• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제52권1호
• /
• pp.9-16
• /
• 2003

In this paper, we propose a reliability evaluation method considering the momentary interruptions of power distribution systems. The results of research are concentrated on two parts. One is the analytic and probabilistic reliability evaluation of power distribution system considering the momentary interruptions and the other is the reliability cost evaluation that unifies the cost of sustained and momentary interruptions. This proposed reliability cost evaluation methodology is also divided into the analytic and probabilistic approach and the time sequential Monte Carlo method is used for the probabilistic method. The proposed methods are tested using the modified RBTS (Roy Billinton Test System) form and historical reliability data of KEPCO (Korea Electric Power Corporation) system. Through the case studies, it is verified that the proposed reliability evaluation and its cost/worth assessment methodologies can be applied to the actual reliability studies.

• 대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A
• /
• 제52권12호
• /
• pp.705-712
• /
• 2003

In this paper, we propose new unified methodologies of reliability and its cost evaluation in power distribution systems. The unified method means that the proposed reliability approaches consider both conventional evaluation factor, i.e. sustained interruptions and additional ones, i.e. momentary interruptions and voltage sags. Because the three voltage quality phenomena generally originate from the outages on distribution systems, the basic and additional reliability indices are summarized considering the fault clearing mechanism. The proposed unified method is divided into the reliability evaluation for calculating the reliability indices and reliability cost evaluation for assessing the damage of customer. The analytic and probabilistic methodologies are presented for each unified reliability and its cost evaluation. The time sequential Monte Carlo technique is used for the probabilistic method. The proposed DVL(Demand Varying Load) model is added to the reliability cost evaluation substituting the average load model. The proposed methods are tested using the modified RBTS(Roy Billinton Test System) form and historical reliability data of KEPCO(Korea Electric Power Corporation) system. The daily load profile of the each customer type in domestic are gathered for the DVL model. Through the case studies, it is verified that the proposed methods can be effectively applied to the distribution systems for more detail reliability assessment than conventional approaches.

• 한국정보과학회논문지:소프트웨어및응용
• /
• 제37권2호
• /
• pp.95-103
• /
• 2010

소프트웨어 제품의 시장 경쟁력을 향상시키기 위해서는 이해관계자의 요구사항에 부합하는 품질을 제공하는 동시에 개발 예산 내에 개발 가능한 아키텍처를 획득할 수 있는 방안이 요구된다. 하지만 아키텍처의 품질 검토 및 선정을 위해 사용되는 기존 아키텍처 평가 기법은 아키텍처 설계를 통해 획득 가능한 품질속성에만 초점을 맞추고 있어 아키텍처가 개발 비용에 미치는 영향을 체계적으로 고려하지 않는다. 본 논문에서는 소프트웨어 비용 추정 모델인 COCOMO II를 적용한 아키텍처 비용 추정 기법을 제안하여 기존 아키텍처 평가와 병행 가능한 비용 분석을 통해 기존 아키텍처 평가 기법을 보완하며 품질과 비용이 함께 고려된 아키텍처 선정을 지원한다. 제안 기법의 정확성 검증을 위해 본 논문의 기법을 RPS (Robot Patrol System)의 아키텍처 후보 목록에 적용한 뒤 비용 추정 결과를 각 아키텍처 후보의 실측 공수와 비교하였다.

• 설비공학논문집
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.201-208
• /
• 2009

Our government will make a plan regulating the cooling limit temperature of the summer season to 26 degree and the heating limit temperature of the winter season to 20 degree for energy saving. Where, the key point of this politic pursuit can be the charge system on heating and cooling cost. We have suggested new cost allocation methodology as a worth evaluation method in the precedent study, and preformed the worth evaluation and cost allocation on four kind of warm air produced from a heating system as an example. In this study, we applied the suggested method to four kind of cool air, and preformed the worth evaluation and cost allocation on each cool air. As a result, similarly to the precedent study, the more energy a customer saved, the more cooling unit cost decreased, and the more energy a customer consumed, the more cooling unit cost increased. From this analysis, we hope that the suggested methodology can offer a theoretical basis to the energy charge policy of government, and induce the spontaneous energy saving of consumers.

• 한국태양에너지학회 논문집
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2003

This study aims to presents Evaluation Method of Green Remodeling that analyze the value of environment through expense, using the method of life cycle cost and life cycle assessment simultaneously. The results of this study are summarized as follows. Evaluation Model developed in this study can convert economical value of environment into cost by integrating. In addition, the model can apply as a useful tool to estimation of economical design alternative as well as quantification of environmental loads and costs. Evaluation Model presented In this study observe energy consumption and the environmental load emission with qualification, it can forecast effect of environmental cost that cost estimation is expected to be added to energy cost rate by being possible. Synthetically, when Estimation Model and computer program that developed in this study is applies to the construction industry; reasonable management of environmental load is convenient at each step of Green Remodeling. In addition, at preliminary design phase, practical use may be possible by reasonable yardstick about various alternatives and improvement of design alternatives likewise by grasping environmental effect.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제16권8호
• /
• pp.661-670
• /
• 2016

