• Title/Summary/Keyword: 평가 항목

Search Result 4,949, Processing Time 0.03 seconds

A Framework for Evaluating Ubiquitous Services using Fuzzy AHP (Fuzzy AHP를 이용한 유비쿼터스 서비스 평가 프레임워크)

  • Kim, Su-Yeon;Hwang, Hyun-Seok
    • Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
    • /
    • v.13 no.5
    • /
    • pp.158-167
    • /
    • 2008
  • In recent years, various information technologies including ubiquitous computing technology have been developed and deployed. The more ubiquitous services based on ubiquitous technology have widely been spread, the more evaluation methods of those services are required. In this study, we suggest a framework for evaluating ubiquitous services by identifying evaluation factors and their relative importances. Combining review of related works and experts' opinions on the evaluation, we calculate the factors affecting ubiquitous service evaluation and relative importances among those factors using fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). We conduct a case study to illustrate the applicability and feasibility of the suggested framework.

  • PDF

A case study of Privacy Impact Assessment -Focus on K hospital Privacy impact assessment case- (개인정보 영향평가 사례 연구 -K병원의 영향평가 사례를 중심으로-)

  • Jeon, Dong-Jin;Jeong, Jin-Hong
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.10 no.8
    • /
    • pp.149-157
    • /
    • 2012
  • Recently, many corporations and public institutions are busy preparing and providing measures in dealing with new privacy information law. This study reviews privacy impact assessments in order to perform preventing and diagnosis against potential threats focus on the K-hospital case. The quality of protection in K-hospital shows that the corporations itself is 79.0, the system is 97.0, the life cycle of the privacy is 67.4 and CCTV is 90.0. The lowest levels are saving and keeping 50.0, usage and offer 64.1 and destruction 66.7 among the life cycle of the privacy. The result of risk analysis shows that the highest levels are controlling for privacy 11.0, saving and keeping 12.5 and destruction 13.0. From the result, dangerous duplications are saving and keeping and destructions.

A Study on the Evaluation Criteria for Feasibility Analysis of Apartment House Development Project (공동주택 개발사업 타당성 평가항목에 관한 연구)

  • Hong, Ju-Hyun;Go, Seong-Seok
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.10 no.1
    • /
    • pp.102-113
    • /
    • 2009
  • When planning and promoting apartment house development project, it is very important to carry on profitability in planning stage through realistic evaluation and analysis about distributability. Especially, the analysis about project feasibility through forecasting the early distribute rate is crucial stage because it could evaluate overall expecting benefit and feasibility of the project. However, researches and studies related with forecasting profitability and distributabilty of construction development project are insufficient. Also there is a big gap of the standard for evaluating early distribute rate between government and individual corporations. So it is necessary to study about the evaluating early distribute rate. In this point, this study aims to present effective evaluating standard(criteria) which is for forecasting profitability and distribute rate through analyzing various factors and weight of apartment house development projects. This study compared and analyzed examples of the real initial rate of private apartment sale based on the government estimated standard. Among estimated index, omitted items and factors to be additionally considered are combined as 33 detail appraisal contents of 4 parts 9 items by allotting them based on the data about priority of all considered factors.

Evaluation Category Selection For Automated Essay Evaluation of Korean Learner (한국어 학습자 작문 자동 평가를 위한 평가 항목 선정)

  • Kwak, Yong-Jin
    • 한국어정보학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2017.10a
    • /
    • pp.270-271
    • /
    • 2017
  • 본 연구는 한국어 학습자 작문의 자동 평가 시스템 개발의 일환으로, 자동 평가 결과에 대한 설명과 근거가 될 수 있는 평기 기준 범주를 선정하기 위한 데이터 구축과 선정 방법을 제시한다. 작문의 평가 기준의 영역과 항목은 평가체계에 대한 이론적 연구에 따라 다양하다. 이러한 평가 기준은 자동 평가에서는 식별되기 어려운 경우도 있고, 각각의 평가 기준이 적용되는 작문 오류의 범위도 다양하다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 자동 평가 기준 선정의 문제는 다양한 평가 기준에 중 하나를 선정하는 분류의 문제로 보고, 학습데이터를 구축, 기계학습을 통해 자동 작문 평가에 효과적인 평가 기준을 선정 가능성을 제시한다.

