• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제24권5호
• /
• pp.97-106
• /
• 2023

Citizens' demand for public CCTVs continues to rise, along with an increase in variouscrimes and social problems in cities. In line with the needs of citizens, the Seoul Metropolitan Government began installing CCTV cameras in 2010, and the number of new installations has increased by over 10% each year. As the large surveillance system represents a substantial budget item for the city, decision-making on location selection should be guided by reasonable standards. The purpose of this study is to improve the existing related models(such as public CCTV priority location analysis manuals) to establish the methodology foranalyzing priority regions ofSeoul-type public CCTVs and propose new mid- to long-term installation goals. Additionally, using the improved methodology, we determine the CCTV priority status of 25 autonomous districts across Seoul and calculate the goals. Through its results, this study suggests improvements to existing models by addressing their limitations, such as the sustainability of input data, the conversion of existing general-purpose models to urban models, and the expansion of basic local government-level models to metropolitan government levels. The results can also be applied to other metropolitan areas and are used by the Seoul Metropolitan Government in its CCTV operation policy

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제59권3호
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2017

The decision-making process is the act of finding the best solution among various alternatives through comparison between various criteria based on objectives of the project, evaluation standard, and conditions. However, in practice it is not easy to simply decide the optimum decision, especially for selecting malfunctioning reservoirs because no systematic evaluation criteria or standard assessment process are available. Therefore, this study adopted AHP method, which is a MCDM (multi-criteria decision making technique) to identify the malfunctioning reservoirs for efficient management of reservoirs. Important criteria of the selection of malfunctioning reservoirs and priority weights of each criteria were determined based on results of expert's survey under a stepwise hierarchical approach. The most important factor for the decision of malfunctioning reservoirs was obtained as Reservoir efficiency among the selected criteria including Reservoir efficiency decrease, Disaster Risk, Reservoir efficiency, Available water storage, Future water demand, Resident Needs. The AHP technique was applied on 11 reservoirs in Andong region to verify its applicability. Scoring method was applied for the comparison with the results of AHP method.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제20권4호
• /
• pp.35-52
• /
• 2021

Nowadays data-based decision making is emerging as the center of the business environment paradigm, but many companies do not have data-driven decision-making systems. It has also been studied that using an expert's intuition in decision making can be more efficient in terms of speed and cost, compared to analytical decision making. The goal of this study is to analyze customer churn factors using a group of experts within a financial company from the viewpoint of decision-making efficiency. We applied a debit card 'A', product of the National Credit Union Federation of Korea. The churn factors of all the financial expert groups were examined. Also. the difference in each group (management support, card recruitment, customer service group) was analyzed. We expect that this study will be helpful in the practical aspects of managers whose environments is lack data-oriented infrastructure and culture.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 2008

본 연구는 중장기적 고속철도망 계획을 위한 투자우선순위를 전통적인 평가기법에서 벗어나 지속가능 한 교통의 관점에서 이를 분석할 수 있는 방법론을 제안하고, 다원-개준 의사결정기법 중의 하나인 다원-속성 효용이론(MAUT)을 이용하여 이를 분석하였다. 지속가능 한 교통지표는 경제지표, 사회지표 및 환경지표로 구분하였으며, 지속가능 한 고속철도망 지수 분석 결과 경부와 호남 고속철도 이후에 건설되어야 할 우리나라의 고속철도망 노선축의 투자우선순위는 동서축, 남해축, 서해축 등의 순서로 분석되었다.

• 콘크리트학회논문집
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.323-328
• /
• 2005

교량구조물은 설계당시에 설계기준에서 요구하는 구조적 안전성을 확보할 수 있도록 설계 및 가설된다. 그러나 시간이 지날수록 중차량이나 교통환경변화 등 여러 원인에 의해 손상을 받게되고 문제가 있는 교량은 결국에는 교체 또는 개선이 필요하게 된다. 본 논문에서는 기존 연구자료를 검토하여 교량의 유지관리조치를 수행하기 위한 의사결정과정에 영향을 미치는 인자를 파악하였고, 이를 이용하여 우선순위 산정 알고리즘을 제안하였다.

