• 패션비즈니스
• /
• 제18권6호
• /
• pp.67-85
• /
• 2014

This study compares and analyzes the fashion industry of Korea with that of China and Japan, the two countries geographically and culturally adjacent to Korea, by applying the generalized double diamond model to find useful measures to strengthen the global competitiveness of the Korean fashion industry. The fashion industries of Korea, China and Japan were first compared in terms of the four determinants of the double diamond model: thereafter, the double diamond model of Korea, China and Japan were compared. In this, study 31 sub-variables were extracted to measure the eight determinants and secondary data were collected from selected sources between January 2013 and May 2014. The results of comparing the domestic diamond models showed that: China is considerably better than Korea and Japan in terms of demand conditions, firm strategy, organization, and competition conditions while Japan is superior in terms of demand conditions and Korea shows better related and supporting industries conditions. When comparing and analyzing the international diamond models, Japan is superior in terms of factor conditions and China has better demand conditions, while Korea has failed to lead in any of the four determinants. When comparing and analyzing the comprehensive diamond model per country, China show superior demand conditions and firm strategy, organization, and competition conditions, Japan has better factor conditions, and Korea shows superior related and supporting industries conditions.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제30권9_10호
• /
• pp.1354-1365
• /
• 2006

China has a big potential as an apparel market due to its rapid economic growth. In the fashion industry, great attention has been paid to China. However, analysis of competitiveness has received relatively little attention from fashion scholarship. This study attempts to apply the double diamond model to analyze the international competitiveness of the apparel industry of China as well as of Korea. The purpose of this study is 1) to establish diamond model components in the fashion industry for Korea and China respectively, and 2) to compare the established diamond models(i.e., double diamond model, multinational diamond model) between Korea and China. Finally we suggested a marketing strategy based on the results of the double diamond model application. To build a diamond model for each country intensive literature review were conducted and additionally quantitative data were collected from 31 merchandisers and managers. We found that the domestic diamond of China was larger than Korea's, but firm strategy, structure and rivalry condition of Korea were more competitive than China's. Secondly, regarding the international diamond, China was more competitive, and especially had more the larger factor condition than Korea confirming that Korea was less competitive than China. This article provides a theoretical background and empirical findings for the competitiveness model of the fashion industry.

• 한국의류학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.507-518
• /
• 2007

This study aimed to investigate the competitive advantages of Chinese fashion industry and firms to Korean fashion industry by applying the generalized double-diamond theory. Data collection was done by internet and fax survey. Questionnaires were distributed to the Korean textiles and apparel firms who entered China for production anuor distribution. List of firms were provided by KOFOTI, KOTRA, and Korea Apparel Industry Association. Total 198 questionnaires were distributed, and 77 questionnaires were used for final analysis. The results were follows. Korea's competitiveness scores of double-diamond model were higher in every aspects, such as demand condition, infra/supportive industry, firms's strategy and competition except factor condition. Glottalization score in double diamond model measured by the degree of glottalization which was determined by international diamond factors which make firm's multinational/international activities possible. Chinese fashion industry's globalization score of factor condition was significantly higher than Korea, but for the rest of aspects, Korean fashion industry showed higher scores. Therefore, Korean fashion firms can overcome comparative disadvantage of factor condition by utilizing Chinese fashion industry no matter what type of entry. In addition, considering the growth rate of Chinese fashion industry and its power of influence in the world market, the entry to the global market of the Korean fashion industry can be possible.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.57-81
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this paper is to seek ways to improve the competitiveness of Korea's fashion industry by utilizing the source of competitiveness of Japan's fashion industry, which represents the world's leading countries in terms of fashion, so that Korea can better enter the global fashion market. The study shall first compare the competitiveness of the Japanese and Korean fashion industries by utilizing the generalized double diamond model; second, provide an understanding of what the Japanese fashion industry can offer to Korean fashion industry and companies - that is, understand what the Japanese fashion industry's competitive edge is; and third, study the kind of global competitiveness that Korea's fashion industry must achieve. To adopt a generalized double diamond model to compare the competitiveness of the Korean and Japanese fashion industries, we selected 31 sub-variables to act as determinants of the model. That is, we extracted 31sub-variables by doing research of literature to analyze national competitiveness of the fashion industries. To measure these 31 sub-variables, secondary data was gathered. We collected data related to each sub-variable from various sources of Korea and Japan. And to calculate the competitiveness index, we took three steps with reference to previous studies. We found that status of the fashion industry of the two countries as it stands. That is, Japan is an advanced country of which fashion industry is domestic market-oriented while Korea is a small open economy that mainly focuses on the foreign market. Out of 31 proxy variables, Korea's fashion industry shows higher measurements relating to production and export than Japan, but Japan's fashion industry reports higher measurements than Korea in the fields of R&D, design and brand power, the rate of value added, the efficiency of companies and globalization. In order for Korea's fashion industry to achieve competitiveness in the global market, it should pursue the following development direction. First, it is very difficult for Korea to follow the footsteps of the U.S. and Japanese fashion industries that are able to take advantage of economies of scale, because Korea is smaller than those countries. Therefore, in the case of small economies such as Singapore, strengthening of international activities will practically improve domestic determinants that Korea should improve its domestic diamond by enhancing the current competitiveness of its international diamond. In other words, Korea needs to further endeavor to develop and expand global resources and markets as well as improve its competitiveness in terms of R&D, design and brand power, the rate of value-added, and the efficiency of companies. As the Korean fashion industry shows relatively advanced level of information technology and the fashion education system, it has considerable potential to grow. Korea is expected to have a huge growth potential since it has relatively higher level of information technology, fashion education system and activities than those of Japan in both the domestic diamond and international diamond. In particular, a better environment is laid out before Korea to gain competitiveness in the fashion industry due to the recently growing influence of the Korean Wave that Korea is expected to grow as a leader in the Asian market as well as in the global market.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.195-216
• /
• 2022

