nurses' Silence Behavior Scale is a useful tool for assessing multifaceted silence behavior among nurses. It can provide basic data for developing better communication strategies among nurses and other hospital staff.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권11호
• /
• pp.347-354
• /
• 2020

이 연구의 목적은 W치과대학의 역량기반 치의학 교육과정 개편을 위한 역량모델을 개발하는데 있다. 이를 위해 이 연구방법은 역량모델 개발절차를 3단계로 진행하였다. 역량모델 준비 단계는 구성원의 인식조사를 분석하고, 개발단계는 역량수준 등을 개발하였다. 평가단계는 전문가에게 내용타당도를 검증받았다. 그 결과 내용타당도지수(CVI: content validity index)는 .91로 높은 CVI를 나타났으며, 대학차원의 공통역량인 4개의 핵심역량과 전공역량인 직무역량을 연계한 역량모델을 개발하였다. 이러한 절차를 걸쳐 개발된 W치과대학의 역량모델 개발 사례는 앞으로 역량모델 개발이 필요한 연구에 기초자료를 제공할 수 있으며, W치과대학의 역량 기반 교육과정 개편에도 반영할 예정이다.

• 한국건축시공학회지
• /
• 제8권6호
• /
• pp.155-160
• /
• 2008

The BTL project, 4 years since its operation. has benchmarked the PFI Project in Japan and has been introduced. Given the evaluation step to select a preferred bidder, in a technological factor, the basic plans are corrected and complemented, whereas in a price factor, the low price bidding system is being enforced. There is concern that how to select preferred bidders and how to operate project costs during operation and management period may be problematic. Thus, in this study, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, the method of deciding the priority to select preferred bidders in an early stage of the project and the evaluation model to evaluate the validity of BTL project expenses in process of project enforcement are established. Targeting the group composed of experts who have experiences in the BTL project. Then, the levelling of evaluation factors and grouping have been carried out as following : LCC analysis and disbursement for government including two more detailed factors.

• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.511-528
• /
• 2015

창의적 잠재력이 실현된 재능으로 발달하는 과정은 복합적이고 비선형적이다. 이러한 특성은 단기적으로 어떤 문제를 해결해야 하는 상황에서보다 장기적으로 창의적인 삶을 살아가야 하는 과정에서 더욱 두드러진다. 본 연구는 대학생을 대상으로 창의적 과정 이론 중 하나인 Sawyer의 Zigzag 모델을 토대로 창의성 경로 척도(CPI: Creativity Path Inventory)를 개발하고 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도를 검증하였다. 이에 모델의 각 단계 특성을 반영한 8요인 88문항을 개발하였으며, 문항분석과 구인 타당도 검증 과정을 통해 최종 7요인(생각해내기, 배우기, 궁금해하기, 도전하기, 되돌아보기, 구현하기, 연결하기) 38문항을 확정하였다. CPI 전체 38문항의 내적 합치도는 .835로 나타나 신뢰로운 척도임이 확인되었고, 최종 모형의 적합도 지수 역시 양호한 결과를 보였다. 신뢰도와 타당도가 입증된 CPI는 일상적 창의성의 관점에서 창의성을 발현하고자 하는 사람들이 자신의 강점과 약점을 스스로 점검함으로써 자기계발을 할 수 있도록 도움을 줄 것이다.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제52권6호
• /
• pp.564-581
• /
• 2022

