The cut is placed high up in the section, the 1st sloping holes below the cut, and divided all the holes located below the 1st sloping holes into a certain area with longitudinal section, to lower pollution made from tunnel blasting. With the sequential blasting machine, after I first blasted holes around the cut holes by a pre-splitting method, blasted the cut area and the 1st sloping holes. The 1st and 2nd sloping holes divided areas are initiated gradually to free face upwards made by the cut. Especially, I pre-splinted contour holes previous blast the before sloping holes from the contours. The ground vibration from the earth surface just over the advance face decreased about 42.0% compare with the down blasting method under the condition of equal charge weight per delay. I controlled the crack and over break of the mother rock by pre-splitting contour holes before blast the first sloping holes from the contours. The peak values of noise and air blast by blasting decreased about 10dB more than the down blasting method. the noise and air blast diminished gradually as a round. The throw distance of the fly rock was decreased about 55%.

We did bench blasting upon the natural rock which it's uniaxial compressive strength was about $1,420~1,476kgf/\textrm{cm}^2$. This is the results we inferred after measuring, analyzing the ground vibration velocity of the front and back direction from the free face of the bench blasting. We have to induce the square and cube root scaled equation and the general equation to guarantee confidence upon the data when analyzing the measurement data of the test blasting. The variable distance is in reverse proportion to the permitted ground vibration velocity. The shorter is the exploding point to a protection structure, the bigger is the reflection that the direction of the free face experts the ground vibration velocity, The ground vibration velocity front of the free face tends become reduced about 38~46% compare with back of the free face in the range that the permitted ground vibration velocity is 2.0~5.0mm/sec. In case of 2.0mm/sec, when a protection structure is within about 95m, the max. allowable charge weight per delay on positing front of the free face can be more used about 2.61 times than that on positing back of the free face, in case of 3.0mm/sec within about 78m more about 2.38 times, in case of 5.0mm/sec within 60m more about 2.10 times. In case of 2.0~5.0mm/sec when a protection structure is within about 200m front from the free face, the max. allowable charge weight per delay can become about 1.52 times than the case on back to the free face.

화약류를 사용하여 암반을 절취하는 작업현장에서의 발파공해는 항상 발생하고 있다. 특히 폭약의 폭발로 인해 발생하는 지반진동은 크고 작은 문제를 야기하고 있다. 일반적으로 발파현장에서 사용하고 있는 일반발파와 진동제어(미진동)발파에 대한 의미와 구분 및 시공에 대해 인식시키고자 그동안의 경험과 이론을 토대로 하여 연구하게 되었다. 본 연구에서는 일반발파와 진동제어발파를 구분하는 요소로 암분류 및 진동속도를 지발당장약량과 관계, 암분류에 따른 비장약량 및 발파공당 암절취량 그리고 천공경을 선정하여 고찰하였다. 이들 요소를 기준으로 일반발파와 진동제어발파의 경계가 되는 보안물건으로부터 거리 산출방법에 대해서 연구하였다. 일반발파나 진동제어발파 모두 보안물건에는 한계 진동속도 이내의 진동이 전달되어야 하며, 그 경계가 되는 발파공당 절취암량은 연암의 경우 약$16.67m^3$, 보통암의 경우 약$12.5m^3$, 경암의 경우 약 $10m^3$을 기준으로 하는 것이 바람직하고, 그 경계가 되는 보안물건으로부터 거리는 일정하게 정해진 것이 아니므로 현장에서 대상암반에 대해 시험발파를 실시하여 암분류, 비장약량, 지발당장약량, 한계 진동속도를 기준으로 결정하는 것이 바람직하다. 진동제어(미진동)발파구간내에서 발파설계단가는 일률적이 아닌 약2~3구간으로 분할하여 산출해야한다.