• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.47 no.3
• /
• pp.49-72
• /
• 2013

This study analyzes the effect of A university's institutional repository(A-IR) which performs as a gateway of university research. This research presents A-IR's operational policy and usage analyses which consist of visits, pageviews, demographics and behaviors of visitors, frequency of visits and traffic sources. On the basis of this analyses, this research found the correlations between usage of IR and citations of research papers.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.327-328
• /
• 2011

본 연구는 분야별 핵심 연구자를 선별하기 위한 방법론을 다루고자 한다. 핵심 연구자를 선별할 때 가장 흔히 사용하는 방법 중에 하나는 높은 피인용회수(Timces Cited)를 갖는 연구자를 찾는 것이지만 피인용회수가 곧 연구 성과의 순위를 대변한다고 볼 수 없다. 본 연구에서는 특정 학문 분야에서의 연구 성과에 대한 분석을 토대로 핵심연구자를 선별하기 위한 요인들을 수립하고 검증하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.1014-1019
• /
• 2003

논문과 특허는 연구 성과의 명시적 산물로서 그 수와 인용되어지는 정도는 연구 성과와 그 질을 측정, 평가하는데 많이 이용되어왔다. 본 연구에서는 우리나라의 분야별 논문수와 피인용수를 이용하여 우리나라 논문 발표 활동이 여타 다른 국가들과 비교하여 어떤 특징을 보이는지 살펴보았다. 우리나라의 논문 발표 활동은 미국, 일본, 영국, 프랑스, 독일 등 선진국이나 스위스, 핀란드 둥 유럽소국과도 다른 양상을 보였다. 특정 분야에 특화 된 정도나 분야별 연구 결과의 편차 등은 대만, 중국 등 현재 과학기술이 급격한 성장추세에 있는 나라와 비슷한 양상을 보였다. 이번 연구는 논문 분석이 각 국가의 전체적인 과학 활동의 특징을 파악하는데 도움이 될 수 있음을 제시하였다고 하겠다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.53 no.4
• /
• pp.143-162
• /
• 2022

Altmetrics is an alternative impact evaluation index that evaluates the social interest in the research performance of individuals or institutions in universities, research institutions, and research fund support institutions. This study empirically analyzed what kind of attention a papers of domestic library and information science researchers published in an international academic journal was receiving in the international community using Altmetric explorer. As a result of the analysis, 230 papers were tracked. The average Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) was 6.63, but there were 2 papers that received overwhelming attention (over 170 points) as they were mentioned in news report and Twitter. Second, there was a tendency for high AAS to appear in cases where a domestic researcher participated as a co-author and the main author belonged to an overseas institution, and in the case where the research funds were supported by foreign government agencies. In addition to the field of the library information science or information system, the papers classified as the field of public health service and education showed high AAS, and it was confirmed that these papers were published in the journals of various fields such as life science. Finally, it was confirmed that there was a weak correlation of r =0.25 between the AAS and the number of citations of the analyzed paper, but a strong correlation of r =0.68 between the number of Mendeley readers and the number of citations.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.199-218
• /
• 2003

The discriminating power of journal evaluation criteria of Korean medical journals were measured. The study used the data of 76 medical journals, collected in the "Korean Medical Journal Evaluation" process conducted by the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE) between 1997 and 1999. For each evaluation criterion, the distribution of the individual score vs the total score of a journal received was plotted and their correlations were analyzed. It is found that the evaluation criteria with a high discriminating power are the ones associated with the peer review system and the journal editing. The evaluation criteria with a low discriminating power are the journal frequency and how often a chief editor is changed. Some evaluation criteria such as "Journal holding rates of medical libraries" and "year-end index" need modifications in the evaluation methods. Other evaluation criteria such as "Journal self-citation rate","SCI citation rate" and "SCI impact factor" need to modify the score ranges. It is recommended that the new evaluation criteria such as "citation rate by Korean medical journals" and "Access availability of the journal information through major Korean medical abstract databases" should be added.formation through major Korean medical abstract databases" should be added.dded.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.47-75
• /
• 2012

