References
- Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92(3), 473-498. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20278
- Chang, H. S., & Lee, H. J. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 30(7), 887-900. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.7.887
- Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Elias, M. J., & Tobias, S. E. (1990). Problem solving/decision making for social and academic success. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
- Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75(2), 169-183. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750203
- Harren, V. A. (1979). A model of career decision making for college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 119-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90065-4
- Jang, J., Mun, J., Ryu, H., Choi, K., Krajcik, J., & Kim, S. (2012). Korean middle school students' perceptions as Global Citizens of Socioscientific Issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1124-1138. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1124
- Ju, I., & Lee, H. (2013). Patterns of middle school students' value-judgement and decision-making on biotechnology-related socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.079
- Kim, J., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2016). Effects of sociosientific issues instruction on elementary school students’ character and values as a global citizens. The Journal of Elementary Education, 29(3), 1-25.
- Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). Comparision of the effects of socioscientific issues instruction on promoting college students’ character and values: Based on idiocentrism and allocentrism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 395-405. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.3.395
- Koh, H. (1992). A study on the effect of the career counseling on Korean college students' decision making styles and on career decision making status (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sookmyung Woman's University, Seoul, Korea.
- Lawson, A. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico‐predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052117
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Lee, H. (2008). Decision-making patterns of pre-service science teachers on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 12(2), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2008.12.2.377
- Lee, S., Chang, Y., Lee, H., & Park, K. (2003). A study on the development of life-skills: Communication, problem solving, and self-directed learning. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute [KEDI].
- Lee, Y. C. (2007). Developing decision-making skills for socio-scientific issues. Journal of Biological Education, 41(4), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656093
- Lim, M., & Jung, S. (2013). An analysis of changes in gifted, middle school students’ decision-making on socioscientific issues in biotechnology. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 17(4), 1501-1522. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2013.17.4.1501
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.) (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future: A report with ten recommendations. London, England: King's College London, School of Education.
- Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015). 2015 Revised Science Curriculum. Sejong: Author.
- Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
- Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1463-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708717
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
Cited by
- The Effect of Writing Activities on the Creative Problem Solving Ability of Biological Gifted and Talented Middle School Students vol.46, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.4.455