• 가족자원경영과 정책
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.61-76
• /
• 1999

The purpose of this study is to investigate the degree of influence on the elderly’s life adjustment and decision making in the family. For these research tasks the data were collected through interview. the respondents were 296 of man and woman elderly who lived in JeonJu. It was analyzed by various statistical methods such as Frequency, Percentile, ANOVA, correlate, t-test, Multiple Regression Analysis. The finding of this study are as follows; 1) Decision-making of the elderly in family had significant differences I the area of sex, the sum of monthly personal expenses, satisfaction level of personal expenses, subjective economic level and self-esteem in the order named. 2) Elderly life-adjustment had significant differences in the area of the residential district, the present job, the situation of a apouse, religion, education, the sum of the monthly personal expenses, health, satisfaction level of personal expenses, subjective economics level and self-esteem. 3) When we observe relationship with the elderly decision-making in family and life-adjustment, relation decision-making in family and life-adjustment appeared positively. 4) Decision-making of the elderly in family had the significant differences according to the variables such as sex, the sum of monthly personal expenses, and self-esteem in the order named, and the most influential factor among them was sex. 5) Elderly life-adjustment had the significant differences according to the variables such as self-esteem, decision-making, religion, health, the sum of the monthly personal expenses, the residential district in the order named. The most influential factor was self-esteem and the explanary of those variables for the elderly life-adjustment was 55.1%.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권9호
• /
• pp.307-315
• /
• 2022

The review of known decision-making support systems and technologies regarding the possibility of donation and transplantation showed that currently there are no systems and technologies of decision-making support regarding the possibility of donation and transplantation considering civil law. The paper models the decision-making support process regarding the possibility of donation and transplantation, which is a theoretical basis for the development of rules, methods and technology of decision-making support regarding the possibility of donation and transplantation considering civil law. The paper also developed the technology of decision-making support regarding the possibility of donation and transplantation considering civil law as a component of the Unified State Information System for Organ and Tissue Transplantation, which automatically and free of charge determines the possibility/impossibility of donation and transplantation. In the case of the possibility of donation, the admissible type of donation is also determined - over-life or after-life donation - and data about potential donor is entered in the relevant Donor Register. In the case of the possibility of transplantation, if the recipient needs a transplant of one of the paired organs or a part of the organ/tissue, then data about potential recipient are entered in the Transplantation List from both over-life and after-life donor, otherwise, if the recipient needs a transplant of a non-paired organ or both paired organs, then data about potential recipient are entered only in the Transplantation List from after-life donor.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.221-230
• /
• 2022

본 연구에서는 뷰티 전공 대학생의 진로 의사결정 유형을 확인하고, 진로 준비 행동과 전공 만족에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석을 통해 진로 준비 행동의 향상을 목적으로 한다. 2021년 11월 1일부터 30일까지 진행하였고, 질문지는 총 485부를 분석 자료로 활용하였다. 연구 방법으로 빈도 분석, 요인분석, 신뢰도 분석, 상관관계 분석, 다중 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과로 첫째 진로 의사결정 유형이 진로 준비 행동과 전공 만족에서 정적(+) 상관관계가 나타나 통계학적으로 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 합리적 진로 의사결정 유형은 의존 및 직관적 유형과 상관 관계가 있었으며, 진로 준비 행동으로 시간 노력, 능력 활동, 정보수집의 진로 준비 행동과 전공 만족으로 수업 만족, 교과 만족에서 모두 통계적으로 유의한 정적(+) 상관관계를 나타냈다. 셋째 진로 의사결정 유형 중 합리형과 의존형이 진로 준비 행동의 하위요인인 능력 활동에 통계적으로 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

• 융합정보논문지
• /
• 제9권6호
• /
• pp.91-96
• /
• 2019

최근 획득방안 도출을 위한 선행연구 조사 분석의 객관성 및 신뢰성이 확보된 과학적 결과에 대한 요구가 증대되고 있다. 이러한 요구에 따라 획득방안 연구 방법론에 대한 검토가 진행되고는 있으나, 아직까지는 초기 단계이며 비 전문적인 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 실무에 활용할 수 있도록 일반적인 의사결정 방법 및 국가 연구 개발 사업 의사 결정 방법, 현재 활용 중인 AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), ANP(Analytic Network Process), KAAM(Knowledge-based Alternative Analysis Model) 등의 무기체계 획득 방안 연구 방법론 등을 비교하여 무기체계 획득방안 연구에 가장 적합한 AHP 기법을 방법론으로 제안하였다. AHP 항목으로 비용, 효과, 전력화 시기, 사업 관리 위험 등의 종합적인 요소들을 비교 분석함으로써 무기체계 획득방안 연구의 객관성과 신뢰성을 높이고, 정량적인 비교 분석으로써 과학적인 결과를 도출하였다. 본 연구를 통해 AHP를 활용하여 보다 무기체계 획득방안을 과학적이고 정량적으로 비교 분석할 수 있게 기여하였다.

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.381-395
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal gas turbine system for special purpose ships. First we generate critical evaluation criteria an construct their hierarchical structure. The criteria consist of qualitative ones as well as the economic factor. Then AHP is applied to solve the decision making problem AHP gibes good results different from those only by the economic evaluation methods. And during the analysis, the procedure produces many useful informations to the decision making. The results shows that AHP is an appropriate method for these kinds of problems such as the system selection.

