• 제목/요약/키워드: Students' Thinking

검색결과 2,674건 처리시간 0.025초

LOGO를 이용한 프로젝트 학습에서 나타난 초등 수학영재 학생들의 전략적 사고 (The Strategic Thinking of Mathematically Gifted Elementary Students in LOGO Project Learning)

  • 류희찬;장인옥
    • 대한수학교육학회지:수학교육학연구
    • /
    • 제20권4호
    • /
    • pp.459-476
    • /
    • 2010
  • 본 연구의 목적은 LOGO를 이용한 프로젝트 학습에서 나타난 초등 수학영재 학생들의 전략적 사고 유형을 분석하여 LOGO 학습과 고등 사고 활동과의 연관성을 구체적으로 밝힘으로써 영재교육 프로그램으로서 LOGO 활용에 대한 새로운 방향을 제시하고 LOGO 교수-학습의 효과적인 접근 방안을 모색하는데 있다. LOGO 프로그래밍을 계획하는 과정에서는 기존의 지식과 절차를 활용하는 유추적 사고, 변수를 이용한 일반화, 여러 가지 명령어의 기능을 통합하여 활용하는 통합적 사고, 문제 해결을 위해 기존 명령어를 평가하는 비판적 사고, 현재의 상황을 새로운 관점에서 이해하고 응용하는 발전적 사고, 여러 가지 해결 방법을 구상하는 유연한 사고 등의 전략적 사고가 관찰되었다. 오류 수정 과정에서 나타난 전략은 명령어의 문법적인 지식, 그림과 절차를 대조하는 방법, 절차를 분해하는 분석적 사고, 도형-분석적 추론, 시각적 추론, 경험적 추론 등이 나타났다.

  • PDF

중학교 학생들의 확률적 사고 수준 평가 기준 개발 : 미국의 사례 (A Framework for Assessing Probability Knowledge and Skills for Middle School Students: A Case of U.S.)

  • 박지윤;이경화
    • 대한수학교육학회지:학교수학
    • /
    • 제11권1호
    • /
    • pp.1-15
    • /
    • 2009
  • 일부 연구자들 (Jones et al., 1997; Tarr & Jones, 1977; Tarr & Lannin, 2005)은 학생들의 확률적 사고틀에 대해 연구해왔다. 이들 연구는 학생들의 확률적 사고 수준을 이해하는 도구를 제공하였다. 그러나 중학교 학생들의 확률적 사고 수준 관련 연구는 조건부 확률과 독립성 개념에만 머물러 있었다. 이 연구에서는 Jones et al.(1977), Polaki (2005), and Tarr and Jones(1977)의 연구를 분석하고, 미국의 교육과정과 국가 수준의 평가 자료를 분석하여 중학교 학생들의 확률적 사고 수준을 평가할 수 있는 틀을 개발한다.

  • PDF

디자인씽킹 기법을 활용한 캡스톤디자인 수업이 대학생의 수업 만족도에 미치는 효과 분석 (Analysis of the effects of capstone design class utilizing the design thinking technique of class satisfaction of college students)

  • 이승희;정효경
    • 대한치과기공학회지
    • /
    • 제42권4호
    • /
    • pp.394-401
    • /
    • 2020
  • Purpose: The present study is an analysis of the extents of class satisfaction of college students who had applied the design thinking technique to capstone design class. Methods: The experimental method involved an analysis of 122 cases of data where advance and post replies were performed for the subject by students who had applied the design thinking technique and students who had not. The students involved had attended the capstone design class as a junior in the Department of Dental Technology at D University. Results: In the satisfaction with performance process of the capstone design class, five questions among nine had a high positive rating, while all eight questions on the satisfaction with performance methods had a high negative rating. Among ten questions on subjective learning outcomes, six showed a high positive rating. After the application of the design thinking class method, all mean values of the group with the application were higher than the group with no application in satisfaction with performance process, satisfaction with performance method, and subjective class outcomes. Hence, the design thinking class did have positive effects on the students' improvement of class. Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, it is implied that the considerations about diverse class composition methods and operation methods capable of improving the students' satisfaction are needed for efficient operation of the capstone design class.

