• Title/Summary/Keyword: Qualitative and Quantitative

Search Result 3,581, Processing Time 0.029 seconds

Paradigm Shift of Digital Divide and Intellectual Digital Divide (정보격차의 패러다임 전환과 지적 정보격차)

  • Lee, Seungmin
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.51 no.1
    • /
    • pp.91-114
    • /
    • 2020
  • Due to the settlement of the ICT environment and the widespread dissemination of Net media, the quantitative digital divide based on access to information has evolved into the formation of a qualitative digital divide. In the current information environment where enormous amounts of information exist on the Internet, there is a deeper intellectual digital divide that is different from the existing quantitative and qualitative digital divide. This study identified the changes in digital divide resulted from the evolution of information environment and empirically verified the formation of the intellectual digital divide. It also demonstrated that the intellectual digital divide is not distinct from the existing quantitative and qualitative digital divide, but from differences in the intellectual capacity of the information based on the factors of the existing digital divide. In particular, it was confirmed that the educational and economic levels, which have been the key factors of the traditional digital divide, still form the quantitative and qualitative digital divide, and also act as the key factors in the formation of the intellectual digital divide.

Development and Adaption of Sustainablility Evaluation Indicators for Chungcheongbuk-Do Province - Adopting Quantitative & Qualitive Indicators - (충청북도 지속가능성 평가지표의 개발 및 적용 - 정량적 정성적 지표의 도입 -)

  • Moon, Seok-ki;Yu, Byong-Deuk
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.85-100
    • /
    • 2016
  • Local Agenda 21 organizations have been founded at the most divisions of local government in Chungcheongbuk-Do, but there has been no methods to monitor the total Sustainable Development trends. For the alternative solution of that problem in the Province, this study purposed (1) to develop Indicators fit to this Province (2) to examine the availability of the developed indicators adopting to each division section. Indicators were developed and examined by fields and Quantity / Quality considerations. As a 1st step, committee-composed with field professionals each-selected and developed Quantitative Sustainable Development Indicators(SDIs) optimized to Chungbuk-Province through critical discussions proposing Qualitative Indicators as a suggestion. In 2nd step, developed Indicators were applied and tested upon each divisions. Statistic data were used to calculate indices. 3rd step is adoption stage of Qualitative Indicators which were tested with questionnaire survey analysis. As a results, SDIs for Chungcheongbuk-Do -38 Quantitative SDIs within 4 provisions of 11 items with 8 Qualitative indicators categorization be put off- is developed. With the application test, 5 Quantitative Indicators- were found to be not adaptable because of lack or none of statistic data. Among the 8 Qualitative Indicators, 3 pairs found to be similar results in each pair which needed to be integrated into one. With them, bio-species related and health related Indicators were proposed to be newly added. Nation wide Sustainability comparison between divisions and Ecological Indicator selection are another themes to be considered.

Comparison of a Qualitative and a Quantitative Approach to Evaluate the Performance of R&D Projects: A Case Study (연구개발 프로젝트 정성·정량평가 비교 분석을 통한 성과평가 발전방향 연구 : K연구원 사례를 중심으로)

  • Lee, Suchul;Ko, Mihyun
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.271-291
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study measures and compares the performance of research and development (R&D) programs in government-funded research institutes (GRIs) in terms of qualitative and quantitative approaches to find out strategic insights for improving performance evaluation policy. In particular, we adopt the evaluation results from the real data of K institute in 2015 for a qualitative evaluation and the results of data envelopment analysis (DEA) for a quantitative evaluation. Comparative analysis of the R&D performance of 14 programs finds that the difference between the evaluation results of qualitative and quantitative approaches is significant. From this finding, we suggest several strategic directions to complement two approaches each other.

Analyzing Students' Works with Quantitative and Qualitative Graphs Using Two Frameworks of Covariational Reasoning (그래프 유형에 따른 두 공변 추론 수준 이론의 적용 및 비교)

  • Park, JongHee;Shin, Jaehong;Lee, Soo Jin;Ma, Minyoung
    • Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
    • /
    • v.27 no.1
    • /
    • pp.23-49
    • /
    • 2017
  • This study examined two current learning models for covariational reasoning(Carlson et al.(2002), Thompson, & Carlson(2017)), applied the models to teaching two $9^{th}$ grade students, and analyzed the results according to the types of graphs(a quantitative graph or qualitative graph). Results showed that the model of Thompson and Carlson(2017) was more useful than that of Carlson et al.(2002) in figuring out the students' levels in their quantitative graphing activities. Applying Carlson et al.(2002)'s model made it possible to classify levels of the students in their qualitative graphs. The results of this study suggest that not only quantitative understanding but also qualitative understanding is important in investigating students' covariational reasoning levels. The model of Thompson and Carlson(2017) reveals more various aspects in exploring students' levels of quantitative understanding, and the model of Carlson et al.(2002) revealing more of qualitative understanding.

