• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.32-44
• /
• 2023

This research aims to examine the role of writing self-efficacy in engineering students' writing metacognitive strategies and writing apprehension. To achieve this purpose, first, the relationships among writing self-efficacy, writing metacognitive strategies and writing apprehension were investigated. Second, the effects of writing self-efficacy, as perceived by engineering students, on writing metacognitive strategies as well as writing apprehension were explored. A total of 173 engineering students from one university in Korea responded to survey based on a three-variables scale. The findings were that, firstly, positive correlations between writing self-efficacy and writing metacognitive strategies were identified in terms of sub-factors of those two variables. Secondly, negative correlations between writing apprehension and writing self-efficacy, and between writing apprehension and writing metacognitive strategies, were identified in terms of sub-factors of those variables. Thirdly, writing self-efficacy predicted engineering students' writing metacognitive strategies' sub-factors and writing apprehension. The practical implications of these findings are discussed herein, with particular attention on education for promotion of writing self-efficacy and reduction of writing apprehension.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제27권2호
• /
• pp.13-24
• /
• 2024

This research aims to examine the effects of engineering students' self-regulated learning strategies on writing self-efficacy, perceptions of writing feedback, and learning presence. To achieve this purpose, firstly, differences in self-regulated learning strategies, writing self-efficacy, perceptions of writing feedback, and learning presence were investigated among engineering and non-engineering students. Secondly, the effects of self-regulated learning strategies, as perceived by engineering students, on writing self-efficacy, perceptions of writing feedback, and learning presence were explored. A total of 196 engineering and non-engineering students from one university in Korea responded to a survey based on a four-variable scale. The findings were as follows: firstly, there were significant differences in self-regulated learning strategies, writing self-efficacy, perceptions of writing feedback, and learning presence by major. Secondly, positive correlations between self-regulated learning strategies, writing self-efficacy, perceptions of writing feedback, and learning presence were identified in terms of sub-factors of those variables. Thirdly, engineering students' self-regulated learning strategies predicted writing self-efficacy, perceptions of writing feedback, and learning presence. The practical implications of these findings are discussed herein, with particular attention to education for the promotion of self-regulated learning strategies and their application to writing courses, as well as diverse learning environments.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제22권2호
• /
• pp.291-300
• /
• 2001

This study investigated the effects of shared writing strategies within a whole language approach on children's writing behaviors and abilities. The subjects were thirty-six 5-to 6-year-old kindergarten children, 18 each in the experimental and control groups. The results indicated a significant increase in frequency of spontaneous writing, quantity of writing, and quality of writing in the experimental group compared with the control group. The educational implications for kindergarten teachers are that teachers need to integrate shared writing strategies into teacher-initiated activities and use various strategies of whole language to improve literacy learning for children.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.125-147
• /
• 2014

본 연구의 목적은 학교도서관에서 읽기와 쓰기를 통합 지도 할 수 있는 학습독서 전략을 개발하여 제안하는 것이다. 읽기와 쓰기 전략은 인지과정에 기반을 둔 절차와 관련된 간접전략과, 절차의 성공적 수행을 도와주는 직접전략으로 나눌 수 있다. 따라서 읽기와 쓰기를 통합한 학습독서 전략을 교수설계모형에 해당하는 간접전략과 모형의 각 단계별 구체적인 실행 방안을 담은 직접전략으로 구성하였다. 본 연구에서는 학습독서가 프로그램 형태로 운영될 수 있는 상황을 고려하여 간접전략인 기본 모형을 준비-설계-운영-평가와 같이 4단계로 설정하였다. 그리고 읽기와 쓰기를 통합 지도하는 학습독서 운영 단계는 '주제정하기-목차쓰기-탐구하기-집필하기-수정하기-출판하기'와 같이 6단계로 구성하였다. 또한 각 운영 단계별로 읽기와 쓰기 활동을 구체적으로 도와줄 수 있는 직접전략을 제시하였다.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.56-65
• /
• 2018

This research aims to explore the relationships between academic writing ability and 'thinking styles' (capable of representing individual differences and diversity) in engineering freshmen in Korea, and to draw educational implications for the development of instructional strategies. (Academic) Writing is not just about conveying an idea or content, it is also about the representation of writer's self. In this perspective, there has been some research conducted on writing (process) and personality. However, to date, little attention has been paid to writing ability of engineering students and its relationships with thinking styles. This study was conducted with 127 engineering freshmen as well as 67 non-engineering freshmen at H University, and students' writing ability as well as their thinking styles have been measured before and after writing class for 15 weeks. Our findings show that firstly, there was a significant difference of writing ability by majors. Second, there were significant differences in freshmen's thinking styles by majors. Third, there was significant differences of writing ability according to thinking styles. Freshmen's internal, legislative and hierarchical styles scored significantly higher in writing ability than the others. And as for the engineering freshmen, internal, external and global styles scored significantly higher in writing ability than the others. Finally, there was a weak but significant relationship between writing ability and thinking styles(hierarchical & internal). These findings are expected to provide an explanation for the development of instructional strategies of writing (related) courses in engineering school.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제33권7호
• /
• pp.1418-1430
• /
• 2013

