• Proceedings of the KOR-KST Conference
• /
• 2007.11a
• /
• pp.180-187
• /
• 2007

Car-sharing은 차량소유(Car ownership)의 대안으로서 개인이나 법인에게 차량을 한 시간의 짧은 단위로 이용하도록 하는 회원제 프로그램이다. 이는 차량을 보유하는 편리함 대신에 차량을 공동 이용함으로써 운영비용을 절감할 수 있다. 15년여 전 스위스에서 시작되어 현재는 유럽, 북미, 일본, 싱가포르 등에서 활성화되어 있고, 유럽에서는 대중교통과의 연계서비스까지도 실시하여 그 효과를 증대시키고 있다. 국내에서는 아직 기업의 수익성 사업으로 시도된 사례는 없으나 최근 서울 성산동 주민의 자발적인 참여로 6개 팀이 한 차량을 이용하는 형식으로 시도되어 이제 그 첫걸음을 떼고 있다. 본 논문에서는 Car-sharing에 대한 개념, 정의 및 택시나 렌터카 등 유사수단과의 비교, 그리고 해외에서 현재 운영 중인 Car-sharing 프로그램의 사례를 소개하고, Car-sharing 도입 시 발생하는 개인의 운영비용 절감뿐만이 아닌 차량통행 감소, 주차 수요 감소, 대중교통 이용률 증가, 오염물질 배출 저감, 교통 혼잡 감소 등 많은 종류의 사회적 편익을 국내 도입 시를 가정해 비용과 함께 개략적으로 추정, 편익-비용 분석을 통해 그 경제적인 효과를 검토하였다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.28 no.6
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2010

As various social problems occur due to increasing traffic accidents, the government has setup and executed strong safety policies. As a result, the number of traffic accidents and the death toll have been decreasing in recent years. However, the setup and execution of the various policies for reducing traffic accidents cost much, so it is necessary to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of each policy. In the present study, enforcement by means of an unmanned over-speed enforcement system, the enforcement effect of which was proven good compared to the cost required for traffic enforcement, is compared with enforcement by policemen. As a result of the comparison, the average speed was 82.66 km/h before the use of unmanned systems and policemen; the average speed with manned enforcement was 70.57 km/h; and the average speed with unmanned systems was 67.85 km/h. The speed limit violation rate was 65% before the use of unmanned systems and policemen; 32% with manned enforcement; and 15% with unmanned systems. Considering the kinds of vehicles, the average speed and violation rate were highest among private cars, then vans, and then trucks.. Considering lanes. The accident rate was estimated based on the above results, and the input cost-to-advantage was estimated. The annual cost-to-advantage was estimated by comparing the above estimated values with the conditions before the unmanned over-speed enforcement system. Subsequently, the enforcement by policemen showed a negative advantage of 76,130,590 won, and the enforcement by the unmanned system showed a positive advantage of 38,577,670 won.

• Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.119-130
• /
• 2018

The VE/LCC study on the existing multi-utility tunnel examined the economical feasibility of the collective area through the cost-benefit analysis of the ten major routes of Seoul for the benefit (7 items) and the cost (5 items) through quantitative methods. In this paper, we analyzed the economic efficiency of 61 sectors by adding 3 items (reduced traffic accident, reduced vehicle noise, social-economic loss). The reduced traffic accident item is an improvement of the traffic accident cost that can be saved by the implementation of the project, and the reduced vehicle noise item is an indicator of the amount of noise change caused by the implement of the business. Finally, the social-economic loss items represent the impact on the local economy due to the construction of the multi-utility tunnel. The amounts of the additional items were compared and items added in the open type and tunnel type multi-utility tunnel were analyzed for each analysis. Result on the analysis, it analyzed the items applied to the basic and detail models in the economic evaluation of the multi-utility tunnel design, and makes it possible to evaluate the economic efficiency more efficiently. The economic evaluation of the basic and detailed models including the items presented in this study will be often used in the design of the multi-utility tunnel design.

• Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.79-94
• /
• 1998

This study begins with emphasis on the approach to public policy development and the extent to which a GIS framework can be used to evaluate projects objectively. This paper relates to public policy making and the use of GIS as a strategic management tool rather than the development of GIS technologies which has been the focus of attention since the advent of the first generation GIS systems in the 1960s. In order to consolidate a view towards public policy, the aim of this study is to show the advantages of using GIS to generate results which could be evaluated by cost and benefit analysis giving options of the alternative methods to estimate the feasibility of projects (both tangible and intangible) in a real public policy scenario. This study also reports that the tangible benefits associated with the GIS projects are better information processing, the easy analysis of data and the cost savings of map updates and printing, whilst the intangible benefits include quality decision making, and precise management of data through computing networks. In GIS context, the task of analysing and evaluating GIS projects is assumed in order to facilitate scientific and quantitative cost-benefit analysis. Previous methods of the cost-benefit analysis has not fully supported the evaluation of the intangible benefits and it has not been possible to make public policy realistic or scientifically understandable limiting decision makers in public domain. With the GIS decision makers are able to explore the potential of projects with this powerful decision supporting tool in practical application. On the basis of its potentials and limitations to cost-benefit analysis, therefore, it can be concluded that more flexible analysis and evaluation methodologies are needed to extend into the intangible benefits. In order to balance the evaluation of both quantitative and qualitative approaches on the cost-benefit analysis new or additional utilities will be required for the next GIS generation appraisal tool.

• Environmental and Resource Economics Review
• /
• v.30 no.2
• /
• pp.237-268
• /
• 2021

As variable renewable sources rapidly increase due to the Energy Transition plan, integration cost of renewable sources to the power system is rising sharply. The increase in variable renewable energy reduces the capacity factor of existing traditional power capacity, and this undermines the efficiency of the overall power supply, and demand resources are drawing attention as a solution. In this study, we analyzed how much electric vehicle demand resouces, which has great potential among other demand resources, can reduce power supply costs if it is used as a flexible resource for renewable generation. As a methodology, a stochastic form of power system optimization model that can effectively reflect the volatile characteristics of renewable generation is used to analyze the cost induced by renewable energy and the benefits offered by electric vehicle demand resources. The result shows that virtual power plant-based direct control method has higher benefits than the time-of-use tariff, and the higher the proportion of renewable energy is in the power system, the higher the benefits of electric vehicle demand resources are. The net benefit after considering commission fee for aggregators and battery wear-and-tear costs was estimated as 67% to 85% of monthly average fuel cost under virtual power plant with V2G capability, and this shows that a sufficient incentive for market participation can be offered when a rate system is applied in which these net benefits of demand resources are effectively distributed to consumers.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.43 no.6
• /
• pp.721-733
• /
• 2023

As the frequency of extreme rainfall events increase due to climate change, climate change adaptation measures have been proposed by the central and local governments. In order to reduce flood damage in urban areas, various flood response policies, such as low impact development techniques and enhancement of the capacity of rainwater drainage networks, have been proposed. When these policies are established, regional characteristics and policy-effectiveness from the cost-benefit perspective must be considered for the flood mitigation measures. In this study, capacity enhancement of rainwater pipe networks and low impact development techniques including green roof and permeable pavement techniques are selected. And the flood reduction effect of the target watershed, Gwanak campus of Seoul National University, was analyzed using SWMM model which is an urban runoff simulation model. In addition, along with the quantified urban flooding reduction outputs, construction and operation costs for various policy scenarios were calculated so that cost-benefit analyses were conducted to analyze the effectiveness of the applied policy scenarios. As a result of cost-benefit analysis, a policy that adopts both permeable pavement and rainwater pipe expansion was selected as the best cost-effective scenario for flood mitigation. The research methodology, proposed in this study, is expected to be utilized for decision-making in the planning stage for flood mitigation measures for each region.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2008.05a
• /
• pp.1540-1544
• /
• 2008

최근 기후변화의 영향일 것으로 추정되는 이상가뭄의 발생빈도가 잦아지는 상황에서 이에 대한 대비책으로서 댐의 비상용량을 비상용수로 공급하는 방안이 조심스럽게 제기되고는 있으나 현재까지 국내에서는 비상용수에 대한 명확한 정의조차 제시되지 않는 등 다소 생소한 개념이라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 비상용수 공급의 국내 외 사례와 비상용수 공급편익 산정에 관한 국내 외 연구를 검토하여 댐에 의한 비상용수 공급의 가능성과 가치를 평가하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 비상용수의 수요는 정기적으로 발생하지 않는 특수한 경우이고 용수공급을 대체할 만한 대안이 거의 없는 극한 상황에서 발생한다. 그러므로 생 공용수의 편익산정 방법에 일반적으로 이용되는 대체시설비용법과 같은 편익산정 기법을 적용하는 것은 여의치 않을 것으로 판단된다. 그리하여 본 연구는 비상용량이 사용될 때의 갈수빈도와 갈수피해액의 관계를 설정하고 피해경감액을 추정함으로써 연평균 편익을 산출하는 방안을 검토하는 방안을 제안하고자 한다. 비상용수 공급편익의 합리적인 계량화하기 위해서는 적절한 이수안전도의 설정과 이에 따른 이수기능의 평가가 선행되어야 한다. 그러나 아직까지 갈수규모에 따른 비상용수 공급편익의 산정방법에 대한 명확한 기준이 마련되지 않은 실정이다. 따라서 향후 비상시 댐의 이수기능을 최대한 활용하고 이에 대한 올바른 가치평가를 위해서도 관련분야에 대한 기초연구가 시급히 이루어져야 할 것이다.

