• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제39권3호
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 1997

This study was conducted to derive optimal design floods by Gamma distribution models of the annual maximum series at eight watersheds along Geum , Yeong San and Seom Jin river Systems, Design floods obtained by different methods for evaluation of parameters and for plotting positions in the Gamma distribution models were compared by the relative mean errors and graphical fit along with 95% confidence interval plotted on Gamma probability paper. The results were analyzed and summarized as follows. 1.Adequacy for the analysis of flood flow data used in this study was confirmed by the tests of Independence, Homogeneity and detection of Outliers. 2.Basic statistics and parameters were calculated by Gamma distribution models using Methods of Moments and Maximum Likelihood. 3.It was found that design floods derived by the method of maximum likelihood and Hazen plotting position formular of two parameter Gamma distribution are much closer to those of the observed data in comparison with those obtained by other methods for parameters and for plotting positions from the viewpoint of relative mean errors. 4.Reliability of derived design floods by both maximum likelihood and method of moments with two parameter Gamma distribution was acknowledged within 95% confidence interval.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 1998년도 학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.318-324
• /
• 1998

This study was conducted to derive optimal design floods by Generalized Extreme-value(GEV) distribution for the annual maximum series at ten watersheds along Han, Nagdong, Geum, Yeongsan and Seomjin river systems. Adequacy for the analysis of flood data used in this study was established by the tests of Independence, Homogeneity, detection of Outliers. L-coefficient of variation, L-skewness and L-kurtosis were calculated by L-moment ratio respectively. Parameters were estimated by the Methods of Moments and L-Moments. Design floods obtained by Methods of Moments and L-Moments using different methods for plotting positions in GEV distribution were compared by the relative mean and relative absolute error. It was found that design floods derived by the method of L-moments using weibull plotting position formula in GEV distribution are much closer to those of the observed data in comparison with those obtained by method of moments using different formulas for plotting positions in view of relative mean and relative absolute error.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제52권6호
• /
• pp.411-420
• /
• 2019

본 연구의 목적은 합리식 기반의 하수관거 설계모델 Makesw와 도시유출해석모델 SWMM을 활용한 국내 하수관거 설계 방법의 적정성 평가를 수행하는 것이다. 대상유역으로는 군자배수구역을 선정하였으며, 강수량, 유량, 토지피복도, 토양도, 불투수도, 수치지형도의 자료를 수집하여 홍수량 산정에 활용하였다. 적정성 평가는 SWMM 기반 홍수량을 기초로 Makesw 기반 홍수량과 비교하여 수행하였다. 홍수량 비교분석은 설계강우와 실제 침수강우사상 기반의 Makesw와 SWMM의 홍수량에 대하여 수행하였다. 설계강우 기반 홍수량 비교 결과 유역의 간선에서는 합리식 설계홍수량이 SWMM 설계홍수량보다 과대모의 하였으나, 유역 내 지선에서는 합리식 설계홍수량이 과소모의되는 관거가 다수 나타났다. 또한 실제 침수사상 적용 결과, 간선 및 지선에서 합리식 모델의 홍수량이 SWMM의 홍수량보다 과소모의되는 관거가 다수 발견되었다. 특히, 유역 중심에 위치하는 간선, 1차 2차지선에서 유량 차이가 큰 관거가 집중되었다. 따라서 합리식 설계방법은 보수적인 설계방법이라고 말하기 어려우며, 하수관거 설계시 정상류해석 방법인 합리식과 부정류 해석방법인 SWMM을 활용한 설계를 병행하고 안정적인 해석결과를 활용하여 설계를 할 필요가 있다.

• 한국농공학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국농공학회 1998년도 학술발표회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.331-337
• /
• 1998

This study was carried out to derive optimal design floods by Weibull-3 distribution with the annual maximum series at seven watersheds along Man, Nagdong, Geum, Yeongsan and Seomjin river systems. Adequacy for the analysis of flood data used in this study was acknowledged by the tests of Independence, Homogeneity, detection of Outliers. Parameters were estimated by the Methods of Moments and L-Moments. Design floods obtained by Methods of Moments and L-Moments using different methods for plotting positions in Weibull-3 distribution were compared by the rotative mean error and relative absolute error. It has shown that design floods derived by the method of L-moments using Weibull plotting position formula in Weibull-3 distribution are much closer to those of the observed data in comparison with those obtained by method of moments using different formulas for plotting positions in view of relative mean and relative absolute error.

