• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제30권3호
• /
• pp.47-66
• /
• 2020

Due to the division of China's departmental laws, the disconnect between theory and practice, and the influence of traditional academic thinking on the understanding of the knowledge structure of arbitration legal talents in practice, the construction of law school colleges, teaching teams, and research centers mostly revolves around departmental laws, tearing the connection of the arbitration legal system. The student-centered, process-guaranteed, and result-oriented arbitration master of law training model is "virtualized," the shaping of arbitration professionalism is ignored, the coverage of practical teaching is narrowed, and the arbitration legal profession is mostly formalized. The prevalence of specialized curriculum systems shortage, single faculty, formalized practical teaching, outdated curriculum settings, unsuitable curriculum system design for development, and inaccurate professional curriculum standards and positioning renders it difficult to integrate the "Belt and Road." The cutting-edge, the latest research results, and practical experience cannot reflect the connotation, goals, and requirements of "Entrepreneurship" education, as well as arbitral issues such as the ineffective monitoring of practical education and the inconsistent evaluation of standards and scales. Under the background of the "Belt and Road," based on system theory and practice and through training goals that innovate and initiate organizational form, activity content, management characteristics, assessment and support conditions, etc., the arbitration law teaching curriculum system is gradually improved and integrated. Through the establishment of a "Belt and Road" arbitration case file database and other measures, a complete arbitration law theory and practice teaching guarantee system has been established. Third parties are introduced, arbitration law experimental modules are developed, students are guided how to discover new knowledge, new contents are mastered, solidarity, cooperation, and problem-solving capabilities are cultivated in the practice of the "Belt and Road," and quality education, vocational education, and innovation education are organically integrated. In order to implement the requirements of arbitration law education, innovation development and collaborative management of arbitration law teaching practice base should be cultivated, thus giving full play to the effect of collaborative education between universities and arbitration institutions.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제10권3호
• /
• pp.303-322
• /
• 2007

교과서에서 사용되는 문제는 주로 정형화된 폐쇄형의 문제로 학생의 문제해결력을 육성하거나 학생의 자주적인 학습을 촉구하는데 제한적이다. 본 연구는 문제해결력을 육성하기 위해 개방형 문제를 해결해가는 과정을 폴리아의 문제해결단계를 따라 학생에게 나타나는 학습변화를 관찰하였다. 학생은 문제를 더욱 신중히 읽고 이해하는 과정에서 단순화하였고 계획수립과정에선 처음엔 익숙하지 않았지만 다양한 방법으로 해결하려는 시도와 체계적으로 되돌아보는 인지과정을 나타냈으며, 실행과정에서는 오류를 통한 계획수립의 재시도가 일어나 통제가 향상되는 과정을 보였다. 반성단계는 점검만하는 수준을 벗어나 다른 해결방법을 무엇인지 등의 반성단계의 필요성을 인식하였고 개방형문제의 실생활 적용과 일반화하는 과정을 통해 문제 해결력이 더욱 향상됨을 알 수 있었다.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제11호
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 1997

This stduy aimed to suggest a possible way for a new setting of interior design education through analyzing educational situations of domestic interior design societies. The study showed that interior design education should not follow expressive methods made from practical work which had been popular in the past and it should establish fundamental formation to make interior design education useful in industrial fields through active educationalindustrial complex. Interior design education is not possible without interrelationship with other professional fields and cooperative attitudes among them. The rapid development in the modern industrial world and the ever-growing information processing world regardless of ideology and regiional boundaries indicate that the future of interior design education will be no longer effective with traditional education systems. The idea suggested in this study may be understood as a bridge between the educational reality and its ideal in interior design teaching. The main points of the study are follows. First, the projects of advanced interior design should be focused on increasing the ability for problem solving rather than accumulating basic knowledge. Second, motivation is important for the maximization of the efficiency of educatiov. Therefore a few suggestions in establishing design conditions, as strategies of inducing 'attention', 'self-confidence', 'satisfaction', and 'relevance' are closely examined to propose practical application methods. Third, educational methods should be developed towards creativity in order to increase abilities of thinking and expressiov. Finally, it is necessary to explore various device which help internship participants to get experiences with a sense of practical situations in industrial fields. This could be possibly done by enforcing academic grades for the work done as an internship participation; by employing workmen in industrial fields as faculty members; and by bringing faculty members into actual industrial situations and providing workmen with lectures. A new approach for a better design education seems to be desirable for the future.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.51-75
• /
• 2020

