• Title/Summary/Keyword: 학교건축

Search Result 731, Processing Time 0.033 seconds

Architectural Work Cost Rate Analysis of Elementary, Middle, and High School Delivered by BTL (초·중등학교 민간투자사업(BTL)의 건축공사비의 공종별 비율 분석)

  • Ryu, Hanguk;Kim, Hyungeun
    • The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
    • /
    • v.14 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 2015

  • The accurate estimation of construction cost is critical for effective budgeting and financing of the project. Accurate estimates also allow for informed decisions when considering the responsiveness of bids or proposals and for a contractor to better monitor construction progress. However, current method for construction cost of the public educational facility uses a basic criteria in Korea, e.g, construction cost per unit floor area. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine present architectural work cost rate of elementary, middle, and high school delivered by BTL(Build-Transfer-Lease). We examined real construction cost of educational facility according to level of school, such as elementary, middle, and high school. The examination revealed that unit price of BTL educational construction cost are different to the level of school, but the composing rate of architectural work cost of the educational facility are very similar. As a result, it is recommended that future researches are initiated to create specific methods to support the accurate cost estimation of educational facility.

  • https://doi.org/10.7743/kisee.2015.14.1.001 인용 PDF KSCI

An Analysis on Current Status of Certification for Green Building Revitalization in School - Focused on the School Located in Gyeonggi-do Province - (학교시설의 녹색건축 활성화를 위한 인증현황 분석 연구 - 경기도 학교시설을 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Jang-Young;Kim, Sung-Joong;Lee, Seung-Min
    • The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.9-17
    • /
    • 2015

  • In this paper, there are several analysis on G-SEED, Building Energy Efficiency Rating System, Energy Performance Index, Energy Saving Plan about how they are applied by classification and planning standard. The analysis result found out that G-SEED has low select percentage by having difficulties to managing and additional cost when the each class is selected. And also, Building Energy Efficiency Rating System in school is planed in comparably simple design and similar size and also mostly uses high efficient machines, which was in high lever comparing to the system in facilities in other uses. In the case of EPI, there are differences on acquiring grades by each region. Especially, Gyung-gi region has a low grade on architecture part comparing to other parts, which seems to acquire more grades by strengthen insulation performance. By the result from the three standards, many facilities has only formal plan to pass the required standard without considering specialities of each buildings, which has a tendency to have a pattern to have a minimum criteria. However, School has a symbolic building which has a obligation to be the base of the aim for growing green energy buildings and green education for students. Therefore, planning with understanding of specialities of the facility, having various and rational evaluation standards from the planning of the building is necessary.

  • https://doi.org/10.7743/kisee.2015.14.3.009 인용 PDF KSCI