• 대한치과기공학회지
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.17-47
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to examine the 2001 curricula in 17 departments of dental technology across the nation in an attempt to find out the educational realities of the departments by term and school year and serve as a basis for the development of more advanced, efficient dental technology curriculum and common educational objectives. For that purpose, the 2001 curricula of the three-year dental laboratory technology departments were analyzed by school year and term to calculate the amount of required credit, the number of subjects, and the weekly classes for electives and major. The findings of this study could be listed as below: 1. The departments of dental laboratory technology nationwide investigated require students to get 120 to 135 credits in total. Out of the credits, 10 to 25 credits are assigned to the electives, and 106 to 11 8 credits are given to the major. 2. There are 50 to 68 subjects in the departments of dental technology. 5 to 16 subjects are the electives, and 41 to 59 are the major. 3. There are 150 to 196 classes per week, which consist of 10 to 30 ones for the electives and 137 to In for the major. 4. The curricula for the first semester of the first year are as follows: 1) 20 to 24 credits are required. 4 to 11 credits are alloted to the electives, and 9 to 19 credits are assigned to the major. 2) The number of subject is 9 to 13, which are composed of 2 to 7 for the electives and 4 to 9 for the major. 3) The weekly classes are 22 to 29. The classes for the electives range from 4 to 14 per week, and 10 to 20 classes a week are for the major. 5. The curricula for the second semester of the first year are as below: 1) There are 20 to 25 credits. 3 to 12 credits are assigned to the electives, and 12 to 19 credits are for the major. 2) The number of subject is 10 to 14, which consist of 2 to 6 for the electives and 6 to 10 for the major. 3) The weekly classes are 22 to 29. and 3 to 12 classes a week are for the electives, and 15 to 24 classes are for the major. 6. The curricula for the first semester of the second year are as below: 1) The number of credits ranges from 20 to 24. Only six colleges offer 2 credits for the electives and the major account for 18 to 24 ones. 2) There are 8 to 12 subjects. Only six colleges offer one or two electives, and 8 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes are 23 to 33. Only six colleges offer 2 or 3 classes a week for the electives, and 21 to 33 classes are for the major. 7. The curricula for the second semester of the second year are as below: 1) The number of credits ranges from 19 to 24. Only two colleges offer 2 credits for the electives and the major account for 18 to 24 ones. 2) There are 7 to 12 subjects. Only two colleges offer one or two electives, and 8 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes are 24 to 36. Only two colleges offer 2 classes a week for the electives, and 24 to 36 classes are for the major. 8. The curricula for the first semester Of the third year are as below: 1) There are 16 to 24 credits. Just a college assigns 2 credits to the electives, and 16 to 24 credits are given to the major. 2) The number of subject is 5 to 12. Only a college offers one elective for optional course, and 5 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes range from 18 to 39. Just a college offer 2 classes a week for the electives, and 18 to 39 classes are for the major. 9. The curricula for the second semester of the third year are as below: 1) There are 16 to 23 credits. Just a college assigns 2 credits to the electives, and 16 to 23 credits are given to the major. 2) The number of subject is 5 to 12. Only a college offers one elective for optional course, and 5 to 12 are the major. 3) The weekly classes range from 18 to 39. Just a college offer 2 classes a week for the electives, and 18 to 39 classes are for the major.

• 한국지구과학회지
• /
• 제43권4호
• /
• pp.557-566
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study was to examine the status of the field application of the Science II career electives with the application of the 2015 revised curriculum up to the 3rd year of high school. This study focused on examining high school science teachers' perceptions of the student-participatory class and process-centered assessment in Science II subjects, which are career-intensive high school science electives. A total of 192 science teachers responded to the survey questionnaire, and 12 teachers participated in interviews. In the in-depth interviews conducted to supplement the survey results, questions were asked about changes in the overall class, the status of student-participatory classes, and changes in the assessment of Science II subjects due to the emphasis on process-centered assessment. The main research results included teachers' perceptions of changes in teaching and assessment methods with the application of the revised curriculum, the degree to which the eight skills used in Science II classes develop the key competencies of science, and the teaching and assessment methods commonly used in Science II classes. Science teachers generally agreed with the purpose and necessity of introducing student-participatory classes and process-centered assessment, which are the core purpose of the 2015 revised curriculum. However, they had difficulties in practice due to the excessive content of Science II subjects. Problems were also encountered with securing objectivity and fairness during assessments and the operation of online science classes due to COVID-19.

