• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제42권
• /
• pp.163-186
• /
• 2009

On April 11, 1980, the "United Nations on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods" ("CISG") was prepared by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and approved by a diplomatic conference in Vienna providing uniform law for international sales of goods. It took effect as of March 1, 2005, in Korea. It is set forth on the seller's remedies for breach by the buyer Section III (Art. 61 - 65) under the CISG. In this study, the focus is only on the seller's notice fixing additional final period for performance (Art. 63) and the right to avoid the contract (Art. 64), with examination on some relevant foreign arbitral awards rendered by the ICC and the CIETAC together. Article 63 provides that the seller may fix an additional period of time for reasonable length for performance by the buyer of his obligation. It was found from the above arbitral awards that the concept of 'reasonable length' should be decided on a case-by-case basis, given the specific circumstances in the case [Art. 63(1)]. It is provided that unless the seller has received a notice that he will not perform within the period so fixed, the seller may not, during that period, resort to any remedy for breach of contract in accordance with Article 63(2). Article 64(1) provides the means and grounds for avoidance of the contract, which can be avoided 1) when the breach of the buyer amounts to a fundamental breach of contract, or 2) when the additional period of time is fixed by the seller, unless the buyer declares that he will not perform so within the period of fixed time. As we examined in the above arbitral awards, it was held that the contract is avoided when the seller sends the final notice stating that he will avoid the contract, after the expiration of the additional period of time fixed by the seller in the ICC award. On the contrary, it was held that the contract should be deemed to be avoided exactly when the expiration of additional period noted in the avoidance notice is elapsed in the CIETAC award. Article 64(2) sets time limits for avoidance.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.289-312
• /
• 2015

감염병의 전파력은 무섭다. 누구를 통해, 어디에서 감염되었는지를 알아내는 것 또한 그리 쉬운 일이 아니다. 오늘날은 교통의 발달로 인해 우리나라에는 없었던 바이러스성 감염병이 유입되고 전파될 확률도 그 만큼 커져있는 상황이다. 감염병은 무엇보다 그것이 유입되기 전에 그 예방과 차단을 철저히 해야 한다. 그럼에도 유입된 경우에는 국가는 조속히 그 확산을 방지할 책무가 있다. 어떤 경우에는 감염병이 지역과 국가를 넘어 세계적 유행 상황이 되는 경우도 있다. 물론 이 경우에는 그 어느 때보다 국가 간의 협력과 세계보건기구 등의 역할이 중요해 진다. 그렇지만 이런 상황에서도 국가의 역할이 감소되는 것은 아니다. 우리 감염병예방법과 검역법은 감염위험이 있는 자 외에, 감염위험 의심자에 대해서도 격리조치를 취할 수 있다고 규정하고 있다. 격리는 더 이상의 감염을 막기 위한 매우 실효적인 수단이지만, 또한 격리의 방법과 내용 등에 비례하여 그 대상자의 자유권은 제한된다. 특히 감염병이 빠르게 유행하고 있는 상황에서는 이에 편승하여 자의적, 불합리한 격리가 발생할 수 있는 가능성도 그만큼 커진다. 이 글은 이런 시각에 기초하여 격리를 통한 공중위생 안전의 확보와 인권의 조화 문제를 생각해 보았다.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.177-225
• /
• 2011

