• 영재교육연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.59-85
• /
• 2001

본 연구는 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 종합적인 평가 기준을 개발하는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해서 먼저, 국내 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 운영 현황을 분석하고 과학영재교육센터 운영에 있어서 시급한 문제점을 도출하였고, 다음으로 ‘특수목적고’와 시·도교육청이 운영하고 있는 ‘과학영재반’과의 차별성을 위한 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 위상을 정립하기 위한 과학영재교육센터 평가의 기본 방향 및 평가틀을 구안하였다. 이를 바탕으로 과학영재교육센터 평가 영역별 평가 기준 및 평가 방법을 구안하였다. 마지막으로, 이상의 연구 결과를 바탕으로 실제 과학영재교육센터 평가에 적용하기 위한 평가 종류(시기)에 따른 평가 방법과 활용 방안을 정리·제시하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 과학영재교육센터 평가 기준은 우리나라 대학부설 과학영재교육센터의 효율적인 평가를 위해 유용하게 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제28권5호
• /
• pp.620-634
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of EarthComm implementation in the U.S. high schools in terms of demographic background including school size, urban/rural area, and teachers' teaching experiences. In addition, this study examined impact of students' higher-order thinking skills by using the visions of National Science Education Standards. Two modular of the EarthComm curriculum were used for this purpose with thirty one teachers and around thousand students involved across four states. Findings were that EarthComm did not significantly impact student achievement differentially in schools of varying sizes and school location, i.e., urban and rural areas. The years of teaching experiences did not impact student achievement scores for Module I but did significantly impact for Module II. It is noted that the two results seemingly conflict with each other similar to other research findings (Ferguson, 1998; Yager et al., 1988). Student higher-order thinking skills, on the other hand, were significantly improved as a result of studying with EarthComm. Implications were discussed at the end of the paper.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.137-173
• /
• 2021

Research and national standards, such as the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) in the United States, promote the development and implementation of K-12 interdisciplinary curricula integrating the disciplines of science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science (STEM+CS). However, little research has explored how teachers provide epistemic support in interdisciplinary contexts or the factors that inform teachers' epistemic support in STEM+CS activities. The goal of this paper is to articulate how interdisciplinary instruction complicates epistemic knowledge and resources needed for teachers' instructional decision-making. Toward these ends, this paper builds upon existing models of teachers' instructional decision-making in individual STEM+CS disciplines to highlight specific challenges and opportunities of interdisciplinary approaches on classroom epistemic supports. First, we offer considerations as to how teachers can provide epistemic support for students to engage in disciplinary practices across mathematics, science, engineering, and computer science. We then support these considerations using examples from our studies in elementary classrooms using integrated STEM+CS curriculum materials. We focus on an elementary school context, as elementary teachers necessarily integrate disciplines as part of their teaching practice when enacting NGSS-aligned curricula. Further, we argue that as STEM+CS interdisciplinary curricula in the form of NGSS-aligned, project-based units become more prevalent in elementary settings, careful attention and support needs to be given to help teachers not only engage their students in disciplinary practices across STEM+CS disciplines, but also to understand why and how these disciplinary practices should be used. Implications include recommendations for the design of professional learning experiences and curriculum materials.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 2001

Using computer technology in teaching school mathematics creates new instructional environments. The emphases on the use of computer technology in the classrooms and in particular the use of computer-based exploration as a context of mathematics instruction have been reflected in the recommendation of the NCTM (Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, 1989). Although the power of using computer technology in the exploration of mathematical problems has been recognized and stressed by many educators, we do not have many research studies on mathematics in computer-based explorations. Especially research has failed to clarify how computer technology can contribute to the construction of procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Up to now most researches on procedural and conceptual knowledge in computer environments have only focused on classifying programming languages which program language has more random access and rich interrelationship characteristic in relation to conceptual knowledge in humans, and which computer language has more characteristic flavor of procedural knowledge. How computer-based explorations affect the knowledge construction of mathematics, therefore, emerges as an issue of research on teacher education program for theoretical framework. This situation leads to do research on the effectiveness of using computer explorations in pre-service teacher education in terms of procedural and conceptual knowledge construction.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권6호
• /
• pp.183-192
• /
• 2016

