• Journal of Convergence for Information Technology
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.209-218
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of information system factors and organizational factors on procedural management performance in small and medium-sized venture companies in the Seoul metropolitan area. In the previous study was conducted mainly on large companies and general SMEs. In this study, the research was conducted considering the characteristics of SMEs. The results showed that system suitability, system quality, and IT assets had a positive effect on procedural management performance, and manager perception and human resource capacity had a positive effect on procedural management performance. But the evaluation and compensation did not have a positive effect on procedural management performance. The results of this study showed almost the same results as those of the previous studies. Venture firms have poor financial ability, technology, and organizational management ability than general SMEs. However, the introduction and diffusion factors of new information systems were not significantly different from those of general SMEs.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.337-338
• /
• 2011

국가연구개발사업은 과학기술기본법 제12조 및 "국가연구개발사업 등의 성과평가 및 성과관리에 관한 법률"에 의거하여 조사 분석 평가를 받게 된다. 정부출연연구기관은 소속된 연구회 체제 안에서 연구개발 활동에 대한 성과를 평가받게 된다. 본 연구는 사례 분석을 통해 국가연구개발 프로그램에 대한 메타평가를 수행함으로써 기존에 제기되고 있는 평가의 문제점을 해결하고 보다 효율적이고 객관적인 평가시스템을 개발하는 것을 목적으로 한다.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.16D no.3
• /
• pp.395-406
• /
• 2009

Korean government has operated EA by the act on efficient introduction of information system and operation, etc. But the evaluation system for EA and the criteria don't prepare well. Particularly, There is no model for EA performance measurement and the way is insufficient. In this study, we derived 8 areas and 17 criteria for the performance evaluation based on the Performance Reference Model of U.S FEA and Korea. And we also derived 8 areas and 10 criteria for it based on the OMB EA Assessment Framework and the EA maturity model in Korea. We propose the performance evaluation model of the five areas that consists of the business performance, customer performance, process, human resource and the technology for EA performance evaluation. To verify the model, we applied the model to three organizations and evaluated EA performance. In addition, we compared the performance result with the performance evaluation area of EA maturity model of Korea to verify the result. We also analyzed the criteria of the proposed performance evaluation model with the current EA maturity model and Performance Reference Model of Korea. As a result of the evaluation, we verified of the proposed performance evaluation model, too.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.5 no.4
• /
• pp.154-160
• /
• 2000

Recently, there are great variations on concepts and rolls of information system as the radical growth in information technology. A systematic MIS evaluation is requested for effective management and operation of information system. Although many researches on MIS evaluation have been progressed, the evaluation of the user satisfaction is limited by evaluating from the each system's result because of the diversity of view points and inclusion of MIS introduction. Therefore, in this paper, a conceptual framework is suggested to evaluate MIS synthetically that is changed by the result of existing MIS evaluation. So to speak, a new evaluation framework is suggested by synthesizing various view points and evaluation method that suggested from the existing MIS evaluation such as user satisfaction of results as the introduction of MIS and the satisfaction of variation of entire organization.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.189-203
• /
• 2010

Is presenting guidance of information performance measurement as government PRM version 2.0 these common reference models in public sector. Government PRM is consisted of assessment classification system and standard line of sight and performance management standard form. Through this, is sorting performance element and define cause-and effect. Government PRM is supplying measurement categories at assessment classification system, but relative importance for application standard by measurement categories is not presenting. In this study, importance for government PRM's measurement categories been applying by commonness Test of information performance measurement of public sector wishes to deduce estimation and priority. Research model used Fuzzy QFD, and designed so that can reflect well PRM's development purpose. I applied Fuzzy AHP and FPP method that graft together fuzzy theory to minimize uncertainty and ambiguity in that expert opinion. Is drawn to element that "Standard model offer for information department and management" is the most important in government PRM's development purpose. "Quality of service" is showing the highest priority in customer results in measurement category. Importance for government PRM's measurement categories can offer common valuation basis in government and public institution. Hereafter if examine closely quantitative cause-and effect for structure model of measurement classification system when study government PRM more objective and efficient reference model become.

• Proceedings of the Korea Association of Information Systems Conference
• /
• 1997.10a
• /
• pp.389-402
• /
• 1997

컴퓨터 소프트웨어를 내장한 시스템의 안전성을 평가하기 위한 여러 가지의 결함 분석 기법들이 있다. 이러한 결함 분석 기법들은 전통적으로는 하나의 시스템을 분석하는데 단지 하나의 방법으로만 분석해 왔으나, 시스템의 종류와 특성이 다양해지면서 시스템에 가 장 알맞는 분석 기법이 동원되어야 함은 이제 필수적이다. 여기에 착안하여, 시스템 내에서 소프트웨어의 크기가 비교적 작고, 안전성과 관련한 시스템의 반응 시간이 특별히 민감하지 않는 소프트웨어의 안전성을 평가하는 방법으로 결함 트리 분석(FTA)과 소프트웨어 오류경 향 및 영향 분석(소프트웨어 FMEA)을 결합한 시스템 결함 분석 방법을 제안하고자 한다.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.165-198
• /
• 2014