모든 공공도서관은 장서 기반의 지식문화서비스 기관이다. 이를 위해 가장 먼저 수립해야 할 필수적 정책인 동시에 전략적 메뉴가 장서개발정책이다. 특히 시도 단위의 종합지식정보센터 및 공동보존서고로서의 법정 업무를 수행해야 할 지역대표도서관은 최적 장서개발정책을 수립·적용해야 한다. 본 연구는 주요 선진국의 대도시 공공도서관 장서개발정책과 국내의 권역별 지역대표도서관 장서개발지침(안) 및 규정을 분석하였다. 그 결과, 대다수 선진국의 정책은 구성체계 및 내용적 측면에서 충실한 반면에 국내는 공식화된 정책문서가 없는 실무지침에 불과하였다. 따라서 모든 지역대표도서관은 장서개발의 중요성 인식, 미래지향적 사고, 전략적 판단 등을 전제로 장서개발정책을 수립·문서화해야 하며, 이를 위한 기본원칙과 구성체계를 제언하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제44권
• /
• pp.31-55
• /
• 2009

This study attempts to provide a comparative overview of the liability systems Korean law and the PELS adopt, that is, the approaches taken by Korean law and the PELS to deal with various irregularities of contractual performance. In addition, it examines in a comparative way the questions of what is the position of the seller's liability for his delivery of defective goods under the chosen liability system and what is the legal nature of the seller's liability. The study finds that the dual liability system taken by Korean law has caused some complexities as to the matter of which liability is applicable in some borderline cases. The problem in such complexities is originated in that the remedies available and the limitation period applicable are differentiated in accordance with one's different categorization among three types of default under the general liability and defective performance under the seller's guarantee liability. In this light, the study argues that the unified liability system under the PELS is superior because its concept of non-performance embraces in a unitary manner all the aspects of default including defects in quality, quantity and title. In addition, it finds that Korean law has suffered endless debates on the question of what are the true contents of the same remedies of rescission and damages provided under the seller's guarantee liability as under the general liability. The debates have been come along on the basis of the traditional presumption among some of civil law jurisdictions that two liabilities be different in terms of not only their legal nature but also their contents of remedies. The study argues that the problem may be circumvented, first, by another way of thinking that the unified liability in Korean law is inferred from the specification of the identical remedies for both the general liability and the seller's guarantee liability under the KCC, second, by the preposition that the requirement of fault be depended upon what remedy the buyer seeks to claim rather than what liability he does to rely on.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제15권10호
• /
• pp.4339-4347
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This study aimed at exploring treatment delay (TD) among cancer patients in China with an attempt to develop a practical methodology facilitating frontline Chinese clinicians in promoting earlier cancer diagnosis and treatment. Materials and Methods: The study comprised framework development, qualitative interviews and paired factor rating. Framework development utilized systematic literature review, soft systems thinking and consensus groups. Qualitative interviews employed a checklist of open questions soliciting information about all the domains included the framework from cancer patients drawn via stratified randomized sampling of inpatients at 10 hospitals in Hefei, China. Paired factor rating used a self-developed computer aid and the interviewed patients as referring cases to weigh the relative importance of the factors listed in the framework in terms of their contributions to specific components of total delay (TD). Results: a) A conceptual framework was proposed consisting of a 6-step path to TD and 36 category determinants. b) A total of 227 patients were interviewed; their TD was 267.3 mean or 108 median days ranging from 0 to 2475 days; average appraisal, illness, behavioral, preparation and treatment delay accounted for 52.1%, 9.4%, 0.30%, 8.8% and 29.4% of the TD respectively. Individual side factors were rated substantially more important than environmental side factors (60% vs. 40%); most influential TD factors included cancer symptoms, overall health, family relations and knowledge about cancer and health. Conclusions: The framework proposed together with the interviewing and rating approaches used provide a potential new methodology for understanding cancer patients' TD and promoting earlier cancer treatment.