과학영재와 일반학생들의 창의적 사고 편향에 대한 분석 (Analysis on Creative Thinking Leaning Between Scientifically Gifted Students and Normal Students)

  • 정덕호;박선옥
    • 영재교육연구
    • /
    • 제21권1호
    • /
    • pp.175-191
    • /
    • 2011
  • 본 연구는 일반 학생들과 과학영재들을 대상으로 문제해결과정에서 주로 활용하고 있는 창의적 사고의 편향을 알아보기 위한 것이다. 일반 학생 144명과 과학영재 97명을 대상으로 창의적 사고의 편향을 알아보기 위하여 R/LCT, BPI를 실시하였다. R/LCT에서 일반 학생들은 우뇌 영역의 사고를 주로 활용하였고, 과학영재들은 좌뇌 영역의 사고를 주로 활용하였다. 일반학생들은 전체적 사고의 활용을 가장 선호하였고, 언어적 사고를 가장 기피하였다. 과학영재들은 논리적 사고를 가장 선호하였고, 임의적 사고를 가장 기피하였다. 일반 학생들의 좌뇌선호집단과 우뇌선호집단 간 좌뇌 영역 사고의 성향과 우뇌 영역 사고의 성향에서 모두 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 즉, 각 집단은 특정의 사고에 편향되어 문제를 해결하려는 경향이 분명하다. 그러나 과학영재들은 좌뇌선호집단과 우뇌선호집단 간 좌뇌 영역 사고 성향은 차이가 적고 주로 우뇌 영역의 사고 성향에서 차이가 크게 나타났다. 즉 과학영재들은 두 집단 모두 논리적 사고, 상징적 사고, 직선적 사고 등 좌뇌 영역의 사고를 적극적으로 활용하고 있다. 결과적으로 과학영재는 일반학생들에 비해 문제를 해결하는 과정에서 서로 다른 방식으로 문제를 해결하려고 한다. 따라서 복잡한 문제는 다양한 사고를 통하여 해결할 수 있으므로 효과적인 과학영재교육을 위하여 영재들의 창의적 사고의 편향을 고려한 교수학습방법이 요구된다.

치위생(학)과 학생의 비판적 사고성향, 임상실습만족도, 임상수행능력에 관한 연구 (Study on critical thinking, clinical practice satisfaction, and clinical performance of dental hygiene students)

  • 김수경
    • 한국치위생학회지
    • /
    • 제19권6호
    • /
    • pp.1037-1046
    • /
    • 2019
  • Objectives: This study was conducted to test the critical thinking tendency, clinical practice satisfaction, and clinical performance, and analyze the factors impacting clinical practice satisfaction and clinical performance of dental hygiene students. Methods: The study conducted a written survey during the period between 30 July ~20 August 2019, among 3rd and 4th year dental hygiene students from Seoul, Gyung-gi region, who had taken clinical practice courses. Using SPSS 22.0 program (IBM SPSS statistics, New York, USA), the study analyzed the final 174 cases. Results: Dental hygiene students scored 3.33±0.43, 3.48±0.83, and 3.30±0.58 for critical thinking, clinical practice satisfaction, and clinical performance, respectively. The clinical thinking score was higher when their study performance was good (p<0.001), clinical practice satisfaction was higher when their major satisfaction was satisfactory (p<0.001), higher when their relationship with their clinical practice partner was good, and the clinical performance was better when the students' major satisfaction was good (p<0.001). The study performance yielded better results when their study achievement was better (p<0.05). Clinical practice satisfaction (r=0.156) and clinical performance (r=0.393) showed a positive correlation with critical thinking, and clinical performance had a positive correlation with clinical practice satisfaction. The impact factor for clinical practice satisfaction appeared to be clinical performance (p<0.05) and major satisfaction (p<0.001), and the factors impacting the clinical performance were among the sub-causes of critical thinking (p<0.05), intellectual fairness (p<0.05), watchfulness (p<0.05), clinical practice satisfaction (p<0.05), and major satisfaction (p<0.01). Conclusions: Results of the study showed that for dental hygiene students, critical thinking, clinical practice satisfaction, clinical performance, and major satisfaction were the impact factors affecting the students' clinical performance. Therefore, the study recommends that development of educational programs and operation of a field-based curriculum is necessary to improve critical thinking, clinical practice satisfaction, and major satisfaction.

