• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.819-839
• /
• 2009

Proposed increases to the government's R&D budget should be discussed based on merits of meeting efficiency and effectiveness criteria. The evaluation of the national R&D budget and related programs are performed in two areas: a system of R&D budget coordination and allocation, and a system of R&D program performance. This paper mainly focuses on the operational areas of R&D budget evaluation system with a focus on their impact to efficiency and effectiveness. The core view point for a R&D budget evaluation system involves two directions: Firstly, to detail the relationships between the later stage (ex. post) activities such as, program survey, analysis, and program performance evaluation, with the budget evaluation. Secondly, to critically oversee all R&D coordination procedures with a different perspective. Budgeting is generally known as a serial process of policy making, planning and executing. It is highly desirable for the budget to be allocated to, and spent by, specific programs as planned, and that each plan be aligned with a specific policy. As such, a strong relevance between the program structure and budget code system is integral to successful execution. It should be performed using a decision making system which closely examines the link between policy and budget. It is also recommended that systematic relationships be maintained among budget coordination and allocation, performance evaluations of policy and program levels, and program survey and analysis system, and that their operational schedule should be reviewed comprehensively as a one integrated system. The National Science and Technology Council is expected to play a major and practical role as the center of policy planning and should be supported by the objective and unbiased system which covers overall process from policy making to program evaluation. Finally, increased utilization of contents, timely program survey and analysis, and accurate of activity scheduling of budget coordination and allocation, and diligent program performance evaluation all contribute towards a more efficient and effective overall evaluation system.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.539-560
• /
• 2015

Korea has enacted the Performance Evaluation law on the R&D Programs since 2006. This study categorizes program size, program history, sustainability, self-evaluation result as antecedents, and analyze the relationship between the antecedents and Meta-evaluation result, the change rate of appropriations. The result shows that program size, program history, self-evaluation result have significant effect to the Meta-evaluation result. And Meta-evaluation result has significant effect to the change rate of appropriations. This study has implication that the performance evaluation system shows significant effect to the appropriations.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.586-590
• /
• 2010

정부가 생각하는 중요한 정책방향은 두 가지를 보면 알 수 있다. 바로 예산과 인력이다. 필요하다고 판단하는 곳에 정부는 예산과 인력이 투입되게 마련이다. 따라서 국가의 재정운용에 대한 평가를 해보면 어떤 것이 중요한 것인지에 대한 가치판단을 할 수 있다. 국가의 물관리 예산도 마찬가지이다. 국민소득과 여러 가지 사회경제적 특성에 따라 물관리예산은 국가별로 차이가 난다. 그러나 경제발전단계가 높을수록 높은 관리예산이 투입되는 것이 일반적이다. 과연 우리나라의 물관리예산은 적정한 것일까? 그러나 우리나라의 물관리는 여러 부처에 분산되어 있고 하천의 관리도 국가하천과 지방하천으로 구분되어 있기 때문에 이 질문에 답을 하기가 어렵다. 엄밀히 말하면 우리나라의 물관리예산이 연간 모두 얼마인지를 정확히 알지 못한다. 결국 적정한 수준인지를 평가할 수도 없다. 홍수방어와 용수공급이라는 시급성으로 인해 공공투자의 성격이 강했기 때문에 굳이 평가가 필요 없었을 수도 있다. 그러나 물관리가 과거와는 달리 복잡해졌고 따라서 물관리를 위한 정부의 재정계획과 집행 역시 여기에 맞게 보다 세심해져야 한다. 이제까지의 물관리예산이 사회적인 인프라를 건설하는데 주력했었다면 이제는 거버넌스와 생태계관리는 물론 물순환 전체를 위한 다양한 정책에 국가 재정이 투입될 필요가 있다. 그러나 이 같은 의사결정은 현재 재정계획과 투입입의 적정성과 타당성이 먼저 평가되어야 한다. 본 연구는 OECD내 다른 국가들의 물관리예산과 우리나라의 물관리예산을 비교분석함으로써 우리나라 물관리예산의 적정성을 평가하고자 한다. 특히 합리적인 재정구조를 가지고 있다고 판단되는 남아프리카공화국과의 비교를 통해 향후 우리나라의 과제가 무엇인지 검토하고자 한다.

• Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
• /
• v.26 no.5
• /
• pp.175-184
• /
• 2008

Uncertainties are unavoidable in engineering applications. In this paper we propose an alpha reliable multi-variable network design problem under demand uncertainty. In order to decide the optimal capacity enhancement, three performance measures based on 3E(Efficiency, Equity, and Environmental) are considered. The objective is to minimize the total budget required to satisfy alpha reliability constraint of total travel time, equity ratio, and total emission, while considering the route choice behavior of network users. The problem is formulated as the chance-constrained model for application of alpha confidence level and solved as a lexicographic optimization problem to consider the multi-variable. A simulation-based genetic algorithm procedure is developed to solve this complex network design problem(NDP). A simple numerical example ispresented to illustrate the features of the proposed NDP model.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.3 s.253
• /
• pp.18-29
• /
• 2000

무기체계 시험평가의 중요성은 국방예산의 효율성 및 무기체계의 신뢰성 제고 측면에서 아무리 강조하여도 지나침이 없을 것이다. 국방예산 획득여건의 악화는 획득비용의 절감과 이에 따른 경제적인 시험평가를 요구하고 있어 현재의 시험평가 방법을 보다 더 효율적.경제적인 방법으로 전환하여 현재의 국방예산 감소추세에 대응하며 시험평가에 소요되는 시간 및 비용을 절감하고 시험평가의 신뢰성을 제고하는 시험평가체계 개선 방안의 모색이 절실히 요구되고 있다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.29 no.1D
• /
• pp.63-72
• /
• 2009

This study aims at establishing the decision-making support system for the highway assets, long-term performance presumption and evaluation of asset value, which are appropriate for Korea, and proposing the methods of the optimal engineering method and the timing decision for the preventive maintenance through the project evaluation, the optimization method and life-cycle analysis related to the highways. In order to supplement the current problem of the near-sighted budget management system, which chooses the maintenance place of the highway, depending on the level of the budget with fixed amount, the long-term required budget prediction system and the economy principle were introduced, so that the pavement agency can predict the level of the required budget, and it was aimed to develop the pavement asset evaluation system to maintain the performance of the highway with the minimum of the cost. In the use of the highway pavement asset evaluation system, to maintain the appropriate level of the pavement evaluation index, when the budget was efficiently established in the reference of the required maintenance budget for the chosen section of the highway in the year concerned, it was possible to analyze the most rational pavement maintenance budget. With this result, it is estimated to prevent the unnecessary waste of budget in advance, and through the development of the decision-making system for the long-term performance presumption and the asset value estimation of the pavement, it is expected to able to analyze the previous evaluation of the project related to the highway and the feasibility of introduction.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.18 no.7
• /
• pp.165-174
• /
• 2013

Recently, many universities in Korea have been faced with critical crisis such as the decrease in the number of freshmen, the pressure for tuition cuts, M&A between universities and so on. Nobody has expected that universities will have this kind of difficulties. The universities are making attempts to innovate the quality of education to secure high level of education and to meet social needs to overcome these internal and external environment of crisis. For this innovation, the universities have sought to reduce the budget as well as conducted the self-evaluation to figure out their relative positions annually. Innovations cannot have having the limitation without education funds. Budget spent in universities have influences directly or indirectly on the structural improvement of the finance and on the growth of universities. The purpose of this study is to explore the decision-making method to find the optimal budget allocation so as to minimize the execution budget and to maximize the management evaluation by taking the advantage to analyse the relationship between the evaluation and the budget. Therefore, in this paper, we implement the development of the mathematical model for the University Evaluation and Budget Allocation Optimization in the form of the linear programming.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.191-229
• /
• 2016

