Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Process-centered Performance Task For Curriculum·Instruction·Assessment Alignment based on 2015 Revised Home Economics Curriculum

교육과정, 수업, 평가의 일체화를 위한 가정과 과정 중심 수행과제 개발

  • Lee, Gyeong Suk (Gyeongsang National University High School) ;
  • Yoo, Taemyung (Department of Home Economics Education, Korea University) ;
  • Yang, Ji Sun (Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University)
  • 이경숙 (경상대학교 사범대학 부설고등학교) ;
  • 유태명 (고려대학교 가정교육과) ;
  • 양지선 (이화여자대학교)
  • Received : 2018.12.07
  • Accepted : 2018.12.31
  • Published : 2018.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to show the development process of the total instructional alignment based on the 2015 revised technology home economics curriculum, and to present the detailed aspects of this task. The results of this study were as follows: First, the clarity phase of the performance established the annual evaluation plan to ensure the consistency of the achievement standard, the learning objectives and the assessment objectives through an analysis of the curriculum. Second, the development phase of the performance tasks and the grading criteria analyzed the contents area and determined the performance assessment task. The performance assessment consisted of a portfolio and project activity types, and also comprised of knowledge markets, as well as e-NIE tasks, including individual tasks and collective tasks. Third, the performance assessment and the results phase were conducted after planning the class operation according to the instructors' directions and arrangement of the schedule into block classes. Afterwards, the performance assessment tasks were revised by the teaching-learning community and class reflection on practical application. As these results demonstrate, developing performance tasks that are centered on the learner's development processes can contribute to teachers' expertise and improvement of instruction.

