• 한국가정과교육학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.111-131
• /
• 1997

The purpose of this study is to develop the lesson model for high school students to improve their abilities as consumer. In the method of the research, the contents on consumer education of the 8 kinds of Home Economics textbooks are reconstructed into the areas of decision-making, financing, reasonable purchasing, and consumer citizenship. The consumer’s ability to be developed in the areas of decision-making, financing, reasonable purchasing, and consumer citizenship is set up as follows： 1) The establishment of the sound consumer morality and values, the ability of independent decision-making, the critical ability, and the problem-solving ability. 2) The ability of research on social, cultural and economic values, and the ability to estimate one’s own short-term and long-term life plan. 3) The ability of reasonable purchase. 4) The ability to participate in a consumer movement, and the ability to take good care of environment. Subsequently, 9 lesson models for the student to improve the consumer’ability are developed.

• 한국치위생학회지
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.925-932
• /
• 2013

Objectives : The purpose of the study is to improve autonomous decision-making ability by analyzing the relationship between autonomy and decision-making ability. Methods : The subjects were 176 dental hygienists in Busan. Self-reported questionnaire was fill out from May 2012 to January 2013. Results : The average of the degree of autonomy was $2.20{\pm}0.29$. Buddhists showed the highest score of $2.37{\pm}0.37$ (p<0.05). Buddhists had the higher education than other religions (p<.05). Clinical decision-making ability was $2.21{\pm}0.25$. Among the subcategories, statistically significant differences (p<.05) was shown by gender, degree of education, and religion in the domain of "Exploration of Choice and Alternatives"; Buddhists showed a higher score in the domains of "Assessment and Re-evaluation of Decisions" and "Review of Values and Goals," with significant difference of p<.05. Autonomy and clinical decision making revealed a positive correlation in the categories "Assessment and Re-evaluation of Decisions" (r=.518, p=.000), "Review of Values and Goals" (r=.610, p=.000), and "Investigation of Information and Synchronization of New Information" (r=.314, p=.000). Conclusions : To improve the performance of dental hygienists, working systems and training will be intensified to develop the autonomy and clinical decision making.

• 한국산학기술학회논문지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.568-575
• /
• 2017

본 연구의 목적은 유아의 용기와 의사결정력, 행복감과 의사결정력의 상관관계를 분석하고, 용기가 행복감에 미치는 영향에 있어 의사결정력이 가지는 매개효과를 규명하는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 S와 G지역 사립 유치원에 재원 중인 만 5세 유아 220명(남아 112명, 여아 108명)을 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 유아의 용기, 행복감과 의사결정력을 측정하기 위해 박찬옥, 이은영(2011)의 교사용 유아 용기 척도, 박지영(2012)의 교사용 유아 의사결정력 측정도구, 김도란(2008)의 행복감 측정 도구를 활용하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 본 연구에서 수집된 자료는 SPSS 21.0 프로그램으로 Pearson의 상관관계분석과 회귀분석, 그리고 Sobel test를 실시하여 분석하였다. 연구결과는 첫째, 유아의 용기와 행복감, 용기와 의사결정력, 행복감과 의사결정력은 각각의 변인 간에 유의미한 정적 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 유아의 용기는 행복감을 의미 있게 예측하는 변인으로 나타났으며, 이 과정에서 의사결정력이 매개효과를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 유아의 행복감을 높이기 위한 교육적 지원이 필요함을 시사하고 있다. 즉, 용기 및 의사결정력을 지원하는 교육 프로그램의 실행이 지원되어야 한다.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.158-167
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Health Promotion Behavior on Spiritual well-being through decision making ability. The data for the study were collected from April 1 to 15, 2019 and the final data used in this study were 332. The research method was cross-sectional questionnaire survey. The collected data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA, $X^2$ analysis, multiple regressions and median effect analysis using SPSS 18.0. Among the participants of this study, 18.1% of men and 81.9% of women were female. The results of this study appeared that the differences in sub-factors of health promotion behaviors by gender were higher in female in health responsibility, substance abuse, social relationship, and self-actualization (p<0.01), while men were higher in exercise than women (p<0.05). Differences in sub-factors of health promotion behaviors by gender were higher in female in health responsibility, substance abuse, social relationship, and self-actualization (p<0.01), while men were higher in exercise than women (p<0.05). Decision making (t=4.899, p<0.01), Health responsibility (t=-1.990, p<0.05), Substance abuse (t=7.344, p<0.01), Exercise (t=7.344, p<0.01), and Self-actualization (t=7.619, p<0.01) were appeared to affect Spiritual Well-Being under statistical significance. Also Decision Making Ability had a partial mediating role in health responsibility and social relationship, which were sub-factors of health promotion behavior, affecting spiritual Well-Being.

