• Title/Summary/Keyword: Top-Down construction method

Search Result 94, Processing Time 0.021 seconds

Development of Top-Down Connection System to Solve the Problem of Construction Tolerances in Installing Prefabricated Beams to Pre-founded Columns (시공오차가 있는 선기초기둥에 공장제작보의 설치가 용이한 탑다운공사용 접합기술개발)

  • Kim, Seung-Weon;Jung, Hee-Weon;Park, Dae-Yung;Kim, Dong-Gun;Park, Joo-Hyun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2011.05b
    • /
    • pp.25-30
    • /
    • 2011
  • Almost prefounded columns for top-down construction certainly have construction tolerances in plan and plumbness. Therefore, it is very difficult to connect prefabricated beams to prefounded columns at each floor level after excavation by usual top-down connection method and this usual connection method leads to long construction time, increasing cost and decreasing quality. This paper presents a new method for connecting prefabricated beam to prefounded column with GROUT-JACKET CONNECTION SYSTEM consisting of sleeve, bearing-shear bands and grout. Details and illustrations of the connections and applications by GROUT-JACKET CONNECTION SYSTEM for the top-down construction are also included in this paper.

  • PDF

A Case Study on the Application and History of Improved Method Top-Down Support by the Building Structure (건축 구조체를 이용한 개량 역타공법의 변천 과정과 적용 사례연구)

  • Lee, Jung-Jae;Jung, Kyoung-Sik;Roh, Bae-Young;Hong, Won-Pyo;Kim, Jong-Ho
    • 기술발표회
    • /
    • s.2006
    • /
    • pp.45-53
    • /
    • 2006
  • Top-Down Construction Method has been considered as the steadiest and the most reasonable method of construction since 1984 when it was applied to LG Da-Dong building and its usage in the field construction has since grown rapidly. With increased cases, engineers not only pursue their studies of R & D continuously but also develop various technical methods based on Top-Down Construction in an era of rapid technological change to adopt them to the field construction. Top-Down Construction meets the needs of these challenging points, such as reduction and eliminates of temporary equipment for supporting permanent structures on the ground, improved method of construction, shortening construction periods, cost reduction, and allows for minimal environmental impact.

  • PDF

Study on the Application of Semi-open cut Top-Down Construction for Framework (세미 오픈컷 역타공법의 현장적용에 관한 연구)

  • Sho, Kwang-Ho
    • Journal of Korean Association for Spatial Structures
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.129-138
    • /
    • 2011
  • Construction methods for underground structure are classified as bottom-up, up-up, and top-down methods depending on the procedure of construction related to a superstructure. In top-down construction methods, building's main structure is built from the ground level downwards by sequentially alternating ground excavation and structure construction. In the mean time, the main structure is also used as supporting structure for earth-retaining wall, which results in the increased stability of the earth-retaining wall due to the minimized deformation in adjacent structures and surrounding grounds. In addition, the method makes it easy to secure a field for construction work in the downtown area by using each floor slabs as working spaces. However top-down construction method is often avoided since an excavation under the slab has low efficiency and difficult environment for work, and high cost compared with earth anchor method. This paper proposes a combined construction method where semi-open cut is selected as excavation work, slurry as earth -retaining wall and CWS as top-down construction method. In the case study targeted for an actual construction project, the proposed method is compared with existing top-down construction method in terms of economic feasibility, construction period and work efficiency. The proposed construction method results in increased work efficiency in the transportation of earth and sand, and steel frame erection, better quality management in PHD construction, and reduced construction period.

Specificity of Prefounded Column for Top-Down Construction (Top-Down 공사용 선기초기둥의 특성)

  • Kang, Seung-Ryong;Rhim, Hong-Chul;Kim, Seung-Weon;Park, Dae Young;Kim, Dong-Gun;Song, Jee-Yun;Jeong, Mee-Ra
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2008.11a
    • /
    • pp.135-139
    • /
    • 2008
  • For deep basement construction of buildings downtown, the usage of Top-Down Method is increasing as much as ever from strong demand. One of the essential elements for the construction by Top Down Method is the pre-founded columns, which are installed in the ground and on which a building is installed. The fact that the pre-founded columns are placed in the ground makes them susceptible to its plumbness; this aspect distinguishes pre-founded columns from general columns. However, there are no criteria for erection tolerance. Therefore, field-measured-data concerning out-of-plumb of pre-founded columns in the construction field should be accumulated and investigated so that criteria and specifications for the erection tolerance of pre-founded columns may be established through the understanding of its aspects. In this paper, we investigate out-of-plumb of pre-founded columns for the construction case and analyze its aspects, and propose considerations for design and construction phase.