• 한국교육학연구
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.79-99
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 대학생의 수강신청 기준을 탐색하고 교양과목과 전공과목에 따른 수강신청 기준을 살펴보는 것에 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 문헌조사 및 대학생 10명을 대상으로 사전 인터뷰를 실시하여 본 연구를 위한 설문지를 개발하였다. 최종 개발된 설문지를 활용하여 대학생 301명을 대상으로 2016년 11월 1일부터 12월 5일까지 온 오프라인 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 도출된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 선행연구, 사전 인터뷰 및 전문가 검토를 통해 확정된 대학생의 수강신청 기준은 상세한 강의계획서, 강의명, 과목 커리큘럼, 국어/영어 강의, 팀 프로젝트 여부 등 총 29개였으며, 다양한 수강신청 기준 요인의 구조를 파악하고자 탐색적 요인분석(EFA)을 실시하였다. 연구자가 설정한 대학생의 수강신청 기준은 '학습 편의성', '교수자 특성', '강의 실용성', '학습 기대 및 관심', '강의 외적 요소' 등의 5개 요인으로 구성되었다. 둘째, 대학생들은 교양과목 강의를 선택 시 '학습 편의성'이 가장 중요한 요인으로 작용하고 있었으며, '학습 기대 및 관심', '강의 외적 요소', '교수자 특성', '강의 실용성' 순이었던 반면, 전공과목의 경우 '교수자 특성', '학습 편의성', '학습 기대 및 관심', '강의 외적 요소', '강의 실용성' 순으로 중요하게 인식되고 있었다. 본 연구는 대학생의 수강신청 기준을 살펴보고 이를 교양과목과 전공과목으로 나누어 심도 있게 분석하였다는 데 의의가 있으며, 추후 본 연구를 토대로 대학생의 강의 및 교육 만족도와 연계된 수강동기 및 수강신청 기준에 관한 연구의 필요성을 제언하였다.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.31-63
• /
• 2013

The goal of this study is to improve the competitiveness of professional librarians in society. To this end, we analyzed domestic and international LIS curriculum, determined demand from field librarians through a survey, carried out job analysis by library types, and developed an operating model for LIS curriculum by synthesizing all of these results. Finally, we suggested a course of study for civil service librarians based on this model. As a result, the six required courses for civil service librarians are: Introduction to Library and Information Science, Information Organization, Information Services (Reference and Information Services), Library Management, Information Retrieval, and Field Work. The four core courses for the civil service concentration are: Collection Development, Information Sources by Subjects, Public Library Management, and Digital Libraries. Suggested electives best suited to this career path include Using Web Resources, Information Literacy, Information Services in Culturally Diverse Communities, Library Marketing, Libraries and Cultural Programs, Reading Guidance, Library History, Small Library Management, Studies in Library Buildings, Library Cooperation, Managing Digital Collections, and Information and Communication in a Digital Age.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.40-52
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 목적은 2025년 고교학점제의 전면도입에 직면한 고등학교 지구과학 선택과목의 변화 방향을 탐색하고 차기 교육과정 개정에 대비하여 지구과학 선택과목 재구조화 방안을 모색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 지구과학교육 전문가 델파이 조사, 현장지구과학 교사설문 조사, 전문가 심층 면담을 수행하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면, 지구과학 선택과목 재구조화에서 고려해야 할 점으로 지구과학소양 함양, 학생 진로와 연계, 지구과학 자체의 재미, 학생선택률과 대학입시라는 4가지 키워드를 도출하였다. 이를 바탕으로 지구과학 선택과목의 구체적인 재구조화(안)으로 지구과학 소양을 강조하는 지구시스템과학, 그리고 교과내 진로 연계를 강화한 고체지구과학, 대기·해양과학, 우주과학의 총 4개 과목을 구성하였다. 고교학점제 도입으로 지구과학 과목의 선택률이 하락할 것이라는 우려를 해소하려면, 지구과학 선택과목의 진로 연계성을 높이는 등 지구과학 교과의 위상 재정립을 필요로 한다. 후속 연구에서는 지구과학 선택과목의 명칭과 핵심개념 등에 대한 정교화와 공론화가 필요하다.

• 대한지구과학교육학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.112-122
• /
• 2021

본 연구의 목적은 2022 개정 과학과 교육과정을 앞두고 고교학점제에 대비하여 과학과 융합선택과목의 재구조화 방안을 탐색하는 것이다. 본 연구는 2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 경우 비(非)이공계열 진로적성을 지닌 소위 문과계열의 학생들의 과목선택권을 보장하지 못한다는 문제의식에서 출발하였다. 이를 위해 2015 개정 교육과정에서 비이공계열 진로적성을 지닌 학생들을 위한 과학과 선택과목이었던 과학사, 생활과 과학, 융합과학을 중심으로 2015 개정 교육과정 운영실태에 대한 학생들의 인식을 설문조사하고, 교사 12명과의 면담을 통해 이들 선택과목의 운영 실태와 개선 방안을 도출하였다. 과학사/생활과학/융합과학 과목은 2022 개정 교육과정에서 과학과 융합선택과목으로 분류, 개정될 예정이다. 연구결과에 따르면 고등학생들은 과학사/생활과학/융합과학을 교양 과학으로 인식하고 있으며, 개인적인 흥미와 노력 부족, 학습내용 자체의 어려움 등으로 이들 과목을 어려워하는 것으로 나타났다. 과학사/생활과학/융합과학 과목의 교육과정 운영 실태를 살펴보면 학생들은 주로 생활과과학을 선택하며, 과학사 과목의 경우 내용이 어려워서 교사도 학생도 기피하는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과를 토대로 2022 개정 교육과정의 과학과 융합선택과목 재구조화 방안을 간학문적인 핵심개념을 중심으로 한 내용접근성이 높은 융합선택과목 개발, 인공지능(AI)이나 첨단과학 관련 핵심개념을 중심으로 한 융합선택과목 개발, 모듈단위로 구성된 융합선택과목 개발, 간학문적 융합선택과목을 지도할 수 있는 과학교사 전문성 개발지원 등의 측면에서 제안하였다.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제15권
• /
• pp.45-72
• /
• 1988

A study has been made prior to the emphatic research to see how the curriculum of the Library Science Departments, in general, has developed to date. In the principles of the composition of the curriculum of library science, research has been conducted to determine what decisions will be the most appropriate for the changing trend of the society, regarding the matters of general specialization versus subject specialization education, the definition, change and operation of the core subject, the expansion of the elective specialized subjects and the composition of the curriculum by types of the library, and the curriculum composition in terms of subject specilization. The curriculum should consist of a unified series of courses and other educational experiences, designed to meet specific program objectives. Principles and concepts should be emphasized, over routines and techniques. All students should study certain fundamental 'core' subjects, as well as more specialized electives. General education (studies outside of librarianship) should be a major component of the total education of the librarian. Fundamental core subjects should be treated as introductory courses covering deep studies that can provide the most inclusive information related to the library science field. They should be offered as pre-requisites required of all the students entering the Department of Library Science. Specialized subjects and interdisciplinary courses comprising subject concentration should be offered as electives at the advanced level.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.80-92
• /
• 2022

한국교육고용패널 2004-2007년 자료 중 343명의 이과 고등학생 조사 데이터를 활용하여 과학에 대한 태도에 대한 잠재 성장 모형을 적합하였다. 모형 적합 결과, 과학에 대한 태도의 무성장 모형보다 성장 모형이 더 나은 것으로 나타났다. 통제 변수가 없는 무조건 성장모형에서 과학에 대한 태도의 초기치와 변화량의 분산이 유의미하였으므로, 여기에 학생 개인 수준에서 이수한 과학 선택 과목의 수, 심화(II) 과목의 비율, 교과 다양성, 그리고 중학교 3학년 때의 성적 백분위를 통제 변수로 투입하였다. 이러한 조건 성장모형에서 중학교 3학년 때의 성적 백분위는 과학에 대한 태도 초기치에 정적으로(+) 유의미한 직접 효과가 있었고, 과학 심화 과목의 비율과 교과 다양성이 과학에 대한 태도 변화량에 정적으로(+) 유의미한 직접 효과가 있었다. 연구 결과에 기반하여, 2022 개정 과학과 교육과정이 고교학점제를 대비하여 '일반선택' 계열에서는 교과 지식의 구조를 견지한 물리, 화학, 생물, 지구과학 교과를 제시하고, '융합선택' 계열에서는 해당 교과들의 구조가 어느 정도 유지된 통합형 교과를 개발하며, '진로선택' 계열에서는 차별화된 심화성과 엄격성을 지닌 교과를 제공하는 방향을 제안하고 지지하였다.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.29-40
• /
• 2007

Human factors engineering has been taught in the design fields and considered as a necessary course for design students, We, ergonomists working with a design department, analyzed the current status of ergonomics curricula in the Korean design colleges. Sixty one percent of schools with design departments were offering ergonomics courses and most courses were electives. Comparatively more ergonomic courses were offered in industrial design and digital media departments. Ergonomic and human factors knowledge might not properly be acquired with this current status of the design curricula and systematic solutions should be considered and prepared for the future Korean designers.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제10권
• /
• pp.71-120
• /
• 1983

In this study, a model curriculum for the Library and Information Science programs in Junior Colleges is presented by comparing those curricula of the Republic of Korea, the United States of America, England and Japan. In Korea, 80 credits are required for graduate of Junior College and 60 credits of that total credits are for major courses. At Toshokan Danki Daikagu in Japan, 73 credits are opened for the Department of Library Science and 87 credits for the Department of Library and Information Science respectively. In the United States of America, 30 credits for major courses out of 90 total credits are opened at Lansing Community College and 24 credits for major courses out of 60-64 credits at Mesa Community College distinctively. On the basis of the various analyses, the following principles are applied in designning the model curriculum; (1) Possibly 3 credits per subject are assigned, (2) Major credits for graduate are 60-64 credits including possible optional subjects, (3) 20 percents of those 60-64 credits shall be applied for electives, so that 72-78 credits are assigned for major, (4) In order to combine theory and practice, and to select practice areas as required major, the ratio between required and elective must be adjusted, (5) In order to avoid duplication of subject, adequate individuality must be provided, (6) The Information Science areas must be dealt with in Library Science since computer systems are being rapidly adopted in libraries and the education for resources of materials and foreign languages are also important for successful fulfillment of mediator's roles between materials and users. Therefore the following model curriculum is suggested; 31 credits in 11 subjects for required major, 46 credits in 18 subjects for electives in major, total 77 credits for 29 subjects are established, and it includes such areas as material organization, foreign languages, resources of materials, library management, information science, fundamental studies, services and practice.