본 연구는 국가직무표준(National Competency Standards, NCS)에서 제시한 시각디자인 직무를 적용한 캡스톤디자인 운영사례를 통해 시각디자인 전공 분야 학생들의 시각디자인 실무능력 변화와 캡스톤디자인의 활용 가능성을 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 동의과학대학교 시각디자인전공의 '커뮤니케이션 디자인 프로젝트' 교과목을 수강하는 2학년 학생과 담당교수, 그리고 산업체가 협업하여 '연예인 로버트 할리의 캐릭터디자인' 과제를 중심으로 연구를 진행하였다. 이 과정에서 학생들은 '커뮤니케이션 디자인 프로젝트'에서 배운 전공 이론과 실기를 '연예인 로버트 할리의 캐릭터디자인' 개발에 직접 적용해 보고 그 결과물을 공모전에 지원하게 된다. 수집된 학생 설문 분석, 산업체 평가, 공모전 수상 등의 자료를 분석한 결과, 캡스톤디자인에 참여한 시각디자인 전공 학생들은 NCS에서 제시한 지식, 기술, 태도의 관점에서 시각디자인 직무에 대한 이해도가 높아졌으며 과제를 수행하는 과정에서 문제해결기술과 실무능력이 고취되었음을 보여주었다. 따라서 본 연구에서의 캡스톤디자인 교육설계가 현장실무중심 시각디자인 교육과정 개발에 유용한 기초자료가 될 수 있을 것으로 여겨진다.

• 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.475-487
• /
• 2000

As a result of carrying out t-test against the learning activity that used the learning materials designed by level, significant disparity was found. Thus, it was found that hte effect of this learning activity became more visible with lapse of time. But the major cause by which there appeared small significant disparity as a result of testing is that the units of experiment were limited and that the period of using the learning materials was not long. In an analysis on the results of interest test, the experimental class also appeared to show the average score that was higher than that of the comparative class by 0.10 after converting a decimal point. The outcome of attitude test was that the experimental class showed a higher average score by 0.11, as a result of converting a decimal point, than that of the comparative class. So, a large number of students showed an improved reaction. But, there seemed some problems of the learning materials or the method of progressing the activity in changing under achievement students or students who avoided studying math. When the effect of the level-based learning activity was investigated, more than 80% of the experimental class’s students showed a positive reaction. Thus, it could be judged that students, who felt some burden at studying math, might be served more largely, not by teacher’s uniform instruction, but by an individual learning using the level-based learning materials that enabled them to do a systematic self-learning for themselves.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제5권2호
• /
• pp.121-142
• /
• 2001

The goal of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA) 2001 was to affirm the accountability of school education, to scientifically manage and elevate the quality of education at the national level, and to articulate the final design of the NAEA. It was implemented on June 28th of the year 2001. The assessment frame for NAEA includes the achievement standards, the assessment standards, the instruction for the item development, and the grading policy for mathematics subject. Most of items are multiple-choice types, but the performance-based items should be at least thirty percent of the total items, also 30% in case of mathematics. Approximately 1% of students among entire population of the Grades 6 were randomly selected. Therefore, the finally sampled examines were 8023 at Grade 6. The result of the analysis of the NAEA revealed that Grade 6 students was labelled as ‘average’ level in general (Number and Operation: average, Geometric figures: average, Patterns and Functions: excellent, Measurements: average, Letters and Expressions: average, Probability and Statistics: average). The most characteristic finding was that except for Grade 6(its average is 69.92), most secondary students obtained low test scores and its average of each grade is below 50 out of 100. Especially, the scores on the performance-based items were by and large very low. This finding implies that Korean students are not familiar with the kind of test items which requires expression of ideas and feelings and they are rather familiar with the multiple-choice items. Another interesting finding was that the students in small towns and remote areas showed significantly low scores in all four skills compared with Seoul, metropolitan cities and medium and small cities. This may be attributed from the fact that the remote areas do not have equal learning environment with regard to social and cultural experience, supply of various teaching materials, extracurricular lessons which are directly related to teaching and learning. These findings may be utilized as a reliable resource fur improving curriculum and teaching and learning in Mathematics.

