Korean journal of applied entomology (한국응용곤충학회지)

Korean Society of Applied Entomology (한국응용곤충학회)
권호 표지

Occurrence of Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Chrysanthemum and ITS and D3-28S rDNA Characterization of Pratylenchus spp.

국화재배지의 식물기생선충 분포조사 및 뿌리썩이선층의 ITS와 D3-28S rDNA 특성조사

  • Han, Hye-Rim (Division of Forest Diseases and Insect pests, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kook (Applied Entomology Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA) ;
  • Choi, Dong-Ro (Division of Forest Diseases and Insect pests, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Han, Man-Jong (Division of Forest Diseases and Insect pests, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Park, Byeong-Yong (Ginseng & Medicinal Crop Division, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA)
  • 한혜림 (국립산림과학원 산림병해충과) ;
  • 이재국 (농업과학기술원 농업해충과) ;
  • 최동로 (국립산림과학원 산림병해충과) ;
  • 한만종 (국립산림과학원 산림병해충과) ;
  • 박병용 (작물과학원 인삼약초과)
  • Published : 2006.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A survey was conducted to find out the major plant parasitic nematode in Chrysanthemum morifolium fields in Korea from May to June in 2005. A genus of Pratylenchus was determined as the most important plant parasitic nematode based on analysis of total 50 samples from 8 cities of chrysanthemum field. Pratylenchus showed 86% occurrence rate and average numbered 1,095 per 200cc soils and 1g root. Five Pratylenchus isolates, 'Muan', 'Masan', 'Tean', 'Gumi', 'Jeongup', were selected for the molecular identification of the species of Pratylenchus, and ITS and D3-28S ribosomal DNA were amplified by PCR. For the ITS, only 'Muan' isolate was differentiated by total 1 kb PCR amplification, which was 200 bp larger than all the other isolates. There was no size variation in amplified D3-28S rDNA and all isolate represented approximately 320 bp of PCR product. Sequence data of D3-28S rDNA were analysed by MegAlign program in DNASTAR software and phylogenetic tree was constructed. Sequence homology was 100% between 'Gumi' isolate and 'Tean' isolate and 'Jeongup' isolate was also close to these isolates by 99.7% sequence homology. 'Gumi', 'Tean' group and 'Jeongup' isolate were determined to be closely related to Pratylenchus vulnus by 96.7% and 96.3% similarity in respectively. D3 sequence of 'Masan' isolate was 100% identical to P. penetrans, and 'Muan' isolate showed 99.7% similarity to P. brachyurus. This result was congruent with the branch divergence pattern shown in phylogenetic tree.