이 연구에서는 학생들의 발성사고와 반구조화된 면담을 통하여 주장하는 글쓰기 과정에서 나타나는 글쓰기 과정 요소 및 글쓰기 전략을 조사하였다. 연구대상은 중학교 2학년 학생 18명이었다. 학생들은 글쓰기 과제에 제시된 정보들을 바탕으로 제시된 주장에 대한 찬성이나 반대 입장을 결정하도록 하였다. 발성사고와 면담의 전사본을 분석하여 글쓰기 과정에서 나타난 글쓰기 과정 요소와 글쓰기 전략을 분류하였고, 학생들이 작성한 글의 수준도 평가하였다. 주장하는 글쓰기의 과정 요소에 대한 분석 결과, 목표 설정, 개요 조직, 내용 평가 등의 요소에서 문제 해결 글쓰기와 다른 특징이 나타났다. 또한 주장하는 글쓰기에서는 '정보 조정'이 새롭게 발견되었다. 글쓰기 전략은 의사결정 유형(반성적/직관적)과 글쓰기 과정에서 개요 조직의 유무에 따라 네 가지(반성적 의사결정 및 개요 조직, 반성적 의사결정 및 개요 비조직, 직관적 의사결정 및 개요 조직, 직관적 의사결정 및 개요 비조직) 유형으로 분류하였다. 반성적 의사결정 및 개요조직 전략을 사용한 학생들은 주장과 논거의 관련성, 반대 입장에 대한 논박, 글의 구조 등의 측면에서 평가한 글쓰기 점수가 가장 높았다.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.171-188
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of ongoing feedback from the professor in students' processes of learning and developing writing skills. Specifically, the researcher was concerned with how ongoing feedback affected students' attitudes towards writing because in EFL contexts, motivating students to write is a first step to engage them in a challenging journey of academic writing. 20 freshmen taking a writing course, "Paragraph & Essay Writing", at A university participated in this study and they were asked to complete the questionnaire at the end of the spring semester 2009. The results revealed that receiving ongoing feedback from the professor had a positive influence on affective domain, was helpful to develop learning strategies, and was valuable in learning outcomes. However, they also expressed negative opinions: feeling a burden, focusing on forms, and feeling confused. To reflect their opinions, the following four suggestions were made to create a more effective learning environment: promoting learner autonomy, facilitating individual writing conferences, giving balanced feedback in between form and content, and using judicious feedback through careful streaming.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.347-363
• /
• 2019

본 연구에서는 의사소통 중심의 수학 쓰기 학습 전략을 활용한 수업이 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도와 수학적 성향에 어떤 영향을 주는지 알아보고자 하였다. 그 목적을 달성하기 위하여 동질성이 검증된 실험집단과 비교집단을 선정하여 실험집단에는 자신의 생각과 느낌 쓰기, 문제해결 과정쓰기, 개념 설명쓰기 등 3가지 유형의 의사소통 중심 수학 쓰기 학습 전략을 활용한 수업을 하고, 비교집단에서는 교과서 및 지도서에 준한 일반 수업을 진행하였다. 그 결과 비교집단에 비교하여 실험집단의 학생들의 수학 학업 성취도가 유의미하게 향상되었으며 수학적 성향에도 긍정적인 영향을 준 것으로 나타났다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.6-18
• /
• 2015

There has been an explosion of new research and writing about all aspects of the information disciplines. Nevertheless, both academics and practitioners often find it difficult to engage in successful writing strategies. Indeed, writing is hard work, and doing it in a way that leads to publication is an even harder task. Since reading is essential to good writing, the challenges of learning to write are obvious. In this essay, I am drawing on many years of experience in writing and publishing, as well as considerable reading of writers’ memoirs, advice books on writing, literary studies, and other perspectives on the experience of writing in order to offer a set of approaches that can be pursued over a lifetime of scholarship and practice. Writing is a craft or art to be learned, and learning demands paying attention to the audience, having clear objectives, being an avid reader, and possessing the ability to accept and learn from criticism. While information professionals and scholars incessantly write for each other, there are large segments of the public and other disciplines who they ignore. Fortunately, the tools and resources for improving one’s writing are both broad and deep; discipline and realistic strategies are all that are required to improve one’s writing and, ultimately, to achieve success in publishing.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제14권10호
• /
• pp.829-839
• /
• 2014

본 연구의 목적은 한국의 한 대학에 개설된 영작문 수업에서 수사 패턴과 의미 구성을 통해 학생들의 영작문 전략을 살펴보는 것이다. 참여자는 선택 과목으로 개설된 영작문 수업의 교사와 학생들이며, 학생들이 작성한 영어 의견문과 교사와의 인터뷰가 주된 데이터이다. 데이터 분석을 위해 '주장-근거' 패턴이 사용되었다. 분석 결과, 89%의 학생들이 주장, 근거, 그리고 결론의 요소를 사용하였으며, 또한 89%의 학생들은 수업 시간에 사용된 교과서에 등장하는 모델 글의 내용을 그대로 모방하거나 혹은 미미한 수준으로 발전시켜 자신들의 글 내용을 구성하였다. 이는 작문에서 창조성과 상상력을 가장 중요시하는 교수자의 수업의도와는 매우 동떨어진 것이었다. 이러한 결과는 대학 수업에서 좋은 점수를 얻기 위한 학생들의 '수용'전략으로 해석되어질 수 있다. 본 연구의 결론은 학생들은 교사의 수업 의도와는 상관없이 재설정된 환경에서의 성공을 위해 자신들의 방식으로 영어 작문을 위한 나름의 전략을 구사한다는 것을 보여준다.