• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.167-184
• /
• 2011

D대학교 공과대학에서는 2010학년도 신입생들을 대상으로 수학기초학력평가를 실시하고, 그 결과에 따라 보충수업 형식의 수학기초학력 향상프로그램을 진행하였다. 본 연구에서는 이 프로그램이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 수학기초학력평가 성적과 대학수학 성적을 보충수업 비대상자와 대상자, 대상자 중에서도 보충수업에 출석한 횟수에 따라 비교 분석하였다. 또한 학습동기에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위하여 수학적 성향검사, 수학에 대한 인식 설문, 그리고 정규수업과 보충수업에 대한 설문을 실시하고 그 결과를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, D대학교 공과대학 신입생들은 대체로 수학기초학력이 부족하였고 수학기초학력 향상프로그램은 학업성취도와 학습동기에 크게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 효율적인 대학수학 교육을 위해서는 수학기초학력평가를 실시하고 수학적 성향검사와 수학에 대한 인식 설문을 통하여 학생들의 수학적 배경을 정확하게 파악해야 하며, 대학수학 교수 학습은 수학기초학력 향상에 초점을 두어야 함을 제언하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.31-48
• /
• 2009

Utilizing the path analysis method, the study explores the relationships among the influential factors in mathematics modeling academic achievement. The following conclusions are drawn: 1. Achievement motivation, creative inclination, cognitive style, the mathematical cognitive structure and mathematics modeling self-monitoring ability, those have significant correlation with mathematics modeling academic achievement; 2. Mathematical cognitive structure and mathematics modeling self-monitoring ability have significant and regressive effect on mathematics modeling academic achievement, and two factors can explain 55.8% variations of mathematics modeling academic achievement; 3. Achievement motivation, creative inclination, cognitive style, mathematical cognitive structure have significant and regressive effect on mathematics modeling self-monitoring ability, and four factors can explain 70.1% variations of mathematics modeling self-monitoring ability; 4. Achievement motivation, creative inclination, and cognitive style have significant and regressive effect on mathematical cognitive structure, and three factors can explain 40.9% variations of mathematical cognitive structure.

• 한국초등수학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.497-516
• /
• 2018

본 연구는 초등학교 5학년 학생들의 수학적 모델링 수업에서 모둠 구성 방법에 따라 수학적 모델링 과정 수행 능력과 수학적 추론 능력에 차이가 있는지 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 3가지 문제 상황으로 각각 8차시에 걸쳐 총 24차시의 수학적 모델링 수업을 설계 및 실시하였다. 그 결과 동질 모둠 보다는 이질 모둠에서 더 낳은 수학적 모델링 과정 수행 능력과 수학적 추론 능력을 보여 주었다. 본 연구 결과는 수학 수업에서 수학적 모델링을 적용할 때 모둠 구성의 관점에서 이질 모둠이 보다 효과적임을 시사한다.

• 한국보육지원학회지
• /
• 제19권4호
• /
• pp.29-52
• /
• 2023

Objective: This research aims to examine the effect of a young children's engineering-focused STEAM program based on the project approach - a program that constructs components aligned with children's interests in their play through an engineering design process - on their scientific inquiry ability, mathematical problem-solving ability, and creativity. Methods: In this research, 42 five-year-old children from a public kindergarten in S district, I city, were randomly divided into experimental and comparative groups, each with 21 children. The engineering-focused STEAM program was conducted from April 18 to June 10, 2022, with the experimental group exploring the 'car' theme and the comparison group focusing on a different theme. The study employed an independent sample t-test and analysis of covariance(ANCOVA), using the pretest as a covariate to control variables. Results: The children-selected 'cars' themed engineering-focused STEAM program was effective in enhancing their scientific inquiry ability, mathematical problem-solving ability and creativity. Conclusion/Implications: The engineering-focused STEAM program, which emerges from young children's interesting daily play, had positive effects on enhancing their scientific inquiry ability, mathematical problem-solving ability, and creativity. This research can serve as fundamental data for developing education programs focused on engineering within the STEAM framework, guided by children's emergent play.

• 아동학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.175-185
• /
• 2007

This study examined types of errors made by young children on the Mathematical Ability Picture Test for Young Children(Hwang & Choi, 2007). The subjects were 30 5-year-old children. The process of taking the Mathematical Ability Picture Test was videotaped and the videotape was transcribed for analysis of errors. Findings were that in most of the sub-areas, strategy selection errors were dominant, followed by comprehension errors. Second, there was a tendency for boys and girls to make similar types of errors in every sub-area of the Mathematical Ability Picture Test for Young Children.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.113-131
• /
• 1998

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships among affective characteristics, mathematical problem-solving abilities, and reasoning abilities of the 6th graders for mathematics, and to analyze whether the relationships have any differences according to the regions, which the subjects live. The results are as follows： First, self-awareness is the most important factor which is related mathematical problem-solving abilities and reasoning abilities, and learning habit and deductive reasoning ability have the most strong relationships. Second, for the relationships between problem-solving abilities and reasoning abilities, inductive reasoning ability is more related to problem-solving ability than deductive reasoning ability Third, for the regions, there is a significant difference between mathematical abilities and deductive reasoning abilities of the subjects.

• East Asian mathematical journal
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.381-389
• /
• 2011

The flexible mathematical thinking - the ability to generate and connect various representations of concepts - is useful in understanding mathematical structure and variation in problem solving. In particular, the flexible mathematical thinking with the inventive mathematical thinking, the original mathematical problem solving ability and the mathematical invention is a core concept, which must be emphasized in all branches of mathematical education. In this paper, the author considered a case of flexible mathematical thinking with an inventive problem solving ability shown by his student via real analysis courses. The case is on the proofs of the equivalences of three different definitions on the concept of limit superior shown in three different real analysis books. Proving the equivalences of the three definitions, the student tried to keep the flexible mathematical thinking steadily.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육
• /
• 제41권2호
• /
• pp.157-172
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to improve middle students'mathematical communication ability. We designed the mathematics instruction model based on Vygotsky's ZPD to develop the mathematical communication ability, and applied to 2nd grade students in Middle School. And we investigated the significant differences between the group which was instructed with mathematical communication and the group which was instructed with teacher's traditional explanation in aspects of learning achievement, mathematical disposition, and mathematical communication abilities. The results of the study are as follows : 1. There is no significant difference in learning achievement within significance level .05 between the group which was instructed with mathematical communication and the group which was instructed with teacher's traditional explanation by t-test. 2. There is a significant difference in reflection within significance level .01 and in self-confidence within significance level .10 by MANCOVA. 3. There is a significant difference in mathematical communication ability within significance level .01 between two groups by covariance analysis. In particular, there is a significant difference in reading within significance level .01 and in speaking within significance level .05 by t-test.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈C:초등수학교육
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.303-313
• /
• 2013

공간능력은 수학의 직관적 관점과 수학적 이해 및 수학적 성취도와도 밀접한 관련이 있다는 점에서 매우 중요한 능력으로 평가될 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 초등학교 4, 5, 6학년 학생 1228명을 대상으로 공간시각화능력을 조사하였다. 이를 통하여 다음과 같은 연구결과를 얻을 수 있었다. 첫째, 공간시각화 능력과 수학성취도, 공간시각화 능력과 공간시각화 검사시간 사이에 상관관계가 있다. 둘째, 공간능력은 남녀 사이에 차이가 있었으며, 남학생이 여학생보다 더 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 공간능력은 학년수준에서 4학년보다는 5학년이 높았으며, 5학년보다는 6학년이 더 높게 나타났다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.105-124
• /
• 2010

본 연구의 목적은 아동들의 수학적 의사소통 능력 중 말하기 능력과 쓰기 능력에 대해서 심도 깊게 알아보고, 말하기 능력과 쓰기 능력에서 어떤 차이점이 있는지를 조사하는 것이다. 3명의 5학년 아동들이 본 연구에 참여하였고 도형 영역에서 그들의 말하기 능력과 쓰기 능력이 분석되었다. 아동들은 자신이 알고 있는 수학적 개념이나 문제 해결 과정을 말 또는 글로 설명하기 위해서 적절한 수학적 언어를 선택하여 사용하는데 어려움을 나타내고 있었다. 본 연구에 참여한 아동들의 경우에는 말하기 능력이 쓰기 능력보다 좋은 것으로 나타났다.