본 연구는 대학도서관에서 제공하는 서비스 가치를 극대화하기 위하여 서비스디자인 방법론을 대학도서관에 적용하였다. 이를 위하여 서비스디자인 모형인 '더블다이아몬드모델'(Double Diamond Model)을 대학도서관에 적용, 서비스디자인 도구인 퍼소나(Persona), 고객여정지도(Customer Journey Map), 터치포인트(Touch Points)를 활용하였다. 서비스디자인을 대학도서관에 반영하기 위하여 주제와 관련된 문헌 및 선행연구를 고찰하였으며, 설문조사 및 이용자와 사서면담, 현장조사를 통해 상황별 이슈를 발견하고 퍼소나와 상황시나리오를 도출하였다. 나아가 설정된 퍼소나의 상황별 행동과 이용자의 감정변화에 대한 정보를 종합하여 이를 고객여정지도로 시각화하고 3개 분야 11개 항목의 서비스 개선안을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 특정 서비스를 개선하기보다 서비스 개선방안을 도출하기까지의 과정에 주안점을 두었다. 또한, 대학도서관 서비스개선 및 새로운 서비스 방안을 제시하는 것이 본 연구의 목적이었다. 이를 통해 실질적인 서비스 개선 방안을 대학도서관에 적용하였다는 것에 본 연구의 의의가 있다.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.207-221
• /
• 2022

기존의 '환경설계를 통한 범죄예방(Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design; CPTED)' 이론은 실천 과정에서 미흡함이 있었고, 이 때문에 통상적인 범죄예방 디자인 프로세스에는 한계점이 존재했었다. 본 연구의 목적은 디자인학의 관점에서 제3세대 CPTED 이론적 프레임워크와 더블 다이아몬드(Double Diamond Model) 디자인 프로세스 이 두 가지의 접목을 분석하는 것이다. 본 연구는 이를 통해, 더블 다이아몬드 디자인 프로세스가 접목된 가시적인 제3세대 CPTED 디자인 프로세스를 제시하고자 했다. 또한, 각 학자별로 제3세대 이론적 프레임워크에 대해 연구한 관련 논문을 각자의 주장, 목표, 전략 방법, 거주적합성 원칙(Liveability)에 따라 명확히 정리했다. 이를 바탕으로, 영국 디자인 위원회의 혁신을 위한 프레임워크를 결합하여, 제3세대 이론적 프레임워크와 더블 다이아몬드 디자인 프로세스의 접목에 명확한 기준과 기초를 마련했다. 또한, 단계적인 아웃풋과 활동 방식으로 양자 간의 접목에 대한 구체적 내용을 분석하고 설명했다. 연구의 의의는 더블 다이아몬드 디자인 프로세스와 가시적인 제3세대 CPTED 디자인 프로세스의 접목을 통해 거주민들의 자아 가치 실현 행동을 유도하고 이로 인한 참여(Engagement)를 돕는 것이다. 또한, CPTED 프로젝트에 참여한 디자인 관련 종사자 및 기타 분야 종사자의 협업에 참고가 될 수 있는 연구 결과를 도출하는 것이다.

