• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.25 no.1
• /
• pp.5-18
• /
• 2014

Criteria for evaluating digital libraries have been suggested in prior studies, but limited research has been done to understand users' perceptions of evaluation criteria. This study investigates users' opinions of the importance of digital library evaluation criteria. Thirty user participants, including 10 faculty members and 20 students, were recruited from five universities across the United States. They were asked to rate the importance of evaluation criteria in eight dimensions (e.g. collections, information organization, context, etc.). The results demonstrate that users care about evaluation criteria related to the use and quality of collection and services rather than the operation of digital libraries. The findings of this study are relevant to the development of user-centered digital libraries and associated evaluation frameworks through the incorporation of unique users' needs and preferences.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Costume
• /
• v.54 no.7
• /
• pp.15-26
• /
• 2004

The internet is one of the modern facilities that has been diffused very rapidly in recent years and tremendously influenced on our life. Although the adolescents are major users of internet, the literature in clothing and textile area has not addressed the relationships between adolescents' internet use and clothing behavior, The purpose of this study was to examine the differences of adolescents clothing behavior. purchase evaluative criteria, and information source according to the use of internet. Descriptive statistics, t test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and Duncan test were employed to analyze the data collected from the convenience sample of 572 middle and high school students in Gyeongnam, Korea. The use of internet was partially related to the adolescents' clothing behaviors. purchase evaluative criteria. and information source. Also, it was observed that the frequency and purpose of fashion website tended to be related more than the amount and purpose of internet did. Marketing implications from the results were suggested.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.17 no.6
• /
• pp.77-83
• /
• 2014

This paper deals with the practical experience and lessons to develop the criteria for evaluating projects in Computer Science & Information Engineering. In engineering education, project-based learning is different from problem-based learning. Project tasks are closer to professional reality. And self-direction is stronger in project work. In this paper, the development of project evaluation criteria is introduced with consideration of these differences. It is explained through running examples of basic project courses in Computer Science & Information Engineering.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.36-55
• /
• 1994

This study discussed extensively the CD-ROM evaluation criteria that are necessary for library and information center to acquire the CD-ROM products. The evaluation criteria discussed in previous studies are divided into managerial and technical aspects, and especially the search software and user interface catagories in the technical aspect are investigated separately. Finally the basic checklist is suggested for the evaluation of CD-ROM product in appendix.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2015.10a
• /
• pp.832-834
• /
• 2015

최근 CCRA(Common Criteria Recognition Arrangement) 협정서 개정에 따라 공통평가기준인 CC(Common Criteria) 평가제도에 변화가 생기고 있다. 현재의 CC 평가제도가 가지는 한계를 보완하고자 PP(protection profile)를 대신하는 cPP(collaborative protection profile)가 개발되었는데, 기존의 폐쇄적으로 운영되던 PP 개발 프로세스와 달리 cPP 개발에는 CCRA 회원국의 여러 기관 및 기업이 적극적으로 개발에 참여할 수 있다. 따라서 현재 세계 각국에서 cPP 개발에 관한 논의가 활발히 진행되고 있으며 세분화된 연구도 요구되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 기존의 CC 평가제도가 가지는 한계를 살펴보고 이러한 한계를 극복하기 위한 cPP의 등장 및 개정되는 새로운 CC 평가제도의 운영을 분석한다.

• Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association
• /
• v.39 no.12
• /
• pp.51-63
• /
• 2001

With the development of information technology, more and more internet sites are available to consumers. Increasing on the interests of diet and health in modem society, there are numerous internet sites dealing with food, nutrition and health. Considering the importance and expected roles of internet sites in information dissemination in the future world, it is important to put more efforts to encourage internet sites with more accurate an useful information. Up to present, not much work has been done on quality analysis and evaluation of the internet information. This study aimed to develop a model to evaluate and rank the internet information according to its quality so that consumers can be guided toward correct information source. Three models were adapted from the literature for pilot study to develop a model suitable for evaluation of contents of sites related to food and nutrition information. From the pilot study, a evaluation model was developed with criteria more relevant to Korean internet site by expert panel. Evaluation criteria of the model is authority, accuracy, objectivity, coverage, and user-friendliness. For the objective and systematic evaluation, scores were assigned totaling maximum 100 point to each evaluation criteria factors. The model developed in this study could be used as one for other internet sites in area other than food and nutrition.

• Journal of Distribution Science
• /
• v.14 no.11
• /
• pp.117-128
• /
• 2016

Purpose - In order to collect information needed for the establishment of more effective marketing strategies of on-line purchasing agent services targeting Chinese consumers, the study investigated the relationship among Chinese selection criteria. They included fashion products, use of information source, and satisfaction with on-line purchasing agent services. The study also identified the differences in the Chinese selection criteria of fashion products, use of information source, and the satisfaction level with on-line purchasing agent services according to their age and gender. Research design, data, and methodology - The study was implemented through a normative-descriptive survey method using a self-administered questionnaire. Data were collected from February 9 to 28, 2016, and analyzed by factor analysis, ANOVA and Duncan test, t-test, and multiple regression analysis. Results - Differences were found in selection criteria of fashion products and use of information sources among groups. Thirty's age group was concerned about price/brand more than the twenty's were. Twenty's were concerned about practicality/quality of the products more than the thirty's. Hallyu/broadcasting was used by men more than by women as an information source of Korean fashion. SNS/WOM(word of mouth) was used more by women than by man. Twenty's showed lower level of satisfaction with customer services/credibility than other factors. The thirty's showed lower level of satisfaction with informational role of the service than other factors. Those who utilize each type of fashion information source more showed higher satisfaction level with on-line purchasing agent service of Korean fashion products.. In general, according to the selection criteria and use of information, there were differences in satisfaction with on-line purchasing agent service of Korean fashion products. Conclusions - Considering the findings of the study, as well as age, gender, selection criteria and use of information source, Chinese consumers could be used as a criteria of market segmentation for on-line purchasing agent services of Korean fashion products. The results manifested that there is a need to differentiate marketing strategies according to the satisfaction levels with each satisfaction factors of on-line purchasing agent service of Korean fashion products.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.5 no.3
• /
• pp.827-836
• /
• 1998

본 연구의 목적은 평활 적합도 검정에 이용되는 모형선택 기법 중 AIC (Akaike information criteria) 기법과 BIC (Baysian information criteria) 기법을 사용한 검정통계량들에 대한 검정력을 비교 분석함에 있다. 또한 이 두 가지 기법을 이용한 새로운 검정 통계 량을 제시하고 기존의 검정 통계량들과 비교 분석하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.115-138
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study is to provide general principles to be used in designing university websites from the perspective of information architecture. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria of web sites were developed based on information architecture principles. The students taking IA class were directly involved in constructing the evaluation criteria and they can be classified into four categories: 1) information organization; 2) navigation system; 3) labeling system; and searching system. These criteria were employed in evaluating twenty randomly selected university websites in Korea. General principles to be used in designing university websites were developed based on the findings of the study. They are composed of four major components in designing: 1) systematic information organization; 2) flexible navigation system; 3) consistent labeling system; and 4) efficient searching system.

• Preventive Nutrition and Food Science
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.305-310
• /
• 2006

The Web is an important source of information for health care consumers, and the resources they find on the Web have a direct affect on their health outcomes. Despite the enormous benefits of online health care, the quality of health information on the Internet is an area of increasing concern. Therefore, there's a need to develop quality assessment tools that can filter out poor quality online health information. The purpose of this study is to explore the critical attributes for assessing website quality and for developing quality assessment measurements. We completed three focus group discussions with 24 participants that were administered by a moderator and based on specifically focused group questions. The results suggest that the most important quality criteria, as identified by the respondents, were related to issues of credibility and accuracy. To determine the credibility of Internet health information, the respondents stated one must consider the following: the information source, disclosure of the author's or organization's credentials/qualifications, disclosure of ownership and the updating of the content. For the accuracy of content, elements such as a statement of purpose, evidence-based information, relevance and completeness should be considered. Interactivity, accessibility, and design were additional quality criteria.