• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2019

Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of implementing a systematic Drug Utilization Review (DUR) system on contraindicated drug use and pharmaceutical expenditures in Korea. Methods: A literature search was conducted using search engines such as PubMed, EMBASE, NDSL, and RISS for relevant systematic studies. The database search was performed and updated in April 2018. Two independent reviewers evaluated the abstracts to find potentially eligible articles. Results: In total, 1433 potentially eligible studies were selected, and 11 articles were eventually shortlisted for inclusion in the present review system. The outcome showed that contraindicated drug use decreased after implementation of the DUR system in Korea. The analysis also showed that the DUR system contributed to a reduction in pharmaceutical expenditures. Conclusions: Our study showed that implementing the DUR system reduced both contraindicated drug use and pharmaceutical expenditures in Korea.

• 약학회지
• /
• 제55권3호
• /
• pp.173-184
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to review foreign retrospective Drug Utilization Review(DUR), and so to suggest a development plan suitable for use with domestic situation. Literature review of foreign retrospective DUR program and domestic project such as DUR and prescribing analysis project were reviewed. To improve prescribing quality, developed countries such as US, Canada, UK, France, and Australia have implemented various forms of policy. Based on the review of foreign retrospective DUR program, we suggested to apply practical implementation of retrospective DUR program.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.20-29
• /
• 2013

Medical errors such as adverse drug event, improper transfusion, wrong-site surgery, mistaken patient identity and so on commonly occur at health care practice. Information technology, like Drug Utilization Review(DUR) system which reviews, analyzes, and interprets medication data when prescribing, can play a key role in reducing such medical errors and improving patient safety. Korean Government has guided all hospitals to implement concurrent DUR(cDUR) system, which is the first case worldwide in that all healthcare providers have to use cDUR system when prescribing. This paper introduced a case study that a tertiary hospital has integrated the cDUR system into its comprehensive Hospital Information System(HIS) and analyzed the whole prescription data during a week right after adoption of cDUR system. Considering technical strength and weakness, the cDUR system was integrated into the HIS, using Broker Servers for minimizing doctors' anxiety. As the quantitative analysis of the whole prescription data, DUR conflict events, which mainly included duplicate medications and contra-indicated drug interactions for outpatients, were 2.77%. Although only 0.7% is for the contra-indicated drug interactions, it will be greatly devoted to achieve the purpose of DUR such as improving patient safety.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.104-114
• /
• 2021

Objective: To explore the perception of drug utilization review (DUR) system and DUR modernization pilot project among healthcare professionals and patients. Methods: We conducted 8 times of focus group interviews (FGI) between August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The healthcare professionals and patients who participated in the DUR modernization pilot project were included in the present study. Based on the type of project participation or medical institution, the participants were divided into the following four groups: group 1, hospital; group 2, clinic; group 3, pharmacy; and group 4, patient. Within each group, interviews were conducted under a pre-defined agenda to identify the implicit perceptions of the participants; the contents of the interviews were, then, categorized. Results: Healthcare professionals established a consensus on the positive aspects of the DUR system and DUR modernization pilot project. However, substantial concerns remain, such as additional workload associated with monitoring adverse events or acquiring consents from patients. Furthermore, a difference of opinion over the DUR convenience system was observed. Among 3 DUR convenience system, the personal medication history review service was highly utilized, but pop-up hold function and communication system was rarely used. Conclusion: We observed that systematic intervention using the DUR system is effective for both healthcare providers and consumers. Adverse events caused by inappropriate drug use can be prevented by continuous patient monitoring. Therefore, the role of DUR system needs to be expanded to establish a safe drug management system.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.178-184
• /
• 2024

연구배경: 본 연구는 의료질평가지원금 drug utilization review (DUR) 평가지표 도입 전·후의 DUR 점검률 및 의약품 중복처방 예방률 변화 차이를 비교하여 DUR 평가지표의 도입과 안전한 의약품 사용 간의 효과성을 파악하고자 한다. 방법: 본 연구는 2018년 건강보험심사평가원(Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service) DUR 자료(DUR 평가지표 도입 전)와 2023년 의료질평가지원금 평가 결과 산출 자료(DUR 평가지표 도입 후)를 활용하였다. 종속변수는 DUR 평가지표로, DUR 점검률과 의약품 중복처방 예방률 지표를 활용하였다. 독립변수는 DUR 평가지표 도입 여부이며, 통제변수는 의료기관 단위변수로, 종별 구분, 설립 구분, 소재지, DUR 청구 software 업체, 병상 수를 선정하였다. 결과: DUR 평가지표 도입 전·후의 의약품 중복처방 예방률 변화 차이를 분석한 결과, DUR 평가지표 도입 전·후의 의약품 중복처방 예방률은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었으며, DUR 평가지표 도입 후 의약품 중복처방 예방률이 유의미하게 증가하였다. 결론: 본 연구의 정책적 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, DUR 시스템의 지속적인 평가 진행이 필요하다. 본 연구를 통해 DUR 평가지표 도입 후 의약품 중복처방 예방률이 유의하게 증가한 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 DUR 시스템의 효과를 계속해서 검토하고 의약품 사용의 안전성을 확대하기 위해 DUR 시스템의 지속적인 평가 진행이 필요할 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, DUR 시스템 정보를 활용하는 의료기관과 이를 관리하는 기관과의 협력 파트너십 구축이 필요하다. 의료기관의 적극적인 DUR 점검 참여와 관리기관의 다각적인 지원을 바탕으로 공동의 노력과 협력이 이루어진다면, DUR 시스템의 활성화를 통해 안전한 의약품 사용을 보장하고 국민건강을 보호하며, 의료의 질적 수준 향상을 불러올 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.234-241
• /
• 2019

