• Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.113-123
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this research is to develop evaluation indicators forperformance improvement of horticultural therapy garden. In order to achieve a therapeutic purpose, the gardening activity held by the trained horticultural therapist. Moreover, horticultural therapy is 'a medical model' for the treatment and basic premise of the research was set, as horticultural therapy garden is characterized area to support activities of patients and horticultural therapist functionally and efficiently. For this study, three times of Delphi and AHP techniques were proceeded to export panels who were recruited by purposive sampling. Through these techniques, it was possible to deduct the evaluation indicator which maximizes the performance of the horticultural therapy garden. The evaluation items were prioritized by typing and stratification of the indicator. The results and discussions were stated as followings. Firstly, a questionnaire of experts was conducted to horticultural therapists and civil servants who were in charge of horticultural therapy. As results(horticultural therapists: 87.8%, civil servants: 75.2%), It is possible to conclude that both positions have the high recognition and agreed on the necessity of horticultural therapy. Secondly, Delphi investigation was conducted three times in order to develop the evaluation indicator for performance evaluation. After Delphi analysis, total 34 of evaluation elements to improve the performance of the horticultural therapy garden by reliability and validity analysis results. Thirdly, AHP analysis of each evaluation indicator was conducted on the relative importance and weighting. Moreover, the results showed 'interaction between nature and human' as the most important element, and in order of 'plan of the program', 'social interaction', 'sustainable environmental', and 'universal design rule', respectively. On the other hand, the exports from the university and research institute evaluated the importance of 'interaction between nature and human', while horticultural therapists chose 'plan of the program' as the most important element. Fourthly, the total weight was used to develop weight applied evaluation indicator for the performance evaluation of the horticultural therapy garden. The weight applying to evaluation index is generally calculated multiply the evaluation scores and the total weight using AHP analysis. Finally, 'the evaluation indicator and evaluation score sheet for performance improvement of the horticultural therapy garden' was finally stated based on the relative order of priority between evaluation indicators and analyzing the weight. If it was deducted the improvement points for the efficiency of already established horticultural therapy garden using the 'weight applied evaluation sheet', it is possible to expand it by judging the importance with the decision of the priority because the item importance decided by experts was reflected. Moreover, in the condition of new garden establishment, it is expected to be helpful in suggesting ways for performance improvement and in setting the guidelines by understanding the major indicators of performance improvement in horticultural therapy activity.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.19-34
• /
• 1996

This study provides an overview of the accreditation landscape in Korea, and identifies some problems in the current accrediting review program which assesses the library's achievements These are as follows: (1) The weight given to the library sector is insufficient. (2) There are no indicators to appraise the achiement of the informational and educational functions of academic libraries (3) It is completely devoted to input indicators, but not process or output indicators (4) It is impossible to evaluate the quality os library services. (5) The units of statistics are not standardised. Some alternative measures and indicators are proposed to evaluate the performances of academic libraries' services. It is suggested that an official draft should be prepared by Korean academic librarians to amend the library sector of current accrediting review program.

• Smart Media Journal
• /
• v.11 no.7
• /
• pp.70-75
• /
• 2022

In 2019, the government improved the system to reduce the maximum weight of economic feasibility items in the comprehensive evaluation from 50% to 45% in order to improve the problem that economic feasibility is a decisive factor in passing the preliminary feasibility study. This study is to analyze the effect of system improvement in 2019 and verified the difference between before and after system improvement. As a result of regression analysis and correlation analysis, both periods showed high correlation, and the difference through Z-test was analyzed as not statistically significant. This result means that institutional improvement to reduce the impact of economics was not effective. Therefore, it is judged that it is necessary to discuss the design of a more effective comprehensive evaluation study through research such as reevaluating the weights of each item in the comprehensive evaluation in various ways in existing projects.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.28 no.2
• /
• pp.29-41
• /
• 2012