  • PDF

Use of Concrete Filled Tube as a Pre-founded Column for Top Down Construction (Top Down 공사에서의 CFT 선기초기둥 활용방안)

  • Kang, Seung-Ryong;Rhim, Hong-Chul;Kim, Seung-Weon;Kim, Dong-Gun;Song, Jee-Yun;Jeong, Mee-Ra;Lee, Hai-Chool
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2008.05a
    • /
    • pp.31-34
    • /
    • 2008
  • Construction of buildings downtown is increasing as much as ever with a strong demand. A Top-Down Method is suitable for its advantage in minimizing its disturbance to the neighborhood. In general, the Pre-founded Column, one of the most important aspects of the Top-Down Method, has been made with an H-Shape Steel Column. However, due to its structural and economical benefits, the usage of CFT(Concrete Filled Tube) columns in the place of Pre-founded Columns is increasing. To promote their applications, we analyze the merits of CFT columns by comparing them with I-Shape columns and propose further research.

  • PDF

Numerical Approach to Evaluate the Behavior of Concrete Panel Considering Construction Method (수치해석을 이용한 시공방법에 따른 판넬식 옹벽의 거동 분석에 관한 연구)

  • Junhee, Kang;Hoki, Ban
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.23 no.12
    • /
    • pp.17-23
    • /
    • 2022
  • This paper analyze the precast panel retaining wall's safety factor changes based on the numerical analysis using PLAXIS 2D software. Numerical analysis conditions include construction method, nail and panel fixing method, backfill material compaction conditions, rainfall conditions. The classification according to the construction method of the precast panel retaining wall includes the top-down and bottom-up methods. The difference between the top-down and bottom-up methods is the presence or absence backfill material and the ground excavation method. The top-down method involves vertically excavating the ground and attaching the panel using mortar, but in the bottom-up method, the ground is vertically excavated and harden the backfill material. As a result of numerical analysis, the top-down method secured a higher safety factor in all cases except the rainfall conditions.

A Study on Void Examination in Top-Down Column Joint (역타설기둥 타설이음 부분의 공극성상에 관한 연구)

  • 이영도;임형일;김성식;정병훈;정상진;진영헌
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2001.11a
    • /
    • pp.34-39
    • /
    • 2001
  • When top down method is used, it could be a construction method trouble in column joint, between the former concrete and the latter. It could bring a void and weak concrete in column. The purpose of this study is finding a way to prevent concrete void and concrete suitable for top down, through V-metering for top down column and concrete experiment.

  • PDF

A Case Study on the Top-Down Methods Performed in the Excavation Works of Domestic Downtown (국내 도심지 굴착공사에 적용된 Top-Down 공법의 시공사례 연구)

  • Chung, Jeeseung;Park, Sukk
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.18 no.2
    • /
    • pp.5-19
    • /
    • 2017
  • Underground excavation for building construction in Korea is changing from conventional support method (Strut, Ground anchor) to inside permanent support method by stability, economic, circumstances around excavation and etc. This study was selected the sites of Top-down, New Top-down, S.P.S, S.T.D and B.R.D in general use. This study was compared and analyzed a construction cost and period between aforementioned methods and conventional support method. Also, this study was confirmed the stability of temporary retaining wall by analysis for measurement data under construction. As a result, this study can grasp that most improved permanent support method is excellent in economic and constructability than conventional support method in case of deep excavation and rapid appearance of bedrock.

Non-Supporting Form System for Top-Down Construction (지하 역타 공법용 상·하 분리형 무지주 지지체 개발)

  • Jeong, Mee-Ra;Rhim, Hong-Chul;Yom, Kyong-Soo
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2008.05a
    • /
    • pp.27-30
    • /
    • 2008
  • For the purpose of developing economical and time-efficient formwork for Top-down construction, a Non-Supporting Form System has been proposed. The system is consisted of two parts: a hanging part to support a steel frame and a section of concrete slab, and the other hanging part to lower the steel frame. In this paper, the proposed system is compared to two existing systems of Non Supporting Top-down Method and Bracket Supported R/C Downward Method. It is expected that this system can be used in Top-down construction with further development.

  • PDF

Structural Stability Study on the Location and Installation form of H-beam Backfill Applied to Top-Down Construction Method (역타공법에 적용되는 뒷채움재 위치 및 설치 형태에 대한 구조 안정성 연구)

  • Shim, Hak-Bo;Jeon, Hyun-Soo;Seok, Won-Kyun;Park, Soon-Jeon
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Building Construction Conference
    • /
    • 2021.05a
    • /
    • pp.179-179
    • /
    • 2021
  • Top-Down construction method is a method of connecting a beam to a column and using a strut to support earth retaining walls. This method has the advantage of reducing the process of underground construction by reducing the work of installation. Recently, there are a lot of cases of damage and defect occurring in H-beam backfill applied to Top-Down construction method and the concrete slab supporting H-beam backfill. For this, appropriate methods were suggested through finite element analysis of the position and installation form of the H-beam backfill.

  • PDF