• Title/Summary/Keyword: Rurality assessment

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

A Study on the Assessment of Rurality Characteristics in Rural Amenity Resources (농촌어메니티자원의 농촌다움 특성 평가에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Jeung-Won;Jeong, Yoon-Hee;Im, Seung-Bin
    • Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning
    • /
    • v.12 no.2 s.31
    • /
    • pp.1-9
    • /
    • 2006
  • Current environmental problems of rural area are connected to loss of rural functions which is food security as well as conservation of environment, balanced development of country and succession of traditional culture. To solve these problems, recent projects are focusing on social changes in rural area and conservation of rurality creating values of rural amenity resources. At this point, full implications of rurality which is the various aspects of rurality should be defined to be applied in direct plans to conserve the rurality. In this study, nine attributes of rurality are found as various meanings with adjectives included in image of rurality. For practical use of these adjectives of rurality attributes, we evaluate the list of rural amenity resources and suggested plans for conservation of rural amenity. These attributes can be used as an effective method for village plan which brings one of the attributes into relief.

A Study on Evaluation of the Rurality by the Distance of View (조망거리에 따른 농촌경관의 농촌다움 평가에 관한 연구)

  • Shin, Min-Ji;Shin, Ji-Hoon
    • Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning
    • /
    • v.21 no.2
    • /
    • pp.63-77
    • /
    • 2015
  • Improve the rural views of the Government and the municipalities with the intention of rural landscape planning. However, rural scenery evaluation of landscape types and element categories, landscape scenes, such as the valuation of resources selected, form a coherent system and ecological point of view is not only a Visual perspective of evaluation, or evaluation is made. This study evaluates the rural landscape through the rural landscape for rurality is implemented can explain the image. Rural amenity 100 represented the rural landscape in rurality with photos of photos, and scenes, photos, location-based rural Vista rurality landscapes drawn components. Selected landscape photography scenic landscapes in the u.s. survey and image vocabularies through surveys is representative of the landscape in rurality of each Vista location-specific photos and images began extracted factors. As a result, the Distant view is a town and village in the rolling hills of the surrounding environment is an image behind the Vista Skyline, Farmland Rural village forests, Behind the hills, Individual housing roof, Housing arrangement, The number of household includes landscape components. Factor analysis 'openness', 'intimacy', 'activity', 'complexity', 'safety' was down to five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 66.45 percent. Middle distance view is close to being out of town houses and village environment, an image in the skyline hills Vista, farmlands, village forests, rolling hills, behind the scenes of the housing component of the neck, the sperm will honor an individual factor analysis results are 'intimacy', 'safety', 'openness', 'specificity', 'complexity' five factors the whole description of the capacity factors compared to 67.24 percent. Close-range view is mainly in Vista village embraced the individual elements and an image of a harmonious location in the surroundings of the sperm, individual houses, fences, gates, courtyard, Garden, garage, agricultural facilities, including, but not limited to, factors assay but an 'intimacy', 'complexity', 'safety', 'activity', 'openness' five factors, such as a description of the overall factors that force was 65.29%. This research seeks to determine the extent to which rurality of rural landscape Vista by location attributes and elements and representative officer in photo selection and rurality to extract the image. To date, followed by a comprehensive study, which was presented through the readjustment could not overlook the Visual elements. The future rural development officer for the evaluation of rural landscape classification and quantitative and objective assessment will have to come up with ways to do.

Rurality and Preferences of Rural Landscapes in Korea - A Comparison of Evaluations by Koreans and Foreigners - (농촌경관의 농촌다움과 선호도 평가 연구 - 내국인과 외국인 평가 비교를 중심으로 -)

  • Ahn, Tong-Mahn;Son, Ju-Dong;Kim, Myung-Soo
    • Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning
    • /
    • v.11 no.3 s.28
    • /
    • pp.43-52
    • /
    • 2005
  • Twelve selected rural villages were investigated to identify typical Korean rural landscapes. Among many photos taken in those villages, which are believed to represent rural amenities, one hundred photos were selected and again sixty of them were chosen through a questionnaire survey of landscape students. Two hundred domestic subjects and one hundred and one overseas visitors were surveyed to find their evaluations of 'rurality' of the Korean rural landscapes and their 'preferences' of those landscapes. Photo numbers 16, 40, 48, 37, 49, 11, 8, 56, 15 were evaluated most 'rural' and/or 'preferable' by domestic subjects. As the overseas visitors 'mrurality', they were asked to evaluate their 'preferences' only. Photo numbers 60, 7, 38, 28, 59, 15 were the most preferred Korean rural landscapes by them. In summary, Korean public generally preferred rural landscapes with natural beauty and, on the other hand, overseas visitors most preferred historic rural landscapes. Both group preferred least rural landscapes with man made structures.

A Study on Assessment and Classification about Rural Landscape Resources - Centered on Comprehensive Development Project of Rural Village - (농촌경관 보전 및 관리를 위한 경관자원 분류 및 평가에 관한 연구 - 농촌마을종합개발사업을 중심으로 -)

  • Lee, Dong-Kun;Ok, Ju-Hee;Hong, Chnn-Sun;Youn, So-Won;Park, Chang-Sug;Yoo, Heon-Seok
    • Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning
    • /
    • v.11 no.2 s.27
    • /
    • pp.21-34
    • /
    • 2005
  • The objective of this study is to suggest a planning direction for the management and conservation of a rural landscape. For suggesting the planning direction, this study was classified rural landscape resources based on spatial type to understand the assessment of rural landscape. This study examined literature reviews and site investigations for collecting the data on the resources of a rural landscape to maintain rurality. First above all, it was classified into physical and non-physical resources. Non-Physical resources include elements such as inhabitants' will, leaders' will and the software. It is also to reflect all these factors on the planning. Next, this study classified the resources of a landscape into artificial and natural resources and applied these resources to rural areas which were divided into five types: industry area, life area, natural landscape area, program area and human behavior area. The pictures obtained from this field survey were used for a questionnaire survey to understand the value of a rural landscape. The contents of questionnaire survey were divided into two parts: the presentation condition of a rural land-scape and assessment of a rural landscape. Especially, the value of a rural landscape was divided into the ecological value, socio-cultural value and holistic value.

A Basic Study on 'Ruralism' Perception through Expert Group: Focusing on Delphi and AHP Analysis (전문가집단을 통해 본 '농촌다움' 인식에 관한 기초연구: 델파이와 AHP분석을 중심으로)

  • Jee Yoon Do;Ki Chun Seo;Myeong Cheol Jeong;Jin Ah Choi
    • Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
    • /
    • v.32 no.4
    • /
    • pp.251-259
    • /
    • 2023
  • This study was conducted for the purpose of the basic direction for the new regulations and categories of Ruralism changing in the new era. To this end, the results of Delphi analysis and AHP analysis by dividing it into the definition, criteria, scope and component items of Ruralism based on systematic literature review are as follows. First, through studies representing most rural areas, it was found that Ruralism was the most problematic keyword and most of the studies did not cover it as they were studying various ranges of rural areas. Second, the Delphi survey was able to derive keywords that can be used as evidence for item classification and clear concept establishment for the regulation and category setting of Ruralism. Third, through the hierarchical decision-making method, it was found that landscape factors are the most important thing in forming Ruralism as well as deriving priorities that can be a baseline for each item. This study is meaningful in providing a minimum baseline as basic data for establishing the concept of Ruralism, and it is believed that future-oriented Ruralism can be established if reviews are added from various perspectives to overcome limitations dependent on expert groups.