• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.221-235
• /
• 2007

Open problems can provide experiences for students to yield originative and various products in their level, because it is open with respect to its departure situation, goal situation, or solving method. Teachers need to pose and utilize open problems in forms of solution-finding or proving problems. For this we first have to specify which resource and method to use by concrete examples. In this article, we exemplify a method and procedure of posing an open problem by the two cases in which we pose open problems by reorganizing given closed problems. And we analyze students' responses for the two posed open problems. On the basis of these, we reflect implications for mathematical education of open problems.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.37 no.6
• /
• pp.1037-1049
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this study is to explore how the flow of discourse move and their reasoning process in dialogic argumentation during group modeling on excretion. Five groups of three to four students in the second grade of a middle school participated in the modeling practice of a Gifted Center. Analysis was conducted on argumentation during the modeling activity in which students should explain how the waste product (ammonia) leaves the body. It was found that there was a sequential argumentative process-tentative consensus, solving the uncertainty, and consensus. There were several discourse moves - 'claim' and 'counterclaim' in the stage of tentative consensus, 'query' and 'clarification of meaning' in the stage of solving the uncertainty, and 'change of claim' in the stage of consensus. Students participated in the dialogic argumentation by constructing argument collaboratively for reaching a consensus. Critical questioning in the stage of solving the uncertainty and reasoning in the stage of consensus were the impact factors of dialogic argumentation. By answering the critical questions, students changed their claims or suggested new claims by defending or rebutting previous claims. Students justified group claims with diverse argumentation scheme and scientific reasoning to reach a group consensus. These findings have implication for science educators who want to adopt dialogic argumentation in science classes.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.39 no.4
• /
• pp.511-523
• /
• 2019

In this age of the $4^{th}$ industrial revolution, we, science educators, are giving more light on students' agentic behavior in the process of educating future scientist. This study, with the analytic lens of epistemic agency, explores the key stages of a student-driven R&E program rather than the scientist-led R&E program. It also examines to understand the emergence of students' epistemic agency in each stage of R&E. Data from participant observation for 18 months and in-depth interviews were collected and analyzed with the constant comparative method of grounded theory. This study identifies and describes five key stages of student-driven R&E: The stage of exploring research theme, designing research, performing lab activity, interpreting results, and communicating research. It also finds that (a) students' epistemic agency emerged with the constant interactions with the R&E structure; (b) students' epistemic agency has deep relations with the epistemic beliefs of the students; (c) students positioned themselves as decision-makers in the R&E practice; (d) the redistributed power and authority of the R&E contributed to the emergence of students' epistemic agency.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.68 no.5
• /
• pp.259-273
• /
• 2024

This study aimed to investigate changes in metamodeling recognition among chemistry teachers through a teacher educational program related to redox models and water electrolysis experiments. To this end, a science model education program was developed for 9 chemistry teachers and conducted over 10 lessons for a total of 40 hours. In addition, a pre- and post-survey was administered to determine teachers' metamodeling recognition in non-contextual and contextual situations. As a result of the study, through the science model education program, teachers showed educational effects in both non-contextual and contextual situations. In the case of non-contextual situations, the stages of scientific metamodeling knowledge development of chemistry teachers came out differently depending on the type of question. For example, the nature or purpose of the model, the modeling process, or the evaluation and improvement of the model improved from low to high, but there was no significant change because the perception of model change and diversity was already high in advance. In the case of contextual situations, the stage of scientific metamodeling knowledge development improved from objectivity to subjectivity in both the redox model theory class and the water electrolysis model experiment class. Therefore, through the 5E circular learning model-based education program, chemistry teachers' perception of metamodeling was clearly improved. However, the modeling activities of teachers in the water electrolysis model experiment class were different from the change in metamodeling perception. The types that teachers selected as additional experiments for modeling were analyzed in two ways. The first type is when they are interested in finding an ideal condition in which the ratio of hydrogen and oxygen gas is close to 2:1 through additional experiments. The second type is when additional experiments are designed with interest in why the experimental results are coming out like that. It was analyzed that the second type was the experiment necessary for modeling. In addition, modeling activities were analyzed into two types. The first was a type in which water molecules were directly decomposed in two electrodes to generate hydrogen and oxygen gas. This type was the case of regression to the textbook model regardless of the experimental results, and 6 chemistry teachers out of 8 were analyzed as this type. The second type was the type in which water reacted at the (+) electrode to generate other substances, and hydrogen ions reacted at the (-) electrode to generate hydrogen gas. Teachers who performed these modeling activities corresponded to the second type in additional experiments, and 2 chemistry teachers out of 8 corresponded to this. Therefore, it is necessary to provide an experience of activities corresponding to the second type of experiment and modeling through an educational program that provides an experience of directly modeling through experiments in order to develop modeling capabilities, unlike the development of metamodeling knowledge.