• 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.61-72
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study was to analyze elementary school teachers' implementation for the emphasis on the revision, major contents, teaching and learning method, and evaluation in the 2009 revised national science curriculum. To fulfill the purpose of this study we carried out a survey with 222 elementary school teachers. Main findings of this research were as follows: First, they highly agreed to the increase in class hours and the application of subject classroom, but they had a lower recognition for setting the subject groups. Second, the degree of necessity in discussion and STS was relatively high, but the degree of implementation in science writing, discussion and STEAM was low. Third, in teaching and learning method, they showed a high performance for mutual cooperation, student-led activities and communication, but, a low implementation for open inquiry and instruction considering individual differences. Fourth, in the evaluation of science learning, they showed a high implementation for evaluation based on achievement standards and one based on the understanding and application of basic concepts, but, a low implementation for the development of common evaluation tools. Fifth, it seemed that their recognition for amount, level and interest of science contents and inquiry activities was appropriate and positive.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.71-96
• /
• 2024

본 논문에서는 정보 리터러시 교육의 모형과 표준들이 학교를 기반으로 하여 공공도서관에서 진행하기에 한계가 있음을 확인하고, 공공도서관에서 초등 고학년 대상의 온라인 정보 리터러시 교육을 효과적으로 설계하고 실천하기 위한 교육 모형을 개발·제안하기 위하여 연구를 진행하였다. 선행문헌 고찰과 현황 및 사례 분석을 통해 정보 리터러시의 정의 및 영역, 학습 단계 및 활동, 개념 및 절차 모형, 교수학습 계획을 포함한 1·2차 모형을 개발하였다. 교육모형의 내적 타당성 평가를 위해 1·2차 전문가 조사를 진행하였으며, 수집된 의견을 종합하고 수렴하여 최종 모형을 도출하였다. 연구 결과, 최종적으로 개발된 교육모형은 '정보 리터러시 개념', '교육의 구성요소 영역', '개념 모형', '절차 모형', '설계원리 및 상세지침', '학습 단계 및 활동', '교수·학습 계획'의 7개의 영역으로 구성되었으며 모형을 적용하여 실제 교수학습계획을 제시하였다.

• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.165-185
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 2015 개정 교육과정에서 강조하고 있는 교육과정, 수업, 평가의 일체화를 실현하기 위한 가정과 과정 중심 수행과제 개발 및 적용사례를 제시하는데 목적을 두었다. 이러한 목적에 따라 개발 절차는 수행의 명료화, 수행과제 및 채점기준 개발, 수행평가 실시 및 결과의 3단계로 수행하였으며 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 수행의 명료화 단계에서는 2015 개정 기술·가정 교육과정의 분석을 통해 성취기준-학습목표-평가목표가 일관성을 가지도록 평가시기, 횟수, 반영비율, 수행평가의 영역별 배점, 평가유형을 포함한 학기별 평가계획을 수립하였다. 둘째, 수행과제 및 채점기준 개발 단계에서는 교육과정 내용체계를 분석하여, 수행과제를 결정하고 과제 소요시간, 참여 방법, 산출물의 형태를 고려하여 개별과제와 모둠과제를 포함한 포트폴리오, 프로젝트 활동 및 지식시장, e-NIE 유형의 수행과제를 개발하였다. 개발된 수행과제는 교과 전문적 학습공동체 협의를 통해 타당성을 검토하고 재수정하여 세부적인 수행과제 채점기준을 개발하였다. 셋째, 수행평가 실시 및 결과 단계에서는 교사의 수업방향에 따라 교과 운영을 계획을 수립하고 교수·학습과 연계하여 블록 수업으로 시간표를 편성한 후 수행평가를 실시하였다. 이후 교과 전문적 학습공동체에서 개발된 수행평가 과제와 수행평가 산출물, 수업적용에 대한 수업성찰을 토대로 수행평가 과제를 재수정 하였다. 본 연구를 통해 학습자의 성장을 도울 수 있는 학습의 과정을 중시하는 수행과제를 개발함으로써 교사의 수업전문성과 현장의 수업개선에 기여할 수 있다.