사고 유형에 따른 영재 아동과 일반 아동의 학습 선호 활동의 차이 연구 (A Study on the Differences in Learning-Activity Preferences between Gifted and Average Students according to Thinking Styles)

  • 신종호;서정희;최재혁;김용남;김윤근;이현주
    • 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
    • /
    • 제25권spc5호
    • /
    • pp.495-506
    • /
    • 2007
  • This study investigated the differences in learning activity preferences according to different thinking styles between gifted and average students. A cluster analysis procedure was performed to classify students on the basis of thinking styles. Two clusters of different thinking styles were deduced: the gifted group with a high level thinking style (cluster 1), and the average group with a low level thinking style (cluster 2). The gifted group (cluster 1) preferred projects, simulations, discussions and game activities to other types of loaming activities. Gifted students and average students also were clustered into each three unique subgroups with respect to levels and patterns in thinking styles, and these subgroups also showed different learning preferences. The clusters of gifted students included the self-regulated learning type (cluster a), cooperative-learning type (cluster b), and the passive-learning type (cluster c). The clusters of average students included the independent learning type (cluster i), no-preference learning type(cluster ii), and the no-motivation & teacher-directed learning type (cluster iii). Theses clusters indicated significant differences not only in thinking styles but also in terms of preferences regarding learning activities. Theses findings are discussed in terms of their educational implications.

  • PDF

역발상적 사고 기법의 가능성 탐색: 대학생들의 아이디어 생성 과정의 특징을 중심으로 (The Investigation on the Possibilities of Assumption Reversal Thinking Skill: Focusing on the Characteristics of the Idea Generation Process by University Students)

  • 강성주;박지영;윤지현
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제33권2호
    • /
    • pp.501-510
    • /
    • 2013
  • 창의적 문제 해결 과정의 핵심은 독특하고 다양한 아이디어의 생성이다. 따라서 아이디어의 생성을 어려워하는 학생들에게 이를 도와줄 수 있는 구체적 방안 마련이 요구되며, 이에 역발상적 사고 기법을 고려해 볼 수 있다. 이에 이 연구에서는 역발상적 사고 기법을 기반으로 한 아이디어 생성 과정의 특징을 대학생을 대상으로 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 역발상적 사고기법은 학생들의 관점 전환을 유도하며, 새로운 아이디어의 산출을 도왔다. 이에 학생들의 아이디어 산출을 지원해 주는 사고 틀로서 역발상적 사고 기법의 가능성을 확인할 수 있었다. 그러나 역발상적 사고가 좀더 효과적으로 이루어지기 위해서는 학생들이 산출된 아이디어에 대한 이론적 판단이나 가치 개입, 경험 등으로 인한 편견을 배제할 수 있도록 지도할 필요가 있다. 또한 학생들이 역발상적 아이디어에 대한 다른 사람들의 반대나 비판 등을 감수하면서 새로운 아이디어를 실행시키고자 하는 과제집착력이나 용기 등을 함양할 수 있는 방안 마련도 요구된다.