• 한국관개배수논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.34-50
• /
• 1997

This study was conducted to derive optimal design floods by Log Pearson Type III distribution model of the annual maximum series at five watersheds along Geum, Yeong San and Seom Jin river systems. Design floods obtained by different methods for evaluatio

• 한국관개배수논문집
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.32-46
• /
• 1998

This study was conducted to derive optimal design floods by generalized gamma distribution model of the annual maximum series at six watersheds along Han and Nag Dong river systems. Design floods obtained by different methods for estimation of parameters

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제43권2호
• /
• pp.167-185
• /
• 2010

설계홍수량산정과 관련하여 국내 실무에서 어려움을 겪는 가장 큰 문제 중 하나는 설계강우의 결정이다. 설계강우와 관련된 문제는 보다 세부적으로 살펴보면 강우의 시간분포와 강우의 공간분포 결정 문제로 집약될 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 강우의 시간분포와 공간분포에 관련된 문제를 해결할 수 있는 방법으로 티센가중치를 반영한 교호블록형 이동강우(TWBK moving storms)에 의한 설계홍수량 산정기법을 제안하고 그 적용성을 검토하였다. 100년 빈도 48시간 이동강우를 한강유역에 적용하여 그 결과를 기존 연구에서 홍수위 실측자료로부터 빈도해석에 의해 구한 홍수량과 비교하여 적용성을 입증하였다.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제40권4호
• /
• pp.45-57
• /
• 1998

This study was conducted to derive optimal design floods by Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution for the annual maximum series at ten watersheds along Han, Nagdong, Geum, Yeongsan and Seomjin river systems. Adequacy for the analysis of flood data used in this study was established by the tests of Independence, Homogeneity, detection of Outliers. L-coefficient of variation, L-skewness and L-kurtosis were calculated by L-moment ratio respectively. Parameters were estimated by the Methods of Moments and L-Moments. Design floods obtained by Methods of Moments and L-Moments using different methods for plotting positions in GEV distribution were compared by the Relative Mean Errors(RME) and Relative Absolute Errors(RAE). The results were analyzed and summarized as follows. 1. Adequacy for the analysis of flood data was acknowledged by the tests of Independence, Homogeneity and detection of Outliers. 2. GEV distribution used in this study was found to be more suitable one than Pearson type 3 distribution by the goodness of fit test using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and L-Moment ratios diagram in the applied watersheds. 3. Parameters for GEV distribution were estimated using Methods of Moments and L-Moments. 4. Design floods were calculated by Methods of Moments and L-Moments in GEV distribution. 5. It was found that design floods derived by the method of L-Moments using Weibull plotting position formula in GEV distribution are much closer to those of the observed data in comparison with those obtained by method of moments using different formulas for plotting positions from the viewpoint of Relative Mean Errors and Relative Absolute Errors.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제51권9호
• /
• pp.769-782
• /
• 2018

설계홍수량 산정은 일반적으로 수자원설계 목적을 위해 요구되며 수자원 관련 계획, 안정성 그리고 수공구조물의 위험도를 평가하기 위해 추정된다. 그러나 설계목적을 위한 국내의 유량자료는 매우 제한적이며, 강우자료와 비교해 봤을 때 상대적으로 관측년수가 상당히 적은 실정이다. 이러한 점에서 본 연구에서는 기 수립된 하천의 재현기간에 따른 설계홍수량 및 유역특성인자(면적, 유역경사)로부터, 설계홍수량을 멱함수 형태로 지역화하여 미계측 유역에서 설계홍수량 산정이 가능한 모형을 개발하였다. 제안된 설계홍수량 지역화 모형의 매개변수 산정과 불확실성을 정량적으로 평가하기 위해 계층적 Bayesian 모형을 활용하였으며, 최종적으로 교차검증 관점에서 모형의 적합성을 검정하였다. 모형 적용 결과, 기존 면적기반의 홍수량 산정식에 비해 약 0.3 이상 높은 상관성을 가지며 홍수량을 추정하는 결과를 확인하였다. 본 연구를 통해 제안된 모형은 검증과정과 도출된 결과를 통해 유역특성에 따른 재현기간별 설계홍수량을 효과적으로 재현하는데 유리할 뿐만 아니라, 동시에 모형의 매개변수 및 결과에 대한 불확실성 정보를 제공함으로써 미계측 유역의 홍수량을 평가하는 기초자료로써 활용 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제55권6호
• /
• pp.57-68
• /
• 2013

About 74 % of reservoirs in Korea are older than 40 years and their storage capacities have been decreased substantially. As part of reservoir reinforcement, the dam heightening project has been ongoing for about 110 reservoirs. The main purpose of the dam heightening project is to secure additional environmental water, while improving flood control capacity by gaining additional storage volume. The objective of this study was to evaluate reservoir flood control capacity changes of dam heightening reservoirs for effective management of additional storage volume. In this study, 13 reservoirs were selected for reservoir simulation of 200 year return period floods. Rainfall data of 1981-2100 were collected and divided into 4 periods (1981-2010; 1995s, 2011-2040; 2025s, 2041-2070; 2055s, 2071-2100; 2085s). Probability rainfalls and 200yr design floods of each period were calculated using FARD2006 and HEC-HMS. Design floods were used as inputs of each reservoir simulation using HEC-5. Overall, future probability rainfalls and design floods tend to increase above the past 1995s. Control ratios were calculated to evaluate flood control capacities of reservoirs. As a result, average flood control ratios were increased from 32.6 % to 44.2 % after dam heightening. Control ratios were increased by 12.7 % (1995s), 12.4 % (2025s), 10.3 % (2055s) and 10.9 % (2085s). The result of this study can be used as a basis for establishing the reservoir management structure in the future.