Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of Recognition level of Factors for the Successful implementation of the 'Return to Farm and Rural' of the local Government' Policies

군지자체 귀농·귀촌정책의 성공적인 추진을 위한 요인의 중요도 인식 수준

  • Oh, Sang-young (Department of Business Administration, U1 University)
  • Received : 2018.10.12
  • Accepted : 2019.01.20
  • Published : 2019.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the policies of return to farm & rural of the local government 's local communities. Through this, we intend to provide information for the successful establishment of the policies of the local village. The local economy is difficult due to the declining population. Therefore, it is also important as a way to increase the population. It is also important as a way to revitalize agriculture. The results of this study are as follows. The main factors are education, self-sufficiency, adaptation, funding, and consulting. In addition, the importance of these was highest in the self-supporting environment (28%). Followed by adaptation (21%) and funding (20%). Followed by consulting (17%) and education (15%). We can conclude that the factors that show a somewhat lower proportion are less important, but we can also conclude that the importance of the factors is high due to the high maturity of the factors. The importance analysis used AHP technique. The results of this study can be a guide for government policy.

본 연구는 지방의 기초자치단체의 귀농귀촌 정책을 연구하였다. 이를 통해 성공적인 귀농귀촌 정책의 수립을 할 수 있는 정보를 제공하고자 한다. 인구 감소로 인해 지방 경제가 어려운 실정이다. 따라서 인구를 늘리기 위한 방편으로도 중요하다. 또한 농업을 활성화하기 위한 방안으로도 중요하다. 본 연구의 결과에서는 귀농귀촌 정책의 주요 요인으로 5가지가 선정되었다. 주요 요인은 교육, 자립 환경, 생활적응, 자금지원, 컨설팅 등이다. 또한 이들의 중요성은 자립 환경이 28%의 비중으로 가장 높았다. 이어서 비중이 높은 요인은 생활적응(21%), 자금지원(20%)이었다. 다음으로 컨설팅(17%), 교육(15%) 등의 순으로 비중으로 분석되었다. 비중이 다소 낮게 나타난 요인은 중요도가 낮다고 판단 할 수도 있지만 이미 그 요인의 성숙도가 높아 중요성이 낮아진 것으로도 판단할 수 있어 상세 분석을 위해서는 추가적인 연구가 필요하다. 중요도 분석은 AHP기법을 활용하였다. 그리고 본 연구 결과는 정부 정책의 지침이 될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Table 1. Analyzing Satisfaction with Agricultural Environment

DJTJBT_2019_v17n1_37_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Agricultural annual and age group : local government support policy satisfaction

DJTJBT_2019_v17n1_37_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Results of factor analysis

DJTJBT_2019_v17n1_37_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Results of AHP analysis

DJTJBT_2019_v17n1_37_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. C. G. Kim, H. J. Lee, G. H. Kim & M. S. Park. (2011). Analysis of Affecting Factors of Reverse Return to Farm & Rural, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  2. C. G. Kim, H. J. Lee, G. H. Kim & M. S. Park. (2011). A Study on Successful Settlement of Return to Farm & Rural People and Development Plan of Rural Society, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  3. C. W. Lee & S. H. Park. (2015). A Study on Problems and Improvement of Return Farm & Rural Policy in Gyeongsangbuk-do, Journal of Korean Geographical Society, 50(6).
  4. Jeonbuk Province Return to Farm & Rural Support Center. (2016). Beginning your rosy life with agriculture succeeds as much as you prepare, http://www.jbreturn.com/
  5. J. S. Kim, J. I. Seong & S. J. Ma. (2013). Current Situation and Policy Tasks of Return to Farm & Rural Community, KREI of Focus on agricultural affairs 13.
  6. J. S. Kim, J. I. Seong, S. J. Ma & J. E. Yim. (2012). Return to Farm & Rural Policy and Education Systemization Plan, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  7. K. T. Cho, Y. G. Cho & H. S. Kang. (2003). Hierarchical analytical decision making, Dong Hyun Publishing, 170-171.
  8. M. K. Jang, J. W. Lee, J. U. Huh, H. M. Kim, S. H. Che, G. H. Kim & G. S. Song. (2013). A study on the status of settlement of Return to Farm & Rural population and policy development, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  9. M. K. Jang, J. W. Lee, J. U. Huh, H. M. Kim, S. H. Che, G. H. Kim & G. S. Song. (2014). Analysis of Affecting Factors of Reverse Return to Farm & Rural, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  10. M. H. Park, N. W. Oh & J. E. Yim. (2012). A Study on the Promotion of Return to Farm & Rural for Activation of Rural Area, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  11. S. H. Che. (2013). [Influential Factors of Successful Rural Settlement] Analysis of Return to Farm Status and Success Factors, Korea Agricultural and Industrial Education Conference Presentations, 43-60.
  12. S. H. Che. (2014). Population Settlement and Policy Development of Return to Farm & Rural, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  13. S. J. Ma. (2016). What makes it difficult, Agricultural Outlook.
  14. S. J. Ma. (2016). Study on Actual Situation of Settlement by Type and Expansion of Community Roles of Return to Farm & Rural, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  15. S. J. Ma, G. C. Nam & Y. J. Choi. (2016). Analysis of Affecting Factors of Reverse Return to Farm & Rural, Rural society, 26(1).
  16. S. J. Ma, D. S. Park, S. H. Park, Y. J. Choi, Y. U. Choi & G. C. Nam. (2014). Long-term Follow-up Survey 1st year of Return to Farm & Rural, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  17. S. J. Ma & G. H. Jeong. (2008). A Study on the Solution of Entry Disability in Employment of New Agriculture, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  18. S. R. Son. (2016). A Study on the Actual Situation of Return to Farm & Rural in Gyeongnam Area and Policy Measures, Kyungnam Development Institute.
  19. S. H. Park & Y. U. Choi. (2014). Return to Farm & Rural factors and their effects on rural societies and economies, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  20. Statistical Office. (2018). Return to Farm & Fishing.Return to Rural Statistics By 2017. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/index.action.
  21. T. L. Saaty. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill.