• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.26 no.6 s.289
• /
• pp.85-86
• /
• 1993

국제정세의 변화와 오랜 통일에의 염원에 따라 남북한 상호간에 많은 교류가 예상되고 있다. 그러나 해방 후 분단 반세기 동안 남한과 북한은 전혀 교류가 없는 상태에서 서로 다른 길을 걸어왔기 때문에 모든 분야에서 상당한 이질감을 느낄 수 밖에 없다. 수학의 경우에도 분야에 따른 연구상황은 물론, 용어면에서도 많은 차이를 보인다. 우리가 별 노력없이 일본식 한자용어와 영어용어를 그대로 수용하고 있는 경향인데 반하여 북한에서는 한글화 작업에 많은 노력을 쏟아와 대부분의 수학용어들이 우리 고유의 한글로 정착되어 있다. 현재 우리의 감각에는 생소하고 어색한 단어들도 많지만 북한의 좋은 한글용어를 보완, 수정하는 등 중요 자료로 받아들여 우리의 수학용어를 체계화시킴으로써 통일된 앞날의 우리 수학발전에 기초로 삼아야 할 것이다.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.43 no.4
• /
• pp.337-347
• /
• 2004

Korea and China have maintained close relationships since the ancient times along with Japan, which also shares the common Chinese culture. The three major players in Northeast Asia have been recognizing their increasing importance in politics, economy, society, and culture. Considering those relationships among the three countries, it's necessary to compare and investigate their mathematics terminology. The purpose of this study is to investigate the similarities and differences between the terminology of school mathematics in Korean, Chinese and Japanese. The mathematics terms included in the junior high school of Korea were selected, and the corresponding terms in Chinese and Japanese were identified. Among 133 Korean terms, 72 were shared by three countries, 9 Korean terms were common with China, and the remaining 52 Korean terms were the same as Japanese terms. Korea had more common terms with Japan than China, which can be explained by the influences of the Japanese education during its rule of Korea in the past. The survey with 14 terms which show the discrepancy among 3 countries were conducted for in-service teachers and pre-service teachers. According to the result of the survey, preferred mathematics terms are different from one group to the other, yet the Korean mathematics terms were more preferred in general. However some terms in Chinese and Japanese were favored in certain degree. This result may provide meaningful implications to revise the school mathematics terms in the future.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.123-137
• /
• 2014

In this paper, the format of the Korean 2011 & the Japan 2008 elementary school mathematics curriculum are compared especially centered on elements, areas, objectives, and lesson time numbers. Through this comparison, suggestions can be obtained as follows. First, grade-group system which does not meet the actual elementary mathematics education needs to be reconsidered. Second, the area name 'number and operation' needs to be reduced into the area name 'number and calculation'. Third, using the area name 'pattern' needs to be reconsidered. Fourth, using the area name 'probability' needs to be reconsidered. If 'possibility' which some event occurs is seen as ratio, it can be contained area 'quantity relationship'. Fifth, containing the nature of mathematics into the school mathematics objectives needs to be reconsidered. Sixth, it is necessary to enhance the phase of mathematics in elementary education.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.375-396
• /
• 2022

In this paper, to provide an idea for the 2022 revised mathematics curriculum by restructuring the content of the 2015 mathematics curriculum, the content elements of recurring decimals of textbooks, which showed differences in the curriculum of Korea and Japan, were analyzed. As a result of this study, in Korea, before the introduction of the concept of irrational numbers, repeating decimals were defined in the second year of middle school, and the relationship between repeating decimals and rational numbers was dealt with. In Japan, after studying irrational numbers in the third year of middle school, the terminology of repeating decimals is briefly dealt with. Then, when learning the concept of limit in the high school <Mathematics III> subject, the relationship between rational numbers and repeating decimals is dealt with. Based on the results of the study, in relation to the optimization of the amount of learning in the 2022 curriculum revision, implications for the introduction period of the circular decimal number, alternatives to the level of its content, and the teaching and learning methods were proposed.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.407-428
• /
• 2021

This study compares and analyzes the mathematics assessment items of the middle school's national-level academic achievement tests in Korea and Japan, recently revised as a competency-focused curriculum. By comparing and analyzing the assessment items in each country, the analytic framework is integrated into content areas, contexts, and competencies. The characteristics of each country's assessment items developed for each content area were analyzed using the framework. We suggested some implications on developing and improving national-level academic assessment items.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.107-126
• /
• 2021