Basic research have contributed to technological growth or economic growth in U.S. Specially recent studies say that universities also contribute to economic development through scientific activities like science research, education, technology transfers. But we can not assure whether scientific knowledge was connected to real technology or economic performance, and it is difficult to figure out the effect of scientific output. "What is the exact performance of scientific knowledge?" It is still obscure. In this context, this paper analyzes characteristics of the linkage of science and technology. Data are U.S. R&D expenditure, scientific articles, citation of articles in U.S. patents by fields and sectors. As a result, university sector has the most weight of the linkage of science and technology. But, in relative connection rate analysis, industrial sector's is stronger than any other sectors. In the field analysis, linkage of science and technology is very strong in Chemistry, Physics, Biological sciences fields. And recently the linkage was increased in the fields of Computer science, Agricultural science, Engineering. Finally, this paper supports funding policy or estimation policy of government to product of scientific knowledge. University sector is still important because it has the most weight of the linkage. Scientific knowledge of industrial sector is also important. The connection rate of industrial science is the strongest in all sectors. And this research classify the R&D type by science fields. Considering the differences of science fields is needed to product science knowledge effectively.

• The Journal of Information Technology
• /
• v.4 no.3
• /
• pp.49-64
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this study was to observe whether the status of a firm's website affects the performance of the other affiliated websites. In other words, whether or not the website could improve its performance from developing high-status affiliation was investigated. The status of a website being affiliated was measured based on the number of citations, and the performance of a website developing affiliation on the number of visitors. The affiliation between websites was defined as banner links. For the analysis, the status of the initiator's website, that might be expected to affect the website performance, was controlled. To achieve the purpose of this study, a field study method was adopted. To obtain the data, an unprecedented method employing a program that gathers all related information concerning a specific website was used. The findings of this study indicated that the website developing high-status affiliation did not significantly improve its performance. Such findings different from previous research may have resulted from different characteristic of affiliation and limited samples available.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.107-117
• /
• 2014

The Purpose of this study was to empirically investigate the effects of core competencies on the management performance of hospitals and the mediating roles of medical service orientation and internal customer orientation. The sample of this study was composed of 307 employees from 18 general hospitals in Incheon Metropolitan City and Bucheon City. Data were collected with self-administered questionnaires and analyzed using structural equation modelling technique. This study found that core competencies had positive effects on the management performance of hospitals and that medical service orientation and internal customer orientation mediated the relationship between core competencies and the management performance of hospitals. The theoretical and practical implications of the results were discussed and the directions for future research were suggested.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 2015.05a
• /
• pp.226-240
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to establish a proper evaluation system for R&D performance by analyzing relationships between quantitative results of science& technology and national wealth. We analyzed 193,474 research papers in multi-disciplinary fields from SCOPUS database and explored co-relations between HCP production by section and national wealth. This research found a significant relationship between the number of HCP papers and GDP & GDP per capita by nation. Also, results from this study indicate that top 30 to 40 percent of researches should be reflected in the performance evaluation while these numbers could be flexible in accordance with the direction of national policy. In terms of future research, this study provides basis for designing more effective R&D performance evaluation systems.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.45 no.3
• /
• pp.259-277
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze how the changes of evaluation standards have affected Korean medical researchers' academic performance by comparing the publication status of medical articles both domestically and abroad. A total of 314,559 domestic articles in KMbase and 53,423 articles stored in MEDLINE published abroad by Korean researchers were analyzed. All of the data were compared per year according to the research field and indexed journals by numbers and proportions of articles published domestically and abroad. The analysis showed that the number of total articles and the proportion of articles published abroad increased continuously. In the early 2000s, articles published in Korea decreased, otherwise articles published abroad increased sharply. SCI articles showed a steady increase before 2000, and continued to increase over the next few years. KCI articles also showed a rapid increase in the early 2000s while other articles were decreasing. Publication trends shown in this study were similar despite quantitative and timely differences by research area. Performance evaluations focusing on SCI articles affected on quantitative decrease in the number of total articles published domestically. Quantitative growth itself is not an absolute indicator for academic achievement. Therefore, to complement any evaluation of academic achievement, qualitative analysis needs to be done as well.