• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.109-132
• /
• 2007

In the paper, we builds an advanced new credit evaluation system for Micro-small sized individual firms through appropriate evaluation factors derived by logistic regression analysis for credit evaluation model using in Korean Federation of Credit Guarantee Foundations, and the weights of factors computed by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Industry characteristics are more applied to previous credit model with the additional the financial fact-information and non-financial judgement-information. Our results show that the financial factors have become more important than three years ago. Moreover, in the non-financial factors, the fact-information factors consider more important then the judgement-information factors. A new credit evaluation system is developed based on this credit evaluation model.

• Industrial Engineering and Management Systems
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.93-98
• /
• 2002

It is important to evaluate the performance of candidates mathematically from various aspects, and reflect it on decision making. In decision making, we judge the candidates through two steps, classification of objects and comparison of objects or candidates with plural elements. In the former step, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is useful method to evaluate candidates from plural viewpoints, and in the later step, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is also useful method to evaluate candidates with plural categorized data. In fact, each candidate has plural elements, nevertheless it has been more important to evaluate from various aspects in IT society. So, we propose a new procedure complementing AHP with DEA.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제7권2호
• /
• pp.397-412
• /
• 2004

The importance of maritime sector in Korea has been increasingly recognized in recent days. As the country enters the $\ulcorner$new ocean era$\lrcorner$ the oceans are often regarded as holding the keys to solve the problems of modem industry associated with changing environment as well as changing societies and national politics. This paper attempts to address the national maritime R＆D policies and their relative importances. In the methodology, Saaty's analytic hierarchy process model is used to evaluate and rank the selected maritime R＆D projects which have a wide range of characteristics and policy implications. The criteria used for policy evaluation relates specifically to the Korea's evaluation needs and culture, and those criteria are weighted according to their relative importance as perceived by the maritime R＆D specialists.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.153-158
• /
• 2009

An optimal selection problem of SCM system is one of the critical issues for the company's competitiveness and performance under global economy. This paper presents a hierarchy model consisted of characteristic factors for introducing SCM system and an AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision-making model for SCM system evaluation and selection. The proposed model can systematically construct the objectives of SCM system selection to meet the business goals. This paper focuses on selecting an optimal SCM system considering both all decision factors and sub-decision factors of a hierarchy model. Especially, the benefit/cost analysis is applied to choose SCM system. A case study shows the feasibility of the proposed model and the model can help a company to make better decision-making in the SCM system selection problem.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제25권4호
• /
• pp.61-68
• /
• 2002

This paper provides a method of consciousness structure analysis for research and development project evaluation using fuzzy structure modeling(FSM). Fuzzy structure modeling, which is a modeling method for consciousness structure, has a large number of pairwise comparison by human subjective judgement and is difficult to check the consistency index of denoting the precision for human judgement. Thus, in this paper, we analyzed the structure of consciousness by fuzzy structural modeling method, introducing the concept of pairwise comparison matrix in Analytic Hierarchy Process.

• 한국식품영양학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.470-477
• /
• 2010

The purposes of this study were to identify the evaluation categories, areas, attributes of the hospital food service and to define the relative importance of the evaluation categories, areas, attributes of the hospital food service using analytic hierarchy process. A survey was conducted from January 8th to 25th in 2007. Questionnaires were mailed to the 310 directors of dietetic departments of hospitals that included 160 primary hospitals, 107 secondary hospitals, and 43 tertiary hospitals. The result of the analytic hierarchy process indicated that relative importance of evaluation category was 0.5259 for food service management and 0.3407 for nutrition care. The food service management consisted of four subcategories, which are equipment standard, sanitation, production, and delivery service. Sanitation(relative importance: 0.2652) was the most important area among the subcategories and it was followed by equipment standard(0.2067), delivery service(0.1864) and production(0.1848). The nutrition care has two subcategories, menu management and meal management. The relative importance of menu management(0.4174) was higher than that of meal management(0.3555). The quality of food service and nutrition care to inpatients can be improved by the evaluation system based on appropriate applications of the developed evaluation indicators for hospital food service systems.

• 한국문헌정보학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.103-118
• /
• 2004

인터넷 서비스가 안정화 위주로 옮겨가면서 웹서비스의 품질 향상을 위해 보다 많은 투자가 이루어지고 있다. 대규모의 다양한 정보를 제공하고있는 전자도서관 웹 사이트가 객관적인 평가 시스템을 개발하여 적용하므로써 이용자들에게 서비스의 만족도를 높일 수 있는 기준을 마련할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 검색성, 개인화로 기준을 도출하였다. 구축된 사용성 평가 모델을 계층적 분석방법(Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP)을 이용하여 평가하고 검증하였다. 평가지침으로 설정된 항목을 설문조사를 하여 계층적 분석방법에 기초한 디지털 도서관 웹 사이트 평가 모델을 개발하였다.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제18권8호
• /
• pp.9-15
• /
• 2013

클라우드 컴퓨팅을 구성하는 자원은 이질적인 자원으로 구성되므로 다양한 요구사항의 작업을 이질적인 자원에 할당하는 것은 중요한 문제이다. 이는 다수의 판단 기준하에 다수의 선택 문제로 정의할 수 있는데 본 연구에서는 AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) 기법을 통해 이 문제를 해결하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 작업의 특성을 고려한 우선순위기반 스케줄링 기법을 제안하는데 1단계에서는 작업의 중요도에 의해 우선순위를 부여하고 2단계에서는 응답시간, 시스템 이용율, 그리고 비용을 판단기준으로 하여 AHP알고리즘에 의해 최적의 자원에 작업을 할당한다. 제안하는 알고리즘의 분석과 실험을 통해 제안 기법의 효율성을 제시하고자 한다.

• 한국IT서비스학회지
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.41-53
• /
• 2017

Recently, due to the economic recession and increase of ITO (IT Outsourcing), bidding in software industry has been recognized as more competitive and the importance of software bid evaluation for corporate selection is being increased. This study aims to analyze and prioritize influential factors in the software bid evaluation criteria which is adopted as the main evaluation model of national software businesses by Ministry of Science. The priority was developed by AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) through pair-wise comparison. For the analysis, this study developed analysis model for AHP and conducted survey of experts who have work experience for more than 10 years in the IT industry. As the result of analysis, weighted factors in the evaluation criteria were deduced and differences of priority factors between purchaser and bidder were investigated. The analysis showed differences of view point in the bidding process. With these results, this study suggests how to write a proposal strategically and effectively in perspective of the purchaser. It is expected that priority factors will be adopted in strategic proposals in both bidder and purchaser. For purchaser, the priority will be adopted to select reliable bidder. So, we expect that the priority factors will be used to get more values for both bidder and purchaser in their business atmosphere.

• 경영과학
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.73-82
• /
• 2011

Basel II advanced measurement approaches for operational risk need to estimate the frequency and severity distribution of operational losses. Due to lack of internal loss data, the estimation is impossible in many cases and so external loss data might be used by scaling on asset or gross income. To get around lack of loss data, scenario analysis combined with loss distribution approach can be useful in calculating the capital charge of operational risk. However, scenario based loss distribution approach requires much time and effort. Instead we may apply the analytic hierarchy process to measure operational risk of financial institutions. The analytic hierarchy process combined with loss distribution approach is to estimate the capital charge of operational risk in other areas based on the operational VaR in an area with sufficient loss data. AHP provides a tool for timely measurement of operational risk in this rapidly changing global environment.