• 한국과학교육학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.54-63
• /
• 2002

본 연구에서는 과학의 윤리적 측면 중에서도 생물윤리와 관련하여 학생들의 의사결정력 함양에 적합한 주제를 선택하여 의사결정 단계를 세분화시켜 활동함으로써 학생들의 의사결정력 향상을 도모하고자 하였다. 생물 윤리 의사결정 활동지는 선행연구를 바탕으로 하여 재구성된 것으로서 문제인식, 정보 탐색, 대안 생성, 가치준거 설정, 대안 평가, 결과 검토의 단계로 구성되었다. 4차시에 걸쳐서 활동지를 투입한 결과 l차시에 비해 4차시의 학생들의 의사결정력은 향상된 것으로 나타났다. 의사결정의 활동 단계별로 살펴보면, 문제인식이나 대안 생성, 대안 평가하기는 4차시로 갈수록 향상되었으나, 정보탐색이나 가치 준거 결정하기, 결과 검토하기는 향상되지 않았다. 이는 단기간의 학습활동으로 의사결정의 세부 능력을 모두 향상시킬 수 없음을 알 수 있다. 또한 학생들의 의사결정 활동 단계에서 살펴보면, 정보탐색이나 대안 평가 기능의 수행이 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 이는 학생들이 생물 윤리적 쟁점에 직면하여 의사결정을 하는데 있어서 문제와 관련된 생물학적 지식을 제대로 적용하지 못하고 있는 것으로 볼 수 있다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 현대의 과학 기술 사회에서 학생들에게 합리적인 의사결정력을 함양시키기 위해서는 교육과정에 생물학의 윤리적이고 도덕적인 요소를 고려한 구체척인 의사결정 활동이 포함되어야 하며 지속적인 학습이 이루어져야 함을 시사한다.

• 기본간호학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.274-281
• /
• 2010

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the correlation between level of professional autonomy and clinical decision making abilities in clinical nurses, and to provide basic information for promoting competency nurses in making independent decisions. Method: Data were collected from July 1 to July 18, 2008, and participants were 202 clinical nurses in general hospitals. Collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics: frequency and percentage and Pearson correlation coefficients with the SPSS WIN 14.0 program. Results: The professional autonomy index for the nurses was 159.63 points. The clinical decision making ability index was 119.79 points. The most highly ranked factor in clinical decision making was search for information and unbiased assimilation of new information. There was a statistically significant difference in professional autonomy according to age, clinical experience, and type of duty. Relation between level of professional autonomy and clinical decision making showed a positive correlation. Conclusion: As a results show a significant correlation between professional autonomy and clinical decision making in clinical nurses, improvement in professional autonomy of clinical nurses, would be promoted through continuous support and training.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제46권3호
• /
• pp.109-122
• /
• 2023

As platforms become primary decision making tools, platforms for decision have been introduced to improve quality of decision results. Because, decision platforms applied augmented decision-making process which uses experiences and feedback of users. This process creates a variety of alternatives tailored for users' abilities and characteristics. However, platform users choose alternatives before considering significant quality factors based on securing decision quality. In real world, platform managers use an algorithm that distorts appropriate alternatives for their commercial benefits. For improving quality of decision-making, preceding researches approach trying to increase rational decision -making ability based on experiences and feedback. In order to overcome bounded rationality, users interact with the machine to approach the optional situation. Differentiated from previous studies, our study focused more on characteristics of users while they use decision platforms. This study investigated the impact of quality factors on decision-making using platforms, the dimensions of systematic factors and user characteristics. Systematic factors such as platform reliability, data quality, and user characteristics such as user abilities and biases were selected, and measuring variables which trust, satisfaction, and loyalty of decision platforms were selected. Based on these quality factors, a structural equation research model was created. A survey was conducted with 391 participants using a 7-point Likert scale. The hypothesis that quality factors affect trust was proved to be valid through path analysis of the structural equation model. The key findings indicate that platform reliability, data quality, user abilities, and biases affect the trust, satisfaction and loyalty. Among the quality factors, group bias of users affects significantly trust of decision platforms. We suggest that quality factors of decision platform consist of experience-based and feedback-based decision-making with the platform's network effect. Through this study, the theories of decision-making are empirically tested and the academic scope of platform-based decision-making has been further developed.

