• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• 2011.04a
• /
• pp.50-53
• /
• 2011

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• 2008.04a
• /
• pp.134-136
• /
• 2008

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.35-38
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• 2003.10a
• /
• pp.194-196
• /
• 2003

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.115-119
• /
• 2006

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.118-123
• /
• 2005

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.168-168
• /
• 2005

• Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.144-155
• /
• 2020

This research developed an approach to identify ecologically important areas at local scales and explained how the results of this approach could contribute to extend the protected areas in the Republic of Korea (ROK). While most developed countries have considered various biotic and abiotic factors, ecological processes, migration routes, habitat connectivity, ecosystem services, and etc. to determine the protected areas, ROK has considered a few factors focusing on biodiversity, landscape, and the habitats of endangered organisms. However, for sustainable management of our nature, we need comprehensive understanding of various ecosystem factors and interactions among them at local scales in designating protected areas. Forthis, we developed a conceptual model based on the ecological engineering approach and then explained how the results of this approach could contribute to extend the protected areas. In particular, we considered future land-use and climate change in determining the priority areas for novel protected areas. Our research suggested an effective methodology 1) to include various ecosystem factors and 2) to consider future environmental changes as well as current environmental conditions in finding the ecologically important areas and prioritizing these areas. However, our approach has limitations on the real-world applications due to the lack of fundamental information and data on our ecosystems. To improve the effectiveness of our approach in the real-world applications, we need various long-term ecological research results, environmental and ecological monitoring data, and both current and future spatial environmental data.

• Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.207-217
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study was to understand and develop various environmental designs to play a key roles in urban design, so that public green spaces remain vital with future changes. Variability in space, ecology, and society were analyzed based on research of variable environmental spaces in 11 selected studies conducted locally and abroad since the 2010s. Moreover, landscape characteristics, design methods, and design strategies were analyzed accordingly for each case. The results of the study showed that variability in landscapes provided various possibilities for spatial change and satisfied people's functional needs for spatial use. In addition, variable environmental design greatly compensated for the defects by solving the issues associated with fixed landscapes by increasing the flexibility of use and adaptability to the environment. This study showed that variable design is applicable to public green spaces; environmental stress; and variability in architecture, the environment, and landscaping, and it contributes to enhancing the sustainability and resilience of the environment.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2021.06a
• /
• pp.451-451
• /
• 2021

인간활동으로 인해 서식처의 변화, 서식처의 파편화를 비롯하여 기후변화, 토지이용의 변화 등으로 생태계 생물 다양성은 빠르게 손실되고있는 상황이다. 특히 생물 다양성은 생태계 복원력에 중요한 인자로서 유역의 건전성 회복을 위해 생물 다양성을 중요한 인자로 고려하려는 경향이 커지고 있다. 유역 건전성은 주로 큰 하천에서의 친수성, 서식처, 유량 및 수질 등에 적용되어왔고 국내에서는 최근 들어 유역 건전성을 확보하기 위해 수량 및 수질관리, 환경문제 등의 해결을 위해 유역관리 차원에서 접근하려는 시도가 시작되었으나 어떠한 수단을 통해 생물다양성과 서식처 관리를 접근할 수 있는지에 대한 연구는 아직 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 최근 20년 동안 도시화, 댐 건설 등 토지이용변화가 크게 발생한 금강유역(9,865 km²)을 대상으로 InVest 모델 중 서식처 가치평가 모델 (Habitat Quality Model)을 이용하여 유역의 서식처 가치를 평가하고 이를 수생태계 건강성 모니터링 자료와 비교하여 모형의 적용성을 평가하고자 한다.