의약품을 사용할 때 나타나는 부작용은 국민의 건강을 크게 위협할 수 있다. 현재 의약품 부작용에 대한 보고가 매우 미흡한 것이 현실이다. 이에 현재 약국에서 사용하고 있는 의약품 사용평가(DUR:Drug Utilization Review)에 의약품 부작용 보고를 연계하게 된다면 활성화될 수 있다. 의약품 사용평가가 활성화되어 있는 미국 의약품 관리 체계 연구를 통해 의약품 부작용 보고 활성화 방안을 찾을 수 있다. 약국에서 의약품 관리 프로그램으로 사용되는 'Pharm IT 3000'에서 의약품 부작용 보고의 활성화 방안을 연구해 보았다. 문헌연구와 실제 프로그램 운영 방식 연구를 통해 Pharm IT 3000 처방 조제 현황 항목에 의약품 사용평가를 연동시켜 부작용 보고가 편리하게 되는 방안을 찾게 되었다.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.249-255
• /
• 2011

Objective: To examine the drug use (prescribing) pattern of serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs, contraindicated drug interactions) using real world data. Prescription patterns were examined in terms of dispensing types. Method: Retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) study was performed. One hundred and six datasets of serious DDIs (DDI pairs) were determined among DDI datasets that Ministry of Health & Welfare announced for the DUR system from 2004 to 2005. Electronically transacted ambulatory patients' prescription database to Health Insurance Assessment and Review Services (HIRA) from July, 2005 to June, 2006 was collected with personal information deidentified and analyzed in terms of types of dispensing as a contributing factor. Results: After prescription data analysis per each patient, total number of DDI cases using 95 DDI pairs was 5,511, which accounted for 2.6 cases per patients. DDI cases between two drugs from each of community pharmacy dispensing- type prescription were considerable (63% vs. 24% in those from each of in-institutional dispensing-type prescription and vs. 13% in those from a community pharmacy dispensing-type prescription and an in-institutional dispensingtype prescription). Conclusions: DDI cases from different prescribers were found to be significant. Thus, the concurrent DUR process between prescriptions from different physicians and institutions should be implemented for the safe drug use.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2012

This study was to determine the inappropriate drug use in pediatric outpatients who received 2 or more prescriptions on the same day. Retrospective drug utilization reviews (DURs) were implemented to samples obtained from national health insurance claims data during December 2008 to February 2009, using 5 DUR criteria (duplication, drug-drug interaction, drug-disease interaction, drug-age contraindication, incorrect dosage) established in the Drug Information Framework (DIF)-$Korea^{TM}$, DUR program. Among 38,451 claims analyzed in the study, 74.7% had more than one conflicts in the 5 DUR modules. Among 16,472 patients analyzed, 49.6% had conflicts with duplication criteria composing of ingredient duplication (23.3%) and therapeutic class duplication (39.6%). Incorrect dosages were found in 73.6% of patients and under-dosage conflicts accounted for 59.9%, which was higher than over-dosage conflicts (38.3%). In this study, inappropriate drug prescriptions such as under-dose, pediatric contraindication and therapeutic duplication were prevalent in pediatric outpatient settings, suggesting much more awareness to the society, to prevent drug related problems in a vulnerable pediatric group.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.291-303
• /
• 2012

As respiratory tract infections (RTI) account for about 60% of all antibiotic prescriptions in outpatient care setting, there are significant concerns about emerging resistance that are largely due to the excessive or inappropriate use of antibacterial agents for viral respiratory infections. This study was aimed to develop retrospective drug utilization review (DUR) program of antibiotics for RTIs using Delphi methods. Retrospective DUR criteria of antibiotics for RTIs were identified based on clinical practice guidelines and opinion of experts. Expert panel members were clinical doctors and pharmacists and Delphi method was applied by survey on 16 members of panels. The claim data from Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment (HIRA) were used to examine trends in outpatient antibiotic prescription between Janunary to December of 2008. As results, Quality index for RTI was assessed for the claim type, antibiotics use of quantity, duration, number and cost. Antibiotic prescription rate for RTIs, Defined Daily Dose (DDD), and duration of antibiotics use were more recognized as significant quality index by experts' opinion. Use of first line agents suggested by guidelines was low and duration of antibiotics use was shorter compared to the recommendations. Antibiotics were over prescribed for RITs. However, dose and duration of antibiotics were under-used.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.213-220
• /
• 2010

Therapeutic duplication (TD) is a serious problem that frequently occurring primarily in the ambulatory setting in Korea. Implementation of concurrent drug utilization review (DUR) is a promising way to reduce inappropriate prescription and dispensing, and improve patient safety. This study was aimed to develop the process of DUR module of TD. Sixty-five drug ingredients classified into the drug category of the antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory drug approved in Korea (The KFDA-dess nated classification codes of 114 or 264) were reviewed for this purpose. The drug ingredients (and products) were reclassified based on WHO's Anatomical, Therapeutic and Chemical (ATC) classification system. The clinical practice guidelines, textbooks and product labels on therapeutic uses of these drugs in Korea and several fores n countries were reviewed. If the drugs were categorized into the same therapeutically duplicable class, they were defined not to be used concurrently because the concurrent use was "therapeutically duplicated (unnecessary or even harmful)". Among the studied drug products, the following 5 drug classes were considto beas "therapeutic duplication": (1), on-t tooid DURnti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including s Dicylates), (2),Anilidts, (3),Opioids, (4) Ergot Dk Doids and (5) 5-$HT_1$ receptor agonot s. Therefore, concurrent prescribing or dispensing of more than 2 drug ingredients any in the above same classes should be considered as TD and needed to be warrant for careful review by pharmacists before dispensing.