• 산업공학
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.408-419
• /
• 2011

R&D is a foundation for new business chance and productivity improvement leading to enormous expense and a long-term multi-step process. During the R&D process, decision-makers are confused due to the various future uncertainties that influence economic and technical success of the R&D projects. For these reasons, several decision-making models for R&D project investment have been suggested; they are based on traditional methods such as Discounted Cash Flow (DCF), Decision Tree Analysis (DTA) and Real Option Analysis (ROA) or some fusion forms of the traditional methods. However, almost of the models have constraints in practical use owing to limits on application, procedural complexity and incomplete reflection of the uncertainties. In this study, to make the constraints minimized, we propose a new model named Real Option Decision Tree Model which is a conceptual combination form of ROA and DTA. With this model, it is possible for the decision-makers to simulate the project value applying the uncertainties onto the decision making nodes.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.101-113
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study are to develop a SDSS (Spatial Decision Support System) that can incorporate diverse opinions of stakeholders related the designation of protected areas (PA), and to employ the model for the readjustment of the boundary line of the Jirisan National Park of Korea. The SDSS would lead to more rational and less controversial decision-making during the expansion or removal of PA in Korea. Research methods are as follows. Firstly, to select evaluation criteria for SDSS for PA designation by using expert interview and literature survey. Secondly, to measure their preferences on the designation of additional PA or the removal of a part of PA based on the opinions of various stakeholders such as local residents, environmental groups, or public officials. Thirdly, to produce conservation priority maps based on a multi-criteria decision making technique. The SDSS would be used to rational decision making for the expansion of PA or the release of a certain part of PA by reflecting diverse preferences on biodiversity conservation and economic interest of residents. The visualization of conservation priority maps would also increase the efficiency of such decision making processes. The evaluation criteria for the expansion of PA for biodiversity conservation includes vegetation conservation value, wildlife conservation value, and the habitats of key species. The evaluation criteria for the removal of PA includes the proximity to roads and the boundary of PA, land use types, and conservation zoning of the PA. Preference weights are based on data collected from the Jirisan National Park. Both the conservation priority and removal priority maps are based on land parcels so that property rights of all parcels would be correctly represented.

• 한국국방기술학회 논문지
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.7-18
• /
• 2023

군 지휘관은 전투 임무 수행을 위한 작전계획을 수립한다. 작전계획 수립을 위한 현행 교리는 야전의 악조건 하에서 사람의 노력으로 수행 가능하도록 간단명료한 절차와 방법을 사용하도록 하고 있다. 작전계획 수립 과정의 작업은 의사결정의 연속이라고 할 수 있는데, 의사결정의 기준은 대체로 임무변수를 적용한다. 그러나 세부적인 기준은 교리로 고정시키지 않고 창의적으로 수립 적용하도록 하고 있다. 그러나 인공지능 기반의 의사결정을 위해서는 기준들과 사용되는 양식을 정형화할 필요가 있다. 본 논문은 우선 각종 기준들과 양식을 정형화하여 반자동화된 보조시스템에서 사용할 수 있는 방법을 제시하고 이를 인공지능화하기 위한 방안을 모색하고자 한다. 이를 위해 운영분석 분야에서 정립된 수학적 모형과 의사결정 방법들을 적용하여 능률성을 제고시킬 수 있도록 하였다.

• 보건의료기술평가
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.22-26
• /
• 2013

Objectives: Balancing benefits and risks through the drug life cycle has been discussed for many decades. The objective of this study was to review the processes and tools currently proposed for benefit-risk assessment of medicinal drugs. It aimed to establish scientific and efficient drug safety management system based on the synthetic analysis of benefit-risk evidence. Methods: We conducted a review of exiting literatures published by regulatory agencies or initiatives. Not only quantitative methodologies but also qualitative method were compared to understand their key characteristics for the benefit and risk assessment of drugs. Results: Recently, benefit-risk assessments have more structured approaches to decision making as part of regulatory science. Regulatory agencies such as European Medicines Agency, FDA have prepared plans to apply benefit-risk assessment to regulatory decision making. Also many initiatives such as IMI (Innovative Medicine Initiative) have conducted research and published reports about benefit-risk assessment. For benefit-risk assessment, four kinds of methods are necessary. Frameworks such as BRAT (Benefit Risk Action Team) framework, PrOACT-URL provide guidance for the whole process of decision-making. Metrics are measurements of risk benefit. The estimation techniques are methods to synthesis and combine evidences from various sources. The utility survey techniques are necessary to explicit preferences of various outcome from stakeholders. Conclusion: There is the lack of widely accepted, validated model for benefit-risk assessment. Nor there is an agreement among academia, industry, and government on methods for the quantitative valuation. It is also limited by available evidence and underlying assumptions. Nevertheless, benefit-risk assessment is fundamental to improve transparency, consistency and predictability for decision making through the structured systematic approaches.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.107-122
• /
• 2004

This study aims to examine the usefulness on the Evaluation Process for the Feasibility & Priority of A Certain Public Projects. and the Methodology used AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) which used pairwise comparisons of the alternatives and criteria for solving discrete alternative multicriteria decision problems. In this paper, we present a similar phenomenon, rank reversal problem, when we apply the AHP to group decision making process. The problem is identified by an example problem in that the previous rank order of Public Projects choices. we also present three different methods to prevent the undesirable characteristic of the original AHP in appling to Decision Making Process.