참고문헌
- Arnold, J., & Clarke, D. J. (2014). What is ‘agency'? Perspectives in science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 36(5), 735-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.825066
- Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
- Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching pupils "idea-about-science": Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education, 88(5), 655-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10136
- Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin'! Agency, Identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications.
- Chin, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2000). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Choe, H. S. & Tae J. M. (2015). The meaning and value of R&E (Research and Education) experiences of science specialized high schools: Gathering voices of graduates by individual interview. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 14(3), 51-79.
- Damsa. C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andrissen, J. E. B., Erkens G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
- Durkheim, E. (1964). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.
- Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268-291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Giddens, A. (2001). Mordernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Oxford: Polity Press.
- Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843
- Goulart, M. I., & Roth, W. M. (2010) Engaging young childeren in collective curriculum design. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 533-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9196-3
- Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Jung, H. C., Chae, Y., & Ryu, C. R. (2012a). Study on research and education (R&E) programs in science high schools and science academies: Focusing on the differences of perceptions between students and mentors. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(7), 1139-1156. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.7.1139
- Jung, H. C., Ryu, C. R., & Chae, Y. (2012b). Research and education (R&E) programs in science high schools and gifted high schools: Based on the interview results with R&E coordinators. Journal of Gifted and Talented Education, 22(2), 243-264. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2012.22.2.243
- Kang, S. J., Kim, H. J., Lee, G. J., Kwon, Y. S., Kim, M. H., Kim, Y. S., Kim, Y. H., Shin, H. S., Lim H. Y., & Ha, J. H. (2009). A study of scientifically gifted high school students' perceptions on the research and education program. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(6), 626-638.
- Kim, K. & Shim, J. Y. (2008). Scientifically gifted students' perception on the impact of R&E program based on KAIST freshmen survey. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(4), 282-290.
- Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classroom: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Science, 7(3), 313-350 https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672057
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2016). Science high school students' shift in scientific practice and perception through the R&E participation: On the perspective of legitimate peripheral participation in the community of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 371-387. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0371
- Lee, J,. & Kim, S. (2018). Exploring the development of research questions from high school research project. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.3.319
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury PA, CA: Sage Publications.
- Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press.
- Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed). Sanfransisco, AV: Jossey-Bass.
- National Research Council (2000). National science education standards. Washington, DC; National Academy Press.
- Park, J., Jang, K, Lim, I. (2009). An analysis of the actual processes of physicists' research and implications for teaching scientific inquiry in school. Research in Science Education, 39(1). 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9079-8
- Reed, B. (2001). Epistemic agency and the intellectual virtues. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 39(4), 507-526. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01831.x
- Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
- Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Jones (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
- Schwartz, D., & Okita, S. (2004). The productive agency in learning by teaching. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://aaalab.stanford.edu/papers/Productive_Agency_in_Learning_by_Teaching. pdf
- Sewell, W. H. Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1086/229967
- Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn scienceas-practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
- Stroupe, D., Caballero, M. D., & White, D. (2018). Fostering students' epistemic agency through the co-configuration of moth research. Science Education, 102(6), 1176-1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21469
- Yun, H., & Kim, H. (2018). Exploring science high school students' epistemic goals, epistemic considerations and complexity of reasoning in open inquiry. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 38(4), 541-553. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.4.541
피인용 문헌
- 과학고등학교 학생을 대상으로 한 공학적 문제해결 중심 메이커톤 프로그램의 개발 및 효과 vol.23, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2020.23.3.13