• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.94-103
• /
• 2008

This study measured technology transfer efficiency for public institutes. The study made use of DEA being one of the non-parametric linear programming to evaluate technology transfer efficiency for public institutes and to measure technology efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. The measurement of the technology transfer efficiency for public institutes was as follows: The cause of the technology transfer inefficiency was affected by pure technical inefficiency more than by scale inefficiency. Public institutes' RTS(Return To Scale) value varied depending upon the features of the organizations than the features of the regions. Public research institutes' RTS value is more effective than universities' RTS value. We compared the RTS group with the RTS of Projected DMU groups. The RTS group had constant returns to scale effect while the RTS of the Projected DMU had increasing returns to scale effect. The technology transfer efficiency of public institutes varied depending upon the features of the organizations and regions : The technology transfer efficiency of public institutes were as follows : public research institutes at the metropolitan area, public research institutes at the local areas, universities at the metropolitan area and universities at the local areas. In other words, the technology transfer efficiency was affected by organizational characteristics more than by regional characteristics at the place where public institutes were located.

• 산업융합연구
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2016

The purpose of this Study is to present the tasks and means of improving the operational system of public culture and arts institutes in the future on the basis of the analysis of the effectiveness of operation of public culture and arts institutes. The summary of the results of analysis in this Study is as follows: Firstly, it was found that the factor variables that impart effect on the operation of public culture and arts institutes included (1) artistic value, (2) convenience and (3) organizational management, while the performance variable of public culture and arts institutes was (4) operational performance. Secondly, in the analysis of the structure that explains the operational effects of public culture and arts institutes, convenience and organizational management were found to impart effects on the operational performances. However, artistic value was found to have no effect on operational performances. Therefore, these results of analysis imply that organizational management and convenience, rather than artistic value, need to be fortified in order to elevate the operational performances of public culture and arts institutes.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.117-138
• /
• 2012

Governments around the world place great hopes in innovation in their search for new sources of growth and for responses to grand challenges, such as climate change, new or re-emerging infectious diseases, accelerating urbanisation, ageing, food security, and availability of clean water. However they must devise their relevant support policies -- including through sponsored research within public research institutes -- taking into account that innovation processes are currently undergoing a major transformation. New innovation patterns include a broadening scope of relevant activities, a growing importance but changing nature of scientific roots of technological development, a stronger demand-pull, the emergence of new local and national STI powerhouses, and the rise of more open and globalised innovation networks. They translate into new opportunities but also constraints for policies to enhance the contribution of public research institutes to national innovation performance. The article derives the main policy implications regarding the desirable evolution of the mission, research focus, as well as the funding and steering of public research institutes, with a special reference to Korea.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.141-163
• /
• 2008

Technology transfer from public research institutes is receiving an ever increasing importance in today's fast growing economy. Many factors have been cited as influencing the transfer performance. This study is focused on the strategy of institutes which is characterized by technology strategic factors and organizational/institutional factors. Methodologically, the technology strategy is represented by the information contained in applied patents, and the performance of technology transfer is indicated by the number of licensing contracts and royalty income. To further improve the contribution of public research institutes through technology transfer, I argue that individual institutes become more specialized in specific field and become more open to collaboration. It is also recommended that public research institutes gather together since it is easy to form the consortium of technology licensing office and it is not necessary to be located near the industrial field.

• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.63-92
• /
• 2010

Recent years have seen an intensified discussion in many OECD countries about the role and mission of public research in the innovation system. This discussion takes place in quite specific national contexts, but should benefit from international experience. However, whereas voluminous literatures address the changing governance methods, organizational forms and missions of universities, much less attention has been devoted to developing a common understanding of the challenges faced by non-university public research institutions. The main goals of this paper is to contribute to clarifying the nature of these challenges, outlines possible policy answers and draws some implications for Korea. In the first section, the paper uses available internationally comparable indicators to review trends in the contribution of government research institutes (GRIs) to R&D and innovation activities. In the second section, the paper identifies the current major changes in the dynamics of innovation that may call for further adjustments in the positioning, organization and steering of public research institutes. Finally, the paper outlines some strategic objectives and orientations for the reform of public research institutes as part of the broader agenda of the Korean innovation strategy.