2005년 5월부터 6월까지 국내 주요 국화재배 포장에서 총 50개 토양시료를 채집하여 식물기생선충상을 조사하였다. 조사 결과, 뿌리썩이선충(Pratylenchus)의 포장발생률이 86%로 대부분의 포장에서 광범위하게 분포하였고, 밀도는 토양 200 cc와 뿌리 1g에서 평균 1,095마리가 검출되었다. 분자생물학적 동정을 위하여, '무안', '구미', '태안', '정읍', '마산' 등 5지역을 선정하고, 그 지역의 뿌리썩이선충을 대상으로 ITS와 D3-28S rDNA의 유전자 분석을 하였다. PCR 결과 증폭된 ITS는 '무안'의 경우 1 kb 크기로 나타났고, 그 외의 다른 지역의 뿌리썩이선충에서는 0.8 kb로서 약 200 bp가량의 차이가 있었다. D3-28S rDNA의 PCR 결과에서는 모든 지역에서 약 320 bp로 일정한 크기의 gene이 증폭되었으며, 증폭된 DNA는 sequencer를 이용하여 염기서열정보를 얻었다. 얻어진 각 isolate의 D3 염기서열 정보는 DNASTAR 분석 소프트웨어의 MegAlign 프로그램을 이용하여 분석 및 phylogenetic tree를 형성하였다. 분석 결과 '구미'와 '태안' isolate의 D3 염기서열은 100% 일치하였고, '정읍' isolate는 이들 isolate와 99.7%의 유사성을 나타내었다. 또한 이들 세 isolate는 Pratylenchus vulnus와 근연종임이 확인되었는데, '구미', '태안'은 96.7%, '정읍'은 96.3%의 유사성을 각 나타내었다. 한편, '마산' isolate는 P. penetrans와 100% 일치됨을 나타내었고, '무안' isolate는 P. brachyurus와 99.7%의 유사성을 나타냄으로써 높은 상관성을 나타내었다. 이와 같은 결과는 phylogenetic tree에서도 동일한 결과를 나타내고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta, N. and R. B. Malek. 1981. Sympomatology and histopathology of soybean roots infected by Pratylenchus scribneri and P. alieni. J. Nematol. 12: 6-12
  2. Al-Banna, L., A. T. Ploeg, V. M. Williamson, and I. Kaloshian. 2004. Discrimination of six Pratylenchus species using PCR and species-specific primers. J. Nematol. 36: 142-146
  3. Al-Banna, L., V. Williamson, and S. L. Gardner. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of nematodes of the genus Pratylenchus using nuclear 26S rDNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8: 249-259 https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1997.0433
  4. Baldwin, J. G., L. M. Ferris, J. T. Vida, C. D. Eddleman, and W. K. Thomas. 1997. An evolutionary framework for the study of developmental evolution in a set of nematodes related to Canorhabditis elegans. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8: 249-259 https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1997.0433
  5. Choi, D. R., Y. M. Choi and S. C. Han. 1992. Effect of Praty-lenchus coffeae on Growth of Gebera. The Research Reports of the Rural Development Adminisrtation Vol. 34: 85-90
  6. Chungnam Agricultural Research & Extension Services. http:// www.chungnam.rda. go.kr/chrysan/newhome/new/NEW.html
  7. Duncan, L. W., R. N. Inserra, W. K. Thomas, D. Dunn, I. Mustika, L. M. Frisse, M. L. Mendes, K. Morris, and D. T. Kaplan. 1999. Molecular and morphological analysis of isolates of Pratylenchus coffeae and closely related species Nematropica 29: 61-76
  8. Ferris, V. R., J. M. Ferris, and J. Faghihi. 1993. Variation in spacer ribosomal DNA in some cyst-forminng species of plant parasitic nematodes. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 16: 177-184
  9. Handoo, Z. A., and A. M. Golden. 1989. A key and diagnostic compendium to the species of the genus Pratylenchus Filipjev, 1936 (Lesion Nematodes). J. Nematol. 21: 202-218
  10. Handoo, Z. A., L. K. Carta, and A. M. Skantar. 2001. Morphological and molecular characterization of Pratylenchus arlingtoni n. sp., P. convallariae and P. fallax (Nematoda: Pratylenchidae). Nematology 3: 607-618 https://doi.org/10.1163/156854101753389220
  11. Hooper, D. J. 1990. Extraction and processing of plant and soil nematodes. pp. 45-68. In Plant parasitic nematodes in subtropical and tropical agricultureL. ed. by L. Luc 629 pp. CABI, Wallingford, UK
  12. Kim, Young Jin. 1989. Nematodes associated with ornamental plants in Korea. Thesis on Doctor's degree, Graduate School of Kyungpook National University. p 1-93
  13. Kumi Cooperation. http://www.kumlcorp.com/indust04.php
  14. Loof, P. A. A. 1978. The genus Pratylenchus filipjev, 1936 (Nematoda: Pratylenchudae): A review of its anatomy, morphology, distribution, systematics, and identification. Research Information Center. Swidish University of Agricultural Science. Uppsala, Sweden
  15. Loof, P. A. A. 1978. The family Pratylenchenchidae Thorne, 1949. pp. 363-461. In Manual of agricultural nematology. ed by W. R. Nickle. 1,035 pp. MARCEL DEKKER, INC. New York
  16. Orui, Y. 1996. Discrimination of the main Pratylenchus species (Nematoda:Pratylenchidae) in Japan by PCR-RFLP analysis. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31: 505-514 https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.31.505
  17. Park, Byeong-Yong. 1996. Taxonomical study of Pratylenchus spp. in Korea. Thesis on Master's degree, Graduate School of Kon-Kuk University. p 1-49
  18. Roos, M. H., and W. N. Grant. 1993. Species-specific PCR for the parasitic nematods Haemonchus contorus and Trichostrongylus colubriformus. Int. J. Parasitol. 23: 419-421 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(93)90021-P
  19. Uehara, T. T. Mizukubo, A. Kushida, and Y. Momota. 1998. Identification of Pratylenchus coffeae and P. loosi using specific primers for PCR amplification of ribosomal DNA. Nematologica 44: 357-368 https://doi.org/10.1163/005525998X00034
  20. Waeyenberge, L., A. Ryss, M. Moens, L. Pinochet, and T. C. Vrain. 2000. Molecular characterization of 18 Pratylenchus species using rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism. Nematology 2: 135-142 https://doi.org/10.1163/156854100509024
  21. Williamson, V. M., E. P. Caswell-Chen, B. B. Westerdahl, F. F. Wu, and G. Caryl. 1997. A PCR assay to identify and distinguish single juveniles of Meloidogyne hapla and M. chitwoodi. J. Nematol. 29: 9-15