Competition between international Hub ports has been more and more intense. In order to invigorate itself, Gwang-Yang port has been making multilateral efforts. However, it has not still reached 300Millions TEU which is the standard to be permitted as a self-reliance Hub port. Therefore, a functional modification of berth should be considered. This study suggests to transform container berths to general berths. This article is focused on reserve berth mode of Gwang Yang hub port and selected three kinds of berths as alternative subjects of the study: general berth, exclusive berth, and multipurpose berth. This research has conducted that The subjects of the survey were in relation with Logistics as professional mutually group about Gwang-Yang hub port. The measurements of this survey were measure section and factor. Also, Fuzzy AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) was applied to the survey. According to the result, by measuring weight values of alternatives, the best favored one was multipurpose berth expect stability (32.6%), Exclusive berth was graded the most among the alternatives. Also, based on total weight value, the order of priority is as follows: multipurpose berth(38.2%), exclusive port(33.7%), general berth(28.1%).

• International Journal of Highway Engineering
• /
• v.8 no.4 s.30
• /
• pp.145-157
• /
• 2006

Generally, the method of the policy analysis has been used for making a policy decision of the development project of the road through the expert interview based on AHP. According to introducing PI, the study of the method of the integrating process for various opinion of the related groups is required. On this study I evaluate what is a difference between the results of integrated process and the AHP analysis on what is major considering factor in decision-making process. From the analysis, each evaluate factor is in level of significance by ANOVA. First, there is a significance level difference between Group A, C and Group B Second, there is also a significance level difference on the result of AHP analysis for each group in order to evaluate by integrated method. Finally, the method of AHP analysis which considers priority factor is expected as to be useful tool on decision-making of various group.

• 한국방재학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2008.02a
• /
• pp.703-706
• /
• 2008

Structural flood defensive alternatives have been evaluated based on economic feasibility, riskiness of safety and sustainability. Social problems associated with structural flood defensive alternatives such as dams, flood control channels, etc. are currently issued. The evaluation items of policy presented in KDI(2001) are should be modified in order to resolve the social problems. Hence, this study conducted a questionnaire survey of public servants, researchers, and engineers to obtain how to determine evaluation items for policy assessment and to compute their weights in the analytic hierarchy process. This study also compared the weights of the items in KDI(2000) with the weights from the survey in this study. The policy assessment weight was estimated higher than KDI(2000). This result suggests that social awareness increases and the analysis of policy becomes important for selecting optimal structural defensive alternatives.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2000.04a
• /
• pp.581-584
• /
• 2000

웹사이트의 사용성에 영향을 미치는 요소들은 매우 많으며 또한 각각이 갖는 비중 또한 다르다. 이러한 점들을 고려한 웹사이트의 사용성을 예측할 수 있는 평가방법의 개발은 웹사이트 개발자 뿐 만 아니라 사용자들에게도 중요한 문제이다. 이러한 다중기준 평가에서는 대상 시스템의 전체적인 사용성을 효과적으로 정의할 수 있는 단일기준을 추출할 수 없기 때문에 다중기준을 고려하였고 그에 따라 가중치를 설정하기 위해 AHP 모형을 적용하였다. 본 연구의 목적은 웹사이트의 설계, 개발 단계에서 사용성을 평가, 개선할 수 있는 효율적인 사용성 평가방법을 제시하는 것이며 이를 위해 웹사이트의 사용성 평가항목 정의, 각 사용성 평가항목에 대한 세부평가기준 정의, 각 평가기준에 대한 쌍대비교, 가중치 산출, 가중치 종합에 의한 사용성 평가값 산출의 단계를 거쳐 연구가 수행된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2022.10a
• /
• pp.279-280
• /
• 2022