• 영어어문교육
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.153-184
• /
• 2010

On the bases of the 5 principles and the 4 criteria for designing and developing of the listening and the reading test of National English Ability Test (NEAT), this study presents Item-Types Decision-Making Model as a blueprint for designing and constructing the two tests. It sets up the criteria for validating item types, designs a modular type of test specifications, constructs an item-types bank, and specifies a complementary type of test specifications of the two tests. To gather all these threads up, it constructs Item-Types Decision-Making Model which consists of such components as the item-type pool, the validity criteria and the procedures of testing item types, the item-types bank, the modular and the complementary type test specification. Thus, it shows how the Model works in developing and constructing the two level-differentiated listening and reading tests (the 2nd and the 3rd rank) of NEAT. Finally, it discusses some implications and applications of the Model to the two level-differentiated tests (the A and the B type) of 2014 CSAT (College Scholastic Ability Test) systems, National Assessment of Educational Achievement (NAEA), and classroom testing. In conclusion, Item-Types Decision-Making Model functions as a testing template in an item development system and as a matrix in an item-types bank system.

• 한국환경교육학회지:환경교육
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.125-136
• /
• 2002

The ultimate goal of environmental education is to train the civilian who positively participates in solving environmental problems. To do above, not only accurate knowledge but also right value about environmental problems are needed. It is reasonable decision making that choose the first of all alternatives to solve the problems by accurate knowledge and right value of an individual. Teaching reasonable decision making in environmental education is related to raise the participant civilian toward regional environmental problem solving Simulation game helps that students have a opportunity to practice decision making skills about regional problems and give self-confidence to their decision making ability. So, the aim of this study is to present simulation games which is fit to elementary environmental education. The first one is for group decision making, the second one is for individual decision making. These can make a conclusion, winner and loser of games. But last one is open-ended game and aims to make explicit a variety of opinions, issues and conflicts to problem.

• 과학교육연구지
• /
• 제42권1호
• /
• pp.12-26
• /
• 2018

본 연구에서는 과학기술과 관련된 사회적 쟁점에 대한 논증 프로그램을 통해 예비 생물교사들의 의사결정 유형과 의사소통 능력의 변화를 살펴보았다. 또한 의사결정 유형과 의사소통 능력의 상관관계를 조사하고, 예비생물 교사들은 SSI 논증 프로그램 후 의사소통 및 의사결정에 관해 어떠한 경험을 하였는지 살펴보았다. SSI 논증 프로그램은 사회적 의사결정과 문제해결전략을 활용하여 개발되었으며, 낙태, 안락사, 유전자 조작 및 인공지능을 주제로 총 12차시에 걸쳐 진행되었다. 예비교사들은 SSI 문제를 파악하고, 해결책을 생각하며, 최선의 방안을 결정하도록 하였으며, 이 과정에서 소집단 토론을 통해 사회과학적 문제에 대한 논증 활동의 기회를 가졌다. 연구 결과, 예비 교사들의 의사소통 능력은 통계적으로 유의미한 향상을 나타냈으나, 의사결정 유형에는 변화가 없었다. 또한 Pearson 상관 분석 결과, 의사결정 유형 중 '합리적 유형'은 의사소통 능력과 유의미한 상관관계를 나타냈다. 예비교사들은 사회과학적 쟁점에 대한 논증 프로그램을 통해 근거, 자료, 맥락, 반론 등을 고려하여 자신의 주장을 말하는 능력이 향상되었다고 언급하였다. 또한 사회과학적 문제에 관심을 가지게 되고 다른 사람의 비판을 수용할 수 있게 되었을 뿐만 아니라 자신도 다른 사람을 배려하면서 자신의 의견을 말할 수 있게 되었다고 하여 과학교육에서 SSI 논증 활동을 통한 인성 교육의 가능성을 시사한다.