• 정보교육학회논문지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.209-217
• /
• 2017

최근 SW교육이 강조되고 있으나 아직 많은 학생들이 컴퓨터과학을 접할 기회는 많지 않다. 이 논문에서 연구자는 컴퓨터과학에 대한 관심과 이해를 증대시키기 위해 컴퓨터과학 쇼를 구성하였다. 컴퓨터과학 쇼는 이진체계의 이해, 문자 전달하기, 패리티비트 마술, 숫자 카드 찾기, 색깔 모으기(오렌지 게임)들로 구성하였다. 컴퓨터과학 쇼를 초등학생들에게 적용하고 결과를 살펴보았다. 컴퓨터과학 쇼에 참여한 대부분의 학생들은 "컴퓨터과학 쇼에 대한 경험"이 없었다. 컴퓨터과학 쇼 후의 설문조사에서 많은 학생이 "쇼에 대해 재미있다", "컴퓨터과학에 관심이 생겼다", "주변 친구에게 추천 하겠다"라고 응답했다. 연구를 통해 컴퓨터과학 쇼는 초등학생들에게 컴퓨터과학에 대한 흥미를 이끌어 낼 수 있고, 컴퓨터과학에 대한 호기심과 관심을 일으킬 수 있는 방법임을 알게 되었다.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.89-105
• /
• 2009

A family resilience approach aims to identify and fortify key interactional processes that enable families to withstand and rebound from disruptive life challenges. Walsh(1998) described family belief systems, organizational patterns, and communication processes as the three main keys of family resilience. The purpose of this study was to identify the three key factors of family resilience in case of divorced female single-parent families in Korea. The study participants were seven divorced mothers who were living in the institutional facility for female single-parent families. Using a qualitative approach, in-depth interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim for analysis. The study findings were as follows. First, the participants showed positive thinking rather than fear about the adversity induced by the divorce. They also showed the senses of competence, control, and self-esteem. However, the senses of transcendence and spirituality were barely evident. Second, emotional and economic supports from parents, brothers and sisters, and community networks (i.e., mother-child protection institution, healthy family support center) enhanced the family resilience of the participants. Third, the participants showed clear communication, open emotional expression, and shared decision making. This study suggests that more counseling services and parent education be provided by healthy family support center and institutional facilities as important family resilience factors for divorced female single-parent families who are below the poverty line.

• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.1-14
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 2016년 공표한 일본의 학습지도요령과 2015 개정 교육과정 총론의 구성 방식을 비교하기 위한 목적이 있다. 양국의 국가 수준 교육과정 구성을 비교하기 위해 구성 체계, 구체적인 내용과 더불어 정보과 교육의 중요성에 대한 흐름을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 일본은 학습지도요령의 개정 원인, 목적, 목표 달성 방법 등을 제시함으로써, 해당 문서에 대한 당위성이 강조되었다. 한국은 총론과 각론의 분절적 개발에서 비롯된 괴리가 문서상에서도 파악되었고, 시대적 흐름이나 교과의 변화를 고려하지 않은 교육과정의 구성 및 방향설정의 오류를 발견할 수 있었다. 교육과정이 내용에 대한 충분성과 시대적 상황을 반영한 교육을 지원하기 위해서는 전체 프레임에 대한 개선이 필요함을 제언하였다. 내용에 대한 인식 없이 프레임을 구성하는 것은 교육에 대한 목적과 방향을 제대로 설정할 수 없음에 대한 성찰을 제공했다는 데 본 연구의 의의가 있다.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제4권2호
• /
• pp.113-135
• /
• 2013

This paper explores how research excellence is perceived among researchers in Thailand and Japan with an aim to explore whether there are any new indicators that could later be proposed and adopted as criteria of excellence. Based on a questionnaire survey, the findings reflect ideas and viewpoints that could be found among researchers in both countries. Creative researchers are crucial to a strong national research and innovation system. Institutions should provide an environment or incentives based on research performance for their researchers to flourish and be productive. For decades, bibliometrics have been used to evaluate individual research performance for its easy approach and faster speed than a qualitative assessment would warrant. Nonetheless, there have been a number of studies on research performance evaluating systems that point out how a purely bibliometric approach is inadequate in summarizing the quality of the scientific performance. The pressures on researchers today influence their thinking and oppose their creativity. To investigate the perception of research excellence, three key research questions were set in this study: what counts as excellence, how to measure excellence, and how to support excellence. The findings confirm that traditional granting criteria that frames an idea of excellence remain valid, but they also suggest novel criteria be considered and prioritized. This paper argues that the existing evaluating system is insufficient for unleashing the curiosity and creativity of researchers and fostering excellence. In the final section, the paper discusses factors that contribute to scientific creativity that we should not overlook.