• Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
• /
• v.4 no.4 s.15
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2004

This study analyzed the current Urban Disaster Management System(UDMS) and proposed improvements, focusing on fire-fighting. We learned the problems with the UDMS empirically, conducting a survey intended for officials in fire station in various prefectures include big city, 6 metropolitan city and Gyeonggi-do. The problems with the UDMS were classified mainly into problems with law operating system, administration system and systematic countermeasures. As a result, it was found that regions that include Seoul and other big cities manage urban disasters better than the prefectures of which Gyeonggi-do and others are parts Consequently, it is desirable to cater appropriate Urban Disaster Management Systems into each of the two parts, one for big cities and the other for prefecture.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.356-357
• /
• 2017

본 연구에서는 국내에서 재난관리에 있어 지방정부와 민간과의 네트워크를 지역특성별로 구성하는 방안에 대해 제시하였다. 현재 우리들이 살고 있는 과학기술이 발달한 현대 산업사회를 '위험사회' 라는 개념으로 정의하기도 한다. 최근 재난의 유형이 다변화되고 피해규모가 증가됨에 따라 본래의 정부주도하의 재난대응보다는 협업과 협력을 통한 재난관리가 필요하다. 국외에는 이러한 재난대응을 위한 협력구축네트워크를 광역방재거점 등을 설치 운영함으로써 실질적이고 효율적인 협력을 구축하고 운영 중이다. 하지만, 국내에서는 협업 및 협력에 대한 매뉴얼 등을 통한 소프트적인 체계구축에 중점을 두고 대응을 하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 국외사례를 통해 실질적인 거점형태의 민관네트워크를 구축하고, 해당지역에 적합한 운영방안을 선택하는 데에 활용 할 수 있을 것이다.

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.177-179
• /
• 2011

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.168-169
• /
• 2012

• Disaster Prevention Review
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.62-68
• /
• 2011

• Magazine of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
• /
• v.10 no.3
• /
• pp.85-91
• /
• 2010

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.260-265
• /
• 2010

In this paper, we study of the disaster safety management system and find recognition comprehensions and the problem points which are basic in our system. We dedicate this research on improvement analysis and main discussion issues of the system that based on diagnostics in developed countries' system. By taking some essential points of advanced like systems, we construct our own system. Beside that it is proposed to solve problems and find improvement issues by comparing with advanced systems.

• Journal of Korean Society of societal Security
• /
• v.3 no.2
• /
• pp.13-14
• /
• 2010

• Journal of Korean Society of societal Security
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.3-6
• /
• 2011

• Journal of Korean Society of Disaster and Security
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.47-63
• /
• 2020

This study aimed to investigate the effects of social disaster risk perception levels of Koreans on government trust. To this end, differences in disaster risk perception levels based on social disaster types and the effects of social disaster risk perception levels on government trust were analyzed. In the preliminary survey, three types of social disasters with high risk levels (bird flu, fine dust, and nuclear power plants) were selected. The survey was conducted on 1,109 Korean men and women aged 20 years and older. First, the analysis results demonstrated that social disaster perception levels differed based on social disaster types. Second, the results showed that, in terms of social disasters, proactivity, personal knowledge, familiarity, severity, fear, and risk associated with chances of recovery did not affect government trust. Third, the perception of delayed social disaster risk had a positive effect on government trust. Fourth, scientific knowledge about social disasters, control capabilities, lethality, and risk perception at the onset time had a negative effect on government trust. In conclusion, the implications and limitations of this study were discussed.