• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.538-557
• /
• 2006

최근 들어 연구개발 성과물의 평가에 대한 관심이 급격히 증가하고 있다. 이와 관련하여 연구개발성과물의 질을 측정하기 위한 많은 시도가 이루어져 왔으며, 이를 위한 정량적 지수에 대한 중요성 역시 증가하고 있는 상황이다. 연구개발 성과물의 평가를 위해 가장 널리 사용되는 지수로는 논문수, 피인용수, 영항지수 둥이 있다. 그러나 이들은 학문 분야에 대한 편차가 심한 것으로 알려져 있으므로 이들을 사용하는 데에는 많은 한계가 있다. 본 연구에서는 이와 같은 기존의 지표들이 가지는 한계를 실증분석을 통해 제시하고자 하였으며, 아울러 연구개발 성과물로서 논문의 질 평가에 활용될 수 있는 정량 지표를 제시하고자 하였다.

• 한국건축시공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건축시공학회 2011년도 추계 학술논문 발표대회
• /
• pp.191-193
• /
• 2011

The government has performed various countermeasures and policies for the efficiency of Construction Industry. However the analysis of the policy performance is not satisfied. In the study we benchmarked the construction performance evaluation system and indicators which was performed by advanced countries like the United States and the United Kingdom. So we suggested indicators for measuring performance of public construction cost saving strategy performed in 2008 by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs. This paper will provide the basis for establishing future construction policies or plans.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제31권1호
• /
• pp.119-141
• /
• 2014

기업과 같은 영리조직뿐만 아니라 비영리조직인 국가기관들도 조직의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 경영혁신의 일환으로 성과평가를 실시하고 있으며 도출된 성과평가 결과를 조직의 예산과 인사에 반영하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 향후 국립중앙도서관 정보화사업의 효율적 수행과 성과 제고를 위하여 성과지표 모형을 도출하고 도출된 성과지표를 기반으로 정보화사업을 평가하였다. 연구결과 도서관 정보시스템 운영, 디지털 정보자원 확충, 장애인 대체자료 공동활용 체계구축 사업별 2개의 관점에 따라 총 12개의 지표를 선정하였으며, 성과평가 및 중요도-만족도 분석(IPA: Importance-Performance Analysis) 결과를 기초로 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.52-69
• /
• 2006

Researchers indicates several issues as to performance evaluation methods for public health centers. Firstly, health centers are passively involved in the evaluation process, the performance indicators are activity-oriented, and mostly unrealistic. Balanced Scorecard is one of the methods for evaluating organizational performance, which is utilized at current in many industries including public sector. The purposes of this study is to apply balanced scorecard approach to a public health center and to develop performance indicators as well as their vision and strategies. For developing performance indicators, researchers selected K City Public Health Center and implemented brainstorming with members of health promotion team. Through team process they suggested goals, strategies and several indicators they considered proper to accomplish their shared vision. And then appropriateness of the indicators were evaluated by professional researchers in health promotion field for consensus building by email questionnaire. Based on survey and professional consensus meeting, 11 performance indicators were tailored in four perspectives as well as 6 strategies and 10 strategic goals, which are steps for accomplishing shared vision of health promotion team. For details, refer to the paper. Most members of health promotion team were satisfied with the indicators. However issues such as low level of recognition and familiarity with a new concept of BSC, and cultural resistance to strategic approach in public organizations should be addressed for future application and dissemination of BSC technique to public health organizations.

• International Journal of Quality Innovation
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.99-117
• /
• 2008

High-tech industry has been the principal economic source for Taiwan in recent years. The characteristics of high-tech industries in Taiwan are changeable product markets, short product life cycles and high company attrition rate. In the globalization trend, the high-tech industry has gradually increased corporate competitiveness and reached the goal of sustainable operations through knowledge management, knowledge sharing and new product research and development. Firms have aggressively strengthened and integrated their internal and external resources and enhanced knowledge sharing to increase industry operational performance. Effectively strengthening the knowledge management operation and performance evaluation of knowledge sharing in Taiwan's high-tech industry has become a critical issue. In the selection of knowledge sharing Key Performance Indicators (KPI), this research divided the knowledge sharing indicators into representative strategic indicators such as organizational knowledge learning, organizational knowledge resources, organizational information capacity and organizational knowledge performance through screening using Factor Analysis. The characteristics of the constructs were interdependent. This research calculated and adjusted the correlation among the key performance knowledge sharing indicators using ANP and determined the relative weight of knowledge sharing.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제38권4호
• /
• pp.441-462
• /
• 2007

