DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the effects of capstone design class utilizing the design thinking technique of class satisfaction of college students

디자인씽킹 기법을 활용한 캡스톤디자인 수업이 대학생의 수업 만족도에 미치는 효과 분석

  • Received : 2020.10.23
  • Accepted : 2020.12.10
  • Published : 2020.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: The present study is an analysis of the extents of class satisfaction of college students who had applied the design thinking technique to capstone design class. Methods: The experimental method involved an analysis of 122 cases of data where advance and post replies were performed for the subject by students who had applied the design thinking technique and students who had not. The students involved had attended the capstone design class as a junior in the Department of Dental Technology at D University. Results: In the satisfaction with performance process of the capstone design class, five questions among nine had a high positive rating, while all eight questions on the satisfaction with performance methods had a high negative rating. Among ten questions on subjective learning outcomes, six showed a high positive rating. After the application of the design thinking class method, all mean values of the group with the application were higher than the group with no application in satisfaction with performance process, satisfaction with performance method, and subjective class outcomes. Hence, the design thinking class did have positive effects on the students' improvement of class. Conclusion: Based on the results of the study, it is implied that the considerations about diverse class composition methods and operation methods capable of improving the students' satisfaction are needed for efficient operation of the capstone design class.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee HW, Kim SH, Park K, Kim JY. A study on the assessment of program outcomes based on capstone design course. J Eng Educ Res. 2010;13:143-151. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2010.13.6.143
  2. Yoon MH. A study on industry university-government copperative education for environment design [doctoral dissertation]. Chungju: Konkuk University, 2013.
  3. Oh SH. A study on the creative convergent human resource model of PBL-based in Wikifacturing environment [doctoral dissertation]. Seongnam: Gachon University, 2016.
  4. Han SH. Development of capstone design instruction model following international standards: focusing on university engineering students [doctoral dissertation]. Busan: Pusan National University, 2018.
  5. Cho P. Engineering education program that produces gold-collar engineers: enterprise. Eng Educ. 2004;11:42-46.
  6. Ryu YH. Development of a capstone design teaching activity support model to improve the quality of engineering design curriculum [doctoral dissertation]. Busan: Pusan National University, 2008.
  7. Lee J, You SK, Lee YO. A study on the development of empathy based learning model. Korean J Teach Educ. 2014;30:151-177. https://doi.org/10.14333/KJTE.2014.30.4.151
  8. Park SH, Oh SH, Park JS, Lee MK. A unified model of action learning and design thinking for social innovation. Asia-Pac J Bus Ventur Entrep. 2016;11:89-100. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.11.2.201604.89
  9. Yang KR, Moon SC, Han KH, Park SH. The new paradigm shift, design thinking. Entrue J Inf Technol. 2015;14:7-24.
  10. Lim JM. The effects of design thinking on college students' empathy ability [master's thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University, 2017.
  11. Yi SS, Kim DM, Kim MH, Kim SC, Kim HJ, Park KM, et al. Case study of interdisciplinary studio class with design thinking method- focusing on the perspective of instructional design. Des Converg Stud. 2015;14:63-81.
  12. Wang BH. A study on current situation and student satisfaction of capstone design courses for suggestion of its improvement plan. J Korean Inst Intell Syst. 2019;29:130-135. https://doi.org/10.5391/jkiis.2019.29.2.130
  13. Lee SH, Ryu JH. Capstone design for AD & PR. Daegu: Keimyung University Press, 2014.
  14. Park SH, Jung JY, Ryu YH, Kim SO. Development of instructional activity support model for capstone design to creative engineering education. J Fish Mar Sci Educ. 2008;20:184-200.
  15. Lee DH, Yoon JH, Kang SJ. The suggestion of design thinking process and its feasibility study for fostering group creativity of elementary-secondary school students in science education. J Korean Assoc Sci Educ. 2015;35: 443-453. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0443
  16. Kang IA, Jung ES. A qualitative analysis on the differences between the student-selected teams and the learning style-based teams in terms of their satisfactory levels on the learning activities. Korean J Educ Methodol Stud. 2010;22:67-95. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2010.22.3.67
  17. Lee TS, Jun YJ, Lee DW, Chang BC. Present situation and student satisfaction of engineering capstone design course in engineering colleges of Korea. J Eng Educ Res. 2009;12:36-50. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2009.12.2.36
  18. Choi HA, Park JW. Developing the design process in education to improve creativity based on design thinking. J Digit Design. 2014;14:677-686. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2014.14.3.067