• 상하수도학회지
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.289-301
• /
• 2020

Since sewer rehabilitation program requires long construction period and enormous capital investment, determination of rehabilitation priorities is important with systematic planning considering appropriate evaluation parameters. In this research, we applied PROMETHEE(Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Evaluations) known as very objective and scientific multi-criteria decision-making analysis, using the weights determined by AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) for the selected sewer evaluation items to calculate the rehabilitation priorities for each sewer sub-catchment in basin Gusan 1 of Seoul. Preference functions and preference thresholds were estimated for each criterion of ratio of lack of hydraulic capacity of sewers, defect ratio, ratio of sewers with velocity less than its minimum criteria, and density of sewers in the sub-catchment. As a result, it was found that region d had the first priority among four sub-catchments. For each and every sewer located in region d, we could also rank sewers to be rehabilitated urgently.

• 기술경영경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 기술경영경제학회 1999년도 제15회 하계 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.245-265
• /
• 1999

MAUT and AHP are widely used for quantification of subjective judgements in various fields of decision making. This study focuses on the introduction and application of MAUT/AHP method which is a hybrid of MAUT and AHP techniques in R&D project priority setting. This hybrid model can clarify each factors' contribution using MAUT method and can reduce the number of pairwise comparisons of AHP method. This study applies AMUT/AHP method to the evaluation of R&D projects in a Government - funded research institute. To evaluate R&D projects, six evaluation factors are derived. SMART(Simple MultiAttribute Rating Technique) and DVM(Difference Value Measurement ) out of many MAUT methods are used to design the utility function ad AHP is used to allocate the weights among evaluation factors. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the SMART/AHP and the DVM/AHP have the same results with the SMART and the DVM, and they are different results with AHP. It is very hard to decide which one is better. Second, MAUT/AHP's strength is analyzed. MAUT reflects utility values of evaluators to alternatives and AHP results objective and consistent weights of factors through pariwise comparisons. Third, its possible application fields are proposed. It is applicable to subjective decision making problems with high complexity and inter-independent factors.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2002년도 추계학술발표대회
• /
• pp.295-300
• /
• 2002

Since the contents of large-scale repair of a condominium were various, a plan document was not prepared. The owners association of the condominium has given priority to decision-making of price priority over quality. Examination is not performed about the contents of the construction supervision business, which checks whether suitable construction is performed, either. On the other hand, the know-how for builders, such as decision of the process plan under which the repair work lessens influence to the safety and life as much as possible since the place where the resident is living turns into a construction site, and selection of a method of construction, is just going to ask. It is an important subject how the structure of the construction contractor selection, which considered quality, is built. Then, this research focuses on large-scale repair construction of the condominium, and arranges the actual condition of a series of processes from plan document creation to construction supervision. The method of research collects the construction documents of the condominium that carried out Barge-scale repair construction. Next, collection arrangement of the data of construction builder selection is carried out. The method of the construction builder selection of those other than a construction price is examined. The method of quality control of large-scale repair construction is examined.

• 한국지진공학회논문집
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.329-339
• /
• 2019

The strategy for the management of earthquakes is shifting from post recovery to prevention; therefore, seismic performance management requires quantitative predictions of damage and the establishment of strategies for initial responses to earthquakes. Currently, seismic performance evaluation for seismic management in Korea consists of two stages: preliminary evaluation and detailed evaluation. Also, the priority of seismic performance management is determined in accordance with the preliminary evaluation. As a deterministic method, preliminary evaluation quantifies the physical condition and socio-economic importance of a facility by various predetermined indices, and the priority is decided by the relative value of the indices; however, with the deterministic method it is difficult to consider any uncertainty related to the return-year, epicenter, and propagation of seismic energy. Also this method cannot support tasks such as quantitative socio-economic damage and the provision of data for initial responses to earthquakes. Moreover, indirect damage is often greater than direct damage; therefore, a method to quantify damage is needed to enhance accuracy. In this paper, a Seismic Risk Assessment is used to quantify the cost of damage of road facilities in Pohang city and to support decision making.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제18권8호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2013

클라우드 컴퓨팅을 구성하는 자원은 이질적인 자원으로 구성되므로 다양한 요구사항의 작업을 이질적인 자원에 할당하는 것은 중요한 문제이다. 이는 다수의 판단 기준하에 다수의 선택 문제로 정의할 수 있는데 본 연구에서는 AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) 기법을 통해 이 문제를 해결하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 작업의 특성을 고려한 우선순위기반 스케줄링 기법을 제안하는데 1단계에서는 작업의 중요도에 의해 우선순위를 부여하고 2단계에서는 응답시간, 시스템 이용율, 그리고 비용을 판단기준으로 하여 AHP알고리즘에 의해 최적의 자원에 작업을 할당한다. 제안하는 알고리즘의 분석과 실험을 통해 제안 기법의 효율성을 제시하고자 한다.