건설공사 사후평가는 공공건설사업을 대상으로 수요 공사비 공사기간 기대효과 및 사업관리 내용 등을 준공 이후에 재평가하고, 차후 유사사업 추진 시 그 평가결과를 참고하여 발주청의 시행착오를 줄이기 위한 목적으로 2000년부터 도입되었다. 하지만 용역대가 산정기준이 마련되지 않아 사후평가 용역의 질적 저하 및 분쟁발생의 원인이 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 사후평가 용역데이터를 기반으로 공사비요율방식 및 실비정액가산방식의 용역대가 산정기준을 제시하였다. 용역대가 분석을 위해 기존의 사후평가 용역비와 공사비를 조사하고 공사비요율방식 및 실비정액가산방식을 통해 산출된 용역비를 비교분석하였다. 분석결과 실비정액가산방식을 통해 산출한 용역비가 공사비요율방식에 비해 더 정확함을 확인하였다. 실비 정액가산방식은 시설물별 사업특성을 반영할 수 있도록 거리보정계수, 면적보정계수, 통합보정계수 등 다양한 보정계수가 적용되었으며, 선형공사(도로, 철도), 비선형공사 I(주택 산업단지), 비선형공사 II(공항, 항만, 댐, 상하수도), 기타공사로 시설물 구분을 세분화하여 산정기준을 제시하였다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제32권2호
• /
• pp.163-175
• /
• 2007

[ $ulcorner$ ]Cost-Effectiveness Analysis$\lrcorner$ has been wifely used to evaluate economic efficiency of R&D projects, but most of cost-effectiveness evaluation systems have some problems such as systematic method for setting and evaluating cost factors, estimation of single effect on each R&D project, and estimation of cross effects among R&D projects. To solve these problems, we have designed a new evaluation indicator called a $ulcorner$Cost-Cross Effect Integration Indicator$lrcorner$ including cross effects developed in this research. The major research findings are summarized as follows : (1) $ulcorner$Coist Estimation Model$lrcorner$, which estimates the cost factors divided into two classes of assembly product and system product and then integrates the total cost values, has been designed. (2) A new method for estimating parameters of cross effects among R&D projects has been developed. (3) $ulcorner$Cross Effects Estimation Model$lrcorner$ to estimate multi-effects and cross effects by completion time among several projects has been designed. (4) $ulcorner$Integration Estimation Indicator$lrcorner$ for setting priority on a project group has been extracted by combination of total cost value and total effect value.

• 한국도로학회논문집
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.103-112
• /
• 2017

PURPOSES : In this study, field performance evaluation of crack treatment of pavement and the feasibility of surface treatment of pavement are presented. The performance and cost of preventive maintenance methods have been previously verified, and the methods are being used in many developed countries and cities. However, the performance and cost of the system have not been verified in domestic, field applications. Therefore, in order to improve performance, the field performance is evaluated, and a reasonable cost is proposed. METHODS : Visual Inspection was conducted to evaluate the field application and performance of the preventive maintenance method. In addition, the PCI index was calculated from the results of visual inspection of the application area of the surface treatment method, and the performance life of each method was predicted. For the economic evaluation, life cycle cost analysis was performed using the life cycle cost analysis program. RESULTS :In order to evaluate and quantify the field performance of crack repair material, the residue condition of the pavement surface after crack treatment, rather than the performance of the material, is evaluated. In addition, the crack resistance and performance life of surface treatment methods are evaluated. The cost of currently available treatment methods are compared to the common pavement cut and overlay method, and it is determined that the preventive method is not economical based on life cycle cost analysis. CONCLUSIONS :Because of the characteristics of cracking, it is necessary to conduct the evaluation of currently applied methods and the analysis of the cause of damage, by visual inspection. Moreover, in order to evaluate the performance and economic suitability of the currently applied surface treatment methods, it is necessary to acquire information on application sections by monitoring their long-term conditions and performance.

• 공학기술논문지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.287-294
• /
• 2018

Since its introduction in Korea, design VE has widely been used as a means to enhance values in the construction industry. However, a greater emphasis is still placed on cost reduction in approach attitudes and performance evaluations on the implementation of design VE. In this regard, this study presented a performance evaluation method for cost, function, and value of VE proposals. Numerical criteria on the increase and decrease of cost and function that can classify the value enhancement type of VE proposals were proposed based on the performance evaluation method. It is expected that the use of numerical criteria for the type classification of VE proposal, and cost and performance evaluation method proposed in this study will make it possible to conduct a clear and more intuitive evaluation of VE proposal. However, it is appropriate to use the numerical criteria as a guideline to apply the new performance evaluation method for VE proposals. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a statistical analysis with a wider range of users after the repeated application of the findings of this study, and thus to carry out research for presenting the numerical criteria for various types of users.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 1992년도 하계학술대회 논문집 A
• /
• pp.106-109
• /
• 1992

This paper Introduces the concept of the generation cost of generating utilities and its calculation methods. Also, the economic evaluation method using generation cost which is called as a screening curve method will be presented along with the benefits and disadvantages of this concept. Next, the least-cost electric utility planning techniques which is used very widely in many countries will be Introduced In comparison with screening curve method. In this aspects, the optimal dynamic mix can be determined as a result. By comparing these two concepts, we will get the concrete concept why the economic evaluation method using generation cost can not be used for the future generation expansion planning.