본 연구는 2015 개정 교육과정에서 강조하고 있는 교육과정, 수업, 평가의 일체화를 실현하기 위한 가정과 과정 중심 수행과제 개발 및 적용사례를 제시하는데 목적을 두었다. 이러한 목적에 따라 개발 절차는 수행의 명료화, 수행과제 및 채점기준 개발, 수행평가 실시 및 결과의 3단계로 수행하였으며 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 수행의 명료화 단계에서는 2015 개정 기술·가정 교육과정의 분석을 통해 성취기준-학습목표-평가목표가 일관성을 가지도록 평가시기, 횟수, 반영비율, 수행평가의 영역별 배점, 평가유형을 포함한 학기별 평가계획을 수립하였다. 둘째, 수행과제 및 채점기준 개발 단계에서는 교육과정 내용체계를 분석하여, 수행과제를 결정하고 과제 소요시간, 참여 방법, 산출물의 형태를 고려하여 개별과제와 모둠과제를 포함한 포트폴리오, 프로젝트 활동 및 지식시장, e-NIE 유형의 수행과제를 개발하였다. 개발된 수행과제는 교과 전문적 학습공동체 협의를 통해 타당성을 검토하고 재수정하여 세부적인 수행과제 채점기준을 개발하였다. 셋째, 수행평가 실시 및 결과 단계에서는 교사의 수업방향에 따라 교과 운영을 계획을 수립하고 교수·학습과 연계하여 블록 수업으로 시간표를 편성한 후 수행평가를 실시하였다. 이후 교과 전문적 학습공동체에서 개발된 수행평가 과제와 수행평가 산출물, 수업적용에 대한 수업성찰을 토대로 수행평가 과제를 재수정 하였다. 본 연구를 통해 학습자의 성장을 도울 수 있는 학습의 과정을 중시하는 수행과제를 개발함으로써 교사의 수업전문성과 현장의 수업개선에 기여할 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ban, J. C., Kim, S., Park, C., & Kim, H. K. (2018). Teachers' perceptions on the teacher by teacher process fortified assessment. Korea Institute for Curriculum & Evaluation, 21(3), 105-130.
  2. Black, H. (1986). Assessment for learning. In D. L. Nuttall (Ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp. 7-18). London: Falmer Press.
  3. Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: a review of the literature. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative Classroom Assessment: Theory into Practice (pp. 43-62). New York: Teachers College Press.
  4. Brookhart, S. M. (2015). Performance Assessment. FL: Learning Sciences International.
  5. Carter, L. (2007). Total Instructional Alignment: From Standards to Student Success. Bloomington, Ind. : Solution Tree. 박승열, 이병희, 정재엽, 강운학(역)(2017). 교육과정, 수업, 평가의 일체화: 성취수준에서 학생의 성장에 이르기까지. Seoul: Sallimteo.
  6. Chon, K. H. (2016). 과정 중심 수행평가의 방향과 과제 [Direction and Challenges of Process-centered Assessment]. Korean Educational development Institute, Issue paper 04.
  7. Hong, S. H., Chang, I. S., & Kim, T. S. (2017). Elementary school teachers' recognition of process-centered evaluation using consensual qualitative research(CQR). The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(4), 47-69.
  8. Hong, S. J., Kwon, J. R., Kim, M. K., Sang, K. A., Ahn, Y. M., Lee, S. I., & Jang, E. S. (2014). 수행평가 지원 사이트 구축 [Establishment of A Performance Assessment Support Site]. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  9. Kang, D. J., & Yum, S. C. (2015). Analyzing performance assessment plan of practical arts with elementary school sixth graders. Journal of Korean practical arts education, 28(1), 1-18.
  10. Kim, S., Ban, J. C., & Park, C. (2017). 수행평가와 채점기준표 개발 [Development of Performance Assessment and Scoring Criteria]. Daejeon: AMEC.
  11. Lee, K. H., Kang, H. Y., Ko, E. S., Lee, D. H., Shin, B. M., Lee, H. C., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Exploration of the direction for the practice of process-focused assessment. The journal of educational research in mathematics, 26(4), 819-834.
  12. Lim, J. H., & Choi, W. S. (2018). A study on characteristics and meanings of 'process-focused evaluation' in the free semester program. Journal of Korean Education, 45(3), 31-59.
  13. Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (1999). Curriculum: Alternative Approaches, ongoing Issues (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
  14. McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Instruction (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  15. Ministry of Education (1998). 수행평가의 이해 [Understanding of Performance Assessment]. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
  16. Ministry of Education (2015). The Practical Arts(Technology & Hom Economics)Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  17. Ministry of Education (2016a). 학교생활기록 작성 및 관리지침(훈령 일부 개정) [Guidelines for School Records Making & Management]. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  18. Ministry of Education (2016b). Guidebook for the Framework of the 2015 Elementary School Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  19. Ministry of Education & KICE (2014). 문답식으로 알아보는 성취 평가제-고등학교 보통교과 [Performance Assessment System: General Subjects of High School]. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  20. Ministry of Education & KICE (2017). 과정을 중시하는 수행평가 어떻게 할까요?: 중등 [How to Conduct A Process-centered Performance Assessment: Middle]. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  21. KICE (2017). 과정을 중시하는 수행평가, 이렇게 해요! [Process-centered Performance Assessment, Do this!]. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  22. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational Assessment of Students. Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
  23. Park, J. I., Noh, E. H., Kim, Y. H., & Chon, K. H. (2017). A Study on Monitoring and Improvement of The Implementation of Performance Assessment Policies in Secondary Schools. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  24. Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  25. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagne, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation(Vol. 1, pp. 39-83). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  26. Seong, T. J. (2014). 현대교육평가 4판 [Modern Educational Evaluation]. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  27. Sin, H. J., Ahn, S. Y., & Kim, Y. W. (2017). A policy analysis on the process-based evaluation: focusing on middle school teachers in Seoul. Korea Institute for Curriculum & Evaluation, 20(2), 135-162.
  28. Son, J. H. (2018). The effect of backward design reflecting process-focused assessment on science learning achievement and science learning motivation of elementary school students. Journal of Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 11(2), 90-106. doi: 10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.2.90
  29. Song, M. Y., Kim, K. H., Lee, K. E., Noh, E. H., Lee, J. W., & Kim, J. Y. (2016). 수행평가 확대 실시에 따른 주요 쟁점과 과제 [Major Issues and Challenges in Expanding Performance Assessment]. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  30. Stiggins, R. (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York: Merrill.
  31. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758.-765. doi: 10.1177/003172170208301010
  32. Stiggins, R. J. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328. doi: 10.1177/003172170508700414
  33. Yoo, Y. S. (2017). 교육과정-수업-평가를 일체화하는 과정 중심 평가 [Process centered Assessment for Total Instructional Alignment]. Seoul: Joyschool.

Cited by

  1. 학교 공간 디자인을 주제로 한 과정중심평가 프로그램 개발 및 실행: 중학교 가정교과 주생활 영역을 중심으로 vol.32, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2020.12.32.4.81
  2. 과정 중심 평가를 위한 중학교 가정과 교수·학습과정안 개발: 생애설계 단원을 중심으로 vol.33, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2021.3.33.1.101