Verdicts related to major medical litigation given by the Seoul Central District Court, the Seoul High Court and the Supreme Court in 2010 were analyzed. It's shown that in cases of the medical negligence regarding the occurrence of neonatal cerebral palsy, the plaintiff claims were dismissed using criteria proposed by associations of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics in US, and thereof the burden of plaintiffs to prove the medical negligence has increased. In addition, in case of that the expected survival period of infants gets longer, payments for treatment and nursing after survival period determined by judges are made and it was judged to compensate it as a periodical indemnity. In case for the explanation obligation the most frequently mentioned in the medical litigation, in addition to cases of invoking the existing theory of explanation obligation, verdicts to mention the instructions of theory regarding instruction explanation obligation and the possibility of compensation for damages on property are given. Particularly, in cases for a liability of reparation by exaggerating the effects and not disclosing the risks related to treatment with stem cells, even if the treatment not approved by Food and Drug Administration is in violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Law, it's not illegal as violation in Pharmaceutical Affairs Law itself. But there is a certain verdict to present the possibility of an extension of the theory of explanation obligation by acknowledging the liability of reparation caused by illegal acts with no explanations of effects and risks of treatment with stem cell by doctors and pharmaceutical companies. In an incident in which a mental patient fell and died through the opened door of the roof at the hospital, a liability of reparation was acknowledged due to defects in structure installation management and this verdict drew an attention since the overall management responsibility about patients including structures was acknowledged to the hospital besides the obligations on medical practice. In case of the verdict without giving the opportunity to state the opinion with respect to the main legal issues, the responsibility of the court was emphasized since the court did not fulfill the explanation obligations. There were some cases in which payments for nursing and caring to a patient in vegetative state during the plastic surgery was admitted. However, in dental-related incidents, the proportion of cases in which plaintiff won was low since the difficulty of proving may be reflected. In the area of administrative litigation, unlike the existing position regarding arbitrary medical charge cover collected from patients in hospital, the verdict to admit the legitimacy of collection of medical treatment was given and attracted the attention of people. Verdict in which the expression related to medical advertisement was not exaggerated disposed the original verdict and pointed out the problem of excessive regulations on medical advertisement. The effort to analyze the trend of verdicts of court through reviewing the decisions and to organize should be continued, but the full decision should be disclosed as a base, and people and systems to enable the all time monitoring should be prepared.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.77-116
• /
• 2020

현대 과학의 경험과 성과가 반영된 의약품의 사용으로 인류에게 질병의 치료와 건강 상태의 개선이라는 혜택이 주어지고 있다. 그러나 의약품은 질병의 치료라는 혜택 이외에도 본질적으로 피할 수 없는 부작용도 내포한다. 각국은 부작용으로 인한 피해의 최소화를 위해 시장진입 규제나 시판후조사 등의 조치를 취하고 있으나, 부작용의 발생은 피할 수 없다. 부작용으로 인한 손해의 발생이 불가항력이라도 그 점이 사전에 알려진 것이었다면, 의약품의 종류와 사용 형태에 따라서 처방한 의사나 복약지도를 담당하는 약사 등이 손해를 배상해야 한다. 의약품에 결함이 있어 손해가 발생하는 경우도 있는데, 손해 배상의 일반원칙을 그대로 적용해서는 결함으로 인한 부작용 피해자가 손해를 배상받기 쉽지 않다. 우리나라를 비롯한 여러 나라가 제조물 책임법을 통하여 피해자의 보호를 도모하고 있으며, 의약품도 제조물에 포섭되기 때문에 제조물 책임법을 통한 손해배상을 문의할 수 있는데, 이 때 주로 설계상의 결함이나 표시상의 결함이 문제될 수 있다. 제조물 책임법이 제정·시행되기 이전에도 의약품의 부작용으로 인한 손해는 발생하여왔다. 이러한 경우를 위해서 판례는 제조물 책임법과 유사한 법리를 발전시켜 왔고, 의약품 결함은 혈액제제와 관련하여 판례가 형성되어 왔다. 제조물 책임법 시행 이전에 제조된 의약품으로 인한 손해는 향후에도 발생할 수 있기에 판례 법리는 중요한 검토의 대상이다.