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Readiness for Practice Survey (K-RPS). Method: The English Readiness for Practice Survey was translated into Korean using the Translation, Review, Adjudication, Pretesting, and Documentation (TRAPD) method. Secondary data analysis was performed using the dataset from the New Nurse e-Cohort study (Panel 2020) in South Korea. This study used a nationally representative sample of 812 senior nursing students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were also conducted. Convergent validity within the items and discriminant validity between factors were assessed to evaluate construct validity. Construct validity for hypothesis testing was evaluated using convergent and discriminant validity. Ordinary α was used to assess reliability. Results: The K-RPS comprises 20 items examining four factors: clinical problem solving, learning experience, professional responsibilities, and professional preparation. Although the convergent validity of the items was successfully verified, discriminant validity between the factors was not. The K-RPS construct validity was verified using a bi-factor model (CMIN/DF 2.20, RMSEA .06, TLI .97, CFI .97, and PGFI .59). The K-RPS was significantly correlated with self-esteem (r = .43, p < .001) and anxiety about clinical practicum (r = - .50, p < .001). Internal consistency was reliable based on an ordinary α of .88. Conclusion: The K-RPS is both valid and reliable and can be used as a standardized Korean version of the Readiness for Practice measurement tool.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제53권5호
• /
• pp.525-537
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aimed to develop and test a reward scale for hospital nurses. Methods: The initial items were identified through a literature review and focus group interviews with ten hospital nurses. The content validity of the items was evaluated by ten experts. Fifty-one items were derived from the pilot survey. Four hundred eighty-eight nurses participated in the study: 248 for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 240 confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Data were analyzed using item analysis, EFA, CFA, convergent validity, known-group validity, and internal consistency using IBM SPSS Statistics 29.0 and IBM SPSS AMOS 29.0. Results: The final scale consisted of 31 items and eight factors (decent wage, opportunity to grow and develop, support for special situations, various benefits, flexibility of work, job-related achievement, reflecting career and performance, and recognition), which explained 67.3% of the total variance. The eight-subscale model was validated by CFA. Convergent validity was evaluated by analyzing correlation with intention to leave (r = - .63, p < .001) and job satisfaction (r = .54, p < .001). The known-group validity was evaluated by comparing the reward scales according to age, clinical career, income level and hospital type. The scale was found to be reliable with a Cronbach's α of .89. Conclusion: Both the validity and reliability of the reward scale for hospital nurses are verified, which can enhance the understanding of the range of rewards and may assist nurse managers in establishing an effective reward system.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제57권3호
• /
• pp.279-287
• /
• 2024

Objectives: This study validated the Vietnamese version of the Disaster Adaptation and Resilience Scale (DARS) for use in vulnerable communities in Vietnam. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 595 adults from 2 identified communities. The original DARS assessment tool was translated, and the validity and reliability of the Vietnamese version of DARS (V-DARS) were assessed. The internal consistency of the overall scale and its subscales was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega reliability coefficients. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to evaluate its construct validity, building upon the factor structure identified in exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Construct validity was assessed based on convergent and discriminant validity. Results: Following the established criteria for EFA, 8 items were removed, resulting in a refined V-DARS structure comprising 35 items distributed across 5 distinct factors. Both alpha and omega reliability coefficients indicated strong internal consistency for the overall scale (α=0.963, ω=0.963) and for each of the 5 sub-scales (all>0.80). The CFA model also retained the 5-factor structure with 35 items. The model fit indices showed acceptable values (RMSEA: 0.072; CFI: 0.912; TLI: 0.904; chi-square test: <0.01). Additionally, the convergent and discriminant validity of the V-DARS were deemed appropriate and satisfactory for explaining the measurement structure. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the V-DARS is a valid and reliable scale for use within vulnerable communities in Vietnam to assess adaptive responses to natural disasters. It may also be considered for use in other populations.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권10호
• /
• pp.382-392
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 복합적 구조의 자기주도학습 과정을 구성하고, 이를 토대로 대학생들을 위한 복합적 구조의 자기주도학습 측정 도구를 개발하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 문헌 분석 및 선행 연구 검토를 통해서 동기와 학습실행 행동(학습목표 설정, 학습 계획 수립, 학습 활동, 학습결과 평가 행동)과 학습관리 행동(자기관찰, 자기검토, 자기수정)이 복합적으로 구성된 자기주도학습 모형을 구성하였다. 이를 토대로 19개의 하위요인을 구성하였고, 114개 측정 문항을 개발하였다. 먼저 예비 척도를 개발하여 수도권의 D대학 학생 128명을 대상으로 신뢰도 검증을 수행하였다. 그 결과 모든 하위 요인의 신뢰도가 양호한 것으로 나타나 제외된 문항 없이 본 척도를 개발하였다. 본 척도의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 수도권의 D대학 학생 674명을 대상으로 신뢰도와 구인타당도를 검증하였다. 신뢰도는 목표행동 (.834), 목표관찰(.809), 목표검토(.839), 목표수정(.773), 계획행동(.765), 계획관찰(.861), 계획검토(.890), 계획수정(.810), 학습전략(.784), 학습관리(.775), 학습유지(.809), 자원획득(.828), 학습관찰(.846), 학습검토(.827), 학습수정(.830), 평가행동(.892), 평가관찰(.866), 평가검토(.891), 평가수정(.868)로서 모든 하위 요인이 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 구인타당도 검증을 위해 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과 최초 모형은 적합한 것으로 나타나지 않았다. 이에 모형 수정지수를 고려하여 1차 수정한 결과 ${\chi}^2$(563.254), CFI=.963, NFI=.951, RMSEA=.064로 나타나 모형이 타당한 것으로 검증되었다.