• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.48 no.2
• /
• pp.277-290
• /
• 2011

We show that the ${\theta}$-prime radical of a ring R is the set of all strongly ${\theta}$-nilpotent elements in R, where ${\theta}$ is an automorphism of R. We observe some conditions under which the ${\theta}$-prime radical of coincides with the prime radical of R. Moreover we characterize elements in prime radicals of skew Laurent polynomial rings, studying (${\theta}$, ${\theta}^{-1}$)-(semi)primeness of ideals of R.

• Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.42 no.3
• /
• pp.477-484
• /
• 2005

Let R be a ring with an automorphism 17. An ideal [ of R is ($\sigma$-ideal of R if $\sigma$(I).= I. A proper ideal P of R is ($\sigma$-prime ideal of R if P is a $\sigma$-ideal of R and for $\sigma$-ideals I and J of R, IJ $\subseteq$ P implies that I $\subseteq$ P or J $\subseteq$ P. A proper ideal Q of R is $\sigma$-semiprime ideal of Q if Q is a $\sigma$-ideal and for a $\sigma$-ideal I of R, I$^{2}$ $\subseteq$ Q implies that I $\subseteq$ Q. The $\sigma$-prime radical is defined by the intersection of all $\sigma$-prime ideals of R and is denoted by P$_{(R). In this paper, the following results are obtained: (1) For a principal ideal domain R, P$_{(R) is the smallest $\sigma$-semiprime ideal of R; (2) For any ring R with an automorphism $\sigma$ and for a skew Laurent polynomial ring R[x, x$^{-1}$; $\sigma$], the prime radical of R[x, x$^{-1}$; $\sigma$] is equal to P$_{(R)[x, x$^{-1}$; $\sigma$ ].

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.457-466
• /
• 2005

We study in this note rings whose prime radicals are completely prime. We obtain equivalent conditions to the complete 2-primal-ness and observe properties of completely 2-primal rings, finding examples and counterexamples to the situations that occur naturally in the process.

• Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.45 no.2
• /
• pp.249-254
• /
• 2005

Let N be a prime left near-ring with multiplicative center Z and f be a generalized $({\sigma},{\tau})-derivation$ associated with d. We prove commutativity theorems in prime near- rings with generalized $({\sigma},{\tau})-derivation$.

• Kyungpook Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.46 no.2
• /
• pp.153-167
• /
• 2006

We study permuting tri-derivations in ${\Gamma}$-rings and give an example.

• Honam Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.1-4
• /
• 2001

In [2, 7.3.2], the set of attached prime ideals of local cohomology module $H_m^n(M)$ were calculated, where (A, m) be Noetherian local ring, M finite A-module and $dim_A(M)=n$, and also in the special case in which furthermore A is a homomorphic image of a Gornestien local ring (A', m') (see [2, 11.3.6]). In this paper, we shall obtain this set, by another way in this special case.

• Honam Mathematical Journal
• /
• v.40 no.2
• /
• pp.219-225
• /
• 2018

In this paper, we characterize the prime submodules of an injective module over a Noetherian ring.

• The Pure and Applied Mathematics
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.271-278
• /
• 2007

Let R be a 2-torsion free semiprime ring. Suppose that there exists a 4-permuting 4-derivation ${\Delta}:R{\times}R{\times}R{\times}R{\rightarrow}R$ such that the trace is centralizing on R. Then the trace of ${\Delta}$ is commuting on R. In particular, if R is a 3!-torsion free prime ring and ${\Delta}$ is nonzero under the same condition, then R is commutative.

• Journal of the Chungcheong Mathematical Society
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.451-458
• /
• 2009

Let $n{\geq}2$ be a fixed positive integer and let R be a noncommutative n!-torsion free semiprime ring. Suppose that there exists a symmetric n-derivation $\Delta$ : $R^{n}{\rightarrow}R$ such that the trace of $\Delta$ is centralizing on R. Then the trace is commuting on R. If R is a n!-torsion free prime ring and $\Delta{\neq}0$ under the same condition. Then R is commutative.

• Communications of the Korean Mathematical Society
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.211-217
• /
• 2004

In a ring $R_n(K,\;J)$ where K is a commutative ring with identity and J is an ideal of K, all prime ideals of $R_n(K,\;J)$ are of the form either $M_n(P)\;o;R_n(P,\;P\;{\cap}\;J)$. Therefore there is a one to one correspondence between prime ideals of K not containing J and prime ideals of $R_n(K,\;J)$.