• Ocean and Polar Research
• /
• 제44권2호
• /
• pp.147-160
• /
• 2022

SRFC (Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission) requested to the ITLOS (International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea) an advisory opinion relating to the IUU (Illegl, Unreported, and Unregulated) fishing (Case No-21 of the ITLOS). Since, in the UNCLOS, there is no article authorizing the jurisdiction of the ITLOS full court's Advisory opinion, so various scholarly opinion wad divided. But ITLOS delivered its Advisory opinion confirming its jurisdictional competence over the Advisory proceedings with its legal opinion about the IUU issues. It opens new possibility of the alternative dispute settlement mechanism of the ITLOS through the advisory procedures. In reality, there has been a view that ICJ (International Court of Justice) could take the part of a kind of dispute settlement through its Advisory procedures. But the advisory procedures of the ITLOS, with no definite clause in UNCLOS about the advisory procedures, which provides more allowances for the function of advisory opinion as the alternative dispute settlement mechanism. ITLOS accepted the requests of the advisory opinion by the State parties through international organization or themselves directly. And the advisory opinion of the ITLOS aims the interpretation and application into the special issues-specially IUU fishing in Case No. 21 of the ITLOS-. Those factors could enable more enhanced role of the ITLOS as an alternative dispute settlement mechanism. But those possibility has contain risk of excessive and unlimited advisory role of the ITLOS. So it is important to focus on the restriction on the role of the State parties in the request of the advisory opinion to the ITLOS. In this regard it is meaningful that the ITLOS has suggested a kind of legal standing in the advisory procedures in that only coastal States could request the Advisory opinion about the IUU in their EEZ. Furthermore the discretionary power of the ITLOS in the Article 138 of the Rules of the Tribunal could curtail the abuse of the Advisory opinion initiated by the States parties of the UNCLOS. Under this framework, Advisory opinion could broaden more alternative option to the disputes between State parties of the UNCLOS in that after being delivered detailed interpretation of the UNCLOS about the specific issues, States parties could devote themselves to searching for flexible solution for the disputes between State parties. It could obtain legal explanation about the dispute under the Article 297 and Article 298 by detouring the jurisdiction limits through advisory procedures.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.79-117
• /
• 2023

2002년 의료 관련 선고된 판결들 중에는 , 환자의 자기결정권 행사를 보장하기 위하여 구체적인 상황에서 환자에게 의료행위의 위험성과 부작용 등에 관하여 충분히 숙고한 후 결정할 수 있는 시간적 여유가 주어져야 한다는 점을 명시하면서 설명의무의 이행시기와 관련된 의미 있는 판결이 있었다. 또한 보험회사가 실손보험상품 가입자들을 대위하여 의료기관에 대해 부당이득반환을 청구한 사례에서 채권자대위권의 보전의 필요성 관련 적극적 요건과 소극적 요건을 분설하여 명확한 기준을 제시한 판결이 있었다. 의료행정 영역에서는, 국민건강보험법에 따른 요양기관 업무정지처분의 성격을 대물적처분으로 명확히 한 판결, 코로나 백신투여 부작용에 대한 보상 인정 사례에서 인과관계를 폭 넓게 인정한 판결 및 한의사의 초음파 의료기기 사용 등 의료인의 면허범위 관련 판결이 있었다. 환자에 대한 의료기관의 퇴거 청구 사례에서 의료법 제15조 제1항과 관련하여 입원진료계약의 해지에 관한 정당한 사유에 대한 판결을 검토하였다.

• 호남수학학술지
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.33-41
• /
• 2014

Ko(2013, JIA 2013:473) discussed complete convergence for weighted sum of martingale difference field when all indices have the same powers in the normalization. In this paper we generalize this law to the case where different indices have different powers in the normalization.

• 대한예방의학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한예방의학회 2001년도 제53차 추계 학술대회 연제집
• /
• pp.373-374
• /
• 2001

• 한국환경생태학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국환경생태학회 2009년 학술대회 논문집 2호
• /
• pp.95-98
• /
• 2009

• 한국마린엔지니어링학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국마린엔지니어링학회 2005년도 후기학술대회논문집
• /
• pp.88-89
• /
• 2005