• Nuclear Engineering and Technology
• /
• 제54권4호
• /
• pp.1406-1413
• /
• 2022

In this study, a diamond-based neutron scatter camera (DNSC) was developed for neutron spectroscopy in high flux environments. The DNSC was evaluated experimentally and through simulations. It was simulated using several Monte Carlo codes in a two-array layout. The two-array model included two diamond detectors. The simulation reconstructed the spectra of ²⁵²Cf and ²³⁹Pu-Be neutron sources with high accuracy (~93%). The two-diamond array system was experimentally evaluated, demonstrating the neutron spectroscopy capabilities of the DNSC. The reconstructed spectrum of the ²³⁹Pu-Be source manifested the characteristic peaks of the source. The advantage of a DNSC over a NSC is its ability to define any neutron double-scattering events without the need to absorb incident neutrons in the second detector, and atomic recoil energy information is not needed to determine the incident neutron energy.

• The Korean Journal of Ceramics
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.5-12
• /
• 1997

Charged carbon clusters which are formed by the gas activation are suggested to be responsible for the formation of the metastable diamond film. The number of carbon atoms in the cluster that can reverse the stability between diamond and graphite by the capillary effect increases sensitively with increasing the surface energy ratio of graphite to diamond. The gas activation process produces charges such as electrons and ions, which are energetically the strong heterogeneous nucleation sites for the supersaturated carbon vapor, leading to the formation of the charged clusters. Once the carbon clusters are charged, the surface energy of diamond can be reduced by the electrical double layer while that of graphite cannot because diamond is dielectric and graphite is conducting. The unusual phenomena observed in the chemical vapor deposition diamond process can be successfully approached by the charged cluster model. These phenomena include the diamond deposition with the simultaneous graphite etching, which is known as the thermodynamic paradox and the preferential formation of diamond on the convex edge, which is against the well-established concept of the heterogeneous nucleation.

• 서비스연구
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.95-105
• /
• 2021

본 연구는 KSC(kano, Score Model, Concept Position)평가방법을 활용하여 제공할 서비스디자인 만족도에 대한 정확도를 높이는 것이 연구의 목적으로 부산지역을 중심으로 6개 지점을 운영하고 있는 P사 헬스장을 중심으로 건강한 뉴실버세대를 위한 다양한 헬스장 서비스모델을 제시하여 사례연구를 진행하였다. 더블다이어몬드(Double Diamond)방법을 활용하여 P사의 5개 지점 중 연산점을 중심으로 사례연구를 진행하였는데 이는 연산점을 중심으로 노인을 위한 다양한 여가생활 인프라가 잘 구축 되어 있었기 때문이다. 본 연구를 통하여 고객에 대한 다양한 인사이트(Insight)를 추출하였고 발굴한 인사이트(Insight)를 기반으로 관리자와 트레이너의 관점에서 서비스디자인 모델을 최종적으로 9가지 도출하였다. 최종적으로 도출한 9가지 모델을 기반으로 카노(Kano)만족도 평가, 스코어모델(Concept Score), 콘셉트포지션(Concept Position)평가를 통하여 9가지 제시한 안들 중 3, 6번을 제외한 모든 안들이 유효하다는 것을 알 수 있었고 최종적으로 투자비용과 효과성으로 구분하여 실행 로드맵을 제안하였다.

• 무역학회지
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.167-185
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study was to measure the competitiveness of ship finance in Korea, Europe, China, and Japan and compare them with each other to derive implications for strengthening the competitiveness of Korea ship finance. in order to achieve this goal Moon Hui-chang (1998) double diamond model was utilized, and the business conditions, factor conditions, demand conditions, and related and supporting industry were defined and measured for ship finance. As a result, Korea is highly competitive in business and demands conditions due to the high competitiveness of the domestic shipbuilding industry, and Europe is superior to Korea in all aspects except for business conditions. Japan failed to innovate and weakened its competitiveness, while China showed high competitiveness in factors and related supporting industries conditions.