연구실안전법에 따라 모든 연구실은 주기적으로 안전점검과 정밀안전진단을 통해 안전을 확보하고 안전환경 상태에 따라 미흡한 평가등급을 받으면 연구 활동에 제약을 받는 제도가 시행되고 있다. 하지만 현재의 점검 및 진단제도는 안전분야별 각 점검항목에 대해 양호, 주의 및 불량 등 이상 3가지로만 평가하고 있으며 각 점검항목에 대해서도 안전에 미치는 영향에 따른 가중치가 고려되지 않아 평가 대상 연구실에 대한 종합적인 안전수준을 확인하는 데 한계가 있다. 이에 연구실 안전전반에 관한 점검항목을 추가하고 평가기준도 가중치를 고려하여 평가결과가 정량적인 점수로 도출될 수 있도록 개선하여 연구주체자가 평가점수를 향상해감으로써 연구실 안전수준을 향상해 갈 수 있도록 방법을 제안해 보고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.153-159
• /
• 2019

Job creation is the most important issue in the labor market these days, and the quality of jobs is also very important in order to resolve the mismatches that are taking place in the labor market. Kim Young-min (2014) developed the "2012 Quality of Employment Index" with twenty indicators in seven categories, including employment opportunities, to objectively assess the local labor market. This method presents the concept of the aggregate indicator, 'Quality of Work Index', and has the advantage of being easy to produce. However, it is difficult to statistically verify the adequacy of the constitutive indicators and, based on this, make them a single aggregate index through statistical techniques. Therefore, we developed an alternative '2012 Descent Work Index' and a confidence interval using Principal Component Analysis(PCA) and Unobserved Component Model(UCM) presented by Gi-Choon Kang & Myung-jig Kim (2014) and also calculated an alternative '2017 Descent Work Index' using the first half of 2017 local area labour force survey and compared its changes by region. The results of the empirical analysis show that the rank correlation coefficient between two methods of aggregating indicators, simple weight used in Young-min Kim's research, PCA method and UCM used in this study, were found to be statistically significant under 5% significance level. This implies that all methods are found to be useful. However, the PCA and UCM which determine scientific and objective weights based on data are preferred to Young-min Kim's approach. Since it provides us not only the level of aggregate indicator but also its confidence intervals, it is possible to compare ranking with the consideration of statistical significance. Therefore, it is expected that the method of constructing an aggregating indicator using UCM will be widely used in many areas in the future.

• The Korean Journal of Financial Management
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2002

한국 종합주가지수는 한국증권거래소에 상장된 모든 기업들의 가치 가중치에 의한 포트폴리오의 가격의 시계열이라고 할 수 있다. 따라서 이 지수는 한국 경제의 현재의 활동과 미래의 활동에 대한 예상의 총합의 반영 또는 표상을 표현하는 정보라 할 수 있다. 본 논문에서는 시차변수가 독립변수로 도입될 수도 있으며, 시차변수가 아닌 변수가 독립변수로 도입되는 것이 허용되는 회귀모형을 통하여 구조변화의 회수와 구조변환점을 검정할 수 있는 통계량과 이 통계량의 확률분포를 분석하고 한국 종합주가지수에 적용하여 한국 종합주가 지수의 일별수익률에 구조변화가 발생하였는지의 여부와 발생했다면 발생회수와 변환점들을 발견하는데 그 목적이 있다. 한국 종합주가지수의 일별수익률은 분산의 변화 그리고 평균 및 분산의 동시변화가 1997년 9월 27일에 발생하였다. 자기회귀모형에 의할 때 증권시장의 구조변화는 1999년 11월 16일에 이루어졌다. 평균과 분산의 변화가 일어나 구조변화의 단계를 시작하고 구조변화에 알맞는 환경조성에 2년이 소요된 후에 1999년 11월 16일에 구조변화가 정착되었다. 정착이 이루어진 후에야 비로서 이 두 기간은 서로 다른 경제구조와 증권시장구조가 이루어지고 이에 입각하여 시장의 새로운 운동법칙이 전개되고 있다고 할 수 있을 것이다.