• Journal of Energy Engineering
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.141-151
• /
• 2016

Recently, technology for energy recovery from waste has been increasing interest globally including the Korea. In Korea, we have interested in using biogas generated from the sewage treatment process. As one alternative, there are operating biogas combined heat and power plant. The generation amount of the Sewage Sludge are expected to grow in the future. For this reason, total processing cost of Sewage Sludge will increase. To solve this problem, it seems will be invested with the expansion of facilities that use biogas as energy. Therefore, quantitative information on such facilities is required. Thus, this study attempts to economic feasibility analysis for Seonam Biogas Combined Heat and Power Plant. Meanwhile, as the benefit items for economic feasibility analysis consider electricity supply benefit except for heat supply benefit. The average prices of electricity use were residence 123.69, commercial 130.46, and industry 102.59 won per kWh for the year 2015, In addition, the economic benefit are calculated to be residence 310.21, commercial 378.49, and industry 222.87 won per kWh. The results of economic feasibility analysis is NPV 72.18 billion won, B/C 1.90, IRR 37%, shows that economic validity of Seonam Biogas Combined Heat and Power Plant.

• Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.49-59
• /
• 2017

The piezoelectric energy harvester is recently being developed and catching on as a way to achieve low carbon green growth. The practical application of the piezoelectric energy harvester is expected to contribute not only to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions but also to the improvement of residents' welfare. This paper conducted a cost-benefit analysis for the installation of piezoelectric energy harvester on the highway focusing on its impacts on the public. The results showed that the installation of piezoelectric energy harvester on the gyeongbu highway is economically feasible in that it could increase the social welfare for the residents. Finally, this paper suggests policy direction for the practical use of the piezoelectric energy harvester, based on the results obtained.

• Proceedings of the KIEE Conference
• /
• 2011.07a
• /
• pp.1370-1371
• /
• 2011

2011년 RPS(신재생에너지 공급의무화제도)의 본격적인 시행을 앞두고 국내 신재생에너지 산업의 많은 변화가 예상된다. 사업을 추진함에 있어 재무적 타당성을 분석하여 사업을 결정하는 것은 가장 기본적인 절차이다. 이러한 과정에서 비용과 편익에 대한 분석이 이루어지며 이에 대한 신뢰도의 정도에 따라 사업의 성공여부가 좌우된다고 할 수 있다. 통상 재무적 타당성분석은 유형적인 요소를 분석하여 사업성을 결정하지만, 무형적인 비용과 편익도 간과할 수는 없다. 유형적인 요소는 명확한 재무적인 수치로 나타나지만 무형적인 요소를 재무적인 수치로 평가하는 것은 쉬운 일 아니다. 무형적인 비용과 편익에 대한 정형화된 산정모델이 없고, 주관적인 의견에 의존하는 경향이 크므로, 해당 업체의 환경과 특성에 따라 평가방법 및 평가액이 상이하며 평가에 대한 신뢰도 또한 전문가에 따라 차이가 발생한다. 하지만, 이러한 무형적인 요소에 대한 평가는 사업추진 여부에 대해 중요한 변수로 작용할 수 있다. 실례로, 2002 월드컵 유치에 대한 무형효과에 대한 평가액은 가지각색이지만, 월드컵 유치로 인한 국가의 인지도 상승 및 경제적 효과는 누구도 부인하지 못할 것이다. 본 연구에서는 무형효과 산출에 대한 대표적인 사업의 사례 조사를 통해 무형효과 평가모델에 대한 기본 방식을 연구함으로써, 신재생에너지 개발사업에 적용할 수 있는 무형효과 산출 모델의 기본안을 제시하고자 한다.