통합 검색 | Korea Science

최원재;이충호;정지혜;이승원
- 한국융합학회논문지
- /
- 제9권11호
- /
- pp.363-369
- /
- 2018
본 연구의 목적은 자전거 안장 높이에 따라 요추부 근 활성도와 산소 소모량의 차이를 알아보기 위해 실시하였다. 근골계 장애가 없는 22명의 건강한 남자가 본 연구에 참여하였다. 대상자들은 3가지 다른 안장 높이로 3분씩 자전거를 탔으며 각 조건 별로 10분의 휴식시간을 가졌다. 표면 근전도는 요추부 근 활성도를 측정하기 위해 사용되었고 산소 소모량은 휴대용 가스 분석기를 사용하여 평가되었다. 연구 결과 내복사근만 유의한 차이가 있었고(p<0.05), 산소 소모량은 높은 안장 높이가 최적 안장 높이와 낮은 안장 높이 보다 유의하게 높게 나타났다(p<0.05). 본 연구는 안장 높이가 건강한 남성의 내복사근 활성도와 산소 소모량에 영향을 미친다고 제안하지만 안장 높이는 요추 안정화 근육에 영향을 미치지는 않았다.
https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.11.363 인용 PDF KSCI HTML

조승연;안장원;안용한;김용수
- 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
- /
- 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 춘계 학술논문 발표대회 2부
- /
- pp.131-132
- /
- 2011
The Basic Act on Low Carbon Green Growth is particularly important because it establishes the basis for climate change policies and replaces Sustainable Development as a directive idea for all environmental policies and regulations. But there still remain some legal and administrative task to shape the relationship with other laws and international codes. This study aims to propose the fact that the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design should be involved at the Basic Act.
PDF

전상현;안장원;김원우;조승연
- KIEAE Journal
- /
- 제12권1호
- /
- pp.105-112
- /
- 2012
When a building is planned and designed, the design should be able to minimize the cost during the whole life cycle of the building. This study has begun to analyze LCC about the alternative design which is applicable to renewable energy facility construction. It is reviewed domestic and foreign papers about the trend of LCC technology and it is determined the analytical method to analyze the LCC of renewable energy. Regarding the review of alternatives, it is chosen the three alternatives which are able to designed combing the renewable energy facilities and it is performed the LCC analysis about each alternative. Alternative 1 is Photovoltaic + Solar Thermal + Photovoltaic /Wind Power, Alternative 2 is Geothermal + Photovoltaic, and Alternative 3 is Photovoltaic + Solar Thermal. The LCC analysis is present value method, its analytical period is 40 years and it is applied 3.2% of real discount rate. As a result, it is proved that Alternative 1 and Alternative 3 are not able to collectible the early investment cost during the analytical period and Alternative 2 is analyzed that its pay-back period of early investment cost is about 31 years. As the final outcome of this study on case analysis, it is more advantageous to use the combination of Geothermal and Photovoltaic energy than to use the other combination in LCC aspect.
PDF KSCI