  • PDF

Methodological Status and Improvement of Additional Evaluation of Health Impact Items in Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가서 내 건강영향 항목 추가·평가의 방법론적 현황과 개선)

  • Ha, Jongsik
    • Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
    • /
    • v.29 no.6
    • /
    • pp.453-466
    • /
    • 2020
  • The addition and evaluation of health impact items in Environmental Impact Assessment document are written in hygiene and public health items only for specific development projects and are being reviewed. However, after the publication of the evaluation manual on the addition and evaluation of health impact items in 2011, there is a demand for continuous methodology and improvement plans despite partial improvement. Therefore, in order to propose a methodological improvement of the evaluation manual, this technical paper identified detailed improvement requirements based on the consultation opinions on hygiene and public health items, and investigated and suggested ways to solve this problem by reviewing the contents of the research so far. As for the improvement requirements, the contents related to mitigation plan, post management, effect prediction, assessment, and present-condition investigation were presented in Environmental Impact Assessment documents for the entire development project at a frequency of 93%, 85%, 80%, 74%, and 67%, respectively. Particularly, the detailed improvement requirements related to mitigation plan consisted of an establishment direction and a management of development project. Considering the current evaluation manual and the frequency of improvement requirements, this paper proposed concrete methods or improvement plans for major methodologies for each classification of hygiene and public health items. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation methodology related to whether a project is implemented was proposed, which is not provided in the current assessment manual.

A Study on the Improvement of HACCP Evaluation Items in Small Scale Meat Packaging Plant (소규모 식육포장처리업 HACCP 평가항목 개선 연구)

  • Jung, Sung-Won;Cho, Seok-Hyun;Back, Seung-Hee;Kong, Hong-Sik;Nam, In-Sik
    • Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.437-452
    • /
    • 2019
  • The HACCP evaluation standards for the meat packaging plant are divided into general scale HACCP evaluation standard and small scale HACCP evaluation standard. There are 69 evaluation items in the general scale HACCP evaluation criteria, of which 54 items in the prerequisite management and 15 items in the HACCP management are included. The number of small scale HACCP evaluation items are 20 and about 29% of the general scale HACCP evaluation items. This may not be enough to produce a safety livestock products for the purpose of implementing the HACCP system due to the nature of the meat packaging plant, which does not show much difference in the production process or method of product depending on the scale. To improve the small scale HACCP evaluation standard, the importance of each item was compared with the small scale HACCP evaluation based on the rate of non-compliance and the severity levels in the general scale HACCP evaluation items. As a result of the study, 8 items were derived from the prerequisites management, 2 items were derived from the HACCP management, and some similar evaluation items were grouped together. Finally, 10 items were added to the 20 items of the existing small scale HACCP evaluation items. In this study, study on the safety management of domestic livestock products are continuously carried out, so that it is possible to provide safety livestock products to consumers and contributes to securing competitiveness of domestic livestock industry.

Study on Deriving Improvements through Analysis of BF Certification Evaluation Indicators for Parks and Park Facilities (공원 및 공원시설 BF인증 평가지표 분석을 통한 개선방향 도출 연구)

  • Kim, Mi Hye;Koo, Bonhak
    • Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
    • /
    • v.50 no.5
    • /
    • pp.13-29
    • /
    • 2022
  • According to the revision of the Convenience Act for Persons with Disabilities, parks and park facilities where the first park development plan is established after December 4, 2021 are mandatory, and parks must be equipped with convenience facilities for the disabled. Hence, this study aims to derive the improvements of the park evaluation index by analyzing the park certification evaluation index, the building certification evaluation index of park facilities, and the evaluation reports of the current certification status cases. As a research method, first, the certification of parks and park facilities were compared and reviewed with the Park Green Act, and differences in the certification process and certification performance were compared and analyzed. Second, differences and common items were derived by analyzing barrier free (BF)-certification evaluation indicators for parks and buildings. Third, improvement plans were derived after analyzing differences and problems in 4 BF-certified parks and four building certification cases of park facilities in certified parks, focusing on the self-evaluation report and examination results. As a result of analyzing the park and building evaluation indicators, the items for which the evaluation purpose, evaluation method, and evaluation items were commonly applied to 7 access roads for each facility, 5 parking areas for the disabled, 2 guide facilities for information facilities, 14 in 5 categories of sanitation facilities, and 1 for other facilities. In the case of sanitation facilities, there is no case where it was evaluated as a park. If the park does not have an attached toilet, the park is certified as a building. Hence, it would be essential to establish the concept of an attached toilet and discuss the application of the evaluation index on the park sanitation facility. The score of buildings in parks and park facilities was lower than that of the self-evaluation results, and the certification grades of buildings declined in three cases. The items with the highest standard deviation were BF walking continuity for parks and the path to the main entrance among access roads for buildings. As a result of analyzing the park and building evaluation results of 19 common evaluation items except for sanitary facilities, the difference in the grades of the evaluation items for each case site except for one item appeared. Therefore, applying common detailed calculation criteria for items evaluated in common with parks and buildings is needed. Since sanitation facilities have no cases of park certification and are not certified as buildings, it is essential to establish the concept of attached toilets and discuss the application of park sanitation evaluation indicators. It is necessary to develop an evaluation index suitable for the characteristics of the park, such as adjusting the items that are not evaluated in parks and establishing an evaluation index considering the ones of parks. It expects that this study would be used as primary data for improving park certification indicators.