The national R&D performance evaluation system in Korea has been influenced by 'New Public Management' since the 1980s. The 1997 IMF crisis in Korea has necessitated the overhaul of S&T policy strategies in Korea. Reflecting this, effective distribution and utilization of S&T investment and resources has emerged as a crucial policy agenda, while expansionary investment in S&T maintained. During the period of 1999-2005, the R&D evaluation has been more focused on the input side and execution processes than on the results of R&D. Evaluation results were to be reflected in the budgeting of national R&D, but there were some disputes over how to make use of evaluation results between the budgeting ministry and the evaluation agency partly because they were two separate entities. After the advent of the new government(1998-2003) which advocated 'science and technology-oriented society', the national R&D evaluation system has evolved through a new legislation, the Performance Assessment Act, and the establishment of Science & Technology Innovation Agency to build up the unique framework for national R&D evaluation differentiated from the assessment system for general government investment programs. Most recently, due to 'Comprehensive Improvement Plan' in 2013, various components of national R&D evaluation seem to move on a new evolutionary track. For example, different types of evaluation are being developed and tried in accordance with differing evaluation goals, and the individual ministries and the research councils has got more enhanced autonomy and responsibility regarding R&D evaluation. So-called 'tailored' evaluation methods, taking into consideration the characteristics of programs and institutes / organizations to be evaluated, are now being tried. Competences of evaluation experts and agencies has also to be improved and strengthened.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.131-134
• /
• 2010

BSC(Balanced Scordcard : 균형성과표)는 조직의 새로운 성과관리 도구로서, 영리조직을 비롯한 비영리조직에서도 널리 도입, 활용되고 있다. BSC는 단기적인 재무적 지표를 중시한 과거의 성과관리를 벗어나 비재무적 지표를 동시에 고려하여 조직의 본래 목적과 비전을 달성하는데 도움을 주는 균형잡힌 성과관리 시스템이다. 비재무적 지표에 의한 성과관리 시스템이라는 점에서 그간의 다른 시스템과는 달리 공익의 추구를 근본 목적으로 하는 비영리조직에 대한 적용 가능성은 보다 높다고 평가되고 있다(김철회 외, 2006). 그러나 BSC의 선구자인 Kaplan과 Norton(1996)이 지적한 것처럼 비영리조직에 대한 BSC 적용은 영리조직과는 다른 형태로 유연하게 이루어져야 할 것이다. 즉, 영리조직에서 활용되기 시작한 BSC를 조직의 특성과 목적, 비전이 전혀 다른 비영리조직에 도입하고자 할 때에는 반드시 그에 대한 고려 및 차별화된 접근방법이 필요하다는 것이다. 이에 본 연구를 통해 비영리조직에서의 BSC 시스템 도입에 있어서 고려사항을 살펴보고 개선방안을 제시하는 것은 향후 비영리조직에서의 바람직한 BSC 구현을 위해 의미가 있다고 할 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society for Industrial Systems Conference
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.63-73
• /
• 2006

대부분의 CEO들은 대규모 투자가 선행되는 정보시스템의 화폐적 가치에 확신을 가지고 싶어 한다. 지금까지 MIS 연구자들은 정보시스템의 조직적 성과에 관한 여러 가지 간접적인 증거를 보여주었으나 경영자들이 요구하는 정보시스템에 대한 화폐적 확신을 주는데 실패하였다. 본 연구는 최근 각 기업들이 도입하고 있는 BSC의 성과지표 중 정보시스템 관련 지표를 활용하여 기업의 계량적 및 비계량적 성과측정을 활용함으로써 조직의 정보시스템 성과를 화폐가치로 환산할 수 있는 방법을 제시하고자 한다. 이때 사례기반추론 시스템을 활용하면 사례베이스로부터 유사사례를 도출하고 이를 통하여 정보시스템 도입에 필요한 주요 정보를 추론할 수 있게 되어 조직에서 도입할 정보시스템의 잠재적 화폐가치를 어느 정도 가늠할 수 있다. 본 연구는 정보시스템의 화폐적 가치분석을 위하여 실물옵션 가격결정모형을 활용하였고 객관적 화폐가치 추론을 위한 웹 사이트 구축을 목표로 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.175-183
• /
• 2012

The study investigates peer rating, one of the most commonly used sources of performance rating other than those of supervisors. On the whole, both field and laboratory studies indicate that peer assessment is a valid and reliable evaluation procedure, but on average, peer rating is not usually accurate. The aim of the investigation is to explore the relationship of beliefs and attitude about the performance appraisal system as well as a dispositional characteristic as self-monitoring with rating behavior. In particular, the study tests whether the relationship between rating context variables-appraisal self efficacy and appraisal validity- and rating behavior depends in part on the personality of the rater. Data from 445 undergraduate students are analyzed for hypotheses testing. The study finds evidences that the high on appraisal self efficacy and appraisal validity are more likely to affect discriminating rating tendency and to reduce rating level. Results also show that self-monitoring make the moderating effects between contextual factors and rating behaviors. Some implications, future research directions, and limitations are discussed.