As Korean national R&D projects have steadily grown in size, the needs of enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of the national R&D budge spending has been also discussed. Therefore, many efforts have been made to establish performance assessment system to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the national R&D project. One example of such efforts is the stipulation of connecting the results of performance evaluation ranking of the national R&D projects with the budge allocation of for the coming fiscal year. Unlike the stipulated article in the law/regulation that 'more budge shall be allocated to a project rated over excellent grade and vice versa', however, precedent studies have been casting mixed opinions over to the effectiveness of the connection between assessment results and budge allocation. In this respect, the present study attempted to empirically examine if the laws and institutions related to the results of performance evaluation ranking of the national R&D projects with the budge allocation work properly, using panel regression analysis and quantitative data. In addition, this study investigated into the deterrent factors to the connectivity between the performance results of the national R&D projects and budge allocation and sought for a way to improve the system of performance assessment and enhance the reliability of the results by minimizing the hindrance factors.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Railway
• /
• v.14 no.6
• /
• pp.569-574
• /
• 2011

An effective approach to distributing budget to railway line facility improvement is to use investment priorities of railway line segments based on their deterioration. In this paper we present an evaluation method of railway line segment deterioration which can be used to distribute limited budget. Railway line facilities include rail track, railroad switch, subgrade, bridge, tunnel. These facilities and line shape can affect line segment deterioration. Deterioration evaluation method we present is a weighted sum of each component deterioration scores. The component weight can be obtained from experts using analytic hierarchy process.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2020.06a
• /
• pp.408-408
• /
• 2020

「하천법」제3조는 국가는 하천에 대한 효율적인 보전·관리를 위하여 하천에 관한 종합적인 계획을 수립하고 합리적인 시책을 마련할 책무를 지게 하고 있다. 현재 전국에는 총 5,937개의 하천이 존재하며 국가와 국민의 일상생활에 큰 기여를 한다. 국가하천의 경우 하천의 크기 및 지리적 위치 등의 측면에서 볼 때 지방하천, 소하천보다 주요한 역할을 수행하며, 국토교통부의 예산에서도 큰 비중을 차지하고 있다. 국토교통부의 2020년 예산서를 살펴보았을 때 '국토 및 지역개발' 예산 1조 1666억9600만원 중 76.53%를 차지하는 8928억7300만원이 '국가하천정비지원', '국가하천정비'에 활용된다. 이처럼 국가하천의 정비를 위해 매년 많은 예산을 투자하고 있으며 여러 사업을 수행 중에 있으나 사업종료 후 사업에 관한 적절한 평가는 이뤄지지 않고 있다. 국토부에서는 「하천에 관한 사무처리규정」에 따라 매년 6월 국가하천 제방정비에 관한 평가를 수행 중에 있으나, 이는 제방에 관한 평가만을 수행하며 사업 자체에 관한 평가는 이뤄지지 않고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 많은 예산과 관심이 집중되는 국가하천사업이 완료되고 난 후 사업에 관한 평가를 통해 각 사업별 비교·분석이 가능한 표준 평가기법을 개발하고자 하였다. 평가지표의 경우 사업이 진행되는 단계인 '기본계획수립 단계', '실시설계 단계', '시공 단계' 세 단계로 나누어 구성하였으며, 총점이 100점이 되도록 구성하였다. 평가기법의 경우 우선 국가하천사업을 중심으로 평가하도록 하였으나 추후 지방하천, 소하천사업에서도 활용될 수 있도록 개발하였다. 평가기법의 활용성을 검증하기 위하여 Test-bed 사업들을 대상으로 평가지표를 적용하였으며, 필요한 수정·보완사항을 도출하였다. 이러한 하천사업 사후 평가기술의 개발로 사업 간의 비교·분석이 가능해질것이며, 각 평가결과를 바탕으로 향후 하천사업의 계획, 설계 시 벤치마킹이 가능할 것으로 기대한다.