• 한국지구과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.09a
• /
• pp.199-206
• /
• 2005

지구과학은 실생활과 직접적으로 관련되거나 학생들이 친숙하게 생각하는 많은 개념들을 포함하고 있으며 이런 특성은 과학캠프나 자연탐사 활동에서 지구과학과 관련한 탐구주제가 학생들의 큰 호응을 얻는 사실을 설명할 수 있다. 하지만 정규 수업에서 이루어지는 지구과학 실험 수업은 교과서에 제시된 자료해석 위주의 실험이 많아 학생들의 흥미를 반감시키는 경우가 많으며 자료 측정과정에서 과학자가 느낄 수 있는 중요하고 귀중한 경험을 놓칠수 있다. 그런데 인터넷에서는 해양과 대기, 천문, 지질 각 분야에서 지속적으로 갱신되는 실시간 관측 자료를 제공해 주는 곳이 많으며 이 실시간 자료들을 고등학교의 지구과학 실험에 이용할 수 있도록 학습 프로그램을 개발하면 기존의 자료해석 실험이 가지는 한계를 극복하고 학생들의 지구과학에 대한 호응도를 높일 수 있으며 보다 다양한 탐구 능력을 향상 시킬 수 있다. 이러한 학습 프로그램의 특징은 탐구 중심 혹은 문제 해결 학습을 강조하는 현재의 교육 목표를 잘 반영할 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 인터넷에서 제공되는 지구과학 관련 실시간 자료들을 활용할 수 있는 고등학교 지구과학 학습 프로그램을 개발하고 이를 지원할 수 있는 홈페이지를 구축한 후 실제로 수업에 적용하여 교육적 효과를 확인하는 것이다. 연구 결과 실시간 자료를 이용하는 고등학교 학생들을 위한 지구과학 학습 프로그램을 12개의 주제에 대해서 완성했다. 먼저 지구과학실험 시간에 적용할 수 있는 2차시 분량의 학습 프로그램 6주제를 개발했는데 개발 주제는 '지진이 일어나고 있는 곳은 어디인가?', '진앙으로 판의 경계를 결정하기', '진앙의 위치를 찾아라', '암영대를 찾아라', '태양의 자전 주기를 측정하기', '태양활동' 이다. 각 주제별로 수업소개, 학습목표, 과정, 학습자료(학생 활동지, 기타 자료, 수업 내용과 관련한 실시간 자료 제공 사이트 목록), 평가 자료를 만들었다. 학생들의 활동 내용은 <지진이 일어나고 있는 곳은 어디인가?>의 주제를 예로 들면 학생들이 실시간으로 전 세계의 지진활동을 모니터하는 사이트에 접속하여 최근에 지진이 어디에서 일어났는지 알아보고 지난 30일 동안에 일어났던 규모 4 이상의 지진 자료를 다운 받아 세계 지도에 점으로 표시한다. 이 때 학생들은 손으로 진앙의 위치를 지도에 그리는 대신 엑셀의 그래프 기능을 이용하여 지도에 진앙의 위치를 나타내게 한다. 또 개인 과제 연구에 적용할 수 있는 학습 프로그램을 5가지 개발하여 학생들이 특정한 주제에 대하여 탐구 과제를 수행할 수 있게 했는데 개발된 주제는 '태양 활동으로 오로라 예측하기', '국제 우주 정거장을 찾아내자', '한반도 부근의 해양 기상과 해수의 물리적 상호 관계', '일기도 분석을 통한 태풍의 진로 예측', '우리 나라 조석 예측' 이다. 마지막으로 사이버 학습을 통해서 수업 시간의 제약 없이 과제 형태로 처치 가능한 학습 프로그램 개발 했는데 그 주제는 '태풍이 저위도에서 북상하는 이유?'이다. 개발된 프로그램 중 2차시 학습 프로그램은 과학고 중학생 영재반에게, 개인 탐구 과제는 과학고 1학년 학생들에게, 사이버 수업 형태는 과학고 2학년 학생에게 적용시켰다. 실시간 자료 활용을 지원하는 홈페이지를 만들어 자료 제공 사이트에 대한 메타 자료를 데이터베이스화했으며 이를 통해 학생들이 원하는 실시간 자료를 검색하여 찾을 수 있고 홈페이지를 방분했을 때 이해하기 어려운 그래프나 각 홈페이지가 제공하는 자료들에 대한 처리 방법을 도움말로 제공받을 수 있게 했다. 실시간 자료들을 이용한 학습은 학생들의 학습 의욕과 탐구 능력을 향상시켰으며 컴퓨터 활용 능력과 외국어 자료 활용 능력을 향상 시키는데도 도움을 주었다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.27 no.9
• /
• pp.818-831
• /
• 2007