Effects of Critical Thinking and Communication Skills on the Problem-Solving Ability of Dental Hygiene Students

  • Han, Ji-Hyoung;Ahn, Eunsuk;Hwang, Ji-Min
    • 치위생과학회지
    • /
    • 제19권1호
    • /
    • pp.31-38
    • /
    • 2019
  • Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of critical thinking and good communication skills on the problem-solving abilities of dental hygiene students. Methods: A total of 508 dental hygiene students were convenience-sampled from 3 universities. Results: The results revealed that critical thinking had the highest intellectual fairness score of 3.60, and systematicity was the lowest at 3.19. The values for communication skills were high in reaction, social adequacy, and concentration, with an average of 3.65. Problem-solving abilities were in the following order: clarification of the problem, seeking solutions, and decision making. According to general characteristics, more extroverted personalities possessed higher levels of critical thinking, communication skills, and problem-solving abilities (p<0.01). Critical thinking scores were high (p=0.016) in students who responded that peer relationship was difficult; however, their communication skills were the lowest (p<0.001). Additionally, problem-solving abilities were highest among students who reported a difficult peer relationship (p=0.001). The higher the satisfaction with dental hygiene academics, the higher the critical thinking, communication skill, and problem-solving ability (p<0.001). Critical thinking showed a high positive correlation with variables in the following order: clarification of the problem, performing the solutions, seeking solutions, decision making, and evaluation and reflection. The communication skills were also related to these variables listed above (p<0.01). With critical thinking, confidence, watchfulness, intellectual passion/curiosity, sound skepticism, objectivity, and systematicity all influenced the problem-solving ability. Conclusion: Communication skills were influenced by noise control, putting on the other's shoe, social tensions, and efficiency, which affected the problem-solving ability. Dental clinics require dental hygienists to have critical thinking to make analytical judgments and effective communication skills to solve human relation problems with patients and care-givers. Therefore, these skills should be developed in dental hygiene students to improve their problem-solving abilities.

초등 과학영재와 발명영재의 사고양식 비교 (Comparison of Thinking Styles between Gifted Elementary Students in Science and Invention)

  • 김민서;여상인
    • 한국초등과학교육학회지:초등과학교육
    • /
    • 제33권3호
    • /
    • pp.558-565
    • /
    • 2014
  • The purpose of this study was to compare thinking styles between the gifted students in science and invention The subjects were 191 gifted elementary students in science and 182 gifted elementary students in invention, who enrolled in gifted education program. They were given the Thinking Style Inventory (TSI) that standardized Korea version by Yun (1997), which constructed 13 thinking styles of 5 dimensions (functions, forms, levels, scopes, and leanings of the mental self-government). The collected data were analyzed by independent sampling t-test and ANOVA with SPSS. The findings of this study were as follows: the gifted in science prefer executive, oligarchic, and global thinking styles rather than the gifted in invention. Meanwhile, the gifted in invention prefer legislative, judicial, local, and liberal thinking styles rather than the gifted in science. Both of the gifted in science and invention prefer legislative, executive, monarchic, anarchic, external, and liberal thinking styles. There was statistically significant differences between boys and girls in executive, oligarchic, local, and liberal thinking styles of the gifted in science.

간호대학생의 비판적 사고 성향에 관한 연구 - 통합 간호교육과정을 실시하는 일 대학을 중심으로 - (A Study on the Critical Thinking Disposition of Nursing Students - Focusing on a School Applying Integrated Nursing Curriculum -)

  • 윤진
    • 간호행정학회지
    • /
    • 제14권2호
    • /
    • pp.159-166
    • /
    • 2008
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the degree of critical thinking disposition of nursing students and the factors influencing critical thinking disposition. Method: The subjects were 406 nursing students attending at one university who have been taught by the integrated nursing curriculum. Data was collected by a self-administered questionnaire from Nov. 11, 2007 to Nov. 30, 2007. The survey tool developed by Yoon(2004) was used. Data was analyzed by t-test, one way ANOVA and Scheffe test using SPSS Win 12.0. Result: The mean score of critical thinking disposition was 3.57. The sub scales of critical thinking disposition were statistically significant in regard to grade, age and character of subjects. Overall mean score of critical thinking disposition and its sub scales were statistically significant according to the degree of satisfactory of majoring nursing, reason of choosing nursing as a major and satisfaction on integrated nursing curriculum. Conclusion: Critical thinking ability is very important in various nursing situations. Integrated nursing curriculum was developed to improve critical thinking ability of nursing students. It is recommended that evaluation on the goal attainment of the integrated nursing curriculum needs to be monitored continuously.

  • PDF