• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.287-296
• /
• 1991

The purpose of this experiments is to compare the vertical and horizontal magnification, and the distortion of the radiographic image according to the types of panoramic machines. Total 70 radiographs, 10 radiographs out of 7 panoramic machines respectively, were taken from the dry skull with metal balls in the periapical areas of the central incisor, the canine, the second premolar, and the second molar in the maxilla and the mandible. And the author evaluated the vertical and horizontal magnification degrees, and the distortion degrees of radiographic images obtained from each panoramic machine. The results were as follows: There were no significant differences in the vertical and horizontal magnification degrees on the various portions of the jaws (p> 0.05). But there were higher magnification degrees in the Panoura 10C, Panograph Ⅱ, and Veraview than those in other panoramic machines. The lowest average magnification degree was 20.27% vertically, 20.94% horizontally using the Panoradix. The highest average magnification degree was 27.64% vertically, 28.48% horizontally using the Panograph Ⅱ. The lowest distortion was shown using the Panoura 10C in the maxilla, but there was not statistically significant difference between the panoramic machines in the mandible (p>0.05). There were no differences in the vertical and horizontal magnification degrees according to the types of the rotation centers.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.7-16
• /
• 1998

The Scanora/sup (R)/ X-ray unit uses the principles of narrow beam radiography and spiral tomography. Starting with a panoramic overview as a scout image. multiple tomographic projections could be selected. This study evaluated the accuracy of spiral tomography in comparison to routine panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning. An experimental study was performed on a cadaver mandible to assess the accuracy of panoramic radiography and spiral tomography film images for measurement of metallic spheres. After radiographic images of the metallic spheres on the surgical stent were measured and corrected for a fixed magnification of radiographic images. following results were obtained. 1. In the optimal position of the mandible. the minimal horizontal and vertical distortion was evident in the panoramic radiography images. The mean horizontal and vertical magnification error in anterior sites was 5.25％ and 0.75％. respectively. The mean horizontal and vertical magnification error in posterior sites was 0.50％ and 1.50％. respectively. 2. In the displaced forward or in an eccentric position of the mandible. the magnification error of the panoramic radiography images increased significantly over the optimal position. Overall, the mean horizontal magnification error of the anterior site in the different positions changed dramatically within a range of -17.25％ to 39.00％, compared to the posterior range of -5.25％ to 8.50％. However, the mean vertical magnification error stayed with the range of 0.5％ to 3.75％ for all the mandibular positions. 3. The magnification effects in the tomographic scans were nearly identical for the anterior and posterior with a range of 2.00％ to 5.75％ in the horizontal and 4.50％ to 5.50％ in the vertical dimension, respectively. 4. A statistically significant difference between the anterior and posterior measurements was found in the horizontal measurements of the panoramic radiography images of the displaced forward and backward position of the mandible(P<0.05). Also a significant difference between the optimal panoramic and tomographic projections was found only in the vertical measurement(P<0.05).

• Journal of Korean Dental Science
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.53-59
• /
• 2017

Purpose: The objective of the present article is to determine whether there are differences in vertical enlargement ratio among various sites within both jaws in a panoramic radiograph. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and seventy-threeimplant sites in panoramic radiographs were evaluated by two observers. Magnification ratios at various sites in both jaws were calculated and compared with each other. Result: The average vertical enlargement ratio in the panoramic radiograph was 1.264 and this value was larger than original ratio 1.250. Although vertical magnification ratio of maxillary molar area was higher than that of mandibular molar area, every group showed similar magnification ratio in clinical respect. Conclusion: Vertical magnification ratio of the maxillary molar area is statistically higher than that of the mandibular molar area in the panoramic radiograph, but it is clinically negligible.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.129-135
• /
• 1994

This study was performed to evaluate the accuracy of orthopantomogram by measuring the actual and radiographic tooth length and by analyzing the vertical magnification rate. For this study, total 90 teeth of the maxilla and mandible teeth and a dry skull were used. This experiment was attached with metal balls of 1±0.02㎜ at the root and the crown cusp tips of central, 2nd premolar, 1st molar of the maxilla and mandible and the teeth were embedded in dry skull, and then orthopantomogram was taken. The obtained results were as follows: 1. The average of tooth length in orthopantomogram was longer than that of actual tooth length. 2. The average of vertical magnification rate in the orthopantomogram to actual tooth length was 17-26%. 3. Vertical magnification rate of the maxilla teeth was 18-26% and that of mandibular teeth was 17-23%, and the magnification of maxillary teeth was larger than that of mandible teeth(P<0.0l). 4. Vertical magnification rate of posterior area was 22-26% and that of anterior area was 17-18%, and the magnification of anterior area was less than that of posterior area(P<0.01).