Recognizing the importance of abductive inquiry in Earth science, some theoretical approaches that deploy abduction have been researched. And, it is necessary that the abductive inquiry in a geological field excursion as a vivid locale of Earth science inquiry should be researched. We developed a geological field trip based on the abductive learning model, and investigated students' abductive inference, thinking strategies used in those inferences, and the impact of a teacher's pedagogical intervention on students' abductive inference. Results showed that students, during the field excursion, could accomplish abductive inference about rock identification, process of different rock generation, joints generation in metamorpa?ic rocks, and terrains at the field trip area. They also used various thinking strategies in finding appropriate rules to construe the facts observed at outcrops. This means that it is significant for the enhancement of abductive reasoning skills that students experience such inquiries as scientists do. In addition, a teacher's pedagogical interventions didn't ensure the content of students' inference while they helped students perform abductive reasoning and guided their use of specific thinking strategies. Students had found reasoning rules to explain the 01: served facts from their wrong prior knowledge. Therefore, during a geological field excursion, teachers need to provide students with proper background knowledge and information in order that students can reason rues for persuasive abductive inference, and construe the geological features of the field trip area by the establishment of appropriate hypotheses.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.7
• /
• pp.1431-1449
• /
• 2013

This study is based on the assertion that science museums should consider visitors' views and expectations as they are not satisfied in many cases. In this study, we investigated 31 scientifically gifted students and 177 science high school students about their image of science museums. Using the questionnaire, it was found that only 51% of students visited science museums; however, the average number of visits was 4.2. This means that students tended to re-visit after the first visit of the science museum. Students had a 'good' image of science museums when they incurred hands-on experiences and observed new, interesting, curious and funny exhibits. And students had a 'bad' image of science museums due to the following aspects: lack of new and interesting exhibits, information and guide, diverse contents, and hands-on experience; deficiencies in environment; and inadequacy of the management, operation and composition of exhibits. Therefore, they hoped that science museums will provide more hands-on experiences and experiments, new and interesting exhibits, systematic management and composition of exhibits, information and guides, and a good environment. So science museums need to pay special attention to aspects like management, information guides and environment for the first-time visitors. Based on the above results, we suggested "Directions for a good science museum based on students' views". While asking students what topics they wanted to know and learn in a science museum, each student was given the choice of four topics; eventually, 2.9 answers overlapped for each topic. When classifying students' topics into four main themes for the Gwangju National Science Museum, the order from the most popular theme to the least one was 'science in everyday life', 'ocean/space/future science', 'light and science', and 'culture, art and science'. Among the topics mentioned by students, only 37% are exhibited in Seoul, Gwacheon, Daejeon, or Gwangju science museums. We hope that the results and research methods will be used for evaluation, re-construction, and reinvigorated presentation of science museums.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.32 no.5
• /
• pp.805-822
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study was to explore the patterns of group model development about blood flow in the heart and reasoning process by small group interaction. The subjects were 14, 8th graders in a Science Gifted Center. The group discussion was made possible by using triggering questions that can be answered based on experiences of hands-on activities such as a siphon pump analogy model activity and a dissection of pigs' hearts. Despite participating in same activities, the groups showed different model development patterns: unchanged, persuasive, and elaborated. Due to the critical revising, the group's explanatory model was elaborated and developed in the added and elaborated pattern. As critical revising is a core element of the developing model, it is important to promote a group interaction so that students become critical and receptive. The pedagogical analogy model and conflict situation enabled students to present elaborated reasoning. The Inquiry activity with the pedagogical analogy model promote students' spontaneous reasoning in relation to direct experience. Therefore offering a pedagogical analogy model will help students evaluate, revise and develop their models of concerned phenomena in science classroom. Conflict situation by rebuttal enable students to justify more solid and elaborate a model close to the target model. Therefore, teachers need to facilitate a group atmosphere for spontaneous conflict situation.