세계 각국은 국가경쟁력 향상을 위해 R&D 투자 확대 및 효율성 제고에 노력하고 있다. 따라서 국내 과학기술분야 학술정보 유통사업도 질적 제고 및 발전적 미래전략 도출을 위한 연구가 필요하다. 본 연구는 국내의 대표적 과학기술 분야 학술정보 유통기관인 A기관을 대상으로 BSC 기반 성과지표를 적용하여 사업성과를 평가하고 평가결과를 이용하여 중요도 및 성과에 대한 포트폴리오 분석을 실시하였다. BSC기반 성과지표의 평가항목은 정보자원관점, 정보서비스관점, 이용자관점, 경제적관점의 4개 관점에서 정보자원 품질, 정보서비스 품질, 이용자 만족도 및 학술정보의 경제적 유용가치 등 12개 항목으로 구성하였다. 포트폴리오 분석에서는 성과지표별 포트폴리오 분석과 더불어 개별 성과지표의 구성요소별 분석을 실시하였으며, 성과평가 및 포트폴리오 분석결과에 기반하여 A기관의 학술정보 유통사업에 대한 관점별 개선방안을 제시하였다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 4th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management Organized by the University of New South Wales
• /
• pp.426-431
• /
• 2011

The quality of performance evaluation on engineering consultants that provide design-related technical services is difficult to be measured, and only a handful of papers discussed the quality during the design stage. Although design cost is relatively far less than construction cost for a project, the decisions made in the design phase have a significant impact on the final products of the project, especially for large public construction projects. Therefore, this research focuses on reviewing and then establishing a performance evaluation framework for the consulting firms that execute detailed design and provide technical services for the Taipei Rapid Transit Systems (TRTS). By interviewing experts, this study first established a set of indicators to evaluate these firms' performance. Then, those indicators were incorporated into the four aspects of balanced scorecard (BSC) to establish the architecture of the evaluation mechanism. The weight of each indicator was calculated by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) from a survey conducted among experts. The results showed that the top-three indicators were quantity take-off, functions conformity, and budgeting. The framework of performance evaluation established by this study can be applied to measure service performance during the design stage. It not only facilitates the monitoring of consulting firms, but also helps to reduce unnecessary change orders and disputes during the construction stage.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.177-209
• /
• 2007

This work firstly aims to analyse the balance between tangibles and intangibles as well as among human capital, structural capital and relational capital of evaluation indicators for the research institutes in science and technology sector conducted in 2006, by adopting intellectual capital model. The research question of this work comes from that while the R&D activity can produce both tangibles and intangibles, there have no been methodologies to relevantly measure and rationally judge these, in particular, intangible performance. The result shows that the institute evaluation system in 2006 had given more weight on tangibles and structural capital than intangibles and other intellectual capitals such as human capital and relational capital, in comparison to the past evaluation system, even though, in principle, the current evaluation system has to deal with the intangible research performances as well as tangible ones in economic, social and cultural perspective. Finally, based on these analysis, I will try to suggest some policy directions for overcoming the deficits of indicators in institute evaluation system.

• 한국주거학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국주거학회 2008년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.225-230
• /
• 2008

High-rise and high-density apartment complexes has been built and supplied on a large scale in the metropolis and metropolitan areas since 1980s in order to solve housing shortage in cities. Recently they are raising deterioration problems for aging more than 20 years. moreover, those problems show very special characters such as simultaneity and a large scale. The purpose of this study is to propose a direction for the development of the evaluating indicators to measure the level of deterioration of apartments. The level of deterioration of apartments can be evaluated by housing performance. In order to evaluate the deterioration comprehensively, the housing performance indicators should be developed on the social, economical, and physical dimension. This study analyzed the concept of the apartment deterioration and compared housing performance indicators through literature review. First of all, when considering various factors in the evaluation of the deteriorated apartments, such as evaluating ranges, attributes and dimensions, housing performance indicators should be structured with the hierarchical framework. Second, housing performance indicators evaluating the level of deterioration of apartments should include social, psychological, and cultural aspects of home environments in order to understand adequately the attitude of the middle class toward services that apartments provide. Third, in previous researches, most criteria have been developed and weighted based on only expert opinions regarding performance indicators. So, It is necessary to include residents' opinions in developing performance indicators since they can provide more practical and feasible aspects the experts could not experience or understand.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.376-399
• /
• 2008

최근 연구개발 투자규모가 급속히 증가함에 따라 정부는 R&D사업의 투자효율성을 높이기 위한 다양한 정책을 구사하고 있다. 구체적으로 R&D사업에 대한 성과평가를 강화하고 평가결과를 예산의 조정 및 배분에 반영하는 등 성과중심의 평가체계를 정착시키기 위해 노력하고 있다. 이처럼 국가연구개발사업에 대한 평가가 성과중심으로 체계화되기 위해서는 R&D 성과물을 과학적 객관적으로 분석할 수 있는 성과지표의 개발이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 전 부처 연구개발사업에 공통으로 적용할 수 있는 성과지표인 SCI논문지표를 바탕으로 교육과학기술부 3대 연구개발사업에 대한 구체적인 사례분석을 실시하여 이들 사업이 우리나라 전체 R&D에서 차지하는 질적 양적 위상을 파악하고자 하였다. 이러한 분석을 위해 SCI 관련 기존지표와 더불어 4개의 신규지표를 소개하였고 신규지표들의 타당성 조사를 위해 모의실험을 실시하였다. 그 결과 보완된 순위보정영향력지수(ordinal rank normalized impact factor, omIF)가 분야간 비교 시 가장 적절한 성과지표인 것으로 분석되었다.