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.19-23
• /
• 1979

A study was made primarily to investigate vertical and horizontal distortion of the image at the apical region of the dental roots in orthopantomographs. The subjects consisted of two dry skulls with radiopaque materials attached to root surface. Measuring of the width and length of each predetermined point at 23 teeth was performed in dry skulls and radiographic films. The results obtained were as follows; 1. There was overall magnification of image in the vertical dimension. And anterior portion had greater magnification rate than posterior portion, while lower anterior portion had less magnification rate than upper anterior portion. 2. There was reduction of the image in the horizontal dimension of the teeth, because of the position relation between dry skull and image layer of the orthopantomograph. 3. There was a significant difference in distortion rate between the oposite teeth. 4. Cervical portion of the tooth had more decreased rate of horizontal distortion than apical portion.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.71-78
• /
• 1990

This research was made to investigate the change of the image layer and of the vertical and horizontal magnification on the Panelipse radiographic image by the control of profile index. Using the Panelipse, a series of 60 exposures were taken with the steel balls placed in the holes of the plastic model plate, and then evaluated by 4 observers. Two points were assigned for a reading of sharp, one for middling sharp, and zero for unsharp. Each ball image then could be given a total reader score of 0 to 8. The author analyzed the image layer as defined by a sharpness score of 6 or more. The results obtained were as follows: As the profile index was increased, the shape of the image layer was not changed, and the width of the image layer was increased, and the position of the layer shifted away from the rotation center. As the profile index was increased, the ranges of vertical and horizontal magnification was increased, especially the ranges of horizontal magnification was greater than that of vertical magnification.

• Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics
• /
• v.42 no.3
• /
• pp.200-205
• /
• 2017

Objectives: The aim of this in vivo study was to assess the accuracy of 2 third-generation electronic apex locators (EALs), Propex II (Dentsply Maillefer) and Root ZX II (J. Morita), and radiographic technique for locating the major foramen (MF). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two premolars with single canals that required extraction were included. Following anesthesia, access, and initial canal preparation with size 10 and 15 K-flex files and SX and S1 rotary ProTaper files, the canals were irrigated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. The length of the root canal was verified 3 times for each tooth using the 2 apex locators and once using the radiographic technique. Teeth were extracted and the actual WL was determined using size 15 K-files under a ${\times}25$ magnification. The Biostat 4.0 program (AnalystSoft Inc.) was used for comparing the direct measurements with those obtained using radiographic technique and the apex locators. Pearson's correlation analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for statistical analyses. Results: The measurements obtained using the visual method exhibited the strongest correlation with Root ZX II (r = 0.94), followed by Propex II (r = 0.90) and Ingle's technique (r = 0.81; p < 0.001). Descriptive statistics using ANOVA (Tukey's post hoc test) revealed significant differences between the radiographic measurements and both EALs measurements (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Both EALs presented similar accuracy that was higher than that of the radiographic measurements obtained with Ingle's technique. Our results suggest that the use of these EALs for MF location is more accurate than the use of radiographic measurements.

• Journal of Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.281-286
• /
• 1995

Tooth length determination is a crucial step in endodontic treatment. Traditionally, radiographs are used to confirm working length of the root length. This study was performed to evaluate the radiographic distortion(magnification) and calculate correction coefficients for the object-film distance. Ninty-six radiographs were made of eight extracted teeth(two upper first premolars, two lower first premolars, two upper first molars, and two lower first molars) by using the 16 inch long cone paralelling techniques with 1mm interval from 5 to 16mm tooth-film distance. The results were as follows. 1. The least mean radiographic distortion from 5 to 16mm tooth-film distance was 2.42±0.68％(the length of mesiobuccal cusp-mesial root of lower first molars), the greatest distortion was 4.74±1.36％(the length of mesiobuccal cusp-mesiobuccal root of upper first molars). 2. The greatest correction coefficient was 0.986(the mesiobuccal cusp-mesial root of lower first molars, the lowest one was 0.937(the mesiobuccal cusp-mesiobuccal root of upper first molars).

• Imaging Science in Dentistry
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.115-119
• /
• 2005

Purpose : To evaluate the magnification error percentage in repeatedly taken panoramic radiographs of same patient and machine. Materials and Methods : 92 panoramic radiographs from 46 patients were traced and 30 horizontal and vertical measurements were made with digital sliding caliper. The results were compared with paired t-test. Results : There was no statistically significant difference between the two measurements. The overall difference as percentage error was $6.19\pm5.60\%$. The largest error as $14.61\pm12.44\%$ was found at condylar height 1, and smallest as $1.86\pm1.61\%$ at mandibular height. Overall vertical error excluding condylar height 1 was $3.76\pm3.97\%$, and the horizontal error $6.88\pm5.92\%$. Conclusion . Repeatedly taken panoramic radiographs of the same patient and machine was reliable since there was no significant percentage error difference but the percentage error ranged from $1.86\pm1.61\%\;to\;14.61\pm12.44\%$ indicating the error depends on the measuring site.

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.48 no.10
• /
• pp.724-728
• /
• 2010

Accurate analysis of facial asymmetry prior to any orthognathic or orthodontic treatment plan is essential in ensuring good treatment result. Dental CBCT (Cone-beam Computed Tomography) provides as actual three-dimensional measurements of distance and angle without any radiographic magnification as medical CT provides, while its field of view is limited to the oral and maxillofacial area. CBCT is a useful tool for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. The coordinates of facial landmarks are obtained from the 3D reconstruction software which enables the establishment of perpendicular planes and the identification of the landmarks. Then, the bilateral discrepancies of the landmarks are obtained as spherical polar coordinates which can show the amount of asymmetry and its direction. A method of 3D analysis of facial asymmetry using CBCT is introduced in this report.