Lexicon is closely related to human thinking. In particular, a classroom lexicon results from objectifying the teaching-learning activity in classrooms, allowing humans to recognize and explore the activities and phenomena in classrooms explicitly. Therefore, using the lexicon and clarifying what the words mean is to enhance the understanding of teaching activities. The International Classroom Lexicon Project investigates and identifies each country's mathematics classroom lexicon, where ten countries participated. The purpose of this current study is to compare the differences in perceptions between teachers and pre-service teachers about the Korean classroom lexicon previously investigated as a part of the international collaborative project. By comparing the responses of 147 teachers and 127 pre-service teachers, the degree of familiarity with pedagogical terms and the frequency of occurrence or usage in classrooms were compared and analyzed to understand the recognition of pre-service teachers' pedagogical terms. Finally, we also discuss reflections on Korean mathematics teaching practices in Korea.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.35-46
• /
• 2015

In this paper, the teaching contents for angle and measure of an angle in elementary mathematics textbook between Korea and Japan were compared. From this comparison, the following five suggestions were presented as implications to improve the teaching contents for angle and measure of an angle in elementary mathematics textbook in Korea. First, it is necessary to reconsider the way of the definition of angle. There is no use of half line in elementary mathematics, except when to define angle, and the way to define angle and the way to define right angle are not consistent. Second, considering to associate the turning of plane geometrical figures to the $90^{\circ}$, $180^{\circ}$, $270^{\circ}$, $360^{\circ}$ is necessary, and associating them is connected to dealing with point-symmetrical shapes in the fifth grade. Third, there is a need to deal with "the measures of angles are same." in comparing angles. This is possible by superimposing two angles in comparing the measures of them. Fourthly, it is necessary to consider the introduction of the rotational angle. Dealing with the $360^{\circ}$ as the rotational angle is related to explaining that the sum of measures of interior angles in quadrangle is $360^{\circ}$. Fifth, it is necessary to be connected with middle school mathematics curriculum. The term 'straight angle' is used in middle school, and to obtain the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a regular polygon is the contents to be dealt with in middle school.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.627-654
• /
• 2016

Despite the significance of the measurement strand in elementary mathematics education, it is not easy to teach it meaningfully. This study analyzed instructional methods related to capacity and weight in a series of mathematics textbooks of Korea, Japan, Singapore, and the US. The overall analysis was conducted in the following two aspects: (a) what and when to teach main learning content, and (b) how to teach the learning content tailored to the instructional components specific to the topics of measurement (i.e., the necessity of measurement unit, the meanings of measurement terms, appropriate choice of units, appropriate choice of measurement tools, and the necessity of calculation). The results of this study showed overall similarities in using real-life contexts to teach major topics on capacity and weight as well as emphasizing the relations among measurement units. However, noticeable differences were also analyzed in dealing with the meanings of measurement terms, appropriate choice of units, and appropriate choice of measurement tools. Based on these results, this study provides textbook writers with implications on what to further consider in dealing with capacity and weight.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.485-499
• /
• 2015

In this paper, focusing on definitions of terms related to ratio (a:b, external ratio, internal ratio, percentage, proportion, bi-ui-gap(value of a:b)), elementary school mathematics textbooks of Korea and Japan are compared. We can find significant differences between Korean and Japanese textbooks. In Korean textbook, 'bi-yul' includes both of the internal ratio and the external ratio. In Japanese textbooks, the external ratio(amount of unit size) and the internal ratio(wariai) are defined independently. And a:b is set to a subconcept of the internal ratio. In addition, a:b and percentage are presented as methods to express the internal ratio. From these results, the following four implications for developing our mathematics textbooks can be presented as conclusions. First, it is necessary to limit the ratio to mean the internal ratio. Second, it is necessary to define connotatively the ratio as the internal ratio and to set it as a prior concept of a:b. Third, it is necessary to define 1% as the internal ratio 0.01. Fourth, it is necessary to define bi-ui-gap as a number for expressing a:b, when viewing a:b as the expression method of the internal ratio.

• School Mathematics
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.103-121
• /
• 2005

This article compares and analyzes mathematics textbooks of North Korea, South Korea, China and Japan and draws meaningful ways for introducing the division algorithm of fractions. The analysis is based on the five contexts: 'measurement division', 'determination of a unit rate', 'reduction of the quantities in the same measure', 'division as the inverse of multiplication or Cartesian product', 'analogy with multiplication algorithm of fractions'. The main focus of the analysis is what context is used to introduce the algorithm and how much it can appeal to students. This analysis supports that there is a few differences of introducing methods the division algorithm of fractions among those countries and more meaningful way can be considered than ours. It finally suggests that we teach the algorithm in a way which can have students easily see the reason of multiplying the reciprocal of a divisor when they divide with fractions. For this, we need to teach the meaning of a reciprocal of fraction and consider to use the context of determination of a unit rate.