• 지역사회간호학회지
• /
• 제14권3호
• /
• pp.533-545
• /
• 2003

Purpose: This study investigated the situation of public health official training and suggested a scheme for improving central and local official training institutes, in order to improve the quality and quantity of training programs for central and local public health officials. Methods: This study examined training resources, design processes, content and methods of training programs of the Department of Health and Welfare Training in NIH and the fifteen city and provincial officials training institutes in 2002. Results: The central and the local officials training institutes didn't exchange information on public health training. NIH supplied various specialized training programs for senior and junior officials. However, city and provincial official training institutes supplied a few training programs for local public health officials. Conclusion: A mutually cooperative relationship is needed between central and local official training institutes to exchange information on public health official training. The Department of Health and Welfare Training in NIH as a central training institute has to develop training programs related to new public health policies, supply training programs for senior officials, and support local official training institutes. To satisfy the training demands of public health officials, the city and provincial official training institutes should increase the number of training programs for junior officials.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.119-137
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 기업의 관점에서 산연협력주체인 기업과 출연(연)간의 관계특성에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하고, 이러한 산연협력주체간 관계특성이 산연협력성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 기존 산학연협력에 관한 연구에 기초하여 산연협력주체간 관계특성에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 기업의 산연협력의지, 기업의 연구개발능력 및 기업의 지각된 출연(연)역량을 선정하였고, 이들 요인과 산연협력주체 간 관계특성 및 산연협력성과간의 관계를 가설로 설정하였다. 기업의 산연협력의지, 기업의 연구개발능력, 기업의 지각된 출연(연)역량, 산연협력주체간 관계특성 및 산연협력성과로 설정된 연구모형을 검정하기 위하여 산연협력기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 수행하였으며, 116개의 기업으로부터 응답을 받았다. 이 자료를 기초로 PLS-MGA를 활용하여 연구모형을 검정하였다. 실증분석 결과에서 기업의 산연협력의지, 기업의 연구개발능력 및 기업의 지각된 출연(연)역량은 산연협력주체간 관계특성에 정의 영향을 미치고, 산연협력주체간 관계특성은 기업의 산연협력성과에 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기업의 연구개발능력과 기업의 지각된 출연(연)역량은 기업의 산연협력성과에 직접적으로 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 기업의 산연협력성과를 높이는데 정책적 및 실무적 시사점을 제공한다.

• Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.27-40
• /
• 2016

This study uses a network approach to investigate the structural characteristics of sub-organizations within public research institutes in order to obtain their implications for organizational structures. We construct a network based on research similarities between sub-organizations because sub-organizations generally build their own research portfolios. We examine how sub-units are organized based on their structural features. The structural features are compared between three public research institutes in different countries: the Korean the Government-funded Research Institutes (GRIs), the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft in Germany, and the National Laboratories (NLs) in the United States. The structural comparison helps to identify organizational characteristics and to differentiate between them. We found little common ground in the research areas between the GRIs because individual sub-organizations have distinct research portfolios. Therefore, the organizational hierarchy of research in the GRIs is less matured than it is in other public research institutes. This study suggests that the GRIs need to establish integrated strategies in order to strengthen the common knowledge base.

• 경영과정보연구
• /
• 제37권3호
• /
• pp.147-171
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 기업과 정부출연(연)간 산연협력에 영향을 미치는 요인과 산연협력이 기업의 기술적 성과 및 경제적 성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 기존 산학간, 산연간, 산산간 및 산학연간 협력에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구를 고찰하고, 이를 기초로 산연협력에 영향을 미치는 요인을 선정하였다. 본 연구에서 산연협력에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 선정된 요인은 정부출연(연)의 역량, 기업의 연구개발역량과 조직적 특성 그리고 정부 및 지방자치단체의 지원이다. 한편, 기존 연구에 기초하여 산연협력 영향 요인, 산연협력, 기업의 기술적 성과 및 기업의 경제적 성과간 구조적 관계를 7개의 가설로 설정하였다. 본 연구는 산연협력 기업을 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 자료를 수집하였고, 총 116개의 설문지를 회수하여 가설검정에 사용하였다. 가설검정을 위한 방법으로는 PLS-MGA가 사용되었다. 실증분석 결과에서 정부출연(연)의 역량, 기업의 조직적 특성과 정부 및 지방자치단체의 지원이 산연협력에 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 산연협력은 기업의 기술적 성과에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 기업의 기술적 성과는 기업의 경제적 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 반면, 기업의 연구개발역량이 산연협력에 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기업과 정부출연(연)간 산연협력이 기업의 경제적 성과에 직접적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 산연협력과 경제적 성과간의 관계에서 기술적 성과의 매개효과를 확인하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 기업과 정부출연(연)간 협력을 활성화하는데 시사점을 제공할 것이다.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한예방의학회 1995년도 제47차 추계 학술대회 연제집
• /
• pp.73-74
• /
• 1995