Analysis on Mixed Methods Research in Mathematics Education: A Qualitative Approach (초등수학교육에 적용된 혼합연구법의 특성 및 시사점에 대한 연구)

  • Na, Janghaum;Kim, Jinho
    • Education of Primary School Mathematics
    • /
    • v.20 no.2
    • /
    • pp.177-192
    • /
    • 2017
  • In theory, mixed methods that incorporate both quantitative and qualitative approaches can maximize strengths of each method while minimize the short comings of each. Mixed methods research is a feature of educational research nowadays, and the number of studies applied mixed methods research has been gradually increasing. This study investigates how mixed methods research was applied in the field of mathematic education, especially focusing on how qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to best address their research questions. With this in mind, this study carefully selects and analyzes 4 research articles that used mixed methods and were published by Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea in 2015. This study provides detailed result of qualitative analysis on mixed methods research while other a few previous analysis on mixed methods research were tend to focusing on quantitative analysis, producing numeric quantitative information. The result of this study provides practical and in-depth analysis on how to improve validity and possibility of mixed methods research, addressing alternative ways to combine two different research methods and key elements to take into account.

Some Trends and Issues of Qualitative Research Method in Library and Information Science (문헌정보학 분야의 질적 연구 동향과 과제)

  • Lee, Myeong-Hee
    • Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.16 no.2
    • /
    • pp.177-201
    • /
    • 2005
  • The purpose of this research is to study the meanings and characteristics of qualitative research method in LIS. As the philosophy and epistemology of qualitative research are widely different from those of quantitative research, the meaning of validity and reliability must be interpreted in its ow9 structure and dimension. Essentially qualitative researchers seek to understand and interpret the world of others from their own viewpoints which basically tend to be subjective. Accordingly, qualitative researchers‘ understandings and interpretations are met with readers' subjectivity. By carefully analyzing the nature of qualitative research in LIS, I tried to point out some problems in terms of validity and reliability and practical strategies. Six problems issued in the qualitative research method are presented.

  • PDF

A Case Study on ERP Adoption in Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Industry (조선해양 산업에서의 ERP 구축 사례 연구)

  • Jung, Sung Leep;Lee, Jaekwang;Jo, Hyeon
    • Journal of Information Technology Services
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.189-199
    • /
    • 2013
  • As many organizations have adopted and implemented ERP systems, concerns about ERP performance also have increased. Former researches studied the ERP implementation of general large or medium size enterprises but there are not enough studies on ERP systems of a specific industry domain. In this paper, we introduce a case study on ERP adoption methodology of global leading company 'D' in shipbuilding and marine engineering industry. We examined ERP implementation background, method and scope and evaluated ERP performance in perspective of both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative research usually examines ERP performance based on financial statements and qualitative study typically examines organization change or improvement. As a result, ERP implementation in shipbuilding and marine industry can improve quantitative aspects such as cost, human resource and organization performance. As qualitative analysis, business process and tools can be unified and management transparency can be improved by ERP implementation. The result of this paper will be useful guideline for organizations which are considering ERP systems.

Risk Assessment for Performance Evaluation System of Hydrogen Refueling Station (수소충전소 성능평가 장비 안전성 평가 연구)

  • KANG, SEUNGKYU;LEE, DONGHOON
    • Journal of Hydrogen and New Energy
    • /
    • v.33 no.3
    • /
    • pp.232-239
    • /
    • 2022
  • This study performed qualitative and quantitative risk assessment of equipment for evaluating the protocol of hydrogen refueling stations and suggested measures to improve safety. Hazard and operability study was performed for qualitative risk assessment, and Hy-KoRAM was used for quantitative risk assessment. Through a qualitative risk assessment, additional ventilation devices were installed, simultaneous venting of the storage container was prohibited, and the number of repeated refilling of the evaluation equipment was identified to manage the number of fillings of the container. Through quantitative risk assessment, the area around the device was set as a restricted area when evaluating the station, and measures were suggested to reduce the frequency of accidents.

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of antimicrobial usage: the first step for antimicrobial stewardship

  • Song Mi Moon;Bongyoung Kim;Hong Bin Kim
    • The Korean journal of internal medicine
    • /
    • v.39 no.3
    • /
    • pp.383-398
    • /
    • 2024
  • The identification of antimicrobial use patterns is essential for determining key targets for antimicrobial stewardship interventions and evaluating the effectiveness thereof. Accurately identifying antimicrobial use patterns requires quantitative evaluation, which focuses on measuring the quantity and frequency of antimicrobial use, and qualitative evaluation, which assesses the appropriateness, effectiveness, and potential side effects of antimicrobial prescriptions. This paper summarizes the quantitative and qualitative methods used to evaluate antimicrobials, drawing insights from overseas and domestic cases.

Barriers to English Communication at the Korean EFL Adult Level

  • Jung, Woo-Hyun;Oh, Hyun-Ju
    • English Language & Literature Teaching
    • /
    • v.11 no.3
    • /
    • pp.1-23
    • /
    • 2005
  • This paper is a qualitative and quantitative study. The main purpose of the paper is to diagnose what makes English communication difficult at the Korean EFL adult level. In order to obtain data, this study employed interviews and a questionnaire. We identified thirty three factors blocking pathways to oral communication. Qualitative analysis repeatedly revealed patterns such as lack of grammar, lack of vocabulary, lack of background knowledge, and peer pressure, but quantitative analysis yielded somewhat different results: lack of colloquial expressions, lack of vocabulary, lack of various topics, problems in the educational system, difficulty in using existing knowledge, and lack of grammar. Findings which were common to both qualitative and quantitative analyses suggest that lack of linguistic knowledge and lack of background knowledge are major barriers learners encounter in communication. On the basis of the results, suggestions are made for overcoming these barriers.

  • PDF