A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Criteria and Methods for Improving Safety Level in the Laboratory (연구실 안전수준 향상을 위한 평가기준 및 방법 개선 연구)

  • Yang, Yun-Young;Shin, Dong-il
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
    • /
    • 2022.10a
    • /
    • pp.279-280
    • /
    • 2022
  • 연구실안전법에 따라 모든 연구실은 주기적으로 안전점검과 정밀안전진단을 통해 안전을 확보하고 안전환경 상태에 따라 미흡한 평가등급을 받으면 연구 활동에 제약을 받는 제도가 시행되고 있다. 하지만 현재의 점검 및 진단제도는 안전분야별 각 점검항목에 대해 양호, 주의 및 불량 등 이상 3가지로만 평가하고 있으며 각 점검항목에 대해서도 안전에 미치는 영향에 따른 가중치가 고려되지 않아 평가 대상 연구실에 대한 종합적인 안전수준을 확인하는 데 한계가 있다. 이에 연구실 안전전반에 관한 점검항목을 추가하고 평가기준도 가중치를 고려하여 평가결과가 정량적인 점수로 도출될 수 있도록 개선하여 연구주체자가 평가점수를 향상해감으로써 연구실 안전수준을 향상해 갈 수 있도록 방법을 제안해 보고자 한다.

  • PDF

Development of Korean Version of the Dementia Eating Evaluation Tool based on Behavioral Observation (행동관찰 기반 치매 식이 평가 도구의 한국판 개발)

  • Seo, Sang-Min;Woo, Hee-Soon
    • Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation
    • /
    • v.9 no.1
    • /
    • pp.56-68
    • /
    • 2020
  • Objective : This study introduces domestic and overseas systematic assessment tools that can identify eating problems of dementia patients based on abnormal behavior observations and turns them into Korean through the verification of content placement by expert groups. Methods : Three types of assessment tools were selected for final development in Korean version through several meetings based on a wide range of relevant literature searches. The 3 selected assessment tools were first translated by the researchers, and a 9-person expert team was used to verify the Content Validity Index. Results : The EBS content equivalence calculation shows that all 6 questions and 1 response item had a CVI value 0.9, and all items were included in Korean EBS without modification. The EdFED content equivalence calculation showed that all 11 questions had CVI value 0.9, which was included in the Korean edition of EdFED without modification. The content equivalence calculation of the FDI showed that all 19 questions had a CVI of 0.8 or higher, and all items were included in the Korean version of the FDI without modification of the item. Conclusion : Korean versions of the EBS, EdFED and FDI, which are based on behavioral observation and diet tools for people with dementia, have been developed. Early determination of problems related to diet in dementia patients and providing proper intervention through observational Korean version assessment tools is vital in terms of strengthening patient nutrition and reducing caregivers' burden.

Effectiveness Estimation of Rock Slope Stability Evaluation Items for Geometrical Configuration and Topographical Characteristic (기하학적 형상 및 지형학적 특성을 중심으로 한 암반사면 안정성 평가항목의 유효성 평가)

  • Lee, Yonghee;Kim, Jongryeol;Lee, Jinsoo;Kang, Kwonsoo;Kim, Nagyoung
    • Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society
    • /
    • v.9 no.5
    • /
    • pp.61-69
    • /
    • 2008
  • In general, it has been usually used the method that assess rock slope stability using stereographic projection method, limit equilibrium analysis, numerical analysis and slope stability evaluation table. Several methods for assessing the stability of rock slopes has been proposed on the basis of site investigation data. These method adopted different evaluation items and weighting factors by researchers, organization and nation. But the researches for each evaluation items were insufficient. So the effectiveness of rock slope stability evaluation items for geometrical configuration (slope height, slope direction and angle, dip and dip direction of major discontinuity, absolute value for the direction difference for slope and major discontinuities) and topographical characteristic (possibility of topographical water concentration, upper natural slope angle, slope configuration) using 315 failure and stable highway rock slope analysis data, AV (abnormal value) analysis and NMAV (normalized maximum abnormal value) analysis were evaluated.

  • PDF