• Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.57 no.4
• /
• pp.601-612
• /
• 2017

Let Q be the frame g-loop quiver, i.e. a generalized ADHM quiver obtained by replacing the two loops into g loops. The vector space M of representations of Q admits an involution ${\ast}$ if orthogonal and symplectic structures on the representation spaces are endowed. We prove equivalence between semisimplicity of representations of the ${\ast}-invariant$ subspace N of M and the orbit-closedness with respect to the natural adjoint action on N. We also explain this equivalence in terms of King's stability [8] and orthogonal decomposition of representations.

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.57 no.6
• /
• pp.1373-1388
• /
• 2020

In the paper, we give an explicit basis of the cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebra corresponding to a minuscule representation of finite type.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.243-252
• /
• 2010

In this paper we extend the projective properties of representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left R-modules to the projective properties of representations of quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left $R[x]$-modules. We show that if P is a projective left R-module then $0{\rightarrow}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. And we show $0{\rightarrow}L$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as R-module if and only if $0{\rightarrow}L[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. Then we show if P is a projective left R-module then $R[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules. We also show that if $L\longrightarrow^{id}L$ is a projective representation of $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as R-module, then $L[x]\longrightarrow^{id}L[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as $R[x]$-modules.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.50 no.2
• /
• pp.389-398
• /
• 2013

Let R be a ring and $\mathcal{Q}$ be a quiver. In this paper we give another definition of purity in the category of quiver representations. Under such definition we prove that the class of all pure injective representations of $\mathcal{Q}$ by R-modules is preenveloping. In case $\mathcal{Q}$ is a left rooted semi-co-barren quiver and R is left Noetherian, we show that every cotorsion flat representation of $\mathcal{Q}$ is pure injective. If, furthermore, R is $n$-perfect and $\mathcal{F}$ is a flat representation $\mathcal{Q}$, then the pure injective dimension of $\mathcal{F}$ is at most $n$.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.343-352
• /
• 2012

In this paper we show that the projective properties of representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ as left $R[x]$-modules. We show that if P is a projective left R-module then $0{\longrightarrow}0{\longrightarrow}P[x]$ is a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, but $P[x]{\longrightarrow}0{\longrightarrow}0$ is not a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, if $P{\neq}0$. And we show a representation $0{\longrightarrow}P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ of a quiver Q is a projective representation, if P is a projective left R-module, but $P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]{\longrightarrow}0$ is not a projective representation of a quiver Q as $R[x]$-modules, if $P{\neq}0$. Then we show a representation $P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]\longrightarrow^{id}P[x]$ of a quiver Q is a projective representation, if P is a projective left R-module.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.271-281
• /
• 2009

We define injective and projective representations of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$. Then we show that a representation $M_1\longrightarrow[50]^{f1}M_2\longrightarrow[50]^{f2}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is projective if and only if each $M_1,\;M_2,\;M_3$ is projective left R-module and $f_1(M_1)$ is a summand of $M_2$ and $f_2(M_2)$ is a summand of $M_3$. And we show that a representation $M_1\longrightarrow[50]^{f1}M_2\longrightarrow[50]^{f2}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is injective if and only if each $M_1,\;M_2,\;M_3$ is injective left R-module and $ker(f_1)$ is a summand of $M_1$ and $ker(f_2)$ is a summand of $M_2$.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.37-43
• /
• 2006

We prove that $M_1\longrightarrow^f\;M_2$ is an injective representation of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ if and only if $M_1\;and\;M_2$ are injective left R-modules, $M_1\longrightarrow^f\;M_2$ is isomorphic to a direct sum of representation of the types $E_l{\rightarrow}0$ and $M_1\longrightarrow^{id}\;M_2$ where $E_l\;and\;E_2$ are injective left R-modules. Then, we generalize the result so that a representation$M_1\longrightarrow^{f_1}\;M_2\; \longrightarrow^{f_2}\;\cdots\;\longrightarrow^{f_{n-1}}\;M_n$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\cdots}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is an injective representation if and only if each $M_i$ is an injective left R-module and the representation is a direct sum of injective representations.

• Korean Journal of Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.429-436
• /
• 2009

We define a projective representation $M_1{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}M_2{\rightarrow}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ and consider their properties. Then we show that any projective representation $M_1{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}M_2{\rightarrow}M_3$ of a quiver $Q={\bullet}{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}{\bullet}{\rightarrow}{\bullet}$ is isomorphic to the quotient of a direct sum of projective representations $0{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}0{\rightarrow}P,\;0{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}P{\rightarrow\limits^{id}}P$ and $P{^{\rightarrow}_{\rightarrow}}^{e1}_{e2}P{\oplus}P{\rightarrow\limits^{id_{P{\oplus}P}}}P{\oplus}P$, where $e_1(a)=(a,0)$ and $e_2(a)=(0,a)$.

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.51 no.6
• /
• pp.1177-1187
• /
• 2014

In the current paper we study absolutely pure representations of quivers. Then over some nice quivers including linear quivers some sufficient conditions guaranteeing a representation to be absolutely pure is characterized. Furthermore some relations between atness and absolute purity is investigated. Finally it is shown that the absolutely pure covering of representations of linear quivers (including $A^-_{\infty}$, $A^+_{\infty}$ and $A^{\infty}_{\infty}$) by R-modules whenever R is a coherent ring exists.

• Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.52 no.2
• /
• pp.239-268
• /
• 2015

Let Q be a finite quiver and $G{\subseteq}Aut(\mathbb{k}Q)$ a finite abelian group. Assume that $\hat{Q}$ and ${\Gamma}$ are the generalized Mckay quiver and the valued graph corresponding to (Q, G) respectively. In this paper we discuss the relationship between indecomposable $\hat{Q}$-representations and the root system of Kac-Moody algebra $g({\Gamma})$. Moreover, we may lift G to $\bar{G}{\subseteq}Aut(g(\hat{Q}))$ such that $g({\Gamma})$ embeds into the fixed point algebra $g(\hat{Q})^{\bar{G}}$ and $g(\hat{Q})^{\bar{G}}$ as a $g({\Gamma})$-module is integrable.