• 한국주거학회논문집
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.43-55
• /
• 2011

The purpose this study is to develop indicators that measure the healthy housing condition of multi-family housing. The major findings are as follow: first, healthy housing was defined by physical, mental, social, and management aspects and proposed the conceptual model of hierarchy structure of evaluation of healthy housing by literature reviews. Second, evaluating items were selected based on literature reviews of existing indicators and preceding studies about both domestic and overseas multi-family housing. The evaluating indicators were identified as a total of 87 evaluating items which were composed of four dimensions and 16 attributes on the basis of the conceptual model. They cover comprehensive scope of the multi-family housing such as unit, building, complex, and site. Third, as the measurement, the 5-point ordinal scale measure was suggested. The evaluating measurement including measure standards, measure methods, and measure contents were developed by each evaluating items. Lastly, the weighting of evaluating indicators was developed by AHP method conducted by survey of an expert group. Items were identified as high contributors or low contributors. The weighting of these items could suggest several evaluations according to the situation. The level of healthy housing condition may be evaluated by both total evaluation and a specific field of evaluation.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.543-552
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop integrated evaluation indicators of home care services in the hope that the increasing group of long-term home care patients could receive quality care services. Methods: The development involves a methodological study on a development phase and a verification phase. The main survey at a verification stage was conducted by the staffs at 146 institutions who agreed to participate on this study. Results: The evaluation index for the integrated home visit care consisted of five categories and 57 indicators including Managing Institution (12), Environment and Safety (3), Right and Responsibility (7), Process of Care (31) and Results of Care (4). The criterion-related validity was verified in regard to the participation in the 2010 evaluation of long-term home-care institutions by the National Health Insurance Corporation. Conclusion: The evaluation index of the integrated home visiting care developed in this study is considered suitable to utilize as evaluating indicators in managing and evaluating the way of how institutions integrate and provide home visit care services as well as home nursing care services.

• 인간식물환경학회지
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.245-256
• /
• 2021

Background and objective: The vitalization of urban agriculture has increased various forms of experience-based education using school gardens, which raised the importance of school gardens in terms of value as well as the need to develop an implementation system for education-based agricultural experience service using school gardens. Thus, we reset the evaluation indicators from the previous study to establish objective evaluation indicators that enable quantitative comparison of school garden education services. Methods: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and direct question (DQ) surveys were conducted on 20 experts from October 12 to 19, 2020 after establishing the purpose and subjects of evaluation, and then the weights were calculated using the Expert Choice 2010 program. Results: First, we analyzed the problems of the previous indicators by categorizing the performance indicators and comparing and verifying them with six requirements of valuation. Then, we added 'welfare values' and established sub-indicators accordingly. The importance of value indicator in AHP was in the order of education values (0.544), health values (0.182), welfare values (0.164), environmental values (0.062), and economic values (0.049). The importance of environmental and economic values was relatively low, less than 0.1. The importance of sub-indicators was highest in cultivating character (0.144), followed by enhancing ecological sensitivity (0.141) > promoting mental health (0.134) > cultivating agricultural literacy (0.120) > improving social skills (0.104). And mitigating climate change in environmental values was lowest (0.009). Increase in income was the lowest (0.036). This can be regarded as the expression of change to increase the educational effect based on collective life and the connotative meaning of 'school'. In the case of DQ, the AHP weight and order were the same, but the environmental and economic values were relatively low, and the result was different from AHP weight. For sub-indicators, the importance in DQ was highest in promoting mental health (0.136), followed by promoting physical health (0.085), ]cultivating character (0.082), social integration (0.072), and enhancing ecological sensitivity (0.071). After reviewing related experts, we came up with 5 evaluation indicators and 16 sub-indicators for school garden education service, which are objective evaluation indicators that enable quantitative comparison. Conclusion: In the future, we will validate the socioeconomic values of school garden education services and contribute to revitalizing school gardens by establishing policy alternatives for effective operation and management of school gardens.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.177-209
• /
• 2007

This work firstly aims to analyse the balance between tangibles and intangibles as well as among human capital, structural capital and relational capital of evaluation indicators for the research institutes in science and technology sector conducted in 2006, by adopting intellectual capital model. The research question of this work comes from that while the R&D activity can produce both tangibles and intangibles, there have no been methodologies to relevantly measure and rationally judge these, in particular, intangible performance. The result shows that the institute evaluation system in 2006 had given more weight on tangibles and structural capital than intangibles and other intellectual capitals such as human capital and relational capital, in comparison to the past evaluation system, even though, in principle, the current evaluation system has to deal with the intangible research performances as well as tangible ones in economic, social and cultural perspective. Finally, based on these analysis, I will try to suggest some policy directions for overcoming the deficits of indicators in institute evaluation system.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.538-557
• /
• 2006

최근 들어 연구개발 성과물의 평가에 대한 관심이 급격히 증가하고 있다. 이와 관련하여 연구개발성과물의 질을 측정하기 위한 많은 시도가 이루어져 왔으며, 이를 위한 정량적 지수에 대한 중요성 역시 증가하고 있는 상황이다. 연구개발 성과물의 평가를 위해 가장 널리 사용되는 지수로는 논문수, 피인용수, 영항지수 둥이 있다. 그러나 이들은 학문 분야에 대한 편차가 심한 것으로 알려져 있으므로 이들을 사용하는 데에는 많은 한계가 있다. 본 연구에서는 이와 같은 기존의 지표들이 가지는 한계를 실증분석을 통해 제시하고자 하였으며, 아울러 연구개발 성과물로서 논문의 질 평가에 활용될 수 있는 정량 지표를 제시하고자 하였다.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.137-165
• /
• 2013

오늘날과 같이 방대한 정보에의 접근 및 이용이 가능한 정보사회에서 공공도서관이 다양한 유형의 이용자에게 원하는 정보를 제공하기 위해서는 보편성 측면에서 유니버설디자인 원리를 적용한 서비스의 제공이 필요하다. 이에 본 연구는 공공도서관이 본래의 목적에 부합하는 서비스를 제공하고 있는지를 평가하기 위해 6개 평가영역, 10개 평가항목, 41개 평가내용으로 구성된 유니버설디자인 원리에 기초한 공공도서관 서비스의 보편성 평가지표를 개발하였다. 그리고 41개 평가내용에 대해 유니설디자인 적용의 5요소인 '보편성, 편의성, 인지성, 안전성, 경제성' 중 평가지표의 특성에 따라 적용 가능한 요소를 설정하였다.

• 창의정보문화연구
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.49-56
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 해외의 교육정보화 인프라 평가 지표들을 살펴보고, 향후 교육정보화 정책 방향 수립 및 발전을 위한 자료를 만드는데 목적이 있다. 교육정보화 평가 지표를 국제기구와 국가별로 구분하여 각각 OECD PISA의 ICT 친숙도 평가문항, UNESCO 인프라 분석지표, ITU 핵심 지표와 독일 베텔스만 재단의 보고서, 미국 교육부의 학생 접근성 보고서, 중국의 정보화 발전 지수 등을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 학교 인터넷 연결망과 같은 전기 및 통신 시설에 대한 평가 문항(지표)이 공통적으로 모든 지표에서 나타났고, 학습자 대 PC 비율(LCR)도 4개 지표 중 3개의 지표에서 나타났다. 또한, 지원되는 응용프로그램의 종류, ICT 보조 수업의 유형과 같은 다양한 해외 평가 지표가 개발되어 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구의 결과물은 빠르게 급변하는 현대 사회에 적합한 교육정보화 평가를 수행하고 평가도구를 개발 하는데 큰 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.355-376
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 2007년 고안된 병영도서관 평가지표의 개발과정을 고찰하고, 이를 2008년 84개 병영도서관에 적용한 결과 분석을 통해 보다 합리적으로 활용 가능한 평가지표로 수정하는 방안을 모색하였다. 이에 따라 병영도서관 서면평가결과와 10개 기관의 실사결과를 종합하여 나타난 문제점 분석을 통해 계획, 재정, 서비스, 장서관리 등 8개 영역 28개 지표와 지표별 평가 척도 일부를 수정 보완하였다. 또한, 정확하고 객관적인 평가를 위해 군별 특성이 다른 해군과 공군의 병영도서관을 육군 병영도서관과 분리하여 그룹핑할 것과, 보다 완전한 평가를 위하여 병영도서관 실태 조사 표준안을 만들어 군별로 전수조사가 이루어져야 한다는 것을 제안하였다.

• 국제학술발표논문집
• /
• The 3th International Conference on Construction Engineering and Project Management
• /
• pp.1453-1462
• /
• 2009

It is very important for performance of information system that we make an effort to raise user's satisfaction by continuously grasping user's requirement by evaluation of PMIS based on ASP service quality and reflecting this to information system. However, It is lack that developments of suitable evaluation index of PMIS based on ASP service quality. Hereupon, In this study, we propose the evaluation indicators. First, The evaluation area is classified by form the foundation of D & M IS Success Model (2003); system quality, information quality, service quality. Second, The detail evaluation item which include considerations which are gotten through investigation of the construction industry and PMIS based on ASP is grouping by form the foundation SERVQUAL which is a service quality evaluation tool proposed PZB(1988). It is suitable to evaluate PMIS based on ASP service quality in construction industry and able to evaluate various aspects.

• Educational Technology International
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.81-101
• /
• 2005

Campus-based universities have provided face-to-face instruction traditionally. But recently, it is becoming a trend that they provide blended learning which combines e-learning and f2f instruction. Therefore, traditional university has been installing the ICT related convenience for the faculty and students to use easily to their classes. The purpose of this study is to develop quality indicators of ICT-related support for proper blended learning in traditional campus-based universities. This indicators are used for measuring the quality of ICT-related services at university level for quality education. To this end, first, we reviewed literature about quality indicators of university evaluation and e-learning. Second,we did case study. We selected and analyzed one university for a case, And we identified what elements are perceived important to faculty for more efficient use of technology to their class. Third, we summarized all this data and established the quality indicators framework of ICT-related components for blended learning in campus-based universities. Then, these indicators were revised after the expert evaluation. And then 10 experts and practitioners scored importance rating. Finally, we sum them up to 17 indicators and 48 sub-indicators in three phases (input, process, output). Among them, e-learning related organization or body, usability of Learning Management System, and quality assessment system got the highest scores. These indicators are supposed to contribute to measure the quality of ICT-related environment for blended learning and to